Re: [LegacyUG] Name Question
For last name I put the married name in parentheses , for first name I put Mrs. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 12:09:06 PM EDT, Bill Hoff wrote: I leave blank. If you enter unknown or ? a warning displays in that report. Now maybe that can be altered, I’ve not looked for that possibility yet. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 14, 2022, at 10:02 AM, Evelyn .. wrote: I use "Male" or "Female" On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 7:59 AM Fran Markle wrote: What do people use when they don't know the first name or the last name? I want to be consistent, not sure if I should use Uknown, Ukn, UkFn, etc. Curious to hear what others use, thanks, Fran-- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 10?
Did you try contacting the company directly with your concerns? Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, January 22, 2022, 12:10:29 PM EST, Brian Kelly wrote: Sorry, confidentiality rules prevent us from revealing any new features in Version 10. Brian Kelly On 22-Jan.-22 7:35 a.m., Mary Ann Latko Groetsema wrote: > Legacy 10? Can any of you in the beta group answer one question about > the upgrade? I am in the process of switching to RootsMagic 8 _solely > _for the reason that Legacy 9 does not support all the international > diacritics that I need. My ancestors were from Poland and not having > the correct spelling of their names and locations is bothersome. I > would really like to stay with Legacy, but if the next version does not > support the international diacritics, I'll proceed with my migration. > > Thanks in advance if you can provide this information. > > Mary Ann Latko Groetsema -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
No one would confuse Boston, MA, or Boston, MA, USA for being in South Africa. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 11:46:18 PM EDT, Donna Newell wrote: This is very wise. Avoid confusion. Avoid abbreviations, USA could be United States or Union of South Africa. Use appropriate names, enter place as it is in the time period that the event takes place. Study up on genealogy standards and practices. Sent from my iPad On Aug 3, 2019, at 9:02 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: James, It makes perfect sense. "New York" - is that New York City, New York County, or New York State? New York ,,,USA would be city ,New York ,,USA would be county ,,New York ,USA would be state If you can tell which one someone meant by just entering "New York", you need to play the lottery immediately. LOL For those of us who are NOT psychic, please use that proper standard, and put what ever you please in the notes. My humble opinion - tempered with 35+ years of experience as a professional genealogist. Christopher On 8/3/2019 2:07 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: What does not make sense is seeing something like: , , , Indiana, United States of America. when a simple IN would do. Or: , , , Berlin, Democratic Republic of Germany. You can find whatever available record in Berlin today regardless if it was Prussia, Imperial Germany, Natzi Germany, East Germany or West Germany or Occupied American Sector, French Sector, or British Sector, or Federal Rpublic of Germany. This junk belongs in the notes not in the primary entry. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 09:22:00 AM EDT, Christopher Seward Sr wrote: James, I understand where you're coming from. I just think that handling data in a manner that deviates from the standard is inviting data integrity issues. As I said, the choice is yours. Just be aware of the lasting issues it will cause for those who come after. Christopher On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 4:59 AM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Exactly my point. Putting historical location in the notes maintains all the information one needs and still be sensible and useful to family members. If people import information without looking at the notes, then they are not being a good genealogist. It tells me that they just copy things for numbers, not for reliable and useful information to share. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Friday, August 02, 2019 08:51:50 AM EDT, Bill Hoff wrote: Then one cannot find on a map if historic locations used. With many relatives in West Virginia I have this problem. WV did not become a state until June 20, 1863. On top of that many counties within the state were divided over many years, far too many for me to recall them all. Then there is the problem of knowing locations but not dates so one cannot be certain of entries Bill Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you publish & share this information, your method goes against the standard, and can cause issues. An example for me was importing a person's info into my file. I kept getting import errors stating the the location (birth place) did not exist on that date (birth date). Now I have an issue, since this place not only didn't exist when this person was born, but when it did exist, it was in a different country than when he was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, but was actually another. I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting the current name of the location in the notes. On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM EDT, sarrazingeor...@gmail.com wrote: I think one should always the name of a location
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
Well the most obvious is to use CA if your database is originated in the USA for California. and to use CANADA if you for outside the USA. That is if you did not know that Toronto, Ontario, CA was in Canada. or Toronto, ON the same. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 10:27:05 PM EDT, Roberta Schwalm wrote: Yes, it is. CA is the abbreviation for both California and Canada, which is why I always enter California or Canada instead of simply CA. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:23 PM Anne Hildrum wrote: Well isn't CA an Acronym. Ane From: LegacyUserGroup On Behalf Of Ian Macaulay Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2019 10:51 PM To: Legacy User Group Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania I Live in CA, Not California IMHO Acronyms are not proper English, and it confuses your Neighbors. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:14 PM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: I never had a Gedcom file not accept any location file whether it had Indianapolis, Marion Co., IN, or even Indianapolis, IN. not to mention Indianapolis, xxx Township, Marion County, Indiana, United States of America. You soon get the point that the latter is the creation of someone who thinks that they need to police something totally not needed by anyone with common sense, or a tad bit of education. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 09:43:25 AM EDT, wrote: Christopher I agree with you. My suggestion of putting the present name between curly brackets after the referenced location name is simply an easy way to translate old location name into present day name and it is accepted by the different Gedcom programs. Georges De : LegacyUserGroup De la part de Christopher Seward Sr Envoyé : 3 août 2019 09:21 À : Legacy User Group Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania James, I understand where you're coming from. I just think that handling data in a manner that deviates from the standard is inviting data integrity issues. As I said, the choice is yours. Just be aware of the lasting issues it will cause for those who come after. Christopher On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 4:59 AM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Exactly my point. Putting historical location in the notes maintains all the information one needs and still be sensible and useful to family members. If people import information without looking at the notes, then they are not being a good genealogist. It tells me that they just copy things for numbers, not for reliable and useful information to share. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Friday, August 02, 2019 08:51:50 AM EDT, Bill Hoff wrote: Then one cannot find on a map if historic locations used. With many relatives in West Virginia I have this problem. WV did not become a state until June 20, 1863. On top of that many counties within the state were divided over many years, far too many for me to recall them all. Then there is the problem of knowing locations but not dates so one cannot be certain of entries Bill Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you publish & share this information, your method goes against the standard, and can cause issues. An example for me was importing a person's info into my file. I kept getting import errors stating the the location (birth place) did not exist on that date (birth date). Now I have an issue, since this place not only didn't exist when this person was born, but when it did exist, it was in a different country than when he was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, but was actually another. I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting the current name of the location in the notes. On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
Your example does not make much sense. A true genealogist would use the borough name if in the city, the town if on long Island, and NY. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 10:02:53 PM EDT, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: James, It makes perfect sense. "New York" - is that New York City, New York County, or New York State? New York ,,,USA would be city ,New York ,,USA would be county ,,New York ,USA would be state If you can tell which one someone meant by just entering "New York", you need to play the lottery immediately. LOL For those of us who are NOT psychic, please use that proper standard, and put what ever you please in the notes. My humble opinion - tempered with 35+ years of experience as a professional genealogist. Christopher On 8/3/2019 2:07 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: What does not make sense is seeing something like: , , , Indiana, United States of America. when a simple IN would do. Or: , , , Berlin, Democratic Republic of Germany. You can find whatever available record in Berlin today regardless if it was Prussia, Imperial Germany, Natzi Germany, East Germany or West Germany or Occupied American Sector, French Sector, or British Sector, or Federal Rpublic of Germany. This junk belongs in the notes not in the primary entry. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 09:22:00 AM EDT, Christopher Seward Sr wrote: James, I understand where you're coming from. I just think that handling data in a manner that deviates from the standard is inviting data integrity issues. As I said, the choice is yours. Just be aware of the lasting issues it will cause for those who come after. Christopher On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 4:59 AM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Exactly my point. Putting historical location in the notes maintains all the information one needs and still be sensible and useful to family members. If people import information without looking at the notes, then they are not being a good genealogist. It tells me that they just copy things for numbers, not for reliable and useful information to share. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Friday, August 02, 2019 08:51:50 AM EDT, Bill Hoff wrote: Then one cannot find on a map if historic locations used. With many relatives in West Virginia I have this problem. WV did not become a state until June 20, 1863. On top of that many counties within the state were divided over many years, far too many for me to recall them all. Then there is the problem of knowing locations but not dates so one cannot be certain of entries Bill Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you publish & share this information, your method goes against the standard, and can cause issues. An example for me was importing a person's info into my file. I kept getting import errors stating the the location (birth place) did not exist on that date (birth date). Now I have an issue, since this place not only didn't exist when this person was born, but when it did exist, it was in a different country than when he was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, but was actually another. I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting the current name of the location in the notes. On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM EDT, sarrazingeor...@gmail.com wrote: I think one should always the name of a location the way it is indicated in the documentation. If the name has change or if two locations have been merge, I use curly brackets with the new name after the old name. Ex. Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay}, 41194, Loir-et-Cher, Centre-Val de Loire, France
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
CA is the official Government abbreviation for California, used most often in postal addresses and locations. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 09:23:27 PM EDT, Anne Hildrum wrote: Well isn't CA an Acronym. Ane From: LegacyUserGroup On Behalf Of Ian Macaulay Sent: Saturday, August 3, 2019 10:51 PM To: Legacy User Group Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania I Live in CA, Not California IMHO Acronyms are not proper English, and it confuses your Neighbors. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:14 PM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: I never had a Gedcom file not accept any location file whether it had Indianapolis, Marion Co., IN, or even Indianapolis, IN. not to mention Indianapolis, xxx Township, Marion County, Indiana, United States of America. You soon get the point that the latter is the creation of someone who thinks that they need to police something totally not needed by anyone with common sense, or a tad bit of education. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 09:43:25 AM EDT, wrote: Christopher I agree with you. My suggestion of putting the present name between curly brackets after the referenced location name is simply an easy way to translate old location name into present day name and it is accepted by the different Gedcom programs. Georges De : LegacyUserGroup De la part de Christopher Seward Sr Envoyé : 3 août 2019 09:21 À : Legacy User Group Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania James, I understand where you're coming from. I just think that handling data in a manner that deviates from the standard is inviting data integrity issues. As I said, the choice is yours. Just be aware of the lasting issues it will cause for those who come after. Christopher On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 4:59 AM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Exactly my point. Putting historical location in the notes maintains all the information one needs and still be sensible and useful to family members. If people import information without looking at the notes, then they are not being a good genealogist. It tells me that they just copy things for numbers, not for reliable and useful information to share. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Friday, August 02, 2019 08:51:50 AM EDT, Bill Hoff wrote: Then one cannot find on a map if historic locations used. With many relatives in West Virginia I have this problem. WV did not become a state until June 20, 1863. On top of that many counties within the state were divided over many years, far too many for me to recall them all. Then there is the problem of knowing locations but not dates so one cannot be certain of entries Bill Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you publish & share this information, your method goes against the standard, and can cause issues. An example for me was importing a person's info into my file. I kept getting import errors stating the the location (birth place) did not exist on that date (birth date). Now I have an issue, since this place not only didn't exist when this person was born, but when it did exist, it was in a different country than when he was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, but was actually another. I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting the current name of the location in the notes. On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM EDT, sarrazingeor...@gmail.com wrote: I think one should always the name of a location the way it is indicated in the documentation. If the name has change or if two locations have been merge, I use curly brackets with the new name after the old name. Ex. Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay}, 41194, Loir-et-Cher, Ce
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
I never had a Gedcom file not accept any location file whether it had Indianapolis, Marion Co., IN, or even Indianapolis, IN. not to mention Indianapolis, xxx Township, Marion County, Indiana, United States of America. You soon get the point that the latter is the creation of someone who thinks that they need to police something totally not needed by anyone with common sense, or a tad bit of education. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 09:43:25 AM EDT, wrote: Christopher I agree with you. My suggestion of putting the present name between curly brackets after the referenced location name is simply an easy way to translate old location name into present day name and it is accepted by the different Gedcom programs. Georges De : LegacyUserGroup De la part de Christopher Seward Sr Envoyé : 3 août 2019 09:21 À : Legacy User Group Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania James, I understand where you're coming from. I just think that handling data in a manner that deviates from the standard is inviting data integrity issues. As I said, the choice is yours. Just be aware of the lasting issues it will cause for those who come after. Christopher On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 4:59 AM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Exactly my point. Putting historical location in the notes maintains all the information one needs and still be sensible and useful to family members. If people import information without looking at the notes, then they are not being a good genealogist. It tells me that they just copy things for numbers, not for reliable and useful information to share. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Friday, August 02, 2019 08:51:50 AM EDT, Bill Hoff wrote: Then one cannot find on a map if historic locations used. With many relatives in West Virginia I have this problem. WV did not become a state until June 20, 1863. On top of that many counties within the state were divided over many years, far too many for me to recall them all. Then there is the problem of knowing locations but not dates so one cannot be certain of entries Bill Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you publish & share this information, your method goes against the standard, and can cause issues. An example for me was importing a person's info into my file. I kept getting import errors stating the the location (birth place) did not exist on that date (birth date). Now I have an issue, since this place not only didn't exist when this person was born, but when it did exist, it was in a different country than when he was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, but was actually another. I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting the current name of the location in the notes. On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM EDT, sarrazingeor...@gmail.com wrote: I think one should always the name of a location the way it is indicated in the documentation. If the name has change or if two locations have been merge, I use curly brackets with the new name after the old name. Ex. Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay}, 41194, Loir-et-Cher, Centre-Val de Loire, France (Note : I use 5 fields) Georges De : LegacyUserGroup De la part de James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup Envoyé : 1 août 2019 09:26 À : mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup Cc : James G. Hermsen Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania I always use the current geographic location and name today in each entry and in the notes, remark that the geographic name and country was different then than it is today. That way when a grandchild (or anyone) wants to find the place on a map is able to do so. Prussia is very hard to find, if you did not know where to look. Same thing with names of cities whose name has changed. Stalingrad, Linengrad don't make sense for someone born a
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
What does not make sense is seeing something like: , , , Indiana, United States of America. when a simple IN would do. Or: , , , Berlin, Democratic Republic of Germany. You can find whatever available record in Berlin today regardless if it was Prussia, Imperial Germany, Natzi Germany, East Germany or West Germany or Occupied American Sector, French Sector, or British Sector, or Federal Rpublic of Germany. This junk belongs in the notes not in the primary entry. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Saturday, August 03, 2019 09:22:00 AM EDT, Christopher Seward Sr wrote: James, I understand where you're coming from. I just think that handling data in a manner that deviates from the standard is inviting data integrity issues. As I said, the choice is yours. Just be aware of the lasting issues it will cause for those who come after. Christopher On Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 4:59 AM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Exactly my point. Putting historical location in the notes maintains all the information one needs and still be sensible and useful to family members. If people import information without looking at the notes, then they are not being a good genealogist. It tells me that they just copy things for numbers, not for reliable and useful information to share. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Friday, August 02, 2019 08:51:50 AM EDT, Bill Hoff wrote: Then one cannot find on a map if historic locations used. With many relatives in West Virginia I have this problem. WV did not become a state until June 20, 1863. On top of that many counties within the state were divided over many years, far too many for me to recall them all. Then there is the problem of knowing locations but not dates so one cannot be certain of entries Bill Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you publish & share this information, your method goes against the standard, and can cause issues. An example for me was importing a person's info into my file. I kept getting import errors stating the the location (birth place) did not exist on that date (birth date). Now I have an issue, since this place not only didn't exist when this person was born, but when it did exist, it was in a different country than when he was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, but was actually another. I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting the current name of the location in the notes. On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM EDT, sarrazingeor...@gmail.com wrote: I think one should always the name of a location the way it is indicated in the documentation. If the name has change or if two locations have been merge, I use curly brackets with the new name after the old name. Ex. Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay}, 41194, Loir-et-Cher, Centre-Val de Loire, France (Note : I use 5 fields) Georges De : LegacyUserGroup De la part de James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup Envoyé : 1 août 2019 09:26 À : mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup Cc : James G. Hermsen Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania I always use the current geographic location and name today in each entry and in the notes, remark that the geographic name and country was different then than it is today. That way when a grandchild (or anyone) wants to find the place on a map is able to do so. Prussia is very hard to find, if you did not know where to look. Same thing with names of cities whose name has changed. Stalingrad, Linengrad don't make sense for someone born after the Cold War. Peking vs. Bejing. Same thing. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 08:43:54 AM EDT, mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup w
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
Exactly my point. Putting historical location in the notes maintains all the information one needs and still be sensible and useful to family members. If people import information without looking at the notes, then they are not being a good genealogist. It tells me that they just copy things for numbers, not for reliable and useful information to share. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Friday, August 02, 2019 08:51:50 AM EDT, Bill Hoff wrote: Then one cannot find on a map if historic locations used. With many relatives in West Virginia I have this problem. WV did not become a state until June 20, 1863. On top of that many counties within the state were divided over many years, far too many for me to recall them all. Then there is the problem of knowing locations but not dates so one cannot be certain of entries Bill Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you publish & share this information, your method goes against the standard, and can cause issues. An example for me was importing a person's info into my file. I kept getting import errors stating the the location (birth place) did not exist on that date (birth date). Now I have an issue, since this place not only didn't exist when this person was born, but when it did exist, it was in a different country than when he was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, but was actually another. I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting the current name of the location in the notes. On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM EDT, sarrazingeor...@gmail.com wrote: I think one should always the name of a location the way it is indicated in the documentation. If the name has change or if two locations have been merge, I use curly brackets with the new name after the old name. Ex. Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay}, 41194, Loir-et-Cher, Centre-Val de Loire, France (Note : I use 5 fields) Georges De : LegacyUserGroup De la part de James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup Envoyé : 1 août 2019 09:26 À : mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup Cc : James G. Hermsen Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania I always use the current geographic location and name today in each entry and in the notes, remark that the geographic name and country was different then than it is today. That way when a grandchild (or anyone) wants to find the place on a map is able to do so. Prussia is very hard to find, if you did not know where to look. Same thing with names of cities whose name has changed. Stalingrad, Linengrad don't make sense for someone born after the Cold War. Peking vs. Bejing. Same thing. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 08:43:54 AM EDT, mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup wrote: I hope you are not inserting the the added information if it is not in the document. The jurisdictions change over time. In the US what was a county in 1850 may be another county in 1860 and still another county by 1870. The house did not move but the boundaries did. Marie Marie Varrelman Melchiori, Certified Genealogist Emeritus __ __ __ CG or Certified Genealogist is a service mark of the Board for Certification of Genealogists, used under license by Board-certified genealogists after periodic competency evaluation, and the board name is registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office. In a message dated 8/1/2019 6:24:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, wrlinh...@gmail.com writes: I do agree. My standard is: [1. local jurisdiction/repository i.e.township, village, city, etc], 2.County, 3.State, 4.Country and apply to other countries similarly by always using three commas for all locations [usually each has a repository of gene
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
I recommend never to mass import other peoples work. I am careful enough to know and understand exactly what I import from online. Manually importing the information, one knows his information. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 08:16:01 PM EDT, Christopher Seward Sr. wrote: You are free to record as you choose, but keep in mind that if you publish & share this information, your method goes against the standard, and can cause issues. An example for me was importing a person's info into my file. I kept getting import errors stating the the location (birth place) did not exist on that date (birth date). Now I have an issue, since this place not only didn't exist when this person was born, but when it did exist, it was in a different country than when he was born, thus making him appear to be of one heritage, but was actually another. I recommend ALWAYS putting the correct location in, and putting the current name of the location in the notes. On 8/1/2019 4:41 PM, James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM EDT, sarrazingeor...@gmail.com wrote: I think one should always the name of a location the way it is indicated in the documentation. If the name has change or if two locations have been merge, I use curly brackets with the new name after the old name. Ex. Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay}, 41194, Loir-et-Cher, Centre-Val de Loire, France (Note : I use 5 fields) Georges De : LegacyUserGroup De la part de James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup Envoyé : 1 août 2019 09:26 À : mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup Cc : James G. Hermsen Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania I always use the current geographic location and name today in each entry and in the notes, remark that the geographic name and country was different then than it is today. That way when a grandchild (or anyone) wants to find the place on a map is able to do so. Prussia is very hard to find, if you did not know where to look. Same thing with names of cities whose name has changed. Stalingrad, Linengrad don't make sense for someone born after the Cold War. Peking vs. Bejing. Same thing. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 08:43:54 AM EDT, mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup wrote: I hope you are not inserting the the added information if it is not in the document. The jurisdictions change over time. In the US what was a county in 1850 may be another county in 1860 and still another county by 1870. The house did not move but the boundaries did. Marie Marie Varrelman Melchiori, Certified Genealogist Emeritus __ __ __ CG or Certified Genealogist is a service mark of the Board for Certification of Genealogists, used under license by Board-certified genealogists after periodic competency evaluation, and the board name is registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office. In a message dated 8/1/2019 6:24:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, wrlinh...@gmail.com writes: I do agree. My standard is: [1. local jurisdiction/repository i.e.township, village, city, etc], 2.County, 3.State, 4.Country and apply to other countries similarly by always using three commas for all locations [usually each has a repository of genealogical data] . The entry might between comma's might be null if I don't have the information. For example born in USA might be ", , , USA". I know I have some research to do but I only record what I have from that source. For folder hierarchy and some naming situations I reverse the order but always hold to 4 elements for location. I don't believe I have ever had an exception. I am sure I will learn about one here. So far this works for me. Bill On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:20 AM Roberta Schwalm wrote: I do the same thing, Shirley. Most of my
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
No politics, just FACTS, You must have some guilty feelings yourself. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 05:48:27 PM EDT, Pete Beatty wrote: James: Politics has no place in this discussion. On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 5:42 PM James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup wrote: Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM EDT, sarrazingeor...@gmail.com wrote: I think one should always the name of a location the way it is indicated in the documentation. If the name has change or if two locations have been merge, I use curly brackets with the new name after the old name. Ex. Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay}, 41194, Loir-et-Cher, Centre-Val de Loire, France (Note : I use 5 fields) Georges De : LegacyUserGroup De la part de James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup Envoyé : 1 août 2019 09:26 À : mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup Cc : James G. Hermsen Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania I always use the current geographic location and name today in each entry and in the notes, remark that the geographic name and country was different then than it is today. That way when a grandchild (or anyone) wants to find the place on a map is able to do so. Prussia is very hard to find, if you did not know where to look. Same thing with names of cities whose name has changed. Stalingrad, Linengrad don't make sense for someone born after the Cold War. Peking vs. Bejing. Same thing. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 08:43:54 AM EDT, mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup wrote: I hope you are not inserting the the added information if it is not in the document. The jurisdictions change over time. In the US what was a county in 1850 may be another county in 1860 and still another county by 1870. The house did not move but the boundaries did. Marie Marie Varrelman Melchiori, Certified Genealogist Emeritus __ __ __ CG or Certified Genealogist is a service mark of the Board for Certification of Genealogists, used under license by Board-certified genealogists after periodic competency evaluation, and the board name is registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office. In a message dated 8/1/2019 6:24:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, wrlinh...@gmail.com writes: I do agree. My standard is: [1. local jurisdiction/repository i.e.township, village, city, etc], 2.County, 3.State, 4.Country and apply to other countries similarly by always using three commas for all locations [usually each has a repository of genealogical data] . The entry might between comma's might be null if I don't have the information. For example born in USA might be ", , , USA". I know I have some research to do but I only record what I have from that source. For folder hierarchy and some naming situations I reverse the order but always hold to 4 elements for location. I don't believe I have ever had an exception. I am sure I will learn about one here. So far this works for me. Bill On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:20 AM Roberta Schwalm wrote: I do the same thing, Shirley. Most of my ancestors are from Scotland, Ireland, England, Germany and a spattering of French. The only difference is I use "province" instead of State. On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:05 PM Shirley Crampton wrote: I use Village, County, State, Country. Hopefully there is no more than 1 village of the same name in the County. If the place is rural then I put the name of the township in the first position. On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:47 PM Connie Laubach wrote: Trying to decide how to input the location names – I have townships that are made up of villages and boroughs. How are others handling it? I have thought of the following: Village, township, county, state, United States or township-village, country, state, United States (I like this as all villages within the township would be listed together) Thank you, Connie. -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
Yes, but in the notes. Most people I share my information with want to know where the place is now. They, like Trump, have no regard for history, and those who know their history, already know what the original name is. Looking for documents, the current place will know what jurisdiction they once were governed by. It is all about being usable for current people. Otherwise, we would all be recording everying in Latin like they once did. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 01:22:29 PM EDT, sarrazingeor...@gmail.com wrote: I think one should always the name of a location the way it is indicated in the documentation. If the name has change or if two locations have been merge, I use curly brackets with the new name after the old name. Ex. Romorantin {Romorantin-Lanthenay}, 41194, Loir-et-Cher, Centre-Val de Loire, France (Note : I use 5 fields) Georges De : LegacyUserGroup De la part de James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup Envoyé : 1 août 2019 09:26 À : mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup Cc : James G. Hermsen Objet : Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania I always use the current geographic location and name today in each entry and in the notes, remark that the geographic name and country was different then than it is today. That way when a grandchild (or anyone) wants to find the place on a map is able to do so. Prussia is very hard to find, if you did not know where to look. Same thing with names of cities whose name has changed. Stalingrad, Linengrad don't make sense for someone born after the Cold War. Peking vs. Bejing. Same thing. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 8108 Laura Lynne Lane Indianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell 317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 08:43:54 AM EDT, mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup wrote: I hope you are not inserting the the added information if it is not in the document. The jurisdictions change over time. In the US what was a county in 1850 may be another county in 1860 and still another county by 1870. The house did not move but the boundaries did. Marie Marie Varrelman Melchiori, Certified Genealogist Emeritus __ __ __ CG or Certified Genealogist is a service mark of the Board for Certification of Genealogists, used under license by Board-certified genealogists after periodic competency evaluation, and the board name is registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office. In a message dated 8/1/2019 6:24:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, wrlinh...@gmail.com writes: I do agree. My standard is: [1. local jurisdiction/repository i.e.township, village, city, etc], 2.County, 3.State, 4.Country and apply to other countries similarly by always using three commas for all locations [usually each has a repository of genealogical data] . The entry might between comma's might be null if I don't have the information. For example born in USA might be ", , , USA". I know I have some research to do but I only record what I have from that source. For folder hierarchy and some naming situations I reverse the order but always hold to 4 elements for location. I don't believe I have ever had an exception. I am sure I will learn about one here. So far this works for me. Bill On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:20 AM Roberta Schwalm wrote: I do the same thing, Shirley. Most of my ancestors are from Scotland, Ireland, England, Germany and a spattering of French. The only difference is I use "province" instead of State. On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:05 PM Shirley Crampton wrote: I use Village, County, State, Country. Hopefully there is no more than 1 village of the same name in the County. If the place is rural then I put the name of the township in the first position. On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:47 PM Connie Laubach wrote: Trying to decide how to input the location names – I have townships that are made up of villages and boroughs. How are others handling it? I have thought of the following: Village, township, county, state, United States or township-village, country, state, United States (I like this as all villages within the township would be listed together) Thank you, Connie. -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyu
Re: [LegacyUG] Location names for Pennsylvania
I always use the current geographic location and name today in each entry and in the notes, remark that the geographic name and country was different then than it is today. That way when a grandchild (or anyone) wants to find the place on a map is able to do so. Prussia is very hard to find, if you did not know where to look. Same thing with names of cities whose name has changed. Stalingrad, Linengrad don't make sense for someone born after the Cold War. Peking vs. Bejing. Same thing. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, August 01, 2019 08:43:54 AM EDT, mvmcgrs--- via LegacyUserGroup wrote: I hope you are not inserting the the added information if it is not in the document. The jurisdictions change over time. In the US what was a county in 1850 may be another county in 1860 and still another county by 1870. The house did not move but the boundaries did. Marie Marie Varrelman Melchiori, Certified Genealogist Emeritus __ __ __ CG or Certified Genealogist is a service mark of the Board for Certification of Genealogists, used under license by Board-certified genealogists after periodic competency evaluation, and the board name is registered in the US Patent & Trademark Office.In a message dated 8/1/2019 6:24:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, wrlinh...@gmail.com writes: I do agree. My standard is: [1. local jurisdiction/repository i.e.township, village, city, etc], 2.County, 3.State, 4.Country and apply to other countries similarly by always using three commas for all locations [usually each has a repository of genealogical data] . The entry might between comma's might be null if I don't have the information. For example born in USA might be ", , , USA". I know I have some research to do but I only record what I have from that source. For folder hierarchy and some naming situations I reverse the order but always hold to 4 elements for location. I don't believe I have ever had an exception. I am sure I will learn about one here. So far this works for me. Bill On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:20 AM Roberta Schwalm wrote: I do the same thing, Shirley. Most of my ancestors are from Scotland, Ireland, England, Germany and a spattering of French. The only difference is I use "province" instead of State. On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:05 PM Shirley Crampton wrote: I use Village, County, State, Country. Hopefully there is no more than 1 village of the same name in the County. If the place is rural then I put the name of the township in the first position. On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:47 PM Connie Laubach wrote: Trying to decide how to input the location names – I have townships that are made up of villages and boroughs. How are others handling it? I have thought of the following: Village, township, county, state, United States or township-village, country, state, United States (I like this as all villages within the township would be listed together) Thank you, Connie. -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Re: [LegacyUG] Slowness
The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email providers will also work but you will have to give them a try.--- Begin Message --- When you click on NAME LIST (from My Toolbar) at the bottom of the popup window listing the names, there is a button at the bottom of the screen OPTIONS. Make sure nothing is checked in the option list that pops up Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 02:12:42 PM EST, Jack Lamphier via LegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> wrote: The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email providers will also work but you will have to give them a try.I dont find that option From: James G. Hermsen via LegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> To: Jack Lamphier via LegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> Cc: James G. Hermsen <jherm...@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 11:24 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Slowness The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email providers will also work but you will have to give them a try.Make sure in your options you turn off include wife's married name. This option slows the process down a lot. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 11:22:08 AM EST, Jack Lamphier via LegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> wrote: The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email providers will also work but you will have to give them a try. I'm not certain if this got posted earlier of not, but since I installed Leg 9, doing a search using the name list has become a chore, because of its impossible time delay. It takes probably 29 seconds, if at all, just to access either the surname or the given name list. Why ? How can it be speed up or in another install the solution? -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ --- End Message --- -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Re: [LegacyUG] Slowness
The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email providers will also work but you will have to give them a try.--- Begin Message --- Make sure in your options you turn off include wife's married name. This option slows the process down a lot. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 11:22:08 AM EST, Jack Lamphier via LegacyUserGroupwrote: The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email providers will also work but you will have to give them a try. I'm not certain if this got posted earlier of not, but since I installed Leg 9, doing a search using the name list has become a chore, because of its impossible time delay. It takes probably 29 seconds, if at all, just to access either the surname or the given name list. Why ? How can it be speed up or in another install the solution? -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ --- End Message --- -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Re: [LegacyUG] Get the latest version 9 update
The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email providers will also work but you will have to give them a try.--- Begin Message --- I upgraded yesterday. I think Thelma was going to do the same when I talked to her at the SAGA meeting. We will all be on the same page. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen8108 Laura Lynne LaneIndianapolis, IN 46217 317-679-1466 cell317-881-4600 land line On Thursday, April 27, 2017 02:29:47 PM EDT, Loren L. Johns via LegacyUserGroupwrote:The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known providers for free email accounts whose emails do not require this conversion include gmail.com and hotmail.com. Many other email providers will also work but you will have to give them a try.I agree with Bob Austen. Version 9 has not been buggy for me. I wouldn't hesitate to upgrade. Loren Johns -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ --- End Message --- -- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Re: [LegacyUG] Entering a sibling without parents
The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by your email provider. If you want to receive messages without conversion to attachments please use a different email address for your subscription.--- Begin Message --- Just enter at the father Mr.Schommer. You can then enter another child. Hoosierly yours, James G. Hermsen 4278 Pisa Court Indianapolis, IN 46235-1016 317-898-1466 P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail From: MikeFryTo: legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 3:49 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Entering a sibling without parents On 25 Feb 2016 3:13 AM, Ed Ladendorf via LegacyUserGroup wrote: > For a long time, because of several strong indications, I was reasonably sure > that Susanna Schommer was a sister to my g-grandmother, Maria Schommer. Now I > finally have proof of that. When I went to enter a sibling for Maria, I > recieved a message saying that siblings cannot be entered without first > having a parent. > I have no information whatsoever as to what their parents' names were, so in > my mind, not entering a sibling would be a sin. She needs to be there so > someone other than myself could have a shot of finding something I couldn't > yet find. So I entered a mother with the given name of "Not", and the surname > of "Known". The sibling was then added successfully. Has anyone else had this > problem, and if so, how did you handle it? In a past existence (Legacy 7.5) it was possible, with a parent-less person on show in the Family tab, to double-click on the empty parents and have the program 'create' blank parents. You could then add a sibling to the original, parent-less person. No parents were actually created. This no longer seems to work under version 8.0 -- Regards, Mike Fry (Jhb) ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com --- End Message --- ___ LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com