Re: [LegacyUG] Using full christian name in reports

2009-09-23 Thread Kevin Murphy
Click on the "Report Options" buttonSelect the "Format" tab
Tick the "Use full given names for narratives"
Close Report Options and generate your report, this should give you your
desired "John Charles married Jane Emily Doe"

Regards Kevin
shamrockspi...@gmail.com
shamroc...@orcon.net.nz
www.shamrockspider.com
Sent from Manukau, New Zealand

2009/9/24 Ken 

>  Greetings,
>
> I am a Legacy 7 Deluxe user and would appreciate it if someone could help
> me with the following.  I have searched the help area and the archive
> postings without success.
>
> As many of my ancestors seem to have common first names, I would like the
> marriage narrative to use both the first and middle name for all individuals
> in the Ancestor Report.
>
> For example lets assume I have a John Charles Smith who is married to Jane
> Emil Doe.
>
> At present the narrative in the Ancestor Report reads - John married Jane
> Emily Doe
>
> I would like it to read- John Charles married Jane Emily Doe
>
> Thank you.
> Ken
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>


Re: [LegacyUG] Using full christian name in reports

2009-09-23 Thread throw
The following has worked for me in the Ancestor Book Report.  On the report 
initial screen 
select the big Report Options button toward the bottom.  Then select the Format 
tab.  Along 
the left side, one of the check boxes is "Use full given name for narratives."  
Check that and 
all should be well.

Mark from Knoxville

On 23 Sep 2009 at 23:22, Ken wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I am a Legacy 7 Deluxe user andwould appreciate it ifsomeonecould
> help me with the 
> following.I have searched the help area and the archive postings
> without success.
> 
> As many of my ancestors seem to have common first names, Iwould
> likethe marriage narrative 
> touse both the first and middle namefor all individuals inthe
> Ancestor Report.
> 
> For example lets assume I have a John Charles Smith who is married
> to Jane Emil Doe.
> 
> At presentthe narrative in the Ancestor Report reads- John married
> Jane Emily Doe
> 
> I would like it to read- John Charles married Jane Emily Doe
> 
> Thank you.
> Ken





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



[LegacyUG] Using full christian name in reports

2009-09-23 Thread Ken
Greetings,

I am a Legacy 7 Deluxe user and would appreciate it if someone could help me 
with the following.  I have searched the help area and the archive postings 
without success.

As many of my ancestors seem to have common first names, I would like the 
marriage narrative to use both the first and middle name for all individuals in 
the Ancestor Report.

For example lets assume I have a John Charles Smith who is married to Jane Emil 
Doe.

At present the narrative in the Ancestor Report reads - John married Jane Emily 
Doe

I would like it to read- John Charles married Jane Emily Doe

Thank you.
Ken




Legacy User Group guidelines: 

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages: 

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] Children Sort Order

2009-09-23 Thread michael barberi
Many times I have records of the person's siblings and use their dates of birth 
to estimate the person in question.  Sometimes, I don't have sibling 
information, but 6 months later I do.  Hence, I use a variety of sources to 
estimate years of birth and marriage (census, marriage or birth year, sibling 
information etc).  I rarely use a fixed age or year when estimating the year of 
birth or marriage of a person.  The exception would be if several records 
indicate a tight range of time.  In those cases I will use the prefix "ABT".  
If I "estimate" the year of birth or marriage, I use a "range".   In using a 
range there is no need to use the prefix "EST" or "CAL" because a range is 
obviously an estimate based on some calculation.  Under the EVENT/FACT "Birth" 
or "Marriage", I put the details about the estimation in the notes section 
including the sources used and the method of calculation.  In a previous email, 
I outlined the rules I use based on several
 centuries of records for my family's surname from Cerreto Sannita, Italy.   I 
have not used the Master Source when I estimate the year of birth and marriage. 
 However, I find no reason not to.  I welcome comments and suggestions.

When I obtain the actual birth and marriage record, the real year falls within 
my estimated year 99% of the time.  I realize that all of this is "personal 
choice" but I share my point of view to be helpful. 

Mike Barberi

 In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus autem caritas. 
In essentials unity, in doubtful things liberty, but in all things love. 
St. Augustine (A.D. 354 - 430)





From: Heather Stovold 
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 2:30:20 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Children Sort Order

Well, I use EST for my estimates just using cultural "norms" - and I know they 
can be off.  I use CAL if I've calculated the date from something like a 
census, or a tombstone which basically gives me an age at a point of time 
(which of course can also be way off).  I use ABT basically if someone in an 
interview said something like - it was about 1920  of if I have a range of 
dates from various sources (that range more than a couple of years) - and I am 
picking something to put in the birth field - all the others would go in the 
alt.birth fields...  and of course if I have the exact date or year, it has 
nothing before it.

So far, most of my estimated dates have been fairly close (within around 5 
years or so) - but I certainly look for information from a range of fields.   
It helps me keep my people straight (and stops me from merging a person with 
his same-named grandfather a mistake I made decades ago in another program 
and took me a while to fix)

It works well for me



On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Jenny M Benson  wrote:

Robert Arens wrote
>
>
>>>I approximate 30 years per generation, marriage at about 25, first child one 
>>>year after marriage, a child every two years, the wife is 2 years younger 
>>>than the husband. In some large family groups I've been off by as much as 40 
>>>years.
>>




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Children Sort Order (dates or no dates?)

2009-09-23 Thread Heather Stovold
Might have been me  I just reposted my system a moment ago.  I use CAL
when calculated from an age at a time ABT when an aprox date was listed
somewhere else - and EST when I am figuring out an estimated year from other
people's info and cultural norms...

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Paula Ryburn wrote:

> Seems like someone recently posted here (I have a stickie on this!) that
> they use "abt 1820" when the year has been indicated by a source; e.g.,
> census listing.  But they use "est 1820" when they're using some other
> "algorithm" to come up with the year; e.g., Robert's calculations.  Anything
> with "abt" can help research; anything with "est" is just a help to identify
> people in the list.
> --Paula in Texas
>


Re: [LegacyUG] Children Sort Order

2009-09-23 Thread Heather Stovold
Well, I use EST for my estimates just using cultural "norms" - and I know
they can be off.  I use CAL if I've calculated the date from something like
a census, or a tombstone which basically gives me an age at a point of time
(which of course can also be way off).  I use ABT basically if someone in an
interview said something like - it was about 1920  of if I have a range
of dates from various sources (that range more than a couple of years) - and
I am picking something to put in the birth field - all the others would go
in the alt.birth fields...  and of course if I have the exact date or year,
it has nothing before it.
So far, most of my estimated dates have been fairly close (within around 5
years or so) - but I certainly look for information from a range of fields.
  It helps me keep my people straight (and stops me from merging a person
with his same-named grandfather a mistake I made decades ago in another
program and took me a while to fix)

It works well for me


On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Jenny M Benson wrote:

> Robert Arens wrote
>
>> I approximate 30 years per generation, marriage at about 25, first child
>> one year after marriage, a child every two years, the wife is 2 years
>> younger than the husband. In some large family groups I've been off by as
>> much as 40 years.
>>
>


Re: [LegacyUG] Master Source (SW) Comment problem - Attn Legacy staff, please

2009-09-23 Thread Robert Carneal USA

Marilyn-

If it is a repeatable problem (that is, a problem you can forcibly 
reproduce), might as well as report it to:

http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Problems.asp

Thanks.

Robert

At 2009-09-23  02:00 PM, you wrote:
Once in awhile, my input text in those fields doesn't eliminate the 
gray 'hint text' and BOTH come up in the finished source text. 
Usually I catch it in time and delete the offending text. Thought it was me.


Marilyn


--- On Tue, 9/22/09, Paula Ryburn  wrote:

> From: Paula Ryburn 
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master Source (SW) Comment problem - Attn 
Legacy staff, please

> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2009, 9:43 PM
> I have seen inconsistencies in
> those grey "hint text" lines... different issues
> on different templates.  E.g., when you start typing the
> hint doesn't go away and what you type is grey, when you
> start typing the hint goes away but what you type is
> centered and grey, etc.  Do you think I should be
> reporting those as bugs?  If those details have been
> overlooked, I start wondering what else may have been
> missed?  (like Jenny's bug)
>  --Paula in Texas
> Researching: Adair Baker Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton
> Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie
> Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon
> Gump Harbaugh Hopkins Hughes Jones Koyle Laswell McDonald
> Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sullivan
> Williams
>
>
>
> - Original Message 
> From: Jenny M Benson 
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 5:56:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master Source (SW) Comment problem
> - Attn Legacy staff, please
>
> Ward Walker wrote
> > After the 'Comments about this master source' have
> been surreptitiously copied to the 'Comments' field, can you
> manually clear the Comments field, as a workaround?
>
> No!  Deleting text from one place deletes it in the
> other.
>
> It's all a bit odd:  I now see that the grey "hint text"
> in the "Comments" field is shown in black in the "Master
> Source Comments" field.  If I click in the "Comments" field
> and enter text, it appears black and left aligned, but if I
> go into "Master Source Comments", delete the "hint text" and
> type my own, that then appears in the "Comments field" in
> grey and centred.
> -- Jenny M Benson
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group 
guidelines:  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived 
messages:  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Master Source (SW) Comment problem - Attn Legacy staff, please

2009-09-23 Thread Marilyn Clark
Once in awhile, my input text in those fields doesn't eliminate the gray 'hint 
text' and BOTH come up in the finished source text. Usually I catch it in time 
and delete the offending text. Thought it was me.

Marilyn


--- On Tue, 9/22/09, Paula Ryburn  wrote:

> From: Paula Ryburn 
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master Source (SW) Comment problem - Attn Legacy 
> staff, please
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2009, 9:43 PM
> I have seen inconsistencies in
> those grey "hint text" lines... different issues
> on different templates.  E.g., when you start typing the
> hint doesn't go away and what you type is grey, when you
> start typing the hint goes away but what you type is
> centered and grey, etc.  Do you think I should be
> reporting those as bugs?  If those details have been
> overlooked, I start wondering what else may have been
> missed?  (like Jenny's bug)
>  --Paula in Texas
> Researching: Adair Baker Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton
> Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie
> Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon
> Gump Harbaugh Hopkins Hughes Jones Koyle Laswell McDonald
> Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sullivan
> Williams 
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message 
> From: Jenny M Benson 
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 5:56:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Master Source (SW) Comment problem
> - Attn Legacy staff, please
> 
> Ward Walker wrote
> > After the 'Comments about this master source' have
> been surreptitiously copied to the 'Comments' field, can you
> manually clear the Comments field, as a workaround?
> 
> No!  Deleting text from one place deletes it in the
> other.
> 
> It's all a bit odd:  I now see that the grey "hint text"
> in the "Comments" field is shown in black in the "Master
> Source Comments" field.  If I click in the "Comments" field
> and enter text, it appears black and left aligned, but if I
> go into "Master Source Comments", delete the "hint text" and
> type my own, that then appears in the "Comments field" in
> grey and centred.
> -- Jenny M Benson
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines:  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:  
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
> 
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
>    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> 
> 
> 
> 






Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Missing wife in Descendant 's book

2009-09-23 Thread Ron Ferguson

Mary,

My tiscali address is in the header to this email. Right click on my name in 
you email reader and select "properties". It is usually also in brackets 
after the k...@legacyusers... in the "From" field in my email.


Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
Follow me on twitter
http://twitter.com/ronfergy


Mary Hane wrote:

Ron,
I would like to have you look at my files.  How do I contact you
*Off-List*? Mary

Ron Ferguson wrote:

Mary,

If you would like to send me your back-up file (not the multi media)
*Off-List*, I will be happy to take a look at it.

Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
Follow me on twitter
http://twitter.com/ronfergy



Mary Hane wrote:

She is not living and I am not finding any "ghost" marriages.  She
appears on the family tab with husband and all their children, but
if I run the Descendant book she is not listed.  Also if I go to
the descendant TAB she is the only person on it, whereas if I go
to the descendant tab for her husband, both the first wife and
she and her children appear.
Mary

Ron Ferguson wrote:

Mary Hane wrote:

Virginia Dunham wrote:

Mary,
Look under options:  make sure you have "other spouses"
checked...I just ran two reports for one relative with two
spouses...if that option is left unchecked, it eliminates his
second wife.

Virginia



I have "other spouses" checked and she is not marked as
"private" Mary


Mary,

Have a look at your MRIN (View>Marriages) and check that you
haven't ghost marriges for the family - if so then delete them.

Ron Ferguson





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages

2009-09-23 Thread Michele Lewis
Here are my results...

Last Result:
Download Speed: 6586 kbps (823.3 KB/sec transfer rate)
Upload Speed: 1060 kbps (132.5 KB/sec transfer rate)


michele

  - Original Message - 
  From: Jim Walton 
  To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:10 AM
  Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages


  Just to give you an idea, I live in Korea so I ran two tests. The first to a 
local server in Seoul showed

  Down: 13.40
  Up: 7.85

  I then switched to a server in San Francisco, half-way around the world and 
got these results

  Down: 7.61
  Up: 2.01

  My worst case is twice your speeds. Korea, however, is known to have some of 
the fastest Internet connectivity in the world. So, down towards the bottom of 
the page where you did your test is a button (actually more of a text block) 
that says How do your results stack up? Click on that and it will show you how 
you compare to others in your area.

  Jim



  On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Michele Lewis  
wrote:

I did the speed test and these are the results...

download 3.89
upload 1.00

so now tell me what that means.

michele


- Original Message - From: "Brian L. Lightfoot" 

To: 
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:17 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages




  This is getting slightly off topic but since it does directly affect 
Legacy
  users that are trying to upload web pages, here is one more shot at things
  to remember:

  1. Your upload speed is not affected by choice of operating systems; Vista
  or XP have no effect on your upload speed.
  2. Your upload speed is not significantly affected by your amount of RAM
  (unless you are so underspec but then you'd notice problems with just
  running any programs. For the average system, adding additional RAM will 
not
  increase your upload speed.
  3. Your upload speed is not significantly affected by your brand of
  computer.
  4. Your upload speed is not defined by merely saying cable modem, DSL,
  satellite, etc, all of which are loosely defined as "broadband" but
  bandwidth can and does vary widely. Some cable modem connections are only
  768K while others are up to 18Mbps (that's over 23 times faster).
  5. A dirty little secret of your Internet Service Provider is that your
  upload speed is almost always severely reduced over what your download 
speed
  is supposed to be.
  6. Another dirty little secret of your Internet Service Provider is that
  your up/download speed is not "guaranteed" but rather sold to you as "up 
to
  X Mbps". Your results may varyand they will.
  7. The speed and efficiency of the server to which you are uploading will
  affect the time it takes you to transfer files. Normally, it isn't much 
of a
  factor unless you are using AOL, etc.

  If you don't know for sure, call and ask your ISP exactly what speed 
package
  you are paying for: you need two numbers as an answer. For example, a
  typical answer might be "3 Meg down and 256K up". Note that in this 
example
  it's the 256K upload speed which determines how long it takes for you to
  upload web pages.

  Finally (and really getting off topic now), if you are still having long
  delays uploading web pages, go here to test your ACTUAL speed as opposed 
to
  what you are paying for:
  http://www.speedtest.net/

  Brian in CA


  -Original Message-
  From: Michele Lewis [mailto:cranberryf...@charter.net]
  Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:52 AM
  To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
  Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages

  I have a Dell laptop with 2GB RAM.  I am running Vista.  I am not 
uploading
  any pictures at all.  I use a cable modem for my internet connection.

  michele




  Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
  Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
  Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
  To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp












No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.112/2387 - Release Date: 09/21/09 
17:55:00





Legacy User Group guidelines:  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp








--



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by 

Re: [LegacyUG] Missing wife in Descendant 's book

2009-09-23 Thread Mary Hane

Ron,
I would like to have you look at my files.  How do I contact you *Off-List*?
Mary

Ron Ferguson wrote:

Mary,

If you would like to send me your back-up file (not the multi media) 
*Off-List*, I will be happy to take a look at it.


Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
Follow me on twitter
http://twitter.com/ronfergy



Mary Hane wrote:

She is not living and I am not finding any "ghost" marriages.  She
appears on the family tab with husband and all their children, but
if I run the Descendant book she is not listed.  Also if I go to the
descendant TAB she is the only person on it, whereas if I go to the
descendant tab for her husband, both the first wife and she and her
children appear.
Mary

Ron Ferguson wrote:

Mary Hane wrote:

Virginia Dunham wrote:

Mary,
Look under options:  make sure you have "other spouses"
checked...I just ran two reports for one relative with two
spouses...if that option is left unchecked, it eliminates his
second wife.

Virginia



I have "other spouses" checked and she is not marked as "private"
Mary


Mary,

Have a look at your MRIN (View>Marriages) and check that you haven't
ghost marriges for the family - if so then delete them.

Ron Ferguson





Legacy User Group guidelines:   
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:   
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp









Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages

2009-09-23 Thread Ron Ferguson

Jim et al,

This is getting OT, but one should also remember that the method of delivery 
of broadband to a house can also determine the maximum speed allowed.


Mine (in England) is delivered via telephone line and the maximum it can 
take is 8Mb (download), so it would be absolutely pointless buying anything 
faster. I currently have 8MB, but it only operates at 6MB. I was warned by 
my ISP that this would be the case before I signed the contract.


Ron Ferguson
_


New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
Follow me on twitter
http://twitter.com/ronfergy


- Original Message - 
From: Jim Walton

To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: 23 September 2009 05:10
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages


Just to give you an idea, I live in Korea so I ran two tests. The first to a 
local server in Seoul showed


Down: 13.40
Up: 7.85

I then switched to a server in San Francisco, half-way around the world and 
got these results


Down: 7.61
Up: 2.01

My worst case is twice your speeds. Korea, however, is known to have some of 
the fastest Internet connectivity in the world. So, down towards the bottom 
of the page where you did your test is a button (actually more of a text 
block) that says How do your results stack up? Click on that and it will 
show you how you compare to others in your area.


Jim



On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Michele Lewis  
wrote:


I did the speed test and these are the results...

download 3.89
upload 1.00

so now tell me what that means.

michele


- Original Message - From: "Brian L. Lightfoot" 


To: 
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:17 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages




This is getting slightly off topic but since it does directly affect Legacy
users that are trying to upload web pages, here is one more shot at things
to remember:

1. Your upload speed is not affected by choice of operating systems; Vista
or XP have no effect on your upload speed.
2. Your upload speed is not significantly affected by your amount of RAM
(unless you are so underspec but then you'd notice problems with just
running any programs. For the average system, adding additional RAM will not
increase your upload speed.
3. Your upload speed is not significantly affected by your brand of
computer.
4. Your upload speed is not defined by merely saying cable modem, DSL,
satellite, etc, all of which are loosely defined as "broadband" but
bandwidth can and does vary widely. Some cable modem connections are only
768K while others are up to 18Mbps (that's over 23 times faster).
5. A dirty little secret of your Internet Service Provider is that your
upload speed is almost always severely reduced over what your download speed
is supposed to be.
6. Another dirty little secret of your Internet Service Provider is that
your up/download speed is not "guaranteed" but rather sold to you as "up to
X Mbps". Your results may varyand they will.
7. The speed and efficiency of the server to which you are uploading will
affect the time it takes you to transfer files. Normally, it isn't much of a
factor unless you are using AOL, etc.

If you don't know for sure, call and ask your ISP exactly what speed package
you are paying for: you need two numbers as an answer. For example, a
typical answer might be "3 Meg down and 256K up". Note that in this example
it's the 256K upload speed which determines how long it takes for you to
upload web pages.

Finally (and really getting off topic now), if you are still having long
delays uploading web pages, go here to test your ACTUAL speed as opposed to
what you are paying for:
http://www.speedtest.net/

Brian in CA


-Original Message-
From: Michele Lewis [mailto:cranberryf...@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 8:52 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] uploading web pages

I have a Dell laptop with 2GB RAM.  I am running Vista.  I am not uploading
any pictures at all.  I use a cable modem for my internet connection.

michele





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp