Re: [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] more SV_DECL_PTRARR patches (19)
On 2012-06-20 19:51, Michael Stahl wrote: apparently you don't :) or at least i still had to adapt some Count()s in DBG_UTIL Oh darn, you are correct, sorry about that. Took it out while I looking for another problem and forgot to put it back. Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] more SV_DECL_PTRARR patches (19)
On 19/06/12 17:04, Noel Grandin wrote: Hi These patches convert various places from the SV_DECL_PTRARR macros to the STL collection classes. They all pass a full make check (and I compile with --enable-dbgutil) apparently you don't :) or at least i still had to adapt some Count()s in DBG_UTIL Warning - the last patch is a bit of a monster, it is one of the most heavily used data-structures in the SW module. pushed to master, couldn't find anything obviously wrong which probably means i missed something :) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice