RE: [L-I] Re: my participation on L-I

2001-01-13 Thread Mark Jones



>
> Fire away.
>
> Yoshie

I'm on the following lists: this, Lou's, deep-eco, wsn and the crashlist. For the
past couple of weeks I've been scanning the archives of other lists, and I haven't
felt the urge to join or participate in them. I may rejoin Rob's list or perhaps
he'll be good enough to do it for me and save me the bother, altho I would prefer
not to discuss Bhaskar unless someone can first identify for me the name of one
practising and fairly well thought of scientist in any major discipline like
physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy etc, or sub-division thereof, who even knows
of the existence of Roy Bhaskar let alone thinks him of any worth whatsoever.

That's all I'm doing right now and even that is too much. This means, as far as I
can see, that unless you contribute to l-i more it is not likely we are going to be
discussing anything much. I'm already doing more than I meant to anyway. This does
not mean that I do not like to talk with you or don't respect your mind. But I'm not
initiating anything right now, so you better unpack your own torpedos (not Russian
ones, I hope, which are designed on the uroborus principle).

Mark





___
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international



[L-I] Re: my participation on L-I

2001-01-13 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi

>Finally, if L-I is to continue at all (I see little point in this 
>List at present)
>it ought to do what it was set up to do, ie, debate revolutionary theory.

Fire away.

Yoshie

___
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international