Re: Building on MAC OS-X 10.10 fails - Java Runtime missing
Worked. Thanks ! In case anyone else stumbles upon this thread, I've installed this: Java for OS X 2014-00 http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1572 On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/20/2014 01:15 AM, Adam Fyne wrote: So better to build using '--without-java' or better to install the older Java 1-6 ? --without-java has the negative consequence that it silently disables large parts of make check. I don't see a reason not to additionally install Apple's Java 6, as prompted. (And lobby Oracle to get their Java fixed.) -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Building on MAC OS-X 10.10 fails - Java Runtime missing
Hi, I'm trying to build now on a totally fresh clean Macbook, after I've installed whatever was needed. (went with the easy approach, but was missing JDK and ANT so I've installed them separatly). After cloning, autogen make - I get these unit-test errors: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=iYF13p1s All the unit-tests seem to come from 'dbaccess'. I also see this line in the output: No Java runtime present, requesting install. Wasn't JDK 64-bit enough ? In the installation guide for Mac https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/BuildingOnMac it said that only if autogen asks if I want to install JRE - I should accept, so I've assumed it is not missing, since autogen did not complain about it. Best, *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Building on MAC OS-X 10.10 fails - Java Runtime missing
Thanks Stephan. So better to build using '--without-java' or better to install the older Java 1-6 ? On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/19/2014 04:54 PM, Adam Fyne wrote: I'm trying to build now on a totally fresh clean Macbook, after I've installed whatever was needed. (went with the easy approach, but was missing JDK and ANT so I've installed them separatly). After cloning, autogen make - I get these unit-test errors: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=iYF13p1s All the unit-tests seem to come from 'dbaccess'. I also see this line in the output: No Java runtime present, requesting install. Wasn't JDK 64-bit enough ? see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2014- October/064096.html Java problem when running CppunitTest_dbaccess_dialog_save on OS X 10.10 with Oracle JDK 1.8 and http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2014-October/064097.html Re: Java problem when running CppunitTest_dbaccess_dialog_save on OS X 10.10 with Oracle JDK 1.8 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
master build fails on units-tests on MAC OS-X
Hi all, Can't seem to build master on MAC OS-X when unit-tests are turned on. I heard that in order to build on MAC - you need to disable unit-tests. Is that true ? Best, *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: master build fails on units-tests on MAC OS-X
Noel - do you agree? can you also run master build on MAC-OSX with no problem ? On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Adam Fyne adam.f...@cloudon.com wrote: Hi all, Can't seem to build master on MAC OS-X when unit-tests are turned on. I heard that in order to build on MAC - you need to disable unit-tests. Is that true ? on master there is a test that fail on retina, mostly due to rounding round-trip error I think. Norbert -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Windows daily build broken on Windows 8.1
Hi all, When I tried to install latest daily build from 17th and 16th of September (from TB 42). In both cases it installs successfully but when I try to run it, I get this fatal message: *LibreOfficeDev 4.4 - Fatal Error* *---* *The program cannot be started.* *The service manager is not available.* *(Cannot open uno ini file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/LibreOfficeDev%204/URE/bin/uno.ini)* *Start setup application to repair the installation from CD, or the folder containing the installation packages.* Anyone touched the installation process ? Any ideas here? Best, Adam Fyne ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Windows daily build broken on Windows 8.1
Windows build also broken on Windows 7. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Adam Fyne adam.f...@cloudon.com wrote: Hi all, When I tried to install latest daily build from 17th and 16th of September (from TB 42). In both cases it installs successfully but when I try to run it, I get this fatal message: *LibreOfficeDev 4.4 - Fatal Error* *---* *The program cannot be started.* *The service manager is not available.* *(Cannot open uno ini file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/LibreOfficeDev%204/URE/bin/uno.ini)* *Start setup application to repair the installation from CD, or the folder containing the installation packages.* Anyone touched the installation process ? Any ideas here? Best, Adam Fyne -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Windows daily build broken on Windows 8.1
More info: Currently these versions exist in daily-build (TB 42) http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@42/: ... [DIR] 2014-09-14_07.05.33/14-Sep-2014 10:25- WORKS FINE [DIR] 2014-09-15_06.06.46/15-Sep-2014 09:32- WORKS FINE [DIR] 2014-09-16_04.58.45/16-Sep-2014 08:23- WORKS FINE [DIR] 2014-09-16_23.39.39/17-Sep-2014 03:05- *BROKEN* [DIR] 2014-09-17_22.52.14/18-Sep-2014 02:17- *BROKEN* So seems like something broke between 15th and 16th of September. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Adam Fyne adam.f...@cloudon.com wrote: Windows build also broken on Windows 7. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Adam Fyne adam.f...@cloudon.com wrote: Hi all, When I tried to install latest daily build from 17th and 16th of September (from TB 42). In both cases it installs successfully but when I try to run it, I get this fatal message: *LibreOfficeDev 4.4 - Fatal Error* *---* *The program cannot be started.* *The service manager is not available.* *(Cannot open uno ini file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/LibreOfficeDev%204/URE/bin/uno.ini)* *Start setup application to repair the installation from CD, or the folder containing the installation packages.* Anyone touched the installation process ? Any ideas here? Best, Adam Fyne -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
interest, heard back from some professors from the security lab + want to meet Norbert and/or Kohei - why not go ? + Toulouse Hackfest ... + Confirmed for Nov. 15-16th + more details: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest/Toulouse2014 + Munich hack-fest (Jan-Marek): http://www.it-muenchen-blog.de/2014/07/bug-squashing-party-2014/ + jmux (IRC) can add you if you don't want to create an account + will have a BSP come-together; if someone says they're coming just show up etc. + November 21st-23rd, 2014 https://wiki.debian.org/BSP/2014/11/de/Munich + we should drop by with 2 or 3 developers, if possible + Be great to have -really- easy easy hacks for devs (Bjoern) * Commit Access AI: + get Samuel Mehrbrot access again (Michael) * Opening up the ESC calls (Michael) + not everything but most - bridge 2x calls 1x private, 1 public via the G+ hangout ? + not v. fond of public recording issue (Norbert) AI: + see if Florian / talkyo can provide a public / non-recorded room (Michael) + some topics eg. security, commit access still need to be private. * UX Update (Astron / Mirek) + use of redmine discussion - issues / benefits. * QA (Robinson) + un-confirmed bug count climbing again - just over 900 + Robinson distracted by releng while Cloph on vacation + otherwise mostly quiet. * QA stats: + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html +143-93(+50 overall) many thanks to the top bug squashers: Caolán McNamara13 Jean-Baptiste Faure 10 Adolfo Jayme 8 Michael Meeks5 raal 5 Jan Holesovsky 3 * Open 4.4 MAB + 3/12 7/12 3/8 3/8 4/8 4/8 3/7 3/7 2/5 1/2 1/1 + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=79641hide_resolved=1 * Open 4.3 MAB + 14/59 15/58 12/54 13/53 14/52 14/50 11/47 14/47 14/45 19/43 10/32 6/27 23% 25% 22% 24% 26% 28% 23% 29% 33% 44% 31% 22% + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=75025hide_resolved=1 * Open 4.2 MAB + 89/257 91/257 86/252 82/245 83/244 83/243 84/236 85/235 82/229 81/222 34%35%34%33%34%34% 35%36%35%36% + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=65675hide_resolved=1 * Bibisected bugs open: whiteboard 'bibsected' + 143/389 146/385 142/375 141/374 136/361 127/349 119/331 102/308 92/296 + http://bit.ly/VQfF3Q * all bugs tagged with 'regression' + 457(+0) bugs open of 3042(+13) total * ~Component count net * Writer - 138 (+2) Spreadsheet - 91 (+2) Crashes - 30 (-4) Presentation - 29 (+0) Libreoffice - 25 (-1) Database - 25 (+0) Graphics - 23 (+0) UI - 20 (-2) Borders - 19 (-1) Filters - 15 (+0) Drawing - 13 (+0) Print / PDF - 12 (+0) Chart - 9 (+1) BASIC - 5 (+0) Extensions - 5 (+0) Linguistic - 4 (+0) Installation - 4 (+0) Formula - 4 (-1) framework - 1 (+0) sdk - 0 (+0) Impress Remote - 0 (+0) + http://bit.ly/15mM2Yn - for devs ( no NEEDINFO / UNCONFIRMED ) -- michael.me...@collabora.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Yousuf Philips license statement
Yousuf or Jay ? You got me puzzled =) On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com wrote: All of my past future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license. -- Regards, Jay Philips ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Downloading specific daily-build
yeah, but I need a *Windows* build, so setting the entire build environment would take me at least a day... that's why I wanted to know if there is any archive out there somewhere... On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Miklos Vajna vmik...@collabora.co.uk wrote: On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 05:23:59PM +0200, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: Daily builds get deleted after about 15 days or so... Though if you need an older version, you can always build it yourself: 'git checkout old commit', then the usual autogen/make should produce it for debugging purposes. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Downloading specific daily-build
Hi, Any way to download a daily build from 29-06-2014 from machine Win-x86@39 ? I had a link for it, and now I get a 404 when I try to download it... (I need that specific version). Best, *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 700 unconfirmed bugs milestone broke
Great job, guys ! On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: just to say that the count is now 699 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=bug_ statusquery_format=report-tableproduct=LibreOffice format=tableaction=wrap some nice chart: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/reports.cgi?product=LibreOfficedatasets= UNCONFIRMEDdatasets=NEEDINFO great job QA team!!! -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/ mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to- unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: Tinderbox 'Win-x86@42' seems stuck
Thanks all for the info, and Thorsten for the restart ... Looks like the MAC tinderbox is also stuck. Time for me to fire up that link =) On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Adam Fyne wrote Who is responsible for this machine and can maybe quickly check it out? FYI There is a table in the wikipedia with the contact person for each Tinderbox https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox#List_of_registered_Tinderboxes Hope this helps ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Tinderbox-Win-x86-42-seems-stuck-tp4116885p4116923.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Tinderbox 'Win-x86@42' seems stuck
Hi, Looks like latest daily build from that machine was on July 22nd. Who is responsible for this machine and can maybe quickly check it out? Best, *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [ANN] Windows builds no longer horribly slow
Hi Michael, This looks amazing! Last time I built for Windows was ~16 months ago ... It was a horrible mess of dependencies installations in Cygwin really really slow process. Does this change anything ? Or do I still need Cygwin + all the dependencies in order to build it on Windows? I saw an awesome project to help create a Visual-Studio 2013 project, but I am guessing that's just for editing symbols, not for building nativly on Windows, right ? Best, Adam On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote: hello developers (and especially tinderbox maintainers), on master since a week ago, builds with a native Win32 make should work and are substantially faster than the old Cygwin make, both for from-scratch builds and incremental rebuilds. you can have a faster Windows build too, by using the following file: http://people.freedesktop.org/~mst/make-85047eb-msvc.exe and adding a line to autogen.input: MAKE=C:/path/to/make.exe (or just copy it to /opt/lo/bin/make) note: this only works on master; release branches for 4.3 and older require Cygwin make. for details on how to build GNU make from source, and how much speed-up to expect, see: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2014-June/061727.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Blog http://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [PATCH]
Hi Matteo, Thanks for working on this issue and having a patch ready for review! However, the proper way to submit patches for code-review (and subsequent submission on master) is using the gerrit. You can find details on how to do that herehttps://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit . Best, Adam On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Matteo Campanelli matteo.campane...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody! Attached there is a patch for bug 53472. It allows to use adaptively-sized integral symbols in Starmath by means of a new command intd. Cheers, Matteo ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Fun] My emotions during bug reporting process
Like :) On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:22:56 +0100, Zeki Bildirici zeki.ozguryazi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I made a caps to show my feelings during the bug reporting process for LibreOffice. I share this list too to thank all the hardworking QA team, hope you'll enjoy it :) Caps: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-dletn6apbhE/UwPpnCojeLI/ DdM/blgOqIK6QoA/w506-h930/LibreOffice-Y%25C4%25B1lmaz-Vural.jpg nice!!! ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/ mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to- unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: math syntax highlighting
OTOH - It would be great if the Math control would act just like other text in Writer, i.e. - being able to change some of the Math's colors, text-attributes (font-size) etc. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Jose Guilherme Vanz v...@libreoffice.org wrote: Hi I started to work on the math syntax highlighting. Actually, I can identify when we have some problems with parenthesis without close and etc. Now, I would like to change the color or background color to show to the user the problematic character. How can I change the color of the string? Is there some field in the OUString that can I do that? No OUString does not carry any formatting information.. it is merely a glorified UTF-16 sequence of character... otoh there are SetColor/SetBackgroundColor api generaly associated with the object that involved in rendering the string, like the font... Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Please test Windows Bibisect
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Florian has done some incredible work here Thanks a lot, Florian! but we need some testers. If you have a windows machine please try to download the bibisect and play around with it. You can report any problems directly to this thread as it'll be monitored by both myself and Florian. Thanks! Is it possible to have some short explanation on how to use the tool? (besides filling in the location of the local repo remote repo) I'll try to have some cycles for testing it this week. http://florei-libo.115.at/QA/monoBibiGUI/ Almost registered for a garbage website by mistake =) @Florian - really incredible work, thank you for your continuing support of the project :) +1 -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] (BLOCKER) Bug-74825: Windows (x64): LibreOffice could not able to start as LCMS2.DLL is missing.
I am encountering the same problem on my Windows 8.1 machine. After installing master from TinderBox#42 from today (11.02.2014) - cannot run it with same error. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Dushyant Bhalgami dushyant.bhalg...@synerzip.com wrote: Hello Logged one BLOCKER bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74825 After installing the latest master build from TinderBox#42 on Windows 7(x64), LibreOffice stopped launching. While trying to launch the LibreOffice, receiving popup message that The program can't start because LCMS2.DLL is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem -- Thanks Regards, Dushyant Bhalgami This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
IRC going crazy ?
Hi, Any idea why IRC is going nuts and shows people keep getting disconnected? Best, Adam ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
RE: Annoying green square in top left hand corner of Writer document window
Didn't know that myself.. good to know ! :) Adam Fyne Office: +972-77-517-5008 Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Blog -Original Message- From: libreoffice-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:libreoffice-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Tor Lillqvist Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:31 AM To: Alex Thurgood Cc: libreoffice-dev Subject: Re: Annoying green square in top left hand corner of Writer document window It is an intentional debugging aid and is present only when LO is built with --enable-dbgutil. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Questions about Domain Mapper
Hi Miklos, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Miklos Vajna vmik...@collabora.co.ukwrote: Hi Adam, When I look at the code that processes these nodes - I see that all of these parameters are being processed here http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper.cxx#2114 and all are being inserted to the 'rContext' or used with 'appendGrabBag'. So it seems like I should add a flag that is turned on when 'rPrChange' is entered, and add a lot of 'if-else' statements in the code that processes all the 'italic', 'bold' etc to check - if the flag is 'on' - insert the property to the 'RedlineParams' structure, otherwise - insert the property to the 'rContext'. Is this the right approach? It will dirty the code... You don't have to deal with each property individually, you can just handle the collected properties. Have a look at text::XRedline, its makeRedline() method takes a beans::PropertyValues, which is a string-any map in practice. You can add a new RedlineOldformat (or similar) key to that map, and the value of that key can be your property list. When you handle that property in sw core, you can convert that to an SfxItemset. (Have a look at how to code handles the property list - SfxItemSet conversion when you append a new text portion with a given set of properties.) I think I was misunderstood. I think you thought I was asking : I need to add each property like bold\italic\underline separatly to the RedlineParams. What I actually meant to ask was: Currently there are a lot of XML nodes that might appear under 'rPr' node (that is under the 'rPrChange'). For example: 'bold', 'boldbidi', 'italic', 'italicbidi', language, etc. Currently each of these XML nodes is handled by different code in the 'DomainMapper.cxx' file (here is some of it: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper.cxx#2100 ) So I am asking - do I have to go node-by-node and add it to the 'property-list' that will be in the 'RedlineParams'? Or is there any smart way of turning on some flag when the 'rPrChange-rPr' tag is entered, and checking at the end of the 'rPrChange-rPr' tag which properties were inserted to the 'rContext' and add those properties to the 'RedlineParams'. Best, Adam -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Questions about Domain Mapper
*And some more elaboration on that:* I just checked a simple DOCX that had some text in 'bold' and 'italic'. I then turned ON the 'track changes' and removed the 'bold' and 'italic'. When I round-tripped the DOCX through LO - the outputted file *had* the 'bold' and 'italic' turned on. This means that the nodes that were inside the 'r-rPrChange-rPr' were treated as if they were simply inside the 'r'-'rPr' (which is wrong). This ephasises the need to detect when 'r-rPrChange-rPr' are being analyzed in the importer - and to *not* analyze them normally on the run itself, but to store them in the 'RedlineParams' somehow. On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Adam Fyne adam.f...@cloudon.com wrote: Hi Miklos, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Miklos Vajna vmik...@collabora.co.ukwrote: Hi Adam, When I look at the code that processes these nodes - I see that all of these parameters are being processed here http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper.cxx#2114 and all are being inserted to the 'rContext' or used with 'appendGrabBag'. So it seems like I should add a flag that is turned on when 'rPrChange' is entered, and add a lot of 'if-else' statements in the code that processes all the 'italic', 'bold' etc to check - if the flag is 'on' - insert the property to the 'RedlineParams' structure, otherwise - insert the property to the 'rContext'. Is this the right approach? It will dirty the code... You don't have to deal with each property individually, you can just handle the collected properties. Have a look at text::XRedline, its makeRedline() method takes a beans::PropertyValues, which is a string-any map in practice. You can add a new RedlineOldformat (or similar) key to that map, and the value of that key can be your property list. When you handle that property in sw core, you can convert that to an SfxItemset. (Have a look at how to code handles the property list - SfxItemSet conversion when you append a new text portion with a given set of properties.) I think I was misunderstood. I think you thought I was asking : I need to add each property like bold\italic\underline separatly to the RedlineParams. What I actually meant to ask was: Currently there are a lot of XML nodes that might appear under 'rPr' node (that is under the 'rPrChange'). For example: 'bold', 'boldbidi', 'italic', 'italicbidi', language, etc. Currently each of these XML nodes is handled by different code in the 'DomainMapper.cxx' file (here is some of it: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper.cxx#2100 ) So I am asking - do I have to go node-by-node and add it to the 'property-list' that will be in the 'RedlineParams'? Or is there any smart way of turning on some flag when the 'rPrChange-rPr' tag is entered, and checking at the end of the 'rPrChange-rPr' tag which properties were inserted to the 'rContext' and add those properties to the 'RedlineParams'. -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: FW: Smart-Art in Writer - Correct 'Import' approach ?
Hi Miklos, See my comments below. Thanks, Adam On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Miklos Vajna vmik...@suse.cz wrote: Hi Adam, On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 05:35:12PM +0300, Adam Fyne adam.f...@cloudon.com wrote: We are doing some work on implementing 'Smart-Art *Preservation*' in Writer. Meaning – if the user doesWordèLOèWordround-trip we plan that they won't lose their Smart-Art object. Currently Smart-Art is being imported into *simple shapes* in Writer (which don't exactly look the same), and most of the actual data and binding between shapes is lost (not to mention it doesn't look the same). In order to preserve the original Smart-Art object – we would plan on loading the entire XML nodes and attributes of Smart-Art to property maps (e.g. Miklos's great 'InteropGrabBag'). This makes sense, yes. In addition, instead of showing to the user simple shapes (that he can currently edit and move around) – we would like to change this and show the user a *locked* bitmap of the smart-art, that the user cannot manipulate (so that he can at least preserve the original Smart-Art). What is the benefit of this, from a user's point of view? Because at this phase, we are not going to add logic to 'manipulate' the Smart-Art object, so if a user is allowed to changed the location of the shapes, and then saves back the file - and opens it in Word - he won't understand why his 'changes' to the shapes weren't persisted. That's why we believe it is best to simply not allow any changes, because they won't be persisted anyway. Should we take a different approach that maybe pops a message when loading a DOCX with Smart-Art asking the user: *We noticed you are importing a DOCX with Smart-Art. Would you like to preserve it and keep it un-editable or convert it to simple shapes ?* And then act according to the user's choice? (choosing simple shapes will lose the 'Smart-Art' functionality, while choosing 'preserve' will not let the user edit the smart-art, only see it). This is certainly possible, e.g. the ASCII filter asks for encoding IIRC, the CSV import filter is also interactive, but one popup for every smartart is probably a bit too much, imagine a presentation containing 100 smartart shapes. :) The idea was to show a single pop-up for 'all Smart-Art' objects in the file - asking do you want to convert the Smart-Art in this file to simple shapes (and lose functionallity) or preserve the original Smart-Art objects ? Miklos -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: FW: Smart-Art in Writer - Correct 'Import' approach ?
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Miklos Vajna vmik...@suse.cz wrote: Hi, On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:26:31PM +0300, Adam Fyne adam.f...@cloudon.com wrote: we would like to change this and show the user a *locked* bitmap of the smart-art, that the user cannot manipulate (so that he can at least preserve the original Smart-Art). What is the benefit of this, from a user's point of view? Because at this phase, we are not going to add logic to 'manipulate' the Smart-Art object, so if a user is allowed to changed the location of the shapes, and then saves back the file - and opens it in Word - he won't understand why his 'changes' to the shapes weren't persisted. That's why we believe it is best to simply not allow any changes, because they won't be persisted anyway. Hmm, when we discussed the InteropGrabBag idea in the ESC call, AIUI the proposed solution for the attached unhandled meatada vs user editing problem was to empty the InteropGrabBag in case the user edits the object in question: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-July/054428.html invalidate on copy/mutate This way, in case of no editing, the metadata is kept, in case of editing, the edited object is exported as a normal groupshape and the user's modifications win over the unhandled metadata. The idea was to show a single pop-up for 'all Smart-Art' objects in the file - asking do you want to convert the Smart-Art in this file to simple shapes (and lose functionallity) or preserve the original Smart-Art objects ? Ah, that sounds better. And then would you do this for all filters that may contain smartart: PPTX, DOCX, XLSX? (Not sure if we support smartart inside XLSX ATM.) If so, opinion from someone hacking Impress would be appreciated. Currently - the scope of the work is for DOCX. Miklos -- [image: appicon.png] *Adam Fyne* Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://site.cloudon.com/blog ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
FW: Smart-Art in Writer - Correct 'Import' approach ?
Anyone ? any thoughts on the correct approach to take ? I haven't received any feedback about the main question … :\ *Adam Fyne* *Office:* +972-77-517-5008 Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://www.cloudon.com/ *From:* Adam Fyne [mailto:adam.f...@cloudon.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:54 PM *To:* 'libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org' *Cc:* Tsahi Glik (tsahi.g...@cloudon.com) *Subject:* Smart-Art in Writer - Correct 'Import' approach ? Hi Community, We are doing some work on implementing 'Smart-Art *Preservation*' in Writer. Meaning – if the user doesWordèLOèWordround-trip we plan that they won't lose their Smart-Art object. Currently Smart-Art is being imported into *simple shapes* in Writer (which don't exactly look the same), and most of the actual data and binding between shapes is lost (not to mention it doesn't look the same). In order to preserve the original Smart-Art object – we would plan on loading the entire XML nodes and attributes of Smart-Art to property maps (e.g. Miklos's great 'InteropGrabBag'). In addition, instead of showing to the user simple shapes (that he can currently edit and move around) – we would like to change this and show the user a *locked* bitmap of the smart-art, that the user cannot manipulate (so that he can at least preserve the original Smart-Art). Is the approach we are taking good (changing the current malfunctioning behavior that converts Smart-Art to shapes). Should we take a different approach that maybe pops a message when loading a DOCX with Smart-Art asking the user: *We noticed you are importing a DOCX with Smart-Art. Would you like to preserve it and keep it un-editable or convert it to simple shapes ?* And then act according to the user's choice? (choosing simple shapes will lose the 'Smart-Art' functionality, while choosing 'preserve' will not let the user edit the smart-art, only see it). Best, *Adam Fyne* *Office:* +972-77-517-5008 Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://www.cloudon.com/ ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Smart-Art in Writer - Correct 'Import' approach ?
Hi Community, We are doing some work on implementing 'Smart-Art *Preservation*' in Writer. Meaning – if the user doesWordèLOèWordround-trip we plan that they won't lose their Smart-Art object. Currently Smart-Art is being imported into *simple shapes* in Writer (which don't exactly look the same), and most of the actual data and binding between shapes is lost (not to mention it doesn't look the same). In order to preserve the original Smart-Art object – we would plan on loading the entire XML nodes and attributes of Smart-Art to property maps (e.g. Miklos's great 'InteropGrabBag'). In addition, instead of showing to the user simple shapes (that he can currently edit and move around) – we would like to change this and show the user a *locked* bitmap of the smart-art, that the user cannot manipulate (so that he can at least preserve the original Smart-Art). Is the approach we are taking good (changing the current malfunctioning behavior that converts Smart-Art to shapes). Should we take a different approach that maybe pops a message when loading a DOCX with Smart-Art asking the user: *We noticed you are importing a DOCX with Smart-Art. Would you like to preserve it and keep it un-editable or convert it to simple shapes ?* And then act according to the user's choice? (choosing simple shapes will lose the 'Smart-Art' functionality, while choosing 'preserve' will not let the user edit the smart-art, only see it). Best, *Adam Fyne* *Office:* +972-77-517-5008 Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://www.cloudon.com/ ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Adding 'Chart' support in Writer
Hi community, We have started working on adding 'Chart' support in Writer. We found out that the 'Chart' code is not inside Impress, it is in the shared 'oox' folder. We've managed to get to a state where the charts are now *imported* by Writer, but they are still not rendered \ exported correctly. I've attached the patch file with the changes we did for anyone to see. *We'd be happy to know if you think we are on the right track.* Best, *Adam Fyne* *Office:* +972-77-517-5008 Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://www.cloudon.com/ chart_patch-1.patch.patch Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Writer Line Numbering Import \ Export
Hi, There is a bug I am trying to fix regarding line numbering. In Word, a line numbering node typically looks like this: It seems like the DOCX importer does not make use of the imported 'w:start' attribute (it is imported herehttp://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper.cxx#1380 ). What I saw was that in the function PropertyMap::CloseSectionGrouphttp://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/dmapper/PropertyMap.cxx#830 there is a check if m_nLnnMod is set. The function also looks at m_nLnnMin when setting the PROP_PARA_LINE_NUMBER_START_VALUE. However, this m_nLnnMin is set in only when the parser reads the NS_sprm::LN_SLnnMinhttp://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper.cxx#2537value. In addition, the m_nLnnMod is set only when the parser reads the NS_sprm::LN_SNLnnModhttp://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper.cxx#2519value. Am I correct to assume that these values are read only in the DOC importer, and not in the DOCX importer? Is it true to say that DOCX attributes are always 'NS_ooxml::….' ? If I am correct – when I parse the 'start value' in the relevant ' NS_ooxml::LN_CT_LineNumber_starthttp://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/dmapper/DomainMapper.cxx#1380' node, should I simply mimick the behavior of the 'NS_sprm::LN_SLnnMin' parsing? Best, *Adam Fyne* *Office:* +972-77-517-5008 Twitter http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc | LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon | Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc | Bloghttp://www.cloudon.com/ image003.jpg___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Guidance on 'Paragraph Tab' bug
Hi Miklos, Thanks for the help. it helps a lot ! See my comments below in blue ... I have a few questions: 1. Shouldn't CT_PTab call ptab instead of tab? That's right, except that writerfilter::ooxml::OOXMLFastContextHandler has a tab() method, but no ptab() method, that will be one thing you need to implement first. Why would I implement a 'ptab' function? From what you wrote below - it seems that I do not need to do any action for 'ptab'. So does your recommendation still stand that I need 'ptab'? (you said that 'tab()' inserts a '\t' instead of the tab element). 2. What is the meaning of the 'tag' attribute of the 'resource' node? As far as I know, the action .. action=name/ is always a method call. The question was actually about the 'tag' element of a resource, not the 'action' element. 3. The way information is stored in 'model.xml' is so confusing. You're not alone, writerfilter/documentation/ooxml/model.xml is what we found out so far, feel free to extend that if you manage to decode some more detail. In short, whenever you add support for new XML tags, you typically need to extend the file at two places: - the new tag is a child of some existing tag, so extend the parent's definition - you also need to add a matching resource tag in model.xml Once those two definitions match, you get new tokens in dmapper. 363dafefad14411a16f6ea9d2ee0d55b67bc9c8d is hopefully a good example. (Though your case is easier, as you add a new token in an existing namespace.) What do you mean when you say that my case is easy because I add a new token to an existing namespace? what namespace would that be? (I looked at the commit you mentioned and it doesn't make any sense to me...) From the code – I understood that 'action' calls a function in OOXMLFastContextHandler. When do we need such actions? Why is this done on some nodes and on other nodes (like 'run', 'paragraph', 'brush' etc) not done? So – say I need to add a new function called 'ptab' to 'OOXMLFastContextHandler' – Do I simply copy the logic of 'tab()' ? I think it's all about where do you want to handle the input. Normally, the tokenizer just generates these tokens, and dmapper does the mapping. However, in case of tabs, other (RTF, WW8) formats handle the tab as a normal character, so in case of DOCX, an action is used, that converts the OOXML tokens to a simple character, so in dmapper you always get a tab character. So actions are used to generate these fake tokens. Other example: w:hyperlink is also handled in the tokenizer, and it generates a HYPERLINK field from it, and dmapper handles only that. So, should I handle 'ptab' in OOXMLFastContextHandler' or not? Sounds like I shouldn't. If not - should I remove the action from the xml node? Where do I parse the attributes themselves of the 'ptab'? If you handle ptab as a normal element in model.xml, you'll have the usual way to get all its attributes. I would recommend going that way, as ptab is not a character (tab is), but an element with attributes. From what I saw - 'ptab' attributes *are* handled in the dmapper. So the *current* way it works, where 'ptab' is both parsed in 'OOXMLFastContextHandler' and it's attributes are parsed in the dmapper is very confusing. I add it as properties to some existing object of the core? I would check how existing similar features are implement, and do something similar. Normal tabs are not a good example, as those are stored as a \t character inside SwTxtNode, but page break may be a good example. How is 'Page Break' stored in the core? Is there some tutorial on how to add an entirely new object to the core? (you told me once that adding a property to an existing core object is relatively easy, but adding a new object is a much more complex task). Sure, so -- as usual, the first step would be to design how the document model should store these paragraph tabs, then either do the UNO API or some UI, so you can test it. Then you can continue with filters and layout, etc. You say either do the UNO API or some UI. What UI do you mean? How would one control the 'paragraph tabs' through the UI? Thanks, it helps a great deal ! Adam ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice-qa] Question : FILEOPEN bug vs 'filters and storage' bug
Hi, This is my first mail sent to the 'libreoffice-qa' mail-list. I hope this is the correct method of doing things... My question is: What is the difference between bugs posted under 'Writer' section with the keyword 'FILEOPEN', to bugs in the 'filter and storage' section? To me - it seems as if all the bugs under that have the 'FILEOPEN' keyword should be under the 'filters and storage' section, no? Best, Adam ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
