Re: [lfs-dev] gcc9 test log
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 06:00:06PM +0200, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2019, 10:04 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via lfs- > dev: > > > > Thanks a lot. When gcc9 gets released, these numbers can be listed for > > informative purposes even though we will probably not recommend building > > everything. > > > >-- Bruce > [...] > > -- > Thomas > > *) to the native speakers: is 'this numbers' here correct or should it > read 'these numbers' ? > Like Bruce wrote above. Use 'this' for a single item, 'these' for more than one. ĸen -- With a few red lights, a few old bits, we made the place to sweat. No matter what we get out of this, I know, I know we'll never forget. Smoke on the water, a fire in the sky. Smoke, on the water. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] gcc9 test log
Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2019, 10:04 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via lfs- dev: > On 4/24/19 12:34 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2019, 00:21 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via lfs- > > dev: > > > On 4/24/19 12:05 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > just for interest/fun I build a "full featured" gcc-9 including ada > > > > and all other available frontends. Note that there is a new language > > > > frontend for 'D' :-) > > > > > > > > All in all, it does not look bad, what do you think? > > > > > > Yes, looks pretty good. How long did it take to doo all that? Build > > > and installed sizes? > > > > > > -- Bruce > > > > My scripts reported > > > > INFO : 00:17:41 +--- > > INFO : 00:17:41 | Module ... gcc9 > > INFO : 00:17:41 | Duration . 13855 seconds > > INFO : 00:17:41 | SBU .. 144.32 > > INFO : 00:17:41 | Build size ... 12.5 GB > > INFO : 00:17:41 | Test size + 1.1 GB > > INFO : 00:17:41 | Bin size . 3.8 GB > > INFO : 00:17:41 | Total size ... 17.4 GB > > INFO : 00:17:41 +--- > > > > so it last nearly 4 hours using 4 cores in a VM with 4GB RAM. The > > 'Total size' includes everything, source, binaries and logfiles and so > > on. > > Thanks a lot. When gcc9 gets released, these numbers can be listed for > informative purposes even though we will probably not recommend building > everything. > >-- Bruce Yes, its an rough estimate. The above numbers (the duration) includes the test run (make -k check). Without, duration went down to 7464sec (77.75 SBU). And all this*) numbers are for a multilib-enabled gcc (m32 as well as mx32). A native 32bit gcc (of course non-multilib) lasts 5744sec (59.83 SBU) to build without check, but also including all available languages. -- Thomas *) to the native speakers: is 'this numbers' here correct or should it read 'these numbers' ? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] gcc9 test log
On 4/24/19 12:34 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2019, 00:21 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via lfs- dev: On 4/24/19 12:05 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: Hi, just for interest/fun I build a "full featured" gcc-9 including ada and all other available frontends. Note that there is a new language frontend for 'D' :-) All in all, it does not look bad, what do you think? Yes, looks pretty good. How long did it take to doo all that? Build and installed sizes? -- Bruce My scripts reported INFO : 00:17:41 +--- INFO : 00:17:41 | Module ... gcc9 INFO : 00:17:41 | Duration . 13855 seconds INFO : 00:17:41 | SBU .. 144.32 INFO : 00:17:41 | Build size ... 12.5 GB INFO : 00:17:41 | Test size + 1.1 GB INFO : 00:17:41 | Bin size . 3.8 GB INFO : 00:17:41 | Total size ... 17.4 GB INFO : 00:17:41 +--- so it last nearly 4 hours using 4 cores in a VM with 4GB RAM. The 'Total size' includes everything, source, binaries and logfiles and so on. Thanks a lot. When gcc9 gets released, these numbers can be listed for informative purposes even though we will probably not recommend building everything. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] gcc9 test log
Am Mittwoch, den 24.04.2019, 00:21 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via lfs- dev: > On 4/24/19 12:05 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > just for interest/fun I build a "full featured" gcc-9 including ada > > and all other available frontends. Note that there is a new language > > frontend for 'D' :-) > > > > All in all, it does not look bad, what do you think? > > Yes, looks pretty good. How long did it take to doo all that? Build > and installed sizes? > >-- Bruce My scripts reported INFO : 00:17:41 +--- INFO : 00:17:41 | Module ... gcc9 INFO : 00:17:41 | Duration . 13855 seconds INFO : 00:17:41 | SBU .. 144.32 INFO : 00:17:41 | Build size ... 12.5 GB INFO : 00:17:41 | Test size + 1.1 GB INFO : 00:17:41 | Bin size . 3.8 GB INFO : 00:17:41 | Total size ... 17.4 GB INFO : 00:17:41 +--- so it last nearly 4 hours using 4 cores in a VM with 4GB RAM. The 'Total size' includes everything, source, binaries and logfiles and so on. -- Thomas -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] gcc9 test log
On 4/24/19 12:05 AM, Thomas Trepl via lfs-dev wrote: Hi, just for interest/fun I build a "full featured" gcc-9 including ada and all other available frontends. Note that there is a new language frontend for 'D' :-) All in all, it does not look bad, what do you think? Yes, looks pretty good. How long did it take to doo all that? Build and installed sizes? -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-dev] gcc9 test log
Hi, just for interest/fun I build a "full featured" gcc-9 including ada and all other available frontends. Note that there is a new language frontend for 'D' :-) All in all, it does not look bad, what do you think? -- Thomas cat <<'EOF' | LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: trunk revision 270485 === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === gcc tests === Running target unix FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr57193.c scan-assembler-times movdqa 2 === gcc Summary === # of expected passes139578 # of unexpected failures1 # of expected failures 536 # of unsupported tests 2146 /home/lfs/tmp/gcc9/build/gcc-9-20190421/build/gcc/xgcc version 9.0.1 20190421 (experimental) (GCC) === gdc tests === Running target unix === gdc Summary === # of expected passes29394 /home/lfs/tmp/gcc9/build/gcc-9-20190421/build/gcc/gdc version 9.0.1 20190421 (experimental) (GCC) === gfortran tests === Running target unix === gfortran Summary === # of expected passes50213 # of expected failures 188 # of unsupported tests 94 /home/lfs/tmp/gcc9/build/gcc-9-20190421/build/gcc/gfortran version 9.0.1 20190421 (experimental) (GCC) === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary === # of expected passes134395 # of expected failures 528 # of unsupported tests 5871 /home/lfs/tmp/gcc9/build/gcc-9-20190421/build/gcc/xg++ version 9.0.1 20190421 (experimental) (GCC) === gnat tests === Running target unix === gnat Summary === # of expected passes2981 # of expected failures 23 # of unsupported tests 3 /home/lfs/tmp/gcc9/build/gcc-9-20190421/build/gcc/gnatmake version 9.0.1 20190421 (experimental) === go tests === Running target unix FAIL: ./index0-out.go execution, -O0 -g -fno-var-tracking-assignments === go Summary === # of expected passes7349 # of unexpected failures1 # of expected failures 1 # of untested testcases 6 # of unsupported tests 1 /home/lfs/tmp/gcc9/build/gcc-9-20190421/build/gcc/gccgo version 9.0.1 20190421 (experimental) (GCC) === obj-c++ tests === Running target unix === obj-c++ Summary === # of expected passes1458 # of expected failures 10 # of unsupported tests 77 /home/lfs/tmp/gcc9/build/gcc-9-20190421/build/gcc/xg++ version 9.0.1 20190421 (experimental) (GCC) === objc tests === Running target unix === objc Summary === # of expected passes2797 # of expected failures 6 # of unsupported tests 68 /home/lfs/tmp/gcc9/build/gcc-9-20190421/build/gcc/xgcc version 9.0.1 20190421 (experimental) (GCC) === gotools tests === === gotools Summary === # of expected passes419 # of untested testcases 190 === libatomic tests === Running target unix === libatomic Summary === # of expected passes54 === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes2214 === libgo tests === Running target unix FAIL: runtime/pprof === libgo Summary for unix === # of expected passes183 # of unexpected failures1 Running target unix/-m32 === libgo Summary for unix/-m32 === # of expected passes184 Running target unix/-mx32 FAIL: runtime/pprof === libgo Summary for unix/-mx32 === # of expected passes183 # of unexpected failures1 === libgo Summary === # of expected passes550 # of unexpected failures2 === libgomp tests === Running target unix === libgomp Summary === # of expected passes6499 # of expected failures 4 # of unsupported tests 349 === libitm tests === Running target unix === libitm Summary === # of expected passes42 # of expected failures 3 # of unsupported tests 1 === libphobos tests === Running target unix === libphobos Summary === # of expected passes750 === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/2.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_env.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_locale.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_
