Do they have teeth to enforce that, Caspar? The political will, do you
think?
Or is this just PRIME-ing the pump with slick language, to stir up the
waters? ;)
Shava Nerad
Privacy Evangelist,
Blackphone/SGP Technologies
On Apr 16, 2014 7:18 PM, Caspar Bowden (lists) li...@casparbowden.net
wrote:
Please disregard previous, main highlighted link got mangled
=
It's been a remarkable few days for the Committee of European privacy
regulators (the Art.29 Working Party)
In their first opinion on Data Protection law and national
securityhttp://t.co/itKVGpDI1L,
they grudgingly sort of admit it is their job to stop NSA spying, but then
the next day they approve contracts for PRISM's first corporate
partnerhttps://twitter.com/CasparBowden/status/456366945512599552for Cloud
processing (although they aren't
really a mere processor at
allhttps://twitter.com/CasparBowden/status/456413628392939520
)
..and today they issued the highest quality paper I have ever read from
them - No.216, on Anonymisation Techniques
Storified version *here
https://storify.com/CasparBowden/art-29-wp-opinion-216-on-anonymisation-techniques*for
gist, full text (37 pages) in first tweet
If anyone knows of a regulatory text that comes close on this topic, would
like to know...
The relevance to LiberationTech is that if they enforce this, then a whole
bunch of worries about commercial and state spying through BigData will go
away, in Europe at least
Caspar
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations
of list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech.
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
compa...@stanford.edu.
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at
compa...@stanford.edu.
