[leaf-user] Operation not supported by device

2003-08-21 Thread Darcy Parker
Good day listers,

I ma trying to set up a leaf-bering (1.2) FW.  I have the following two
NICs

3C905-TXIRQ10  D800
3C905-TXIRQ9D400

I am loading the following modules

3c59x.o
netsemi.o
tulip.o

When it gets to configuing the NICs I get the following errors

insmodinit_module:netsemi:operation not supported by device
tulipinit_module:tulip:operation not supported by device

Does this mean the only driver I need is 3c59x?  Am I missing something else
here?

Best Regards,
Darcy Parker




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Operation not supported by device

2003-08-21 Thread Simon Bolduc
Hey Darcy

Try loading the pci-scan module as well.  I believe this is needed for most 
(all?) PCI nics.

Simon

Original Message Follows
From: Darcy Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] Operation not supported by device
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 02:00:48 -0600
Good day listers,

I ma trying to set up a leaf-bering (1.2) FW.  I have the following two
NICs
3C905-TXIRQ10  D800
3C905-TXIRQ9D400
I am loading the following modules

3c59x.o
netsemi.o
tulip.o
When it gets to configuing the NICs I get the following errors

insmodinit_module:netsemi:operation not supported by device
tulipinit_module:tulip:operation not supported by device
Does this mean the only driver I need is 3c59x?  Am I missing something else
here?
Best Regards,
Darcy Parker


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Bering UclibC development

2003-08-21 Thread Charles Holbrook
I know I have asked before, but I have lost all past emails and any
links that were given to me in regard to this question.

I have finally gotten to the point that I need to set up a Leaf Bering
UclibC development environment.  I have downloaded the root_woody_fs and
UML kernel and have that working.  I have instructions for how to use
that development environment for Bering but there is no mention to
Uclibc in leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/bdkernel.html, or I am just
missing it.  Does anyone have a FAQ showing the changes that need to be
made to the dev environment to make it compliant with UclibC?  Thanks
for any help.



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] comparison passive ftp clients Dachstein vs Bering

2003-08-21 Thread Victor McAllister
Erich Titl wrote:

Victor

At 12:12 20.08.2003 -0700, you wrote:

My friend is still troubleshooting why Dachstein works with an 
internal passive ftp client SENDING a file and Bering fails.

System is PPPoE

He ran tdpdump in passive ftp mode .
Dachstein  showns the mss at differnt stages of the ftp as 1460 and 1412
In Bering the tcpdump log shows that mss is 1452 and 1460.
Bering has CLAMPMSS = Yes
The internal ftp passive mode client log shows the port that it will 
send the ftp file.

The tcpdump shows that in Dachstien that port is used and the ftp is 
successful.

In Bering the port used by the client shows in the tcpdump file AS 
ONE PORT LOWER THAN THE REQUESTED PORT.

Why would ip_conntrack_ftp assign a passive client one port lower 
than the agreed upon port for transfer.

**
if the ftp log shows that the tcp port for sending the file is 
supposed to be 13780
tcpdump on the Bering firewall shows the packet is sent on port 13779 
and the ftp fails.
**
Is this a bug in ip_conntrack_ftp that only shows up when a client 
sends a file?
Passive clients probably usually recieve files instead of sending them.
Anyone else seen this problem?  My friend's weather station will not 
send ftp files through the Bering box.  It will send files through 
the Dactsein box.  All hardware, application program , remote ftp 
server and ISP are the same.


Can you verify this behaviour on your own ADSL line? You would not 
have to rely on external information and might be in a position to 
present real data to the group.
I checked passive ftp on Bering 1.0 stable 2.4.18 (without pppoe so 
this is not directly applicable) without problems.

cheers

Erich
I will get my friend to run some more tcpdump files and try several 
different experiments to isolate it more.
I need to get his to capture the eth1 and external packets to compare.

Passive ftp fill sending  is working now on his network without 
ip_conntrak_ftp and ip_nat_ftp

I have a static IP and do not see the problem.  I understand that PPPoE 
rebuilds the packets from ethernet to ppp but that certainly should not 
affect the header information.

--
Victor McAllister


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


[leaf-user] Bering floppy basics

2003-08-21 Thread Steve Wright
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/leaf/Bering_1.2_img_bering-1680.bin

With no modifications, this fails with ;

Loading initrd.lrp...
Boot Failed: please change disks... 

Just a dud floppy ?

TIA,
Steve




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] comparison passive ftp clients Dachstein vs Bering

2003-08-21 Thread Erich Titl
Victor

At 12:12 20.08.2003 -0700, you wrote:
My friend is still troubleshooting why Dachstein works with an internal 
passive ftp client SENDING a file and Bering fails.

System is PPPoE

He ran tdpdump in passive ftp mode .
Dachstein  showns the mss at differnt stages of the ftp as 1460 and 1412
In Bering the tcpdump log shows that mss is 1452 and 1460.
Bering has CLAMPMSS = Yes
The internal ftp passive mode client log shows the port that it will send 
the ftp file.

The tcpdump shows that in Dachstien that port is used and the ftp is 
successful.

In Bering the port used by the client shows in the tcpdump file AS ONE 
PORT LOWER THAN THE REQUESTED PORT.

Why would ip_conntrack_ftp assign a passive client one port lower than the 
agreed upon port for transfer.

**
if the ftp log shows that the tcp port for sending the file is supposed to 
be 13780
tcpdump on the Bering firewall shows the packet is sent on port 13779 and 
the ftp fails.
**
Is this a bug in ip_conntrack_ftp that only shows up when a client sends a 
file?
Passive clients probably usually recieve files instead of sending them.
Anyone else seen this problem?  My friend's weather station will not send 
ftp files through the Bering box.  It will send files through the Dactsein 
box.  All hardware, application program , remote ftp server and ISP are 
the same.
Can you verify this behaviour on your own ADSL line? You would not have to 
rely on external information and might be in a position to present real 
data to the group.
I checked passive ftp on Bering 1.0 stable 2.4.18 (without pppoe so this is 
not directly applicable) without problems.

cheers

Erich

THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html


Re: [leaf-user] Bering floppy basics

2003-08-21 Thread Jeff Newmiller
On 22 Aug 2003, Steve Wright wrote:

 http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/leaf/Bering_1.2_img_bering-1680.bin
 
 With no modifications, this fails with ;
 
 Loading initrd.lrp...
 Boot Failed: please change disks... 
 
 Just a dud floppy ?

Maybe.

a) check that the image size is 1720320 bytes.  If not, you may have
encountered text transfer mode problems or other corruption.

b) Unless you are using a program that pre-formats the floppy before
writing the image to it, make sure you format the floppy to 1680 before
you write the image.  The 1440 format will not work.

c) Bad floppies happen.  Try another.

d) Sometimes, bad drives happen.   Clean, or replace either the drive you 
wrote the disk with, or the drive you are reading the disk with.

---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
DCN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Basics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...2k
---



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0

leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html