[OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))
sri, 21. ruj 2016. u 08:54 joost schouppe napisao je: > > Using copyrighted material to spot errors in OSM is still copyright > violation (well, a specialist in copyright should confirm that). > This is an interesting case. I think we are allowed to spot errors using closed sources, but we can not use the source to say what is the right solution. It's as if we are looking for differences between models, and then using only the difference data to look further into the matter using other sources (survey, Bing..). This is interesting to me because I was thinking about making a service that lists differences between OSM data and outside closed source data, and then showing only what is different. Then people would use that "difference data" to direct their mapping efforts. For example, take closed data about opening hours, compare to OSM, and only show which OSM data is wrong according to the closed source. Then mappers would go survey the shop. Would this be OK? Janko ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))
sent from a phone > Il giorno 21 set 2016, alle ore 09:54, Janko Mihelić ha > scritto: > > and only show which OSM data is wrong according to the closed source. Then > mappers would go survey the shop. Would this be OK? I am not sure if publishing the differences would be ok, but looking at them to decide where to survey is ok I think. In your above sentence, rather than "which osm data is wrong" it should be "where osm data is different". cheers, Martin ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))
sri, 21. ruj 2016. u 10:42 Martin Koppenhoefer napisao je: > > I am not sure if publishing the differences would be ok, but looking at > them to decide where to survey is ok I think. > This service would be a personal tool for people to use, so no publishing. Although you could share the link. I'm not sure what constitutes as publishing. > In your above sentence, rather than "which osm data is wrong" it should be > "where osm data is different". > That's right. Janko ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk