Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))
sri, 21. ruj 2016. u 10:42 Martin Koppenhoefernapisao je: > > I am not sure if publishing the differences would be ok, but looking at > them to decide where to survey is ok I think. > This service would be a personal tool for people to use, so no publishing. Although you could share the link. I'm not sure what constitutes as publishing. > In your above sentence, rather than "which osm data is wrong" it should be > "where osm data is different". > That's right. Janko ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
[OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))
sri, 21. ruj 2016. u 08:54 joost schouppenapisao je: > > Using copyrighted material to spot errors in OSM is still copyright > violation (well, a specialist in copyright should confirm that). > This is an interesting case. I think we are allowed to spot errors using closed sources, but we can not use the source to say what is the right solution. It's as if we are looking for differences between models, and then using only the difference data to look further into the matter using other sources (survey, Bing..). This is interesting to me because I was thinking about making a service that lists differences between OSM data and outside closed source data, and then showing only what is different. Then people would use that "difference data" to direct their mapping efforts. For example, take closed data about opening hours, compare to OSM, and only show which OSM data is wrong according to the closed source. Then mappers would go survey the shop. Would this be OK? Janko ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] MAPS.ME combining OSM data and non-OSM data?
Maps.me made an announcement in the last update that they are using Booking.com data to show hotels and allow reserving hotel rooms from within the app. I doubt Booking.com released their data with a permissive license. Janko Mihelić pet, 8. srp 2016. u 14:54 Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> napisao je: > According to [1] if someone combines non-horizontal layers together, > the results must be shared under the ODBL. > > From my investigation it appears that the MAPS.ME app [2] is combining > OSM hotels with non-OSM hotels. > > https://tianjara.net/hosted/maps.me-1.png is a screenshot from the > app. Hotel A appears in the app, > but as far as I can tell was never in OSM but rather one of the hotels > they've added to their app from Booking.com. Hotel B is from OSM. > > This is the area https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-33.87758/151.20447 > > There are other examples of this too like this hotel > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196622136 which in the app shows up > next to their supplemented data like this > https://tianjara.net/hosted/maps.me-2.png > > Am I correct that in order to be complaint with the license MAPS.ME > either need to make this data available under the ODBL or remove all > OSM hotels from their app? > > [1] > http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines/Horizontal_Map_Layers_-_Guideline#Examples_of_where_you_DO_need_to_share_your_non-OpenStreetMap_data > [2] version 6.2.2-Google Data version: 160621 > > ___ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Fwd: using OSM in our commercial application
What if I am selling an application that uses OSM tiles for background, and users of the application can put their data over the background. So, I am distributing the application with the osm tiles, but users aren't distributing their data. Does this mean that they can do that, until they decide to put their data with the tiles online? Thanks, Janko. 2012/5/15 Mayeul Kauffmann mayeul.kauffm...@free.fr Hi, Le dimanche 13 mai 2012 à 18:47 +0400, Алексей Бадьянов a écrit : Dear legal talkers, we are currently developing Scheduling software that should show vehicle routes and GPS positions on the map. Can we use Open Street Map for this in case we are not opening the sources to the public? The question seems clear enough to me. Please note that this is not a legal advice (just a forum of users). You will find answers to many of your questions here: http://http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ In particular: If I have data derived from OSM data, do I have to distribute it? The licence does not force you to distribute or make any data available. But if you do choose to distribute it, or anything derived from it, it must be under the same licence terms as the OSM data. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Common_licence_interpretations I want to use OSM data with my GPS routing/mapping/other application. Do I have licence the application under the OSM licence? If the application is separate and independent, you do not need to licence it under the OSM licence. However, if you distribute OSM derived data with the application, that must be distributed under the OSM licence. (note the warning: The interpretations expressed on this page are the opinions of their contributors, and may be disputed by some OSM mappers and copyright holders.) My understanding is as follows: Probably, for your application, you are going to do two things: 1- build a software (copyrights and license are not at all affected by the fact that you use OSM data). When you say the sources, if you mean the source code of the application, then you are in this case: just use OSM data without giving away your application source code. The licence is meant to facilitate commercial uses of the data. 2- convert/transform/improve OSM data for your application. As long as the new data remains within your company, data rights are not at all affected by the fact that you use OSM data, so you do not have to give anything. If you distribute modified/combined data, then there are some cases where you'll have to give some rights to the recipients of the data (but it is not possible to say more from what you say). Hope this helps, Mayeul many thanks for you help ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk