[leaf-user] new WISP-Dist build 2546

2003-03-16 Thread Vladimir Ivaschenko
Hello All,

A new WISP-Dist test build (2546) is available from
http://www.hazard.maks.net/wisp-dist/downloads/. I did stress
testing of Prism and Cisco cards on Soekris and Teletronics
boards and found several stability issues in the drivers. The
good news is it seems that I've been able to overcome them.  
Hostap driver is reverted to an old version used in 2.4.18-based
WISP-Dist releases, as new one from CVS seems to be very
unstable, at least in slow motherboards. Cisco driver was updated
to the new version Cisco released a couple of days, and looks to
be quite stable as well (the previous Cisco driver could end up
with card being locked up and not able to send anything).

Also trafshow utility is included. This is a quite useful utility 
to look at per-host traffic statistics, especially if your system 
is not powerful enough to run ntop.

-- 
Best Regards,
Vladimir Ivaschenko
Thunderworx - Systems Engineer (RHCE)


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] dachstein NTP Internal Time Server - EXTERNAL ports now open

2003-03-16 Thread William Brinkman
All -

A quick update,

I inserted into network.conf, down about line 323, the
list of servers matching the list from the ntpsimpl
conf from the setup package menu.

ie:
EXTERN_UPD_PORT0=0/0 domain
EXTERN_UDP_PORT1=0/0 bootpc
EXTERN_UDP_PORT2=www.xxx.yyy.zzz/24 ntp
EXTERN_UDP_PORT3=aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd/24 ntp
etc.

The linux clock (date) and cmos clock (hwclock --show)
are probably within a millisecond of each other and no
doubt very close to real time, and the drift log
has begun to show a real value instead of 0.0 so I'm
pretty sure the daemon is up, running and doing its
job.

My M$ machine still cannot sync with the DS firewall
with a unable to contact server and a mandrake 9.0
box with netdate 192.168.1.254 run from root gets
connection refused.

Looks like I'm still lost as how to open the internal
port 123 for the time server.

R - Bill


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] dachstein NTP Internal Time Server - EXTERNAL portsnow open

2003-03-16 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
William Brinkman wrote:

snip

My M$ machine still cannot sync with the DS firewall
with a unable to contact server and a mandrake 9.0
box with netdate 192.168.1.254 run from root gets
connection refused.
Looks like I'm still lost as how to open the internal
port 123 for the time server.
Port 123 for internal systems should be open already.  I strongly 
suspect either your M$ machine is looking for a different flavor of 
time-server (ie something other than NTP), or the NTP package you're 
running does not implement the server functions (I'm not personally 
familiar with the NTP software you're using).

It's also possible you need to configure your ntp software to listen to 
the internal NIC.  You can check which programs are listening on which 
IP's with the netstat command:  netstat -lnp

Look for UDP port 123, and make sure it's either listening on 0.0.0.0 
(all IP's), or the IP of your internal interface.  If nothing is 
listening on that port, you either need different NTP software to 
support the server portion of NTP, or have some kind of configuration 
problem.

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] dachstein NTP Internal Time Server - udp internal port looks open

2003-03-16 Thread William Brinkman
Thank you Charles for the excellent lead!

I took your advice and did a #netstat -ldp | more
and got the following lines concerning port 123 (with
apologies for the formatting problems):

proto recv-Q send-Q local addr foreign addr state
PID/Pgrm name

udp 0   0 192.168.1.254:123  0.0.0.0:*

1063/ntpd

udp 0 0  127.0.0.1:123   0.0.0.0:*
1063/ntpd

udp 0 00.0.0.0:123   0.0.0.0:* 
1063/ntpd

Nothing is in the state column although 'LISTEN'
appears with port 53, 1023, and 80.

I'm no expert but I get the idea that 'LISTEN'should
have been in the 'state' column.  I will start looking
at the conf file and see if I missed something in the
conf to enable the server function.

R - Bill

--- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:
 Port 123 for internal systems should be open
 already.  I strongly 
 suspect either your M$ machine is looking for a
 different flavor of 
 time-server (ie something other than NTP), or the
 NTP package you're 
 running does not implement the server functions (I'm
 not personally 
 familiar with the NTP software you're using).
 
 It's also possible you need to configure your ntp
 software to listen to 
 the internal NIC.  You can check which programs are
 listening on which 
 IP's with the netstat command:  netstat -lnp
 
 Look for UDP port 123, and make sure it's either
 listening on 0.0.0.0 
 (all IP's), or the IP of your internal interface. 
 If nothing is 
 listening on that port, you either need different
 NTP software to 
 support the server portion of NTP, or have some kind
 of configuration 
 problem.
 
 -- 
 Charles Steinkuehler


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] dachstein NTP Internal Time Server - udp internalport looks open

2003-03-16 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
William Brinkman wrote:
Thank you Charles for the excellent lead!

I took your advice and did a #netstat -ldp | more
and got the following lines concerning port 123 (with
apologies for the formatting problems):
proto recv-Q send-Q local addr foreign addr state
PID/Pgrm name
udp 0   0 192.168.1.254:123  0.0.0.0:*

1063/ntpd

udp 0 0  127.0.0.1:123   0.0.0.0:*
1063/ntpd

udp 0 00.0.0.0:123   0.0.0.0:* 
1063/ntpd

Nothing is in the state column although 'LISTEN'
appears with port 53, 1023, and 80.
I'm no expert but I get the idea that 'LISTEN'should
have been in the 'state' column.  I will start looking
at the conf file and see if I missed something in the
conf to enable the server function.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wheelhorsegardentractors/links
Don't knock yourself out about the missing listen.  UDP is a stateless 
protocol, so *NO* UDP entries in the netstat output will have anything 
in the state column.  States only make sense for TCP.

It looks like your server is listening to the internal interface, and 
there are no firewall rules blocking any access from internal networks 
to the firewall itself, so unless you did something really wacky to the 
ipchains rules, that's not your problem either.

I'd make sure your windows client is actually talking NTP, rather than 
one of the other (typically simpler) time protocols.

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] CUSeeMe

2003-03-16 Thread David Pitts
Morning all.

Can anyone give me any advice on getting CUSeeMe running through Bering
1?  My Googling seems to indicate there are some patches required  but I
couldn't find anything compiled.  Can anyone recommend a source of the
modules I would need?  Or a source of information?

Thanks.



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] dachstein NTP Internal Time Server - Any Bering Folks using this?

2003-03-16 Thread William Brinkman
Thank you Charles for the expert advice on upd. 

I did a little more snooping and turns out #netdate
command (linux box) is port 37 while ntp is port 123. 
(I realize I'm beginning to sound like a total moron
and should have done the homework and rtfmed).

I downloaded a program called automachron for the M$
box (which looks pretty good for free) that
specifically calls out which port it plans to connect
to, 37 or 123.  I asked it to hit the firewall
192.168.1.254 and received Error: 192.168.1.254 (123)
- Socket Error: Valid name, no data record of
requested type.  Asking it to look at a 'real' server
under the various protocols (v1,v2,v3,v4) produced the
desired result of providing information to update the
time.

The LEAF Time in Bearing 14.5 Subsection indicates
that the combination of libm.lrp and ntpsimpl.lrp can
be used to create a time server.  The paper then
explicitly says to open the firewall with:
ACCEPT  loc  fw  upd  ntp (to query the Bering time
server for local net).

I did NOT attempt to improve the standard firewall
rules so your comment below saying the internal
network should be able to access the firewall should
still be valid.

Maybe a little more snooping in the ntpsimpl.lrp
documentation is the next step.

Thank you for your valued comments and opinions.

R - Bill   


--- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Don't knock yourself out about the missing listen. 
 UDP is a stateless 
 protocol, so *NO* UDP entries in the netstat output
 will have anything 
 in the state column.  States only make sense for
 TCP.
 
 It looks like your server is listening to the
 internal interface, and 
 there are no firewall rules blocking any access from
 internal networks 
 to the firewall itself, so unless you did something
 really wacky to the 
 ipchains rules, that's not your problem either.
 
 I'd make sure your windows client is actually
 talking NTP, rather than 
 one of the other (typically simpler) time protocols.
 
 -- 
 Charles Steinkuehler


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Samba issues

2003-03-16 Thread Spiro Philopoulos
When using smb-2b.lrp to run a Samba server I couldn't get Windows XP clients
to connect, so I decided to compile some of the latest versions (2.2.3a,
2.2.7a, 2.2.8) of Samba to use. However with these new versions I get the
following error when trying to login from any client (Win2K, smbclient):

  build_sam_account: smbpasswd database is corrupt!  username someuser not in
  unix passwd database!

The odd thing is that the user does exist in /etc/passwd, and everything worked
fine before with smb-2b.lrp (version 2.0.4b).

Similarly, when using smbpasswd to add a user I get the error message:

   User someotheruser does not exist in system password file (usually
/etc/passwd). Cannot add account without a valid local system user.
   Failed to modify password entry for user someotheruser

I've statically compiled these new versions so it shouldn't be a library issue.
Has anybody had any success using Samba (other than the smb-2.lrp  smb-2b.lrp
packages) or knows what the problem might be? Has anybody had success
connecting with WinXP clients when using the smb-2.lrp or smb-2b.lrp packages?
Any help/guesses would be greatly appreciated.
-- 


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] dachstein NTP Internal Time Server - Up and running

2003-03-16 Thread William Brinkman
All,

I put the NTP rpm in my mandrake 9.0 linux box.

Set the ntp.conf server to 192.168.1.254 (firewall
address).  Inserted a /etc/ntp.drift and put a 1 in
the file.  Started the ntpd daemon.

Tested out the troubleshooting guide and on the
mandrake box tried a:

# ntpq -p 192.168.1.254

The results indicated that the firewall was doing its
job as a time server.  The display indicated every
server I had in the conf file of the fire wall as well
as detailed statistics on how much they vary from each
other.

Now the strange part:  From the M$ box, using
Automachron time update software, the time will sync
fine to the mandrake box, but still has the socket
error for the firewall.

Looks like I need to test some other software that
will be more forgiving with the firewall.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Samba issues

2003-03-16 Thread Lynn Avants
On Sunday 16 March 2003 08:19 pm, Spiro Philopoulos wrote:
 When using smb-2b.lrp to run a Samba server I couldn't get Windows XP
 clients to connect, so I decided to compile some of the latest versions
 (2.2.3a, 2.2.7a, 2.2.8) of Samba to use. However with these new versions I
 get the following error when trying to login from any client (Win2K,
 smbclient):

   build_sam_account: smbpasswd database is corrupt!  username someuser not
 in unix passwd database!

 The odd thing is that the user does exist in /etc/passwd, and everything
 worked fine before with smb-2b.lrp (version 2.0.4b).

 Similarly, when using smbpasswd to add a user I get the error message:

User someotheruser does not exist in system password file (usually
 /etc/passwd). Cannot add account without a valid local system user.
Failed to modify password entry for user someotheruser

 I've statically compiled these new versions so it shouldn't be a library
 issue. Has anybody had any success using Samba (other than the smb-2.lrp 
 smb-2b.lrp packages) or knows what the problem might be? Has anybody had
 success connecting with WinXP clients when using the smb-2.lrp or
 smb-2b.lrp packages? Any help/guesses would be greatly appreciated.

You need to setup a home directory for each of the users and login under that
username(s) and set the password. Linux/Samba uses shadow-passwords instead
of the old passwd file. This is likely the source of your errors.
-- 
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
http://www.guitarlynn.homelinux.org:81


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] CUSeeMe

2003-03-16 Thread Lynn Avants
On Sunday 16 March 2003 07:15 pm, David Pitts wrote:
 Morning all.

 Can anyone give me any advice on getting CUSeeMe running through Bering
 1?  My Googling seems to indicate there are some patches required  but I
 couldn't find anything compiled.  Can anyone recommend a source of the
 modules I would need?  Or a source of information?

You'll need to use h323 support, IIRC. There should be ipmasq/iptables
modules (or config) to add/use this support.

BTW, did the updated udhcp package work better for you?
-- 
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
http://www.guitarlynn.homelinux.org:81


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html