Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
On 4 July 2016 at 09:51, First Last wrote: > Could you please add git commit information to openwrt_release file? and why > not change the file name to lede_release? How is this related to LuCI in snapshots? Because some software looks for openwrt_release (e.g. procd). -- Rafał ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 11:43 -0700, David Lang wrote: > I agree. There may be some devices with extremely small flash that > can't fit > luci, but otherwise I think it should be on the default images that > people are > pointed at. > > Having a second set of images without luci isn't a bad idea, but if > forced to > choose, I would say they should have luci > Agree. As Jo observes those not needing LuCI are generally more capable of building their own images without LuCi than people for whom LuCI is essential to their being able to use LEDE, which makes sense since without LuCI is all command line work, while LuCI is a friendlier GUI. Regards, Daniel ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
On 29/06/2016 16:54, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi, > > it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it > would give more testing exposure to the ui... > > My observation on the matter is this: > People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building > from source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend > to be unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...) > > So personally I'd lean toward adding LuCI to the snapshots but would > await further feedback on it. > > ~ Jo > Hi Jo, if you add this then please make it depend on !SMALL_FLASH John ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
On 29 June 2016 at 16:54, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > My observation on the matter is this: > People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building > from source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend > to be unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...) A great summary. I agree and like John's idea. ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:43 PM, David Lang wrote: > I agree. There may be some devices with extremely small flash that can't fit > luci, but otherwise I think it should be on the default images that people > are pointed at. > Having a second set of images without luci isn't a bad idea, but if forced > to choose, I would say they should have luci +1, its confusing to your average person if you don't know how to SSH in and install Luci via opkg. Aaron Z ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
I agree. There may be some devices with extremely small flash that can't fit luci, but otherwise I think it should be on the default images that people are pointed at. Having a second set of images without luci isn't a bad idea, but if forced to choose, I would say they should have luci David Lang On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Adrian Panella wrote: Totally agree with the observation. +1 for including LuCI as default. -Original Message- From: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Jo-Philipp Wich Sent: miércoles, 29 de junio de 2016 09:54 a.m. To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images Hi, it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would give more testing exposure to the ui... My observation on the matter is this: People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend to be unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...) So personally I'd lean toward adding LuCI to the snapshots but would await further feedback on it. ~ Jo ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
On 29/06/16 15:54, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: Hi, it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would give more testing exposure to the ui... My observation on the matter is this: People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend to be unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...) +1 Personally I think the novice user has enough concern over the flashing process let alone then being introduced to the whole command line & opkg stuff before they can get to a friendlier GUI. Kevin ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
While I think adding luci will be convenient for many users. I feel that the initial release is the paramount issue and that builds containing luci could be added later. A nice solution would be to offer downloads built w/wo lucias well as adding 'luci' to the filename if built with luci. On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Panella wrote: > Totally agree with the observation. > +1 for including LuCI as default. > > -Original Message- > From: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of > Jo-Philipp Wich > Sent: miércoles, 29 de junio de 2016 09:54 a.m. > To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images > > Hi, > > it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would > give more testing exposure to the ui... > > My observation on the matter is this: > People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from > source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend to be > unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...) > > So personally I'd lean toward adding LuCI to the snapshots but would await > further feedback on it. > > ~ Jo > > ___ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev > > ___ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
Totally agree with the observation. +1 for including LuCI as default. -Original Message- From: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Jo-Philipp Wich Sent: miércoles, 29 de junio de 2016 09:54 a.m. To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images Hi, it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would give more testing exposure to the ui... My observation on the matter is this: People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend to be unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...) So personally I'd lean toward adding LuCI to the snapshots but would await further feedback on it. ~ Jo ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
Hi, it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would give more testing exposure to the ui... My observation on the matter is this: People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend to be unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...) So personally I'd lean toward adding LuCI to the snapshots but would await further feedback on it. ~ Jo ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
[LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
Hi Jo, can we add luci to snapshot images until the first release is out ? people are using the images and seem to be confused by there being no luci. personally i would prefer to not include luci in snapshots to keep them as minimal as possible but until we have a first release it would make sense. we can revert that change post release. John ___ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
