Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vf_overlay: properly sync inputs.
On 10/04/2012 07:29 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:21:12 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 10/03/2012 10:56 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>> Right now it incorrectly assumes that the frames are sent in the proper >>> order, which worked with old ffmpeg and avconv versions by accident. >>> --- >>> libavfilter/vf_overlay.c | 207 >>> +- >>> 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Looks ok, but hadn't those nested structs being expressed otherwise? >> > > Mans didn't push his patch apparrently. Willing to push it and after that rebase? ___ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vf_overlay: properly sync inputs.
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:21:12 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 10/03/2012 10:56 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Right now it incorrectly assumes that the frames are sent in the proper > > order, which worked with old ffmpeg and avconv versions by accident. > > --- > > libavfilter/vf_overlay.c | 207 > > +- > > 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) > > > > Looks ok, but hadn't those nested structs being expressed otherwise? > Mans didn't push his patch apparrently. -- Anton Khirnov ___ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vf_overlay: properly sync inputs.
On 10/03/2012 10:56 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Right now it incorrectly assumes that the frames are sent in the proper > order, which worked with old ffmpeg and avconv versions by accident. > --- > libavfilter/vf_overlay.c | 207 > +- > 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) > Looks ok, but hadn't those nested structs being expressed otherwise? lu ___ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
