On 12/03/2011 09:39 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > This question still stands. I was not able to find anything readily > available. > > -- DJ Lucas What a disaster! Even RedHat hasn't got this far yet. There is more we need to do to GLibc than install the headers. I'm suggesting that we follow suit, as the rest of the distros have, and re-export the symbols in LFS and continue to install the headers until a *complete* replacement is available.
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/src/patchsets/glibc/2.14.1/0070_all_glibc-2.14-rpc-export.patch Also, OpenSSL will likely be a requirement soon for TI-RPC's crypto libs. As far as BLFS is concerned, we can make the assumption that the eratta was followed with the above changes made (glibc re-installed for people who have already built LFS-7.0), or just stick with what is there now and delete the static libs for TI-RPC, but that does mean that NIS is completely dead (and the shared TI-RPC is still potentially broken). -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
