[Libguestfs] [PATCH 01/13] syntax-check: dirty hack to pass bindtextdomain check

2014-09-23 Thread Hu Tao
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao hu...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
 p2v/gui.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/p2v/gui.c b/p2v/gui.c
index a50307d..2df5017 100644
--- a/p2v/gui.c
+++ b/p2v/gui.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static GtkWidget *run_dlg,
   *cancel_button;
 
 /* The entry point from the main program.
- * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main().
+ * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main_().
  */
 void
 gui_application (struct config *config)
-- 
1.9.3

___
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs


Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH 01/13] syntax-check: dirty hack to pass bindtextdomain check

2014-09-23 Thread Pino Toscano
On Tuesday 23 September 2014 17:20:27 Hu Tao wrote:
 Signed-off-by: Hu Tao hu...@cn.fujitsu.com
 ---
  p2v/gui.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 diff --git a/p2v/gui.c b/p2v/gui.c
 index a50307d..2df5017 100644
 --- a/p2v/gui.c
 +++ b/p2v/gui.c
 @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static GtkWidget *run_dlg,
*cancel_button;
 
  /* The entry point from the main program.
 - * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main().
 + * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main_().
   */
  void
  gui_application (struct config *config)

Maybe it would be better to just remove () from the commit; after all, 
earlier in that comment gtk_init has no () either.

-- 
Pino Toscano

___
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs


Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH 01/13] syntax-check: dirty hack to pass bindtextdomain check

2014-09-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 04:00:44PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
 On Tuesday 23 September 2014 17:20:27 Hu Tao wrote:
  Signed-off-by: Hu Tao hu...@cn.fujitsu.com
  ---
   p2v/gui.c | 2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  
  diff --git a/p2v/gui.c b/p2v/gui.c
  index a50307d..2df5017 100644
  --- a/p2v/gui.c
  +++ b/p2v/gui.c
  @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static GtkWidget *run_dlg,
 *cancel_button;
  
   /* The entry point from the main program.
  - * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main().
  + * Note that gtk_init etc have already been called in main_().
*/
   void
   gui_application (struct config *config)
 
 Maybe it would be better to just remove () from the commit; after all, 
 earlier in that comment gtk_init has no () either.

I'm not exactly sure what the problem is (except that syntax-check
should really be ignoring comments), but can we remove the
parentheses?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org

___
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs