On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 07:48:10AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006, William Ahern wrote: > > > Note that with poll and select you don't lose much by shifting an event in > > and out of a polling state. However, with things like epoll() and kqueue() > > you potentially incur a system call everytime you do switch the notification > > state of each descriptor, which is costly. > > >From my reading of the kqueue code this isn't the case. > The change is 'bundled up' into the 'changes' array and kept there > until the next call to kq_dispatch(). >
Yet another reason why kqueue is superior to epoll? ;) _______________________________________________ Libevent-users mailing list Libevent-users@monkey.org http://monkey.org/mailman/listinfo/libevent-users
