Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Multiple license declaration

2011-06-29 Thread TimSC
I moved the multiple licensing site out of beta. You cannot not revoke 
licenses once they are accepted. I hope it will be useful.


http://timsc.dev.openstreetmap.org/extralicenses/

Tim


___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Multiple license declaration

2011-06-26 Thread Jim Brown
Legal issues aside, map data (and ongoing versions of map data edited by 
different individuals) is intertwined.  Which is to say that people build on 
the contributions of others both in elements that co-exist and elements that 
are direct descendants of each other.

In the end, it's like a book written and edited by a community of authors, each 
building on, and deriving from, each others work.

My suspicion is that a system where each user can choose a different licence 
(or set of licences) for their contribution would either fall apart (as some 
entities would need to be rolled back to the last version compatible with the 
current use case and other items would co-exist under different licences as 
different entities in the db).

I am supposing that both editors and extractors would specify a license and the 
content (shown for editing or extracted to a file) would be dynamically 
filtered from all the data and versions available.  In the case of editors, if 
an earlier/compatible version is edited it would imply a fork of the item under 
edit at the prior version.

I may not actually understand what you intend as a result of this (from a 
practical, data management stand point) so my concern may be misplaced.

Jim Brown -CTO CloudMade

On 26 Jun 2011, at 16:39, "TimSC"  wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I wanted to create a way for individual users to relicense their data 
> under difference licenses. Since OSM and derivatives are OAuth capable, 
> it is possible to authenticate a user and get them to agree to a 
> license. This can be stored in a machine readable format. I hope this 
> will be useful in transferring data between forks, particularly if a 
> significant number of people chose permissive licenses. From what I can 
> tell, most mappers pretty much agree to any license they are presented 
> with. :)
> 
> http://timsc.dev.openstreetmap.org/extralicenses/
> 
> At this stage, I was hoping for ideas for improvements of the legal 
> issues. Any thoughts?
> 
> TimSC
> 
> 
> ___
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


[OSM-legal-talk] Multiple license declaration

2011-06-26 Thread TimSC

Hi all,

I wanted to create a way for individual users to relicense their data 
under difference licenses. Since OSM and derivatives are OAuth capable, 
it is possible to authenticate a user and get them to agree to a 
license. This can be stored in a machine readable format. I hope this 
will be useful in transferring data between forks, particularly if a 
significant number of people chose permissive licenses. From what I can 
tell, most mappers pretty much agree to any license they are presented 
with. :)


http://timsc.dev.openstreetmap.org/extralicenses/

At this stage, I was hoping for ideas for improvements of the legal 
issues. Any thoughts?


TimSC


___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk