Re: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc packages in testing
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:28:59AM +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Hi all; > > as you probably know there some packages in "testing" for Bering-uClibc: > > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=3&MMN_position=3:3#TESTING > > Those packages has been build by user request, provided without any further > documentation and has been gone through minimal testing, just to see if they > start successfully. > > If you want to help LEAF Bering-uClibc, you may want to test one of these > packages, maybe provide some documentation and/or just give feedback. Some feedback on packages I tested (not really using them though, just installed for testing and fun ;-) Knockd works fine: I installed and configured it and it worked at once. Ethtool seems to work too, but a significant part of the queries I tried, it responded that the NIC didn't support that option (or a message alike that). Jaap --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
[leaf-user] nsupdate?
Hi, has anybody ported the nsupdate utility from bind to bering-uclibc? Sven --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
[leaf-user] resolv.conf
Hi, I´m using bering-uclibc 2.2.3 on wrap and having trouble to get pppoe connections working as expected. The connection is established and works fine but /etc/resolv.conf isn´t updated with the ISPs nameservers. Here are some lines from /var/log/daemon.log: Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: Couldn't increase MTU to 1500 Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: Couldn't increase MRU to 1500 Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: Remote message: Login ok Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: PAP authentication succeeded Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: peer from calling number 00:00:21:DC:D8:60 authorized Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: Cannot determine ethernet address for proxy ARP Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: local IP address 62.138.228.54 Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: remote IP address 62.138.228.53 Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: primary DNS address 62.138.228.34 Jan 1 01:00:33 vpn-kaispeicher pppd[5547]: secondary DNS address 62.138.228.35 Jan 1 01:00:42 vpn-kaispeicher ipsec_setup: Starting Openswan IPsec 1.0.7... As you can see, pppd should know the nameservers. I tried setting usepeerdns in /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider but it didn´t work. Any ideas? Sven --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
Re: [leaf-user] multiple static ip address router/firewall
> Andrew Nance wrote: > > | It is hard to estimate but somewhere around 750 Kbps to 1.5 Mbps total > | bandwidth. > > Almost anything fairly modern (ie: Pentium-class PCI based system) > should be > able to handle this kind of bandwidth. Even 486 based systems with EISA > cards (should you actually be able to find one) could probably move this > much data around. > - -- > Charles Steinkuehler On a Soekris net4801 with Bering 1.2 using a 100Mb/s switch and a 8Mb/s cable modem I calculated almost 5Mb/s throughput on FTP. That is: 720MB CD transferred in 20 minutes == 36 MB in a minute == 0.6 MB in a second == 4.8 Mb/s. I guess a WRAP should behave close to this. Not that this below is a very relevant piece of information since the packets were very big and packet count was low, but: on the same Soekris wired with cross eth cables to one workstation on each side (no public connection) with 100Mb/s cards I fed the Soekris from one workstation with ping packets of 64Kbytes per second by increasing the number of simultaneous ping processes. On the target workstation I was observing the received throughput. I kept loading the Soekris/Bering with up to 42 streams, which makes roughly 42 Mb/s of bidirectional traffic. (1 packet sent per second; packet size 64KB * 8 = 512Kb; ping reply makes 2 x 512 Kb/s == 1 Mb/s; 42 processes == 42 Mb/s). More than 42 Mb/s produced a non-linear graph of the received traffic on the target workstation. Doing the same test on a commercial SOHO ethernet firewall/router caused the commercial router to colaps with overload at 4Mb/s, that is after the fourth simultaneous 64KB ping. Tom --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
Re: [leaf-user] Webconf issues
--- "Richard Amerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been trying to get webconf working on a new uClibc box but can't > get anywhere. I did have weblet working but took that off and did > everything I could find online to setup webconf. > > I'm on the latest beta. > > Here is one thing I get: > > Jul 14 12:23:03 RBAFW mini_httpd[10398]: socket :: - Address family not > supported by protocol > Jul 14 12:23:03 RBAFW mini_httpd[10398]: bind 0.0.0.0 - Address already > in use > Jul 14 12:23:03 RBAFW mini_httpd[10398]: can't bind to any address > > Any ideas? > It sounds like something is already using port 80 on your box. As Peter suggested, is an old mini_httpd already running on your box? (ps | grep mini_httpd) Since weblet was working, you might also what to check your etc/inetd.conf and make sure the sh-www line is commented out, and then restart inetd. Hope this helps --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
Re: [leaf-user] Image CF drive
Am 15.07.2005 um 01:37 schrieb Richard Amerman: Does anyone know of any windows tools that can do a disk image of a CF card? I have multiple identical CF cards I need to propagate a uClibc install to, bootable portion and all. The only tools I have found that work with CF cards so far have been for linux. Just copying the packages to the cf and running syslinux to make it bootable does the job for me. Sven --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
