Shava, are you talking about this?
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/07/cyber-jihadists/
I was glib, to be sure, but I followed up by posting the entirety of
your 500 word response to my 200 word post. Also, 2007.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Shava Nerad wrote:
> /snark
>
> Why, take the positive spin. Think of it as proving the New Yorker's place
> in this constellation.
>
> They can destroy Aaron Swartz' character in one article and use him now to
> promote their project without a single qualm.
>
(once so
> egregiously that even in this day of op/ed journalism, I got a retraction)
> to maintain it, since who would understand the architecture and user needs
> better?
>
> This proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, their journalistic integrity.
>
> /end snark
>
> Standard disclaimer: haven't spoken for Tor officially since 2007. But
> gz.
>
> This seems special. Of course, I imagine it doesn't make a fig of
> difference to the average observer, but it's stunning how bold obscurantist
> things like this I can see make me wonder -- what richness am I just missing
> in my environment daily for lack of awareness of the foxes that surround me?
>
> Yrs,
>
>
> Shava Nerad
> shav...@gmail.com
>
> On May 16, 2013 10:01 AM, "Nadim Kobeissi" wrote:
>>
>> The technical aspects aside, I find the fact that they're using Aaron
>> Swartz as a marketing asset to be morally problematic. :/
>>
>>
>> NK
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Jacob Appelbaum
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sarah Lai Stirland:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/05/strongbox-and-aaron-swartz.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/backissues/2013/05/strongbox-the-new-yorker-investigates.html
>>> >
>>>
>>> Kevin Poulsen suggested I open issues on Github and I've been doing so
>>> as 'ioerror' for the last few hours:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/deaddrop/deaddrop/issues
>>> https://github.com/deaddrop/DeadDropDocs/issues
>>>
>>> Looking at the current deployment doesn't impress me much - I think
>>> there is a lot of potential though...
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Jacob
>>>
>>> --
>>> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
>>> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
>> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
>
> --
> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by
> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
