Re: [lfs-support] systemd-231: Cannot resolve properly using the stub resolver
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 16:08 -0500, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:18 AM, aur basica wrote:On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:The instructions on how to install systemd-231 > involves the following instruction. Fix a broken symlink created by the systemd installation process: rm -fv /etc/resolv.conf ln -s ../lib/systemd/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf If I do this, it breaks DNS resolving. I find that more than half of the urls that I visit (via firefox) do not work. If I revert back to to the old way, ln -s /run/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf then everything works fine. Has no one come across this? I've found the following that matches my symptoms to a tee: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3826 Regards, Wayne. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Hi Wayne, I discovered the same issue as well. I had issues downloading packages with curl so at the time I thought it might've been an issue with it till I saw it happen with wget. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Wayne, I fixed this at r11133. Can you please check the development book tomorrow and tell me what you think? I might add thi I had a look at revision 11133. The two commands: rm -fv /etc/resolv.conf ln -sv /run/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf can be removed altogther as they are not needed. Make install creates that link in the first place. The errata page will need to mention that this link will need to re-created only if the previous re-creation of the link was executed, otherwise the steps should be skipped. Regards, Wayne. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] gcc 4.1.2 when make bootstrap
Thans for you, I will be improved. Forgive me, a newer.-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] gcc 4.1.2 when make bootstrap
> From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Tue Oct 11 02:16:53 2016 > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:37:19 +0800 (GMT+08:00) > From: chenyiwei02 > To: "lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org" > > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] gcc 4.1.2 when make bootstrap > > > > I am sorry for I donot use the Re: before. > And thanks for your answer.But, what should I do without using OS released > around 2008,to achieve it use LFS6.3 . There appears to be a Chineses translation of 7.7-systemd - ref: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/read.html https://linux.cn/lfs/LFS-BOOK-7.7-systemd/ http://lctt.github.io/ Also, if you've read 6.8 , then a later book (in English) may still be understandable ok: the basic principles are still much the same. hth, akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] gcc 4.1.2 when make bootstrap
I am sorry for I donot use the Re: before. And thanks for your answer.But, what should I do without using OS released around 2008,to achieve it use LFS6.3 .-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] (无主题)
thanks for your answer,but if I can compile it without using OS released around 2008. if it is possible, what should I do? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] gcc 4.1.2 when make bootstrap
chenyiwei02 wrote: I'm a chinese , forgive me if where I write not right, I will try to express want I want to say. It's the first time I follow the book (LFS6.3),and first time ask a question for foreigner.But I'm a user of linux (Centos) more than 2 years, and if some errors you met while compile tarballs is really hard to solve as you know. The error I met is as following, when I run "make bootstrap" ,on centos 6.5（32bit),following the book. I have already looked for hints form FAQ, and Mailing Lists,and also searched it by search engine except google which is limited by the government. Thanks. make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' make CC=" stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/" CC_FOR_BUILD=" stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/" \ STAGE_PREFIX=stage1/ \ ADAFLAGS="" CFLAGS="-O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer" LDFLAGS="" WARN_CFLAGS="\$(GCC_WARN_CFLAGS)" STRICT_WARN="-pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute " libdir=/tools/lib LANGUAGES="c gcov gcov-dump " MAKEINFO="/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.1.2/missing makeinfo --split-size=500" MAKEINFOFLAGS="--no-split" MAKEOVERRIDES= OUTPUT_OPTION="-o \$@" \ CFLAGS="-O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer" WERROR="" make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' build/genmodes -h > tmp-modes.h /bin/sh: line 1: 20257 Segmentation fault (core dumped) build/genmodes -h > tmp-modes.h make[2]: *** [s-modes] Error 139 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' make[1]: *** [stage2_build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 LFS 6.3 was released 8 years ago (2008). It may be the only Chinese translation, but there have been a huge number of changes since then. CentOS 6.5 was released in 2013. It is likely that it will not build every package from 2008 without serious updates. If someone wants to translate the current version of LFS to Chinese, it is much more likely to succeed. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] gcc 4.1.2 when make bootstrap
I'm a chinese , forgive me if where I write not right, I will try to express want I want to say. It's the first time I follow the book (LFS6.3),and first time ask a question for foreigner.But I'm a user of linux (Centos) more than 2 years, and if some errors you met while compile tarballs is really hard to solve as you know. The error I met is as following, when I run "make bootstrap" ,on centos 6.5（32bit),following the book. I have already looked for hints form FAQ, and Mailing Lists,and also searched it by search engine except google which is limited by the government. Thanks. make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' make CC=" stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/" CC_FOR_BUILD=" stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/" \ STAGE_PREFIX=stage1/ \ ADAFLAGS="" CFLAGS="-O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer" LDFLAGS="" WARN_CFLAGS="\$(GCC_WARN_CFLAGS)" STRICT_WARN="-pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute " libdir=/tools/lib LANGUAGES="c gcov gcov-dump " MAKEINFO="/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.1.2/missing makeinfo --split-size=500" MAKEINFOFLAGS="--no-split" MAKEOVERRIDES= OUTPUT_OPTION="-o \$@" \ CFLAGS="-O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer" WERROR="" make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' build/genmodes -h > tmp-modes.h /bin/sh: line 1: 20257 Segmentation fault (core dumped) build/genmodes -h > tmp-modes.h make[2]: *** [s-modes] Error 139 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' make[1]: *** [stage2_build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] systemd-231: Cannot resolve properly using the stub resolver
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:18 AM, aur basica wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk > wrote: > >> The instructions on how to install systemd-231 involves the following >> instruction. >> >> Fix a broken symlink created by the systemd installation process: >> >> rm -fv /etc/resolv.conf >> ln -s ../lib/systemd/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf >> >> If I do this, it breaks DNS resolving. I find that more than half of the >> urls that I visit (via firefox) do not work. >> >> If I revert back to to the old way, >> ln -s /run/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf >> then everything works fine. >> Has no one come across this? >> >> I've found the following that matches my symptoms to a tee: >> >> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3826 >> >> Regards, >> Wayne. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> >> Do not top post on this list. >> >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> A: Top-posting. >> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >> > > Hi Wayne, > > I discovered the same issue as well. I had issues downloading packages > with curl so at the time I thought it might've been an issue with it till I > saw it happen with wget. > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > > Wayne, I fixed this at r11133. Can you please check the development book tomorrow and tell me what you think? I might add this to the errata page soon. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] B- and LFS Roadmap
Rob wrote: Do we have something like a milestone tracker that shows the status/progress of B and LFS development? http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/roadmap http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/roadmap But those are a bit misleading since new tickets are opened for updated packages every day. Probably better is: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&group=milestone&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=time&order=priority and http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&groupdesc=1&group=milestone&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=component&col=time&order=owner -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] B- and LFS Roadmap
Do we have something like a milestone tracker that shows the status/progress of B and LFS development? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] B- and LFS Roadmap
> From: "Rob" > Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:49:10 -0500 > Subject: [lfs-support] B- and LFS Roadmap > > Do we have something like a milestone tracker that shows the > status/progress of B and LFS development? > Yes: ref b/lfs sections of website; u want to arrive at respective 'trac' areas. akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
