Re: [lfs-support] No Network Connections: LFS 8.3
Hi Pierre. I have searched the internet to find a way to stop gmail top-posting. Is there a client I should perhaps be using.? Sorry if this is top-posting. I apologise. ip addr list: attached screenshot ip route list: no response to the command. There is just no ipv4 addresses at all. On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 21:06, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 9/23/18 8:18 PM, John Le Brasseur wrote: > > Hi Pierre. > > Many thanks. > > Just one last question. > > Where do I find the IPv4 setting in the make menuconfig menu system. Just > > can't find where to set it. > > > > Actually, it is Networking support>Networking options>TCP/IP networking, > but > if you have IPV6, then you have it (I should have checked that...) > > Can you post the output of "ip addr list" and "ip route list"? > > Pierre > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > -- Kind regards, John Le Brasseur +27 73 157 5605 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] No Network Connections: LFS 8.3
Hi Pierre. Many thanks. Just one last question. Where do I find the IPv4 setting in the make menuconfig menu system. Just can't find where to set it. On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 19:25, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 9/23/18 6:34 PM, John Le Brasseur wrote: > > Hi Pierre. > > I don't know if attachments are allowed on this forum but I have attached > > three screenshots: > > startup screen, > > ls-l_sys_class_net and > > ip_link_list > > > > I am not sure of the answers to your other questions but i did not use > systemd > > and there is no /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file at all. > Only > > 55- ..., 81- ... and 83- ... > > I checked in my LFS 8.2 build and found > > a /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file. > > I typed it identically into my LFS 8.3 build, with no visible success. > > Copy of net-rules also attached. > > Iv'e just got this feeling it is the kernel build but do not know how to > > tackle the problem itself.(or Iv'e forgotten) > > > > This is not a kernel problem, since the NIC's are recognized (but see > below). > They are given names of the form enp0sx, with x=3, 8, 10. But it seems that > your startup files bring them up, although only messages concerning IPV6 > are > shown. Maybe IPV4 is not configured? Is IPV4 enabled in the kernel? If > IPV4 is > configured, the only things that can be wrong are the IP addresses. To see > the > IP addresses, the command is "ip addr list". The NIC connected to NAT > should > have an address starting with 10.0.2. > > Then to test what you have as a gateway (normally 10.0.2.2), the command is > "ip route list". It should return something like > "default via 10.0.2.2 blah" > > Test that you can reach it with "ping 10.0.2.2" (I hope it works with > virtualbox, it does with qemu). Then verify that /etc/resolv.conf has > "nameserver 10.0.2.3" > > That's all I can think of > > Pierre > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > John -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] No Network Connections: LFS 8.3
Hi Pierre. I don't know if attachments are allowed on this forum but I have attached three screenshots: startup screen, ls-l_sys_class_net and ip_link_list I am not sure of the answers to your other questions but i did not use systemd and there is no /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file at all. Only 55- ..., 81- ... and 83- ... I checked in my LFS 8.2 build and found a /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persisten t-net.rules file. I typed it identically into my LFS 8.3 build, with no visible success. Copy of net-rules also attached. Iv'e just got this feeling it is the kernel build but do not know how to tackle the problem itself.(or Iv'e forgotten) On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 17:50, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 9/23/18 5:29 PM, John Le Brasseur wrote: > > Hi Pierre. > > Thank you. > > I have set VirtualBox adapter one to NAT, adapter two to bridged and > adapter > > three to internal. It has the same host I used for LFS 8.2. > > All networks operate in chroot mode. None when restarting the LFS 8.3 > build. > > The LFS 8.2 build is on the same host so the settings are identical, > > naturally, and works fine. > > I don't think its anything to do with the settings in VirtualBox. > > Rather a missing kernel module/option, or some udev/eudev setting. > > > Have you tested that you can see the NIC? Either "ip link list" or "ls -l > /sys/class/net". You should see the 3 adapters... > > Are you using systemd (udev) or SYSV (eudev)? It the second, do you have > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules? > > Pierre > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > -- Kind regards, John Le Brasseur +27 73 157 5605 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] No Network Connections: LFS 8.3
Hi Pierre. Thank you. I have set VirtualBox adapter one to NAT, adapter two to bridged and adapter three to internal. It has the same host I used for LFS 8.2. All networks operate in chroot mode. None when restarting the LFS 8.3 build. The LFS 8.2 build is on the same host so the settings are identical, naturally, and works fine. I don't think its anything to do with the settings in VirtualBox. On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 16:37, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 9/23/18 3:36 PM, John Le Brasseur wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > I have now built LFS 8.3. > > When in the chroot state 'evrything' seems to be 100% including network > > connections. > > Expected, since it's your host connection. > > > When starting the system, everything still seems fine but there are no > network > > connections. > > I am building on VirtualBox with Ubuntu as host for the builds. > > I don't think I had any problems with network connections in 8.2 so I > should > > imagine I have done something wrong this time. > > Any obvious places to check please. > > That depends on the mode you have selected for networking under > virtualbox. If > you are using "NAT", check that you have set up a static address of the > form > 10.0.2.x (DHCP would allocate 10.0.2.15, but I guess you have not yet built > dhcpcd). Personally, I use 10.0.2.9 for a static address. Also the DNS > should > be set to 10.0.2.3, and gateway to 10.0.2.2. > > Also, virtualbox emulates various NIC, check that the modules for the NIC > you > have selected are included in the kernel. You can also look at > /sys/class/net > (in booted guest), to check that the kernel has found a NIC. > > HTH > Pierre > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > -- Kind regards, John Le Brasseur +27 73 157 5605 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] No Network Connections: LFS 8.3
Hi I have now built LFS 8.3. When in the chroot state 'evrything' seems to be 100% including network connections. When starting the system, everything still seems fine but there are no network connections. I am building on VirtualBox with Ubuntu as host for the builds. I don't think I had any problems with network connections in 8.2 so I should imagine I have done something wrong this time. Any obvious places to check please. Regards, John -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] Running the mpfr-4.0.1 Tests
t
--enable-plugins --enable-shared --disable-werror --enable-64-bit-bfd
--with-system-zlib
200 make tooldir=/usr
201 make -k check
202 make tooldir=/usr install
203 mv -v /tools/bin/{ld,ld-old}
204 mv -v /tools/$(uname -m)-pc-linux-gnu/bin/{ld,ld-old}
205 mv -v /tools/bin/{ld-new,ld}
206 ln -sv /tools/bin/ld /tools/$(uname -m)-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld
207 gcc -dumpspecs | sed -e 's@/tools@@g' -e
'/\*startfile_prefix_spec:/{n;s@.*@/usr/lib/ @}' -e '/\*cpp:/{n;s@$@
-isystem /usr/include@}' > `dirname $(gcc --print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs
208 echo 'int main(){}' > dummy.c
209 cc dummy.c -v -Wl,--verbose &> dummy.log
210 readelf -l a.out | grep ': /lib'
211 cd ..
212 cd ..
213 grep -o '/usr/lib.*/crt[1in].*succeeded' dummy.log
214 grep -B1 '^ /usr/include' dummy.log
215 grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
216 grep "/lib.*/libc.so.6 " dummy.log
217 grep found dummy.log
218 rm -v dummy.c a.out dummy.log
219 ls -l gmp*
220 tar -xvf gmp-6.1.2.tar.xz
221 cd gmp-6.1.2
222 ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-cxx --disable-static
--docdir=/usr/share/doc/gmp-6.1.2
223 make
224 make html
225 make check 2>&1 | tee gmp-check-log
226 awk '/# PASS:/{total+=$3} ; END{print total}' gmp-check-log
227 make install
228 make install-html
229 cd ..
230 ls -l mpfr*
231 tar -xvf mpfr-4.0.1.tar.xz
232 cd mp
233 cd mpfr-4.0.1
234 ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-static --enable-thread-safe
--docdir=/usr/share/doc/mpfr-4.0.1
235 make
236 make html
237 cd ..
238 history >/duff-hist
Thank you Ken especially for the 'history >/duff-hist' tip. Hope I remember
that.
Thanks everyone once again.
I am proceeding.
John.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 at 02:08, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On 2018-08-06 15:11 -0400, Michael Shell wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Aug 2018 19:52:52 +0800
> > Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> >
> > > No. /tools/lib/libquadmath.so.* is useless now. After "6.10
> > > Adjusting the Toolchain" the default dynamic linker should have
> > > been changed to /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 instead of
> > > /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. Then it should search /usr/lib,
> > > not /tools/lib.
> > >
> > > MPFR configure script add "-lquadmath" if
> >
> >
> >Xi,
> >
> > Good catch! But, I think what threw me (and Hazel) off is why does
> > the MPFR build process attempt to link against libquadmath in the
> > first place? After all, as you said, libquadmath won't be available
> > (in /usr/lib) until after gcc is (re)installed in step 6.20.1
> >
> > So, MPFR's configure detects libquadmath (in /tools/lib) and then
> > links its tests against libquadmath, but those tests later fail
> > because the dynamic linker is set to link from what is in /usr/lib?
>
> I made a mistake descripting what MPFR configure was doing. Should be:
>
> echo "int main(){}" > conftest.c &&
> cc conftest.c -lquadmath
>
> And do *not* run the compiled test program. So it don't know the program
> can't be executed.
>
> The problem is, GCC default dynamic linker has been changed to
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 built in 6.9, but the linker (`ld`, not
> `ld.so`) still searches /tools/lib. It's a mismatch of linker and
> dynamic linker. So, libquadmath can be searched by linker, but not
> by dynamic linker.
>
> > In short, does the presence or absence of libquadmath affect the actual
> > libmpfr.so or just its test executables - that without libquadmath the
> > tests would not be linked against it and yet they still work fine?
> > Does it affect, say, the number of tests that are done? Depending
> > on the answer here, there may be a case for reinstalling MPFR again
> > after gcc.
>
> I just tried to build MPFR on a completed LFS. The tests linked to
> libquadmath, but libmpfr.so itself did not.
>
> Oh no, I think there is another problem. In 6.16 the final Binutils
> should have been built. So the final `ld` should have replaced the
> linker used in "Adjusting the Toolchain".
>
> Suggestion to John:
>
> Remove /tools and extract your backup. Then restart Chapter 6. Make
> sure to do all checks in "Adjusting the Toolchain". And, do them again
> after "6.16 Binutils".
>
> Ken's debugging way (using .bash_histroy") may be useful. You can
> attach it here and we will play a "Spot The Differences" game :)
> --
> Xi Ruoyao
> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
>
> --
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> Do not top post on this list.
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>
--
Kind regards,
John Le Brasseur
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] Running the mpfr-4.0.1 Tests
Thank you Xi Ruoyao.
You are correct.
"echo "int main(){}" > dummy.c &&
cc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose | grep SEARCH | sed 's/; /\n/g' "
still points to /tools/lib.
I saved a copy of /tools and /sources before starting chapter 6.
Can I exit chroot and delete certain folders, stay in chroot and delete
certain folders, stay in chroot and delete all the contents or is there
another option?
I should be able to restart Chapter 6, right?
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 14:13, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On 2018-08-06 12:44 +0200, John Le Brasseur wrote:
> > Hi Mike.
> > Thanks for your reply.
> > The output is:
> >
> > ls -lad /tools/lib/libquad*
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1203304 Aug 4 13:55 /tools/lib/libquadmath.a
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 971 Aug 4 13:55 /tools/lib/libquadmath.la
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 13:55 /tools/lib/libquadmath.so ->
> libquadmath.so.0.0.0
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 13:55 /tools/lib/libquadmath.so.0
> -> libquadmath.so.0.0.0
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 955232 Aug 4 13:55
> /tools/lib/libquadmath.so.0.0.0
>
> No. /tools/lib/libquadmath.so.* is useless now. After "6.10
> Adjusting the Toolchain" the default dynamic linker should have
> been changed to /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 instead of
> /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. Then it should search /usr/lib,
> not /tools/lib.
>
> MPFR configure script add "-lquadmath" if
>
> echo "int main(){return 0;}" > conftest.c &&
> cc conftest.c -lquadmath &&
> ./a.out
>
> returns 0 (successful). But after 6.10 this should NOT succeed
> because GCC spec has been changed to search /usr/lib instead
> of /tools/lib and there is NO libquadmath.so in /usr/lib.
>
> It's very likely you've made a mistake in 6.10. Please run:
>
> echo "int main(){}" > dummy.c &&
> cc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose | grep SEARCH | sed 's/; /\n/g'
>
> It should contain "/usr/lib", and should NOT contain
> "/tools/lib".
> --
> Xi Ruoyao
> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
>
> --
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> Do not top post on this list.
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>
--
Kind regards,
John Le Brasseur
+27 73 157 5605
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] Running the mpfr-4.0.1 Tests
Hi Mike. Thanks for your reply. The output is: ls -lad /tools/lib/libquad* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1203304 Aug 4 13:55 /tools/lib/libquadmath.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 971 Aug 4 13:55 /tools/lib/libquadmath.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 13:55 /tools/lib/libquadmath.so -> libquadmath.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 13:55 /tools/lib/libquadmath.so.0 -> libquadmath.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 955232 Aug 4 13:55 /tools/lib/libquadmath.so.0.0.0 On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 12:38, John Le Brasseur wrote: > Many thanks for your reply Hazel. > I won't be surprised to have made a mistake but I must say I concentrated > hard during every step. > I have the following in the /tools/lib folder: > > "-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1203304 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.a > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 971 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.la > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.so -> > libquadmath.so.0.0.0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.so.0 -> > libquadmath.so.0.0.0 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 955232 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.so.0.0.0" > > Does this indicate a mistake? > > > > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 11:26, Hazel Russman > wrote: > >> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 10:05:37 +0200 >> John Le Brasseur wrote: >> >> > Hi. >> > >> > My first post. >> > (Sorry for ignorance) >> > >> > I am using the LFS-BOOK-8.2 >> > I have reached step 6.18.1. >> > Everything has gone according to plan so far unless I missed something. >> > I ran 'make check' for mpfr-4.0.1 and all tests failed with similar >> > comments, e.g.: >> > >> > "./tzeta_ui: error while loading shared libraries: libquadmath.so.0: >> cannot >> > open shared object file: No such file or directory >> > FAIL tzeta_ui (exit status: 127)" >> > >> > Is this a common error? >> > What could likely be wrong? >> > Should I make mpfr again? >> > Is there likely a problem elsewhere? >> > Any ideas? >> > >> > Many, many thanks. >> > >> > John >> > >> > -- >> > Kind regards, >> > >> > John Le Brasseur >> >> No, it's not normal. It's a serious error which means that you have made >> a mistake in Chapter 5 (probably in Section 5.10). >> >> Libquadmath, which this build needs, is part of gcc. The first pass of >> gcc in Chapter 5 disables it, but the second pass includes it. So you >> should have it installed in the /tools tree. Check in /tools/lib for it. >> >> If it isn't there, then you probably reused the gcc source tree for your >> second pass instead of deleting it and re-extracting your gcc sources. >> >> It looks like you will need to start again. >> >> -- >> -- >> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page >> >> Do not top post on this list. >> >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> A: Top-posting. >> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >> > > > -- > Kind regards, > > John Le Brasseur > > -- Kind regards, John Le Brasseur +27 73 157 5605 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] Running the mpfr-4.0.1 Tests
Many thanks for your reply Hazel. I won't be surprised to have made a mistake but I must say I concentrated hard during every step. I have the following in the /tools/lib folder: "-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1203304 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 971 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.so -> libquadmath.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.so.0 -> libquadmath.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 955232 Aug 4 15:55 libquadmath.so.0.0.0" Does this indicate a mistake? On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 11:26, Hazel Russman wrote: > On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 10:05:37 +0200 > John Le Brasseur wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > My first post. > > (Sorry for ignorance) > > > > I am using the LFS-BOOK-8.2 > > I have reached step 6.18.1. > > Everything has gone according to plan so far unless I missed something. > > I ran 'make check' for mpfr-4.0.1 and all tests failed with similar > > comments, e.g.: > > > > "./tzeta_ui: error while loading shared libraries: libquadmath.so.0: > cannot > > open shared object file: No such file or directory > > FAIL tzeta_ui (exit status: 127)" > > > > Is this a common error? > > What could likely be wrong? > > Should I make mpfr again? > > Is there likely a problem elsewhere? > > Any ideas? > > > > Many, many thanks. > > > > John > > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > > > John Le Brasseur > > No, it's not normal. It's a serious error which means that you have made a > mistake in Chapter 5 (probably in Section 5.10). > > Libquadmath, which this build needs, is part of gcc. The first pass of gcc > in Chapter 5 disables it, but the second pass includes it. So you should > have it installed in the /tools tree. Check in /tools/lib for it. > > If it isn't there, then you probably reused the gcc source tree for your > second pass instead of deleting it and re-extracting your gcc sources. > > It looks like you will need to start again. > > -- > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > -- Kind regards, John Le Brasseur -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] Running the mpfr-4.0.1 Tests
Hi. My first post. (Sorry for ignorance) I am using the LFS-BOOK-8.2 I have reached step 6.18.1. Everything has gone according to plan so far unless I missed something. I ran 'make check' for mpfr-4.0.1 and all tests failed with similar comments, e.g.: "./tzeta_ui: error while loading shared libraries: libquadmath.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory FAIL tzeta_ui (exit status: 127)" Is this a common error? What could likely be wrong? Should I make mpfr again? Is there likely a problem elsewhere? Any ideas? Many, many thanks. John -- Kind regards, John Le Brasseur +27 73 157 5605 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
