Re: [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] more SV_DECL_PTRARR patches (19)

2012-06-21 Thread Noel Grandin



On 2012-06-20 19:51, Michael Stahl wrote:
apparently you don't :) or at least i still had to adapt some Count()s 
in DBG_UTIL

Oh darn, you are correct, sorry about that.
Took it out while I looking for another problem and forgot to put it back.

Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] more SV_DECL_PTRARR patches (19)

2012-06-20 Thread Michael Stahl
On 19/06/12 17:04, Noel Grandin wrote:
 Hi
 
 These patches convert various places from the SV_DECL_PTRARR macros to 
 the STL collection classes.
 
 They all pass a full make check (and I compile with --enable-dbgutil)

apparently you don't :) or at least i still had to adapt some Count()s
in DBG_UTIL

 Warning - the last patch is a bit of a monster, it is one of the most 
 heavily used data-structures in the SW module.

pushed to master, couldn't find anything obviously wrong which probably
means i missed something :)

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice