Re: time for syslog-ng? (was Re: klogd)

[Greg Schafer]

Dan Nicholson wrote:

 I just read that Fedora has decided to take the plunge and replace
 sysklogd as their default syslog.
 
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue94#head-f55df1c4e39b27afc053b435a85088e5aec25a84
 
 Anyway, they've decided to use rsyslog since it maintains a compatible
 interface to sysklogd and the conf file wouldn't have to change.
 
 http://www.rsyslog.com/
 
 I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems promising and active.

Indeed, but IMHO some of the Fedora rationale is questionable ie: dead
upstream is not quite true. That is, if you can believe the sysklogd
maintainer :-)

http://lists.infodrom.org/infodrom-sysklogd/2007/0011.html

Regards
Greg
-- 
http://www.diy-linux.org/

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: LFS is now using the new stylesheets

[M.Canales.es]

El Viernes, 6 de Julio de 2007 01:21, Dan Nicholson escribió:

 +ifdef V
 +Q =
 +else
 +Q = @
 +endif
 +

Yea, I saw something like that on the BusyBox makefiles the other day. Looks 
good to me.

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:   http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:   http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page