Re: inter-sheet formulas don't automatically update any more?
The bug is still there in 4.1.2.2 as far as I can tell. I can try to create a test case, but the spreadsheet I have right now is very complicated and proprietary. There's also a regression where references to CSV sheets give a #REF rather than a value half the time, which also renders the 4.1 branch unusable. Thanks, Yi On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Kohei Yoshida kohei.yosh...@collabora.com wrote: On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 08:31 -0500, Yi Ding wrote: It seems like since the release of 4.1 inter-sheet formulas (formulas that span multiple sheets in the spreadsheet) don't automatically update themselves anymore. Is this a bug or a feature? We would need a bit more information there and preferably a test case. There was a bug that may fit your problem description which I fixed between 4.1.0 and 4.1.1. But to be sure if it's the same problem, we would need a test document from you. Is it possible for you to file a bugzilla bug with a test document and steps to reproduce your bug? Also, have you tried the latest 4.1.x release and see if the bug is still there? Thanks. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, Consultant Principal Software Engineer Collabora Productivity ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: inter-sheet formulas don't automatically update any more?
OK, thank you for letting me know. Is there a bug number where I can track this? Unfortunately it's a showstopper bug for us right now. Thanks, Yi On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Markus Mohrhard markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote: Hey, 2013/9/23 Yi Ding yi.s.d...@gmail.com It seems like since the release of 4.1 inter-sheet formulas (formulas that span multiple sheets in the spreadsheet) don't automatically update themselves anymore. Is this a bug or a feature? It is a bug and can be fixed with a CTRL+SHIFT+F9. Somehow the formula tree is not built during import right now. Regards, Markus ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
inter-sheet formulas don't automatically update any more?
It seems like since the release of 4.1 inter-sheet formulas (formulas that span multiple sheets in the spreadsheet) don't automatically update themselves anymore. Is this a bug or a feature? Cheers, Yi ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: C++11 in LibreOffice
Fair point. :-) Let me see if I can get a build working on Windows this weekend. I see on the wiki that building with VS 2010 is not yet supported: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies Is this information still current? On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote: Hi there, On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 11:21 -0500, Yi Ding wrote: +1 ... +1 ... +1 ... Thanks for your encouragement, but this is a developers list :-) which of these do you want to work on ? There is low-hanging fruit everywhere for developers to focus on - which would you like to look into ? Startup performance for example: reducing the configmgr thrash by tweaking that code to allow us to split out settings that are not commonly needed eg. the labels data would give a measureable boost to startup. It requires only a hacker - is it you ? :-) All the best, Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: C++11 in LibreOffice
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com wrote: On 20/07/12 16:31, Yi Ding wrote: Fair point. :-) Let me see if I can get a build working on Windows this weekend. I see on the wiki that building with VS 2010 is not yet supported: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies Is this information still current? yes it is; there is actually a patch for MSVC2010 attached here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30655 but it is quite outdated and apparently even when it was written there was some CLR thing that didn't work. if you know the MSVC toolchain well then you could try to get that to work, and it would be very useful, but you will probably have to spend some time on it; currently only MSVC 2008 is known to work. Great, thanks. I'll give it a try, although after reading the Building on Windows thread I might end up giving up and just running the build on a VM. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: C++11 in LibreOffice
+1 on considering startup performance/memory usage. It looks like with Office 13 Microsoft has done more work in getting Office to startup faster (no benchmarks, just anecdotal experience). +1 on the ability to do some kind of cross-compiling solution in parallel. +1 on gigabyte spreadsheets of floating point numbers. The competition kind of sucks in this regard... :-) On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 16:04 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: i'm saying it doesn't benefit from the sophisticated optimizations that vendor compilers like SunStudio or Intel do that speed up your BLAS stuff with gigabytes of floating point arrays by X times because office suites don't contain gigabytes of floating point arrays. So - Kohei has been working for years to turn Calc spreadsheets into gigabyte arrays of floating point numbers - precisely to take advantage of this sort of optimisation :-) Having said that, I totally agree, our problems are 95% algorithmic, and fiddling with compiler optimiser settings is the last refuge of the desperate man ;-) The thing that concerns me about gcc vs. MSVC++ is not the speed of the generated code, but it's size (which impacts startup performance, I/O load, memory use etc.). If you checkout the tables you linked the binary size column is quite stark: http://www.willus.com/ccomp_benchmark2.shtml?p18+s12 http://www.willus.com/ccomp_benchmark2.shtml?p14+s12 in several cases a 2x growth. So - clearly this would need benchmarking various ways to see what the story is there with -Os etc. IMHO it's well worth looking at a gcc cross-compiled solution for Windows though; if only to use really fast, fully repeatable, Free Software tooling; though it'd be nice to use an enterprise / maintained cross-compiler - where is cygnus when you need them :-) All the best, Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
regression in 3.6.0rc1
Hi everyone, I filed a bug report (52205) for a regression in referencing CSV files in 3.6.0rc1. There are two trivial files attached so it should be pretty straightforward to confirm. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52205 Would it be possible for this to be considered a blocker for 3.6.0? Thanks, Yi ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
