Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

2012-08-09 Thread Charani
Tony Rolfe wrote:
> I recently ran a potential problems report and found the following
> situation:
>
> A woman had married and had children.
>
> The 1871 census shows her as a widow with several children, including a
> 3-month-old daughter.  Her husband had died in 1868.
>
> The 1881 census shows her being remarried with two more children born
> after 1871 but before her new marriage and with her previous married
> surname.
>
> So, these may have been adopted, they may be fathered by her new husband
> before the marriage, or she may have had another, as yet undocumented,
> relationship (or two).
>
> The three children born between the death of husband 1 and the marriage
> to husband 2 were linked to husband 1 and showed up as potential
> problems.  I've unlinked the three children from their parents and
> linked them to the mother, but now they each have an unknown father.
> This poor woman shows up as having 5 husbands, three unknowns and two
> with names.  Is there any way to consolidate the 3 unknown spouses into
> one, without actually creating someone called "Unknown"?

It may be there was only one other man involved rather than three but
I would keep them all separate until you know for sure.  The baptismal
register may have the "alleged father" named.  Aternatively the poor
law account books may have reference to the "alleged father" being
pursued for maintenance.  IME, this only happened where the mother was
likely to be a charge on the parish (maintenance was only paid for the
child though, not the mother).  If she was able to support herself or
her family were willing and able to do so (which seems to have
happened much of the time), there won't be anything.

One of my 2x great grandmothers never married but had 5 children.
 From the spacing, it seems there may have been up to three different
men involved.  She's shown with three unknown "husbands".  I've never
been able to find anything at all about who fathered her children.

This is again where I would like to see an alternative to "Male" and
"Husband".

--
Charani (UK)
OPC for Walton, Ashcott, Shapwick,
Greinton and Clutton, SOM
http://wsom-opc.org.uk




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

2012-08-08 Thread familytree
...you may also find it helpful until you ascertain the correct parentage of
each child to KEEP separate daddies for each of the kids but enclose ...for
example Daddy1, Daddy2 Daddy3 in privacy brackets...this keeps  them from
appearing in print but still gives you full control over whether they appear
in print Once exact parentage has been confirmed, the names can be changed
to convict the guilty




---Original Message---

From: JLB
Date: 8/8/2012 9:38:48 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

Maybe all 3 were fathered by different men.snip



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




[LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

2012-08-08 Thread Tony Rolfe
Thanks for the advice so far.

I can't merge these people because they don't appear in the name list.
and I can't delete them as they are just "dummy" entries (RIN 0).

When I right-click them I just get "Add the husband" or "Edit the marriage".

Legacy is displaying them as unknown, which is correct, but is
displaying them as different which we don't know is correct.

I was just hoping to simplify the Pedigree view display and have just
one unknown rather than 3, but it doesn't appear to work that way



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

2012-08-08 Thread JLB
Maybe all 3 were fathered by different men. It can happen. In the
meantime, you can merge the 3 unknowns into 1 unknown using the Merge
function.
---
JL Beeken
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog/

On 8/8/2012 5:24 PM, Tony Rolfe wrote:
> I recently ran a potential problems report and found the following
> situation:
>
> A woman had married and had children.
>
> The 1871 census shows her as a widow with several children, including a
> 3-month-old daughter.  Her husband had died in 1868.
>
> The 1881 census shows her being remarried with two more children born
> after 1871 but before her new marriage and with her previous married
> surname.
>
> So, these may have been adopted, they may be fathered by her new husband
> before the marriage, or she may have had another, as yet undocumented,
> relationship (or two).
>
> The three children born between the death of husband 1 and the marriage
> to husband 2 were linked to husband 1 and showed up as potential
> problems.  I've unlinked the three children from their parents and
> linked them to the mother, but now they each have an unknown father.
> This poor woman shows up as having 5 husbands, three unknowns and two
> with names.  Is there any way to consolidate the 3 unknown spouses into
> one, without actually creating someone called "Unknown"?
>
> Advice would be appreciated
>
> thanks
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5188 - Release Date: 08/08/12
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

2012-08-08 Thread Ron Ferguson
Tony,

I should have mentioned, you could, of course, buy the birth certificates to
see if a father is named on them. Also you may find references to the father
in parish records (birth/baptism), and in court records if an application
for maintenance was made.

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/

-Original Message-
From: Tony Rolfe
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:24 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

I recently ran a potential problems report and found the following
situation:

A woman had married and had children.

The 1871 census shows her as a widow with several children, including a
3-month-old daughter.  Her husband had died in 1868.

The 1881 census shows her being remarried with two more children born
after 1871 but before her new marriage and with her previous married
surname.

So, these may have been adopted, they may be fathered by her new husband
before the marriage, or she may have had another, as yet undocumented,
relationship (or two).

The three children born between the death of husband 1 and the marriage
to husband 2 were linked to husband 1 and showed up as potential
problems.  I've unlinked the three children from their parents and
linked them to the mother, but now they each have an unknown father.
This poor woman shows up as having 5 husbands, three unknowns and two
with names.  Is there any way to consolidate the 3 unknown spouses into
one, without actually creating someone called "Unknown"?

Advice would be appreciated

thanks

Tony





Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Re: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

2012-08-08 Thread Ron Ferguson
Tony,

But from what you say Legacy isn't showing them correctly? It is merely
confirming what you know, or rather don't, that the father is unknown.

I have said many time on this list, the last time being this week, that by
right clicking on the unknown father(s) and deleting they will be deleted
from Family View etc. They will still appear in the Marriage List, but other
than you who will read that list?

Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/


-Original Message-
From: Tony Rolfe
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:24 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

I recently ran a potential problems report and found the following
situation:

A woman had married and had children.

The 1871 census shows her as a widow with several children, including a
3-month-old daughter.  Her husband had died in 1868.

The 1881 census shows her being remarried with two more children born
after 1871 but before her new marriage and with her previous married
surname.

So, these may have been adopted, they may be fathered by her new husband
before the marriage, or she may have had another, as yet undocumented,
relationship (or two).

The three children born between the death of husband 1 and the marriage
to husband 2 were linked to husband 1 and showed up as potential
problems.  I've unlinked the three children from their parents and
linked them to the mother, but now they each have an unknown father.
This poor woman shows up as having 5 husbands, three unknowns and two
with names.  Is there any way to consolidate the 3 unknown spouses into
one, without actually creating someone called "Unknown"?

Advice would be appreciated

thanks

Tony




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




[LegacyUG] a surfeit of husbands

2012-08-08 Thread Tony Rolfe
I recently ran a potential problems report and found the following
situation:

A woman had married and had children.

The 1871 census shows her as a widow with several children, including a
3-month-old daughter.  Her husband had died in 1868.

The 1881 census shows her being remarried with two more children born
after 1871 but before her new marriage and with her previous married
surname.

So, these may have been adopted, they may be fathered by her new husband
before the marriage, or she may have had another, as yet undocumented,
relationship (or two).

The three children born between the death of husband 1 and the marriage
to husband 2 were linked to husband 1 and showed up as potential
problems.  I've unlinked the three children from their parents and
linked them to the mother, but now they each have an unknown father.
This poor woman shows up as having 5 husbands, three unknowns and two
with names.  Is there any way to consolidate the 3 unknown spouses into
one, without actually creating someone called "Unknown"?

Advice would be appreciated

thanks

Tony




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp