The LWG is in the process of discussing its concerns with CC and hopes
to be able to clarify things soon. Some of the concerns are 4.0
specific, some would in principle apply to the previous versions too.
Simon
Am 07.12.2016 um 20:21 schrieb Rory McCann:
> Hi all,
>
> The wiki page on ODbL combatibility[1] says, for CC-BY 4.0: "status of
> CC-BY 4.0 is still under consideration by the LWG". Is there any update
> on this consideration?
>
> There's the obvious attribution requirment with all CC-BY licences,
> leaving that aside, my reading of the legal-talk@ list[2] implies that
> there is problems with 4.0 the database rights, right? Is that the only
> problem with it?
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility
> [2] e.g. this email
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2015-May/008136.html
>
>
> ___
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
