Re: [leaf-user] Update: Short term LEAF project goals
I'm referring to only packaging meaning having within the same lrp. Additionally, the package installer should load all modules that are tarred within the package as they are deemed necessary for the utilities to work. I'm not suggesting that the module be compiled or integrated. Can we do away with manual steps when it is obviously needed. That is all. Sorry if my earlier posts have conveyed otherwise. It would probably be enough if a lrp package could have a init script on load that did whatever the module wanted setting on load - that way a module could insmod anything it wanted to. The only real danger here would be when modified packages were written away - does the .o get written twice (wasting space) or not at all (leaving you with a broken system). For that matter - does a .o need to be in /lib/modules once it is loaded? could we get away with copying it from module-specific space to /lib/modules, loading it then deleting it? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Update: Short term LEAF project goals
S Mohan wrote: I'd also suggest a change in lrp packaging by which the modules required for a package to run is bundled with the lrp. Installing the lrp will also insmod the module automatically. A depmod kind of facility will make it easy to use/ configure LEAF. Give me an example please of a package that requires you to go out and find a .o module you need. pppoatm? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] PPPoATM request...
Does anyone have a *working* setup of bering, USB Speedtouch modem and PPPoATM they would be willing to email me the .lrp files for? (stripped of login info obviously) I repeated the build, adding 2.4.18/pppoatm.o, the pppatm.lrp and speedtch.lrp to the 1.0 stable setup, manually ran up modem_run and pppd and still get the connect (0.38) error. I can't figure out why it isn't working I must be going wrong someplace, if other people have working speedtouch+pppoatm setups and I don't. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering/Shorewall vs. Dachstein
Tom -- Can you expand on this just a little bit more? (Or Lynn, can you?) This conclusion is kind of where I got to last night, but only for TCP. What is the equivalent of SYN packet detection for UDP? Or, to put it another way, how does iptables (or Shorewall) determine the state associated with a UDP packet? I can't figure it out from the iptables docs I have. That's because it doesn't have one - UDP is connectionless and stateless. each packet is atomic in itself, and independent of a handshake or index in a packet stream. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] more on speedtouch
Managed to get hold of an original USB speedtouch (will worry about the 330 later :) and got to the point the line is up and happy, but pppd unfortunately is not. log as follows: Feb 12 18:50:41 firewall modem_run[28105]: ADSL synchronization has been obtained Feb 12 18:50:41 firewall modem_run[28105]: ADSL line is up (576 kbit/s down | 288 kbit/s up) Feb 12 18:50:42 firewall pppd[19682]: Plugin /usr/lib/pppd/pppoatm.so loaded. Feb 12 18:50:42 firewall pppd[19682]: PPPoATM plugin_init Feb 12 18:50:42 firewall pppd[19682]: PPPoATM setdevname_pppoatm Feb 12 18:50:42 firewall pppd[19682]: PPPoATM setdevname_pppoatm - SUCCESS Feb 12 18:50:42 firewall pppd[26721]: pppd 2.4.0b1 started by root, uid 0 Feb 12 18:50:42 firewall kernel: atm_connect (TX: cl 1,bw 0-0,sdu 16386; RX: cl 1,bw 0-0,sdu 1502,AAL 5) Feb 12 18:50:42 firewall pppd[26721]: connect(0.38): Operation not supported by device Feb 12 18:50:42 firewall pppd[26721]: Exit. pppoatm shows in lsmod, so presumably is ok. I have added 2.4.18 modules only (from http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/1.0-stable/modules/2.4.18 /) and the speedtouch drivers (from http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/1.0-stable/drivers/speedt ouch-usb/) I notice that we aren't supplying a device to pppd, but I assume that is normal (and that the plugin takes care of it;at least, that is how I read the syslog file) Went over section five of the user guide more times than I can count, http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/mini/BTI-PPP/x203.html a few more times, and am now willing to admit my lack of Clue if it gets me some hints on where I have messed up this time :) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Using a wireless router with LEAF (Dachstein, Bering)
at Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:47 PM, Jeff Newmiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] was seen to say: Since security is a major concern when attached to the Internet, why not make use of the three-interface firewall solution within Bearing/Shorewall and place the wireless access point on that third interface of the firewall within the DMZ? Maybe I'm overlooking a barn-door security breach, but it just seems logical to use your wireless devices on that interface, and routing traffic accordingly. Anyone else have any thoughts on this? A DMZ is not an appropriate place for a workstation in most cases. Machines on a DMZ should be regarded as potential sacrificial lambs, and kept isolated from the rest of your local network. This is not normally acceptable for workstation use. A dmz is a perfectly acceptable place to put a wireless hub - you definitely don't want it to have unrestricted access to the main lan, but you don't want it on the internet either. In fact, if you consider your lan traffic at all sensitive, I could recommend blocking all but IPSEC from the wireless hub - the wireless devices can use a vpn client to connect inwards and you have all the convenience of wireless networking with the security of a decent encryption setup (and of course that allows those workstations (presumably laptops) to be used across the internet too) If your lan isn't that sensitive, that is probably overkill though :) --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Hello and has anyone any experience with...
Ok, new to the list. I have been looking to set up a floppy based router for a vpn connection (bering looks ideal for this) so ditched the Intel 3240 in favour of a speedtouch - only to receive a 330 which appears only to be supported in the latest beta at speedtouch.sourceforge.net, and for which the .sys file is over 700k (oops, not that much space left on the floppy! even gzipped it is 358k) I assume the solution to the space problem is to place the file (and anything else that doesn't change) onto a cdr and mount that as part of the boot - but it seems like an uphill struggle. so on to the obvious question - has anyone already done all or part of this, and can give me some pointers and/or configured lrp files? I assume that the speedtch.lrp from http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/drivers/speedtouch / is for the the original model I don't have --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
