Re: [lfs-dev] grammo - lfs75 - ch9 reboot ?
akhiezer wrote: ref: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.5/chapter09/reboot.html Now that we have said that, lets move on to booting s/lets/let's/ ? (let's == let us). (Noticed it while working with 7.4; and is still there in 7.5; seems to be in several - didn't check 'em all - rels back to incl at least 6.1 ). Or is that deemed to be not a typo/grammatical-err? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] grammo - lfs75 - ch9 reboot ?
On Mar 7, 2014, at 12:22 PM, akhiezer wrote: Now that we have said that, lets move on to booting s/lets/let's/ ? (let's == let us). Probably remove let's or let us altogether... then it is this: Now that we have said that, move on to booting Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] grammo - lfs75 - ch9 reboot ?
akhiezer wrote: ref: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.5/chapter09/reboot.html Now that we have said that, lets move on to booting s/lets/let's/ ? (let's == let us). (Noticed it while working with 7.4; and is still there in 7.5; seems to be in several - didn't check 'em all - rels back to incl at least 6.1 ). Or is that deemed to be not a typo/grammatical-err? Yes it is a grammar error. Use the svn blame command: $ svn blame chapter09/reboot.xml |grep lets 7228 manuel paraNow that we have said that, lets move ... That was done 12/18/05. It went back to rev 4648 (02/19/05) and that was brought over from the testing book we had at the time. Finding the testing branch, it looks like it was first added at rev 4451 (12/22/04). :) I'll fix it at next commit. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
