[LEAPSECS] Tomorrow's Leap Second Today

2015-06-29 Thread Rob Seaman
http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2015/06/29/john-oliver-really-wants-you-to-enjoy-tomorrows-leap-second/
___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs


Re: [LEAPSECS] EBML: yet another date format?

2015-06-29 Thread Brooks Harris

On 2015-06-29 02:19 AM, Hal Murray wrote:

Looks to me they mean 128 bits?

How did you get that?

Er, by not thinking very clearly :-\



supported by a signed 8-octet integer in nanoseconds centered on

8*8 is 64.  I didn't see anything about using two of them.

Right. My obvious error.


POSIX uses 32 bits of seconds and 32 bits of nanoseconds.  That will wrap in
2038.  Using all nanoseconds gets a few more bits so the overall range will
be a bit bigger.  (Whether it's enough bigger is another matter.)

You can get to approximately 3000 years of seconds and retain the Leap 
Second count in 32 bits with -


21 bits unsigned - Days (86400 second days) (2^21 = 2097152 max / 
365.2425 = 5741.8 years max)
11 bits unsigned - Leap Seconds (2^11 = 2048 max * 1.65 Years per Leap 
Second = 3379.2 years max approx)


-Brooks

___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs


Re: [LEAPSECS] EBML: yet another date format?

2015-06-29 Thread Tony Finch
Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:

 POSIX uses 32 bits of seconds and 32 bits of nanoseconds.

POSIX doesn't specify the size of time_t.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  d...@dotat.at  http://dotat.at/
Fair Isle, Faeroes: Southwest 4, backing southeast 5 or 6 later. Moderate,
occasionally slight in southeast Fair Isle. Rain at times, fog patches.
Moderate or good, occasionally very poor.
___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs


[LEAPSECS] a new type of negative leap second

2015-06-29 Thread Tom Van Baak
The folks at http://www.timeanddate.com/time/leapseconds.html have a leap 
second animation on the top right side of the page. I'm not sure how it 
displays for you, but attached are some screen shots on my end. Cute.

/tvb___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs


Re: [LEAPSECS] a new type of negative leap second

2015-06-29 Thread Brooks Harris

Problem solved!

On 2015-06-29 01:47 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:

The folks at http://www.timeanddate.com/time/leapseconds.html have a leap 
second animation on the top right side of the page. I'm not sure how it 
displays for you, but attached are some screen shots on my end. Cute.

/tvb


___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs


___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs


Re: [LEAPSECS] EBML: yet another date format?

2015-06-29 Thread Hal Murray
 Looks to me they mean 128 bits?

How did you get that?

 supported by a signed 8-octet integer in nanoseconds centered on
8*8 is 64.  I didn't see anything about using two of them.

POSIX uses 32 bits of seconds and 32 bits of nanoseconds.  That will wrap in 
2038.  Using all nanoseconds gets a few more bits so the overall range will 
be a bit bigger.  (Whether it's enough bigger is another matter.)

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs


Re: [LEAPSECS] EBML: yet another date format?

2015-06-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp

In message 20150629061957.aafc4406...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net, Hal Mu
rray writes:
 Looks to me they mean 128 bits?

How did you get that?

 supported by a signed 8-octet integer in nanoseconds centered on
8*8 is 64.  I didn't see anything about using two of them.

POSIX uses 32 bits of seconds and 32 bits of nanoseconds.  That will wrap in 
2038.  Using all nanoseconds gets a few more bits so the overall range will 
be a bit bigger.  (Whether it's enough bigger is another matter.)

You overlook that they moved the epoch 30 years.  Not enough, but enough
to make not a problem in my lifetime.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs