[liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-20 Thread Eugen Leitl
- Forwarded message from Alain Hebert  -

From: Alain Hebert 
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:14:27 -0500
To: na...@nanog.org
Subject: About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
Organization: PubNIX, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130131 Thunderbird/17.0.2
Reply-To: aheb...@pubnix.net

( Well I'm sure that there is a few hundrends of paper on this subject )

I have a few ideas but it involve:

 .Dark Fiber;
. All devices at FIPS 140 level;
. Tonnes of resin;
. Wire mesh;
. Fiber DB monitoring;
. Cable Shield monitoring;
. Single Encryption Key injection for the FIPS 140 devices;
. Central Provisioning;
. Kill switch for suspected segments;




And a private fab because it would not be a good idea to
sub-contract that to lets says... some Chinese outfit =D

TLDR: Feasable, hella costly.

PS:

http://spybusters.blogspot.ca/2010/11/fiber-optics-easier-to-wiretap-than.html

Enjoy this week end of the world news.

-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net   
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443



- End forwarded message -
-- 
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-20 Thread Charles Zeitler
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Eugen Leitl  wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Alain Hebert  -
>
> From: Alain Hebert 
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:14:27 -0500
> To: na...@nanog.org
> Subject: About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
> Organization: PubNIX, Inc.
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
> rv:17.0) Gecko/20130131 Thunderbird/17.0.2
> Reply-To: aheb...@pubnix.net
>
> ( Well I'm sure that there is a few hundrends of paper on this subject )
> 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography

charles f zeitler

--

Do what thou wilt
shall  be the whole  of the Law.
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-21 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography

Doesn't really work. Essentially, this is expensive
snake oil.
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-21 Thread Charles Zeitler
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Eugen Leitl  wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote:
>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography
>
> Doesn't really work. Essentially, this is expensive
> snake oil.

so, it's been tried, eh? can you post a link?

charles zeitler

-- 

Do what thou wilt
shall  be the whole  of the Law.
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-21 Thread Andreas Bader
On 22/02/13 03:53, Charles Zeitler wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Eugen Leitl  wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote:
>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography
>> Doesn't really work. Essentially, this is expensive
>> snake oil.
> so, it's been tried, eh? can you post a link?
>
> charles zeitler
>
We had this discussion some time ago.
You can have a look at this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304203604577396282717616136.html
The problem is that you have no insight in military research, therefore
you can not assess how far the different intellegence agencys and the
military is in this area.

Andreas
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-22 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:53:36PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Eugen Leitl  wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote:
> >
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography
> >
> > Doesn't really work. Essentially, this is expensive
> > snake oil.
> 
> so, it's been tried, eh? can you post a link?

QC brand of expensive snake oil has found a niche in
finance. It is of course neat basic research, like
quantum teleportation, and such, of potential
use to quantum computers (which by itself, so
far look remarkably useless as well).

Why it's nonsolving a nonproblem, see
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/09/quantum_cryptog_2.html

Google is your friend for further research.
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


Re: [liberationtech] About private networks (Was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)

2013-02-22 Thread Charles Zeitler
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Andreas Bader  wrote:
> On 22/02/13 03:53, Charles Zeitler wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Eugen Leitl  wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Charles Zeitler wrote:
>>>
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography
>>> Doesn't really work. Essentially, this is expensive
>>> snake oil.
>> so, it's been tried, eh? can you post a link?
>>
>> charles zeitler
>>
> We had this discussion some time ago.
> You can have a look at this article:
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304203604577396282717616136.html
> The problem is that you have no insight in military research, therefore
> you can not assess how far the different intellegence agencys and the
> military is in this area.
>
> Andreas
> --

robotics. might have read it, but i'm not a subscriber

charles zeitler


-- 

Do what thou wilt
shall  be the whole  of the Law.
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech