Re: [Libreoffice] OneGit(tm) migration plan
Christian Lohmaier wrote: /* artwok */ is meant to not being merged. I think this is a bad choice, as you will always need it when building, and for the same reasons it is discussed not to be worthy to be merged, I'm all in favor of merging it: Seconded. That also makes cleaning up / moving stuff around much easier. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpla3IgMQjcr.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] OneGit(tm) migration plan
On Wed, 25 May 2011 15:07:05 +0200 Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Christian Lohmaier wrote: /* artwok */ is meant to not being merged. I think this is a bad choice, [...] Seconded. That also makes cleaning up / moving stuff around much easier. I brought that up initially, but I wont defend it to death. Both ways have their advantages and disadvantages. Lets see what the consensus in the ESC is tommorrow. Best, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] OneGit(tm) migration plan
Hi *, On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: [onegit] I have put what I have come-up with so far on our Wiki http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/One_Git_Conversion [...] Comments and suggestion are welcomed on the 'Discussion Page' associated in the Wiki. Hope it is not off-topic here as well (if it is, please tell and I'll just copy it to wiki discussion page) /* artwok */ is meant to not being merged. I think this is a bad choice, as you will always need it when building, and for the same reasons it is discussed not to be worthy to be merged, I'm all in favor of merging it: * changes very infrequently (thus no significant increase in history data, but even if it was: Does it matter whether you pull it into the one or into the other repository? So I don't understand the only binaries argument as supporting the idea to keeping it separate) * (mostly only) designers work on it. They have no use for git, be it a seperate repository or not. They don't need any history, the cannot use diffs on binaries anyway. A static tarball containing the content or just a webpage for browsing the icons is enough and better suited to satisfy them. ciao Christian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] OneGit(tm) migration plan
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: The fact that our source is spread among 20 git repositories has been a source of grief and quite a common complaint from people joining the project. Recently there ave been some tests conducted to see if having just one big git repo would be viable from a performace stand-point. Björn Michaelsen did some preliminarily measurement that indicated that it would be bearable, and this has been discussed few times during Technical Steering Committee's conference calls. The consensus emerging is that the benefit outweigh the cost. I have been working on setting-up a concrete plan on how to do this migration. I have put what I have come-up with so far on our Wiki http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/One_Git_Conversion I got slightly different figures for the .git/ of each repository. Instead of 1666MB total, I got 1350MB. You may have to run 'git gc' on your repositories. I got the 1350MB figure by testing with fresh clones. Tell me if you want me to update the wiki page with these figures. Simos This is still a work in progress, and there are small and full scale test to be conducted. Planning and exact deployment plan are also very much a work in progress. Never-the-less the general idea is to try to do this migration sightly after 3.4.2, so roughly in the August 2011 time-frame. Comments and suggestion are welcomed on the 'Discussion Page' associated in the Wiki. Please do not do substantial change to the main page without discussing it first. (fixing my horrible English spelling/grammar is fine, of course :-) ) Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] OneGit(tm) migration plan
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote: I got slightly different figures for the .git/ of each repository. Instead of 1666MB total, I got 1350MB. You may have to run 'git gc' on your repositories. I got the 1350MB figure by testing with fresh clones. Yep, very possible... but these number are mostly to get an idea of the order of magnitude... Tell me if you want me to update the wiki page with these figures. Sure, no problem. Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] OneGit(tm) migration plan
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote: I got slightly different figures for the .git/ of each repository. Instead of 1666MB total, I got 1350MB. You may have to run 'git gc' on your repositories. I got the 1350MB figure by testing with fresh clones. Yep, very possible... but these number are mostly to get an idea of the order of magnitude... Tell me if you want me to update the wiki page with these figures. Sure, no problem. Done. Simos ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] OneGit(tm) migration plan
The fact that our source is spread among 20 git repositories has been a source of grief and quite a common complaint from people joining the project. Recently there ave been some tests conducted to see if having just one big git repo would be viable from a performace stand-point. Björn Michaelsen did some preliminarily measurement that indicated that it would be bearable, and this has been discussed few times during Technical Steering Committee's conference calls. The consensus emerging is that the benefit outweigh the cost. I have been working on setting-up a concrete plan on how to do this migration. I have put what I have come-up with so far on our Wiki http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/One_Git_Conversion This is still a work in progress, and there are small and full scale test to be conducted. Planning and exact deployment plan are also very much a work in progress. Never-the-less the general idea is to try to do this migration sightly after 3.4.2, so roughly in the August 2011 time-frame. Comments and suggestion are welcomed on the 'Discussion Page' associated in the Wiki. Please do not do substantial change to the main page without discussing it first. (fixing my horrible English spelling/grammar is fine, of course :-) ) Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
