Rob Myers wrote: > >> There is so much ambiguity about 'produced works' and 'derived databases' >> that it >> would be far better for the licence to state some example cases directly, >> rather >> than require clarifications hosted on the OSM wiki pages (!). > > They are novel concepts so good examples will help people to understand > them, yes. These should be on the wiki rather than in the licence, > though. Licences don't usually get to interpret themselves. :-) >
Hello I think these examples should be in the licens or in an appendix of the licens. A wiki-page or a website could changed everytime. So today, a garminmap will be an produced work and tomorrow it could be a database and so on. This is arbitrariness and no company or free project can be sure, if there offer is legal. Best regards, aighes -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Garmin-Maps-Produced-Works-tp5496944p5501135.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
