Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros
hi KP Am 01.10.2015 um 17:27 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: ... >>> >>> Lokks like it has been lost during kernel update, re-added in my build >>> environment, rebuild and will test. >> >> Good, we need to make sure to not shoot each others foot when pushing to >> orig. >> > > Committed to branch maint; tested and it works for me. Fine, so we have channel 13 again :-) cheers ET -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > > > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi Folks > >> > >> I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I > >> wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the > >> kernel modules. > >> > >> Please advise > > > > Lokks like it has been lost during kernel update, re-added in my build > > environment, rebuild and will test. > > Good, we need to make sure to not shoot each others foot when pushing to > orig. > Committed to branch maint; tested and it works for me. kp -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros
Hi KP Am 30.09.2015 um 19:19 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 18:56:15 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Am 30.09.2015 um 18:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:.. > > I still do not understand. > > I'm rebuilding branch maint with the patch applied and will test on my > machine. > > If that goes well, I'll commit to branch maint, where we collect > non-intrusive > updates and fixes for 5.2. > > This branch will be tagged 5.2.1 sometime in the future and a release of > 5.2.1 > will be done from this branch. > > Doing a rebase on branch maint etc. is usually no problem and takes a few > seconds or minutes, depends how often you rebase it. Sure it can be done. OK now I cherry picked the patch for upgrade from master to maint, will push it, so we have it in origin/maint too. The rest should be clean cheers ET -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 18:56:15 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 30.09.2015 um 18:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi KP > >> > >> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > >>> Hi Erich; > >>> > >>> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I > wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the > kernel modules. > > Please advise > >>> > >>> Lokks like it has been lost during kernel update, re-added in my build > >>> environment, rebuild and will test. > >> > >> Good, we need to make sure to not shoot each others foot when pushing to > >> orig. > > > > To orig? > > orig/master :-( > > > Either of us can commit to git repo branch maint as soon, as it's > > build/tested and looks fine. > > Yes, but pulling with rebase is a PITA (/and alledgedly not recommended > as the default action. I still do not understand. I'm rebuilding branch maint with the patch applied and will test on my machine. If that goes well, I'll commit to branch maint, where we collect non-intrusive updates and fixes for 5.2. This branch will be tagged 5.2.1 sometime in the future and a release of 5.2.1 will be done from this branch. Doing a rebase on branch maint etc. is usually no problem and takes a few seconds or minutes, depends how often you rebase it. kp -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros
Am 30.09.2015 um 18:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi KP >> >> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >>> Hi Erich; >>> >>> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the kernel modules. Please advise >>> >>> Lokks like it has been lost during kernel update, re-added in my build >>> environment, rebuild and will test. >> >> Good, we need to make sure to not shoot each others foot when pushing to >> orig. > > To orig? orig/master :-( > > Either of us can commit to git repo branch maint as soon, as it's > build/tested > and looks fine. Yes, but pulling with rebase is a PITA (/and alledgedly not recommended as the default action. -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros
Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > > > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi Folks > >> > >> I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I > >> wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the > >> kernel modules. > >> > >> Please advise > > > > Lokks like it has been lost during kernel update, re-added in my build > > environment, rebuild and will test. > > Good, we need to make sure to not shoot each others foot when pushing to > orig. To orig? Either of us can commit to git repo branch maint as soon, as it's build/tested and looks fine. kp -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros
Hi KP Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: >> Hi Folks >> >> I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I >> wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the >> kernel modules. >> >> Please advise > > Lokks like it has been lost during kernel update, re-added in my build > environment, rebuild and will test. Good, we need to make sure to not shoot each others foot when pushing to orig. cheers ET -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros
Hi Erich; Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I > wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the > kernel modules. > > Please advise Lokks like it has been lost during kernel update, re-added in my build environment, rebuild and will test. kp -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros
Hi Folks I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the kernel modules. Please advise ET -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
