[Leaf-user] Dachstein glibc

2002-01-20 Thread Kim Oppalfens 

Hi Charles,

If I check my /lib folder in the dachstein floppy release I get the 
impression that
you are using glibc 2.1.3 (because of the filenames).

But I can't seem to find any confirmations on that major change in the docs.
Am I missing something? Is dachstein floppy using 2.1.3 or are the names
changed for some other reason?

Kim


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Re: [Leaf-user] Dachstein glibc

2002-01-20 Thread Kim Oppalfens 

At 13:24 20/01/2002, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
Kim Oppalfens wrote:

 Hi Charles,

If I check my /lib folder in the dachstein floppy release I get the 
impression that
you are using glibc 2.1.3 (because of the filenames).


Ecuse me, but when I list /lib I see for example:

libc-2.0.7.so

and not a single filename containing 2.1.3 .


Erm, I just double checked, and apparently you are  right, I would have 
sworn that when I checked (and double-checked)
yesterday all filenames ended in 2.1.3 (And I only have a dachstein  
eigerstein floppy available.)
Probably wishfull thinking on my part.

Sorry to have bothered the list with a stupid question.

There are only stupid questions, no stupid answers. (Or was that the other 
way around?)

There is no such thing as gravity, the world just sucks

Kim


___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user