Re: [lfs-support] Can Regular Users Contribute?

2016-08-27 Thread Rob
lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
> (Top-posting as I gather that can be useful re accessibility stuff:
is that correct?)

It doesn't matter to me personally. A lot of lists for vi folks do top post 
though.
I strike a compromise between the ones that do and the ones like this which 
bottom post by quoting.
Anyway, as for hardware, I'm afraid I'm not much of an expert on that 
particular topic. In order to get hardware synthesizers to work in newer 
kernels, though, we have to patch them (which I'll mention in my hint when I 
write it.)
I don't currently have such a synthesizer, but it's worth mentioning in case 
someone who has such a thing wants to try LFS one day.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


Re: [lfs-support] Can Regular Users Contribute?

2016-08-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs

Rob wrote:

Bruce Dubbs  wrote: The way this type of thing
is handled is by someone writing a hint:


Do I have to join the hints list (I'm already on way too many lists as
is) or can I send you the hint directly.


You can just post it hre or send to me directly.

  -- Bruce


--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


Re: [lfs-support] Can Regular Users Contribute?

2016-08-27 Thread akhiezer
(Top-posting as I gather that can be useful re accessibility stuff:
is that correct?)

I'd certainly be very interested in learning such info in practice.

Although the software side would be the main info, if possible could
there be some details on hardware that would be used typically.


akh


> From: "Rob" 
> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 08:10:44 -0500
> Subject: [lfs-support] Can Regular Users Contribute?
>
> One of the things missing from the LFS book is the inclusion of accessibility 
> services, such as speakup and BRLTTY. Now these services aren't exactly 
> essential for most users, but for those with vision impairment, we need them 
> in order to use the basic system.
> These packages should be installed during chroot so that we could have speech 
> and braille after (and optionally during)  the boot process. I managed to do 
> this, but I thought it would be helfpul to include at least a page on the LFS 
> hints site; and a reference to such a page in the LFS book.
> What can I do to get such a thing published up there?




--
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.1-rc. Inetutils-1.9.4. All tests passed immediately after building.

2016-08-27 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 27/08/2016 10:35, Hazel Russman wrote:
> The Good Book says:
> 
> One test, libls.sh, is known to fail due to hard coding of some support 
> program paths. All tests pass if the tests are rerun at the end of Chapter 6.
> 
> That doesn't seem to be the case any more. Not on my system anyway.
> 

For me, libls.sh failed (jhalfs build). I agree that it passes when everything
is built...

I have not kept the test-suite log, so I cannot tell what the error was coming
from.

Pierre


-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


Re: [lfs-support] lfs-support Digest, Vol 563, Issue 1

2016-08-27 Thread Pierre Labastie
On 27/08/2016 06:53, Sumit Kokal wrote:
> Hello,
> Hello sir, my first pass is successfully done..all packages are properly
> installed,and  M move to pass 2. First package is binutils.when im configure
> the error is that" c compiler can not create executable " i try 3-4 times but
> same error occurs!
>> Host system ubuntu 16lts
> 
> Hostsystem Requirement output,
> root@sumi-k:/home/sumi# bash version-check.sh
> bash, version 4.3.46(1)-release
> /bin/sh -> /bin/bash
> Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.26.1
> bison (GNU Bison) 3.0.4
> /usr/bin/yacc -> /usr/bin/bison.yacc
> bzip2,  Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010.
> Coreutils:  8.25
> diff (GNU diffutils) 3.3
> find (GNU findutils) 4.7.0-git
> GNU Awk 4.1.3, API: 1.1 (GNU MPFR 3.1.4, GNU MP 6.1.0)
> /usr/bin/awk -> /usr/bin/gawk
> gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.2) 5.4.0 20160609
> g++ (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.2) 5.4.0 20160609
> (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.23-0ubuntu3) 2.23
> grep (GNU grep) 2.25
> gzip 1.6
> Linux version 4.4.0-34-generic (buildd@lgw01-20) (gcc version 5.3.1 20160413
> (Ubuntu 5.3.1-14ubuntu2.1) ) #53-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 27 16:06:39 UTC 2016
> m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.17
> GNU Make 4.1
> GNU patch 2.7.5
> Perl version='5.22.1';
> sed (GNU sed) 4.2.2
> tar (GNU tar) 1.28
> texi2any (GNU texinfo) 6.1
> xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.0alpha
> g++ compilation OK
>  
> 

Could you send the exact text of the error (with a few lines of context)

Pierre

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style