Re: [lfs-dev] lfs-systemd svn 6.75.Util-linux-2.33
On 12/4/2018 2:18 PM, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote: > > No, something out of the ordinary. Came up when the build order was changed > last time. Think procps links to systemd and needs the util-linux logs or > something. Give me a bit and I'll confirm what it was. Sorry so late. I dug through logs and I can't find anything. Sorry for the noise. --DJ -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] lfs-systemd svn 6.75.Util-linux-2.33
On December 3, 2018 5:26:10 PM CST, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
wrote:
>On 12/03/2018 04:42 PM, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote:
>> On December 3, 2018 11:12:34 AM CST, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
> wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2018 10:02 AM, Thanos Baloukas via lfs-dev wrote:
It has
rm -vf /usr/include/{blkid,libmount,uuid}
We don't create those symlinks now. It should be
rm -vf /usr/lib/lib{blkid,mount,uuid}*
Without the above the util-linux installation leaves in /usr/lib
symlinks to /tools/lib
>>>
>>> Those links are now only created in the systemd book. We should
>>> probably remove those at the end of the systemd section and remove
>the
>>> reference in utils-linux.
>>>
>>> If we decide to leave the rm command in util-linux, it should be
>marked
>>>
>>> systemd onle, even if it is a null operation in the sysv version.
>>>
>>> Douglas? DJ?
>>>
>>> I can do it if you don't have time.
>>>
>>
>> I think it would be best to do so in util-linux, but I cannot recall
>exactly why. Procps or psmisc also needs the libraries available I
>think. Of course, both of those are autotools IIRC, so we can get away
>with a -L/tools/lib in LDFLAGS, I think. Only Systemd is difficult
>because it uses the pkg-config values.
>
>If there was a problem with Procps or psmisc, wouldn't it show up in
>the
>sysV book? The symlinks are created in systemd and that isn't built
>with the sysV book.
>
>Also, psmisc is built well before systemd.
>
> -- Bruce
>--
>http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
>FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
>Unsubscribe: See the above information page
No, something out of the ordinary. Came up when the build order was changed
last time. Think procps links to systemd and needs the util-linux logs or
something. Give me a bit and I'll confirm what it was.
--DJ
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] lfs-systemd svn 6.75.Util-linux-2.33
On 12/03/2018 04:42 PM, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote:
On December 3, 2018 11:12:34 AM CST, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
wrote:
On 12/03/2018 10:02 AM, Thanos Baloukas via lfs-dev wrote:
It has
rm -vf /usr/include/{blkid,libmount,uuid}
We don't create those symlinks now. It should be
rm -vf /usr/lib/lib{blkid,mount,uuid}*
Without the above the util-linux installation leaves in /usr/lib
symlinks to /tools/lib
Those links are now only created in the systemd book. We should
probably remove those at the end of the systemd section and remove the
reference in utils-linux.
If we decide to leave the rm command in util-linux, it should be marked
systemd onle, even if it is a null operation in the sysv version.
Douglas? DJ?
I can do it if you don't have time.
I think it would be best to do so in util-linux, but I cannot recall exactly
why. Procps or psmisc also needs the libraries available I think. Of course,
both of those are autotools IIRC, so we can get away with a -L/tools/lib in
LDFLAGS, I think. Only Systemd is difficult because it uses the pkg-config
values.
If there was a problem with Procps or psmisc, wouldn't it show up in the
sysV book? The symlinks are created in systemd and that isn't built
with the sysV book.
Also, psmisc is built well before systemd.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] lfs-systemd svn 6.75.Util-linux-2.33
On December 3, 2018 11:12:34 AM CST, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
wrote:
>On 12/03/2018 10:02 AM, Thanos Baloukas via lfs-dev wrote:
>> It has
>>
>> rm -vf /usr/include/{blkid,libmount,uuid}
>>
>> We don't create those symlinks now. It should be
>>
>> rm -vf /usr/lib/lib{blkid,mount,uuid}*
>>
>> Without the above the util-linux installation leaves in /usr/lib
>> symlinks to /tools/lib
>
>Those links are now only created in the systemd book. We should
>probably remove those at the end of the systemd section and remove the
>reference in utils-linux.
>
>If we decide to leave the rm command in util-linux, it should be marked
>
>systemd onle, even if it is a null operation in the sysv version.
>
>Douglas? DJ?
>
>I can do it if you don't have time.
>
I think it would be best to do so in util-linux, but I cannot recall exactly
why. Procps or psmisc also needs the libraries available I think. Of course,
both of those are autotools IIRC, so we can get away with a -L/tools/lib in
LDFLAGS, I think. Only Systemd is difficult because it uses the pkg-config
values.
--DJ
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-dev] lfs-systemd svn 6.75.Util-linux-2.33
On 12/03/2018 10:02 AM, Thanos Baloukas via lfs-dev wrote:
It has
rm -vf /usr/include/{blkid,libmount,uuid}
We don't create those symlinks now. It should be
rm -vf /usr/lib/lib{blkid,mount,uuid}*
Without the above the util-linux installation leaves in /usr/lib
symlinks to /tools/lib
Those links are now only created in the systemd book. We should
probably remove those at the end of the systemd section and remove the
reference in utils-linux.
If we decide to leave the rm command in util-linux, it should be marked
systemd onle, even if it is a null operation in the sysv version.
Douglas? DJ?
I can do it if you don't have time.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
