Re: [ANN] Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.10

[Michael Stahl]

On 19.09.2015 21:32, Robinson Tryon wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 09:30:55AM -0700, julien2412 wrote:
>>> I'm not sure and, perhaps it's not related, but it seems docx attachments
>>> have mimetype "application/zip" instead of
>>> "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"
>>> (eg: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94359). Even if
>>> confirmed, not a blocker of course ! :-)
> 
> Because OOXML and ODF both use ZIP as a container for a bunch of XML,
> I wonder if the type-detecting mechanisms aren't sufficiently nuanced
> to detect and differentiate between ZIP and ZIP+(DOCX guts).

> Looks like ODF files are recognized quite well on this system, but
> it's struggling with OOXML. Is there a correlation between authoring
> software and recognition?

ODF packages were specifically designed so that relatively dumb tools
like "file" can just look up the mimetype at a particular offset in the
file; OOXML packages on the other hand don't make it so easy.

> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 1:27 PM, David Tardon  wrote:
>> That's nothing new. The attachment format auto-detection has never really
>> worked.
> 
> We did have much worse file-type detection when we were hosted at FDO,
> but I believe that things have gotten significantly better.

yes, there has definitely been a significant improvement.

> David: Is there something we could do to help upstream utilities more
> easily recognize OOXML files?  (both files that LibreOffice creates,
> as well as ones from other sources)

possibly the check in file could be made smarter, if anybody has time to
investigate that...


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [ANN] Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.10

[David Tardon]

Hi,

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 09:30:55AM -0700, julien2412 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not sure and, perhaps it's not related, but it seems docx attachments
> have mimetype "application/zip" instead of
> "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"
> (eg: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94359). Even if
> confirmed, not a blocker of course ! :-)

That's nothing new. The attachment format auto-detection has never really
worked.

D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [ANN] Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.10

[Robinson Tryon]

> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 09:30:55AM -0700, julien2412 wrote:
>> I'm not sure and, perhaps it's not related, but it seems docx attachments
>> have mimetype "application/zip" instead of
>> "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"
>> (eg: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94359). Even if
>> confirmed, not a blocker of course ! :-)

Because OOXML and ODF both use ZIP as a container for a bunch of XML,
I wonder if the type-detecting mechanisms aren't sufficiently nuanced
to detect and differentiate between ZIP and ZIP+(DOCX guts).

Here's a quick test using the 'file' command (v5.14)

qubit@loopbackoffice:~/libreoffice/bugs$ find -type f -print0 | xargs -0 file
./90736/TableCellBorderLineStyle.pptx: Microsoft
PowerPoint 2007+
./93865/fubar.odt: OpenDocument Text
./93853/checkbox bug_pdf-test-export.pdf:  PDF document, version 1.4
./93853/.~lock.checkbox bug.odt#:  ASCII text,
with no line terminators
./93853/checkbox bug.odt:  OpenDocument Text
./93356/testsort.ods:  OpenDocument Spreadsheet
./92703/Character.Controls.rtf:Rich Text
Format data, version 1, ANSI
./91293/impress-file-saved-as-pptx.pptx:   Zip archive
data, at least v2.0 to extract
./91293/.~lock.impress-file-saved-as-pptx_try-2.pptx#: ASCII text,
with no line terminators
./91293/impress-file-saved-as-pptx_try-2.pptx: Zip archive
data, at least v2.0 to extract
./93868/Lecture 1 African Historical Background.pptx:  Microsoft
PowerPoint 2007+
./93851/Untitled 1.ods:OpenDocument Spreadsheet

Looks like ODF files are recognized quite well on this system, but
it's struggling with OOXML. Is there a correlation between authoring
software and recognition?

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 1:27 PM, David Tardon  wrote:
> That's nothing new. The attachment format auto-detection has never really
> worked.

We did have much worse file-type detection when we were hosted at FDO,
but I believe that things have gotten significantly better.

David: Is there something we could do to help upstream utilities more
easily recognize OOXML files?  (both files that LibreOffice creates,
as well as ones from other sources)


Thanks,
--R

-- 
Robinson Tryon
QA Engineer - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
qu...@libreoffice.org
802-379-9482 | IRC: colonelqubit on Freenode
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [ANN] Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.10

[julien2412]

Hi,

I'm not sure and, perhaps it's not related, but it seems docx attachments
have mimetype "application/zip" instead of
"application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"
(eg: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94359). Even if
confirmed, not a blocker of course ! :-)

Julien



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/ANN-Bugzilla-upgraded-to-4-4-10-tp4160166p4160758.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [ANN] Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.10

[Robinson Tryon]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Michael Stahl  wrote:
> On 13.09.2015 11:54, Robinson Tryon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Bugzilla has been upgraded to 4.4.10, and we've made patches to
>> restrict access to the Importance fields (Priority & Severity):
>> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Administration#Access_Control
>
> h, yay!
>
> but ... the page says only the "blocker" severity is restricted, i hope
> the documentation is incomplete and users can't set their own bugs to
> "critical"?

Yes, further restrictions to the Severity field (and other fields)
will be forthcoming :-) I'd like to make sure these changes are solid
before we deploy further tweaks, so please let us know this week if there are
any issues with the 4.4.10 upgrade or the existing set of restrictions.

Thanks,
--R

-- 
Robinson Tryon
QA Engineer - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
qu...@libreoffice.org
802-379-9482 | IRC: colonelqubit on Freenode
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.10

[Robinson Tryon]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Michael Stahl  wrote:
> On 13.09.2015 11:54, Robinson Tryon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Bugzilla has been upgraded to 4.4.10, and we've made patches to
>> restrict access to the Importance fields (Priority & Severity):
>> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Administration#Access_Control
>
> h, yay!
>
> but ... the page says only the "blocker" severity is restricted, i hope
> the documentation is incomplete and users can't set their own bugs to
> "critical"?

Yes, further restrictions to the Severity field (and other fields)
will be forthcoming :-) I'd like to make sure these changes are solid
before we deploy further tweaks, so please let us know this week if there are
any issues with the 4.4.10 upgrade or the existing set of restrictions.

Thanks,
--R

-- 
Robinson Tryon
QA Engineer - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
qu...@libreoffice.org
802-379-9482 | IRC: colonelqubit on Freenode
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [ANN] Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.10

[Michael Stahl]

On 13.09.2015 11:54, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Bugzilla has been upgraded to 4.4.10, and we've made patches to
> restrict access to the Importance fields (Priority & Severity):
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Administration#Access_Control

h, yay!

but ... the page says only the "blocker" severity is restricted, i hope
the documentation is incomplete and users can't set their own bugs to
"critical"?


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[ANN] Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.10

[Robinson Tryon]

Hi all,

Bugzilla has been upgraded to 4.4.10, and we've made patches to
restrict access to the Importance fields (Priority & Severity):
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Administration#Access_Control

If you're restricted from changing the Priority field on a bug, please
let one of the Bugzilla admins know and we'll add you to the
'Contributors' group in the bugtracker:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Administration#Administrators

If you see any issues with the Bugzilla upgrade or the access control
that's been implemented, please drop us an email.

Thanks,
--R


-- 
Robinson Tryon
QA Engineer - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
qu...@libreoffice.org
802-379-9482 | IRC: colonelqubit on Freenode
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Bugzilla upgraded to 4.4.10 (and Severity/Priority fields restricted)

[Robinson Tryon]

Hi all,

Bugzilla has been upgraded to 4.4.10 and updated patches for
restricting access to the Importance fields (Priority & Severity) have
been deployed as well:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Administration#Access_Control

Everyone in QA (plus the devs) should be a member of the
'Contributors' group in Bugzilla, as well as any users who've read the
wiki pages and understand that we have guidelines for prioritization:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Priority#Getting_Started

One of the Administrators can help add people to this group. Just ping us:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Administration#Administrators

If you see any issues with the Bugzilla upgrade or the access control
that's been implemented, please let me know!

Thanks,
--R

-- 
Robinson Tryon
QA Engineer - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
qu...@libreoffice.org
802-379-9482 | IRC: colonelqubit on Freenode
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/