Re: [liberationtech] Successful experiment boosting the number of users using OpenPGP verification for file download
Werner Koch: > On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:30, adrela...@riseup.net said: > >> verification is the least secure method, to the download page? >> (You can see the design here: [3]) >> >> A: 1 in ~11 users. > > Actually [3] is the same URL as [1]. Sorry about that. [1]: www.webcitation.org/6IWk5h4E9 [3]: www.webcitation.org/6IX5bl92D >> standards. However, while the number of downloads didn't >> decrease, the number of signature downloads significantly >> increased. Which is a good > > Well, that sample is actually a bit too small for any conclusion. You can argue the results away pointing out many violations in scientific methods. Just check the different page designs and imagine if that could work, if the answer is yes and you are up for an experiment yourself, try. :) > However, I am interested in the change you made. However, 10% is > the the number I remember from the times I kept and analyzed > download logs. Old [1]: www.webcitation.org/6IWk5h4E9 New [3]: www.webcitation.org/6IX5bl92D -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
Re: [liberationtech] Successful experiment boosting the number of users using OpenPGP verification for file download
Quoth Werner Koch: > On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:30, adrela...@riseup.net said: > > > verification is the least secure method, to the download page? (You can > > see the design here: [3]) > > > > A: 1 in ~11 users. > > Actually [3] is the same URL as [1]. 3 should be this: [3]: http://www.webcitation.org/6IX5bl92D -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
Re: [liberationtech] Successful experiment boosting the number of users using OpenPGP verification for file download
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:30, adrela...@riseup.net said: > verification is the least secure method, to the download page? (You can > see the design here: [3]) > > A: 1 in ~11 users. Actually [3] is the same URL as [1]. > standards. However, while the number of downloads didn't decrease, the > number of signature downloads significantly increased. Which is a good Well, that sample is actually a bit too small for any conclusion. However, I am interested in the change you made. However, 10% is the the number I remember from the times I kept and analyzed download logs. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech