Re: [lfs-support] No Networking in Post Boot
On 14/09/2016 10:28 μμ, Tim Tassonis wrote: On 09/14/2016 06:37 PM, Thanos Baloukas wrote: On 14/09/2016 04:31 μμ, Thanos Baloukas wrote: Did the network interfaces naming policy change? I thought eth* names are not used anymore. Me and my terrible english! s/are not used/were not used/ I think. :) Well, that's definitely a very minor mistake I made a major mistake, sorry. eth* names are still used. https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ Thanks for pointing that. -- Thanos -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] No Networking in Post Boot
Rob wrote: LFS-7.10-Systemd. In section 7.2.1.2 the book talks about creating "/etc/systemd/network/10-eth0-dhcp.network" . Then, in BLFS Chapter 14, - DHCPCD, it talks about disabling systemd-networkd.service. So, does the file referenced in LFS 7.2.1.2 still need to be created if you install dhcpcd? Because I'm getting persistent messages, when I try running "systemctl start dhcpcd@eth0" It says that it fails because of a dependency, but it doesn't say what the dependency is. I don't do systemd very much, but it could be a driver issue. Look at /sys/class/net and see if eth0 exists. It is possible it might be some other name like en01s2. If so, just change the eth0 entry in /etc/systemd/network/10-eth0-dhcp.network to the correct name and try that. If no similar name is present then the driver for your network device is missing. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] No Networking in Post Boot
On 09/14/2016 06:37 PM, Thanos Baloukas wrote: On 14/09/2016 04:31 μμ, Thanos Baloukas wrote: On 14/09/2016 10:52 πμ, Rob wrote: LFS-7.10-Systemd. In section 7.2.1.2 the book talks about creating "/etc/systemd/network/10-eth0-dhcp.network" . Then, in BLFS Chapter 14, - DHCPCD, it talks about disabling systemd-networkd.service. So, does the file referenced in LFS 7.2.1.2 still need to be created if you install dhcpcd? Because I'm getting persistent messages, when I try running "systemctl start dhcpcd@eth0" Did the network interfaces naming policy change? I thought eth* names are not used anymore. Me and my terrible english! s/are not used/were not used/ I think. :) Well, that's definitely a very minor mistake It says that it fails because of a dependency, but it doesn't say what the dependency is. "systemctl status dhcpcd@eth0" says: "... / start failed with result 'depencency'. Again, it doesn't tell you what the dependency is. "systemctl edit dhcpcd@eth0" shows an empty file. I'm a little stuck here. Where do I go next? Kernel configuration is correct and I'm pretty sure it's loading the hardware, since LFS 7.8 was running on the same metal, and I just copied over the 4.2 configuration and did "make oldconfig" to build 4.7.2. -- decentral.ch - IT Stuff Tim Tassonis Dennlerstasse 36 8047 Zürich st...@decentral.ch +41 79 229 36 17 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] No Networking in Post Boot
On 14/09/2016 04:31 μμ, Thanos Baloukas wrote: On 14/09/2016 10:52 πμ, Rob wrote: LFS-7.10-Systemd. In section 7.2.1.2 the book talks about creating "/etc/systemd/network/10-eth0-dhcp.network" . Then, in BLFS Chapter 14, - DHCPCD, it talks about disabling systemd-networkd.service. So, does the file referenced in LFS 7.2.1.2 still need to be created if you install dhcpcd? Because I'm getting persistent messages, when I try running "systemctl start dhcpcd@eth0" Did the network interfaces naming policy change? I thought eth* names are not used anymore. Me and my terrible english! s/are not used/were not used/ I think. :) It says that it fails because of a dependency, but it doesn't say what the dependency is. "systemctl status dhcpcd@eth0" says: "... / start failed with result 'depencency'. Again, it doesn't tell you what the dependency is. "systemctl edit dhcpcd@eth0" shows an empty file. I'm a little stuck here. Where do I go next? Kernel configuration is correct and I'm pretty sure it's loading the hardware, since LFS 7.8 was running on the same metal, and I just copied over the 4.2 configuration and did "make oldconfig" to build 4.7.2. -- Thanos -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] No Networking in Post Boot
On 14/09/2016 10:52 πμ, Rob wrote: LFS-7.10-Systemd. In section 7.2.1.2 the book talks about creating "/etc/systemd/network/10-eth0-dhcp.network" . Then, in BLFS Chapter 14, - DHCPCD, it talks about disabling systemd-networkd.service. So, does the file referenced in LFS 7.2.1.2 still need to be created if you install dhcpcd? Because I'm getting persistent messages, when I try running "systemctl start dhcpcd@eth0" Did the network interfaces naming policy change? I thought eth* names are not used anymore. It says that it fails because of a dependency, but it doesn't say what the dependency is. "systemctl status dhcpcd@eth0" says: "... / start failed with result 'depencency'. Again, it doesn't tell you what the dependency is. "systemctl edit dhcpcd@eth0" shows an empty file. I'm a little stuck here. Where do I go next? Kernel configuration is correct and I'm pretty sure it's loading the hardware, since LFS 7.8 was running on the same metal, and I just copied over the 4.2 configuration and did "make oldconfig" to build 4.7.2. -- Thanos -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] No Networking in Post Boot
LFS-7.10-Systemd. In section 7.2.1.2 the book talks about creating "/etc/systemd/network/10-eth0-dhcp.network" . Then, in BLFS Chapter 14, - DHCPCD, it talks about disabling systemd-networkd.service. So, does the file referenced in LFS 7.2.1.2 still need to be created if you install dhcpcd? Because I'm getting persistent messages, when I try running "systemctl start dhcpcd@eth0" It says that it fails because of a dependency, but it doesn't say what the dependency is. "systemctl status dhcpcd@eth0" says: "... / start failed with result 'depencency'. Again, it doesn't tell you what the dependency is. "systemctl edit dhcpcd@eth0" shows an empty file. I'm a little stuck here. Where do I go next? Kernel configuration is correct and I'm pretty sure it's loading the hardware, since LFS 7.8 was running on the same metal, and I just copied over the 4.2 configuration and did "make oldconfig" to build 4.7.2. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
