Re: Plans for LFS-6.3

2007-07-22 Thread M.Canales.es
El Jueves, 19 de Julio de 2007 00:13, Matthew Burgess escribió:

 I did a full final system testsuite run with the latest package updates
 (including a repackaged version of the latest iproute2 package).  No
 failures there.  I've not done an ICA/farce build though, so that would
 certainly be useful.

ICA/farce reports that the next files differ on iteration1Viteration2 but not 
in iteration2Viteration3:

/etc/ld.so.cache
/usr/include/c++/4.1.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/stdc++.h.gch/0{0,2}g.gch
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1plus

The cc1{,plus} differ was reported some time ago, but the issue was not 
resoled:

http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-February/059028.html

The build has been done on a new AMD64 machine using Ubuntu-6.06.1 (linux 
2.6.15-28-k7 SMP PREEMPT) as host.

Glibc testsuite sow this errors in iteration1:

posix/tst-vfork3.out
nptl/tst-cancell.out

but iteration{2,3} show only:

nptl/tst-cancell.out

Binutils and GCC testsuites are identical on all iterations.


-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:   http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:   http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: LiveCD Users

2007-07-22 Thread A. Drosos
1) What version of the CD do you use/have?
The current version as of 2 months ago (I think it was pre6.2?)

2) What do you use the CD most for?
Building LFS - Getting setup/configuration ideas - Rescue CD

3) What are the most useful parts of the CD to you?
The setup/configuration ideas. It proved invaluable on my last LFS build
when I switched to a full unicode greek-locales system. It has also proven
its worth many times over on various configuration issues (X windows,
networking, etc.)

4) What is the most annoying or useless bits of the CD?
Haven't found anything so far. 

5) What would you change/add/improve?
Frankly, you guys are doing an excellent job and I really appreciate it.
I've been using LFS/BLFS for about 4 years now and am very happy with it. I
get to build my system the way I like it, with the applications I want to
use. I've tried occasionally other distros (it takes me a few days to
completely build up a new LFS/BLFS system) but I end up not using them since
there always is something that annoys me and it would take more time than I
can spare to fix it.

Keep up the good work. I really appreciate it. 

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Plans for LFS-6.3

2007-07-22 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/22/07, M.Canales.es [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 El Jueves, 19 de Julio de 2007 00:13, Matthew Burgess escribió:

  I did a full final system testsuite run with the latest package updates
  (including a repackaged version of the latest iproute2 package).  No
  failures there.  I've not done an ICA/farce build though, so that would
  certainly be useful.

 ICA/farce reports that the next files differ on iteration1Viteration2 but not
 in iteration2Viteration3:

 /etc/ld.so.cache
 /usr/include/c++/4.1.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/stdc++.h.gch/0{0,2}g.gch
 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1
 /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1plus

 The cc1{,plus} differ was reported some time ago, but the issue was not
 resoled:

 http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-February/059028.html

Yeah, those look normal. I think you can get the cc1 and cc1plus
differences to go away if you strip at build time. I.e., `make
LDFLAGS=-s'.

 Glibc testsuite sow this errors in iteration1:

 posix/tst-vfork3.out
 nptl/tst-cancell.out

 but iteration{2,3} show only:

 nptl/tst-cancell.out

I don't know about tst-vfork3, but tst-cancel1 will fail on gcc-4.1.

http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-July/059606.html

Do you still have the output from tst-vfork3?

Thanks, Manuel.

--
Dan
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Plans for LFS-6.3

2007-07-22 Thread M.Canales.es
El Domingo, 22 de Julio de 2007 20:15, Dan Nicholson escribió:


 Do you still have the output from tst-vfork3?


Do you meant the log output on the posix/tst-vfork3.out file?

If the later, I will need to do a new build but stopping it before Glibc 
sources and build directory deletion. 

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:   http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES:   http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page