Re: Plans for LFS-6.3
El Jueves, 19 de Julio de 2007 00:13, Matthew Burgess escribió: I did a full final system testsuite run with the latest package updates (including a repackaged version of the latest iproute2 package). No failures there. I've not done an ICA/farce build though, so that would certainly be useful. ICA/farce reports that the next files differ on iteration1Viteration2 but not in iteration2Viteration3: /etc/ld.so.cache /usr/include/c++/4.1.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/stdc++.h.gch/0{0,2}g.gch /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1plus The cc1{,plus} differ was reported some time ago, but the issue was not resoled: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-February/059028.html The build has been done on a new AMD64 machine using Ubuntu-6.06.1 (linux 2.6.15-28-k7 SMP PREEMPT) as host. Glibc testsuite sow this errors in iteration1: posix/tst-vfork3.out nptl/tst-cancell.out but iteration{2,3} show only: nptl/tst-cancell.out Binutils and GCC testsuites are identical on all iterations. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: LiveCD Users
1) What version of the CD do you use/have? The current version as of 2 months ago (I think it was pre6.2?) 2) What do you use the CD most for? Building LFS - Getting setup/configuration ideas - Rescue CD 3) What are the most useful parts of the CD to you? The setup/configuration ideas. It proved invaluable on my last LFS build when I switched to a full unicode greek-locales system. It has also proven its worth many times over on various configuration issues (X windows, networking, etc.) 4) What is the most annoying or useless bits of the CD? Haven't found anything so far. 5) What would you change/add/improve? Frankly, you guys are doing an excellent job and I really appreciate it. I've been using LFS/BLFS for about 4 years now and am very happy with it. I get to build my system the way I like it, with the applications I want to use. I've tried occasionally other distros (it takes me a few days to completely build up a new LFS/BLFS system) but I end up not using them since there always is something that annoys me and it would take more time than I can spare to fix it. Keep up the good work. I really appreciate it. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Plans for LFS-6.3
On 7/22/07, M.Canales.es [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El Jueves, 19 de Julio de 2007 00:13, Matthew Burgess escribió: I did a full final system testsuite run with the latest package updates (including a repackaged version of the latest iproute2 package). No failures there. I've not done an ICA/farce build though, so that would certainly be useful. ICA/farce reports that the next files differ on iteration1Viteration2 but not in iteration2Viteration3: /etc/ld.so.cache /usr/include/c++/4.1.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/stdc++.h.gch/0{0,2}g.gch /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1plus The cc1{,plus} differ was reported some time ago, but the issue was not resoled: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-February/059028.html Yeah, those look normal. I think you can get the cc1 and cc1plus differences to go away if you strip at build time. I.e., `make LDFLAGS=-s'. Glibc testsuite sow this errors in iteration1: posix/tst-vfork3.out nptl/tst-cancell.out but iteration{2,3} show only: nptl/tst-cancell.out I don't know about tst-vfork3, but tst-cancel1 will fail on gcc-4.1. http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-July/059606.html Do you still have the output from tst-vfork3? Thanks, Manuel. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Plans for LFS-6.3
El Domingo, 22 de Julio de 2007 20:15, Dan Nicholson escribió: Do you still have the output from tst-vfork3? Do you meant the log output on the posix/tst-vfork3.out file? If the later, I will need to do a new build but stopping it before Glibc sources and build directory deletion. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page