[OSM-legal-talk] list of user IDs having accepted the contributor terms
as part of the voluntary relicensing phase of the move to ODbL, existing contributors have had the ability to voluntarily accept the contributor terms. to help the community assess the impact of the relicensing it was planned to make the information about which accounts have agreed available. this will help with the evaluation of the process and analysis of any consequent data loss, should the switch be made. at the last LWG meeting, having been put to the board for approval, it was decided to make this available [1], and i'm pleased to announce that this list is now up [2] and being regularly refreshed from the database every hour. i look forward to seeing the new analyses, visualisations and tools that can be built using this data. cheers, matt [1] https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_86hf7fnqg8 [2] http://planet.openstreetmap.org/users_agreed/users_agreed.txt ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] list of user IDs having accepted the contributor terms
Any info on who, or at least what percentage of people, clicked on the "all my edits are public domain" checkbox? Just curious. Cheers, Greg On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Matt Amos wrote: > as part of the voluntary relicensing phase of the move to ODbL, > existing contributors have had the ability to voluntarily accept the > contributor terms. to help the community assess the impact of the > relicensing it was planned to make the information about which > accounts have agreed available. this will help with the evaluation of > the process and analysis of any consequent data loss, should the > switch be made. at the last LWG meeting, having been put to the board > for approval, it was decided to make this available [1], and i'm > pleased to announce that this list is now up [2] and being regularly > refreshed from the database every hour. > > i look forward to seeing the new analyses, visualisations and tools > that can be built using this data. > > cheers, > > matt > > [1] https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_86hf7fnqg8 > [2] http://planet.openstreetmap.org/users_agreed/users_agreed.txt > > ___ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] list of user IDs having accepted the contributor terms
If the contributor terms change, will there be two separate lists kept, or does the list get reset, or what? On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Matt Amos wrote: > as part of the voluntary relicensing phase of the move to ODbL, > existing contributors have had the ability to voluntarily accept the > contributor terms. to help the community assess the impact of the > relicensing it was planned to make the information about which > accounts have agreed available. this will help with the evaluation of > the process and analysis of any consequent data loss, should the > switch be made. at the last LWG meeting, having been put to the board > for approval, it was decided to make this available [1], and i'm > pleased to announce that this list is now up [2] and being regularly > refreshed from the database every hour. > > i look forward to seeing the new analyses, visualisations and tools > that can be built using this data. > > cheers, > > matt > > [1] https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_86hf7fnqg8 > [2] http://planet.openstreetmap.org/users_agreed/users_agreed.txt > > ___ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] list of user IDs having accepted the contributor terms
Hi, Anthony wrote: If the contributor terms change, will there be two separate lists kept, or does the list get reset, or what? No, the will not be reset. If the terms should be changed, then we will have two groups of contributors, one having agreed to terms "A" and one having agreed to terms "B". As long as any future action by OSMF is within the intersection of "A" and "B" - and this is what it would have to be -, it does not matter who signed which. All suggestions that I have heard of were about narrowing down the contributor terms, i.e. "B" would be a subset of "A", so that the intersection of both would always be "B". Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk