Re: Disabling unit tests, redux
Hey, On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote: I don't even know the names of the various modules I'm working in and prefer to let the smart system figure it out ;-) make build-nocheck works great and things run so much faster on my little laptop. Thank you. I put this info in the wiki to save questions in the future. Please don't. There are good reasons we don't document building without the tests. We had some problems in the past and normally force every developer to execute the minimum amount of tests during a full build. While working on some parts of the code you normally only rebuild this part which limits the number of executed tests. Regards, Markus -Keith On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.orgwrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:56:59AM -0500, Keith Curtis wrote: It appears when making changes to individual C++ files that my computer spends about 90% of the build time running unit tests. It seems that ‘make foo.build’ will not run the tests, at least this is what I “discovered” few days ago. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Disabling unit tests, redux
On 12/18/2013 02:32 AM, Keith Curtis wrote: I don't even know the names of the various modules I'm working in and prefer to let the smart system figure it out ;-) The module names match the top-level directory names, in case that wasn't obvious. So if you do a change to e.g. desktop/source/app/app.cxx it suffices to make desktop to get instdir/ updated. Stephan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Disabling unit tests, redux
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 09:20 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: Please don't. There are good reasons we don't document building without the tests. Indeed; this is/was the consensus of the ESC when this was last discussed; we should not be advertising ways to disable the tests - they are there for a reason. Instead please build just the module you're concerned with. Of course, profiles / patches welcome to speed them up =) ATB, Michael. -- michael.me...@collabora.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Disabling unit tests, redux
Okay, I took it out. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Disabling unit tests, redux
I don't even know the names of the various modules I'm working in and prefer to let the smart system figure it out ;-) make build-nocheck works great and things run so much faster on my little laptop. Thank you. I put this info in the wiki to save questions in the future. -Keith On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:56:59AM -0500, Keith Curtis wrote: It appears when making changes to individual C++ files that my computer spends about 90% of the build time running unit tests. It seems that ‘make foo.build’ will not run the tests, at least this is what I “discovered” few days ago. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Disabling unit tests, redux
On 12/16/2013 06:56 AM, Keith Curtis wrote: It appears when making changes to individual C++ files that my computer spends about 90% of the build time running unit tests. I tried make -sr all to disable them, but it still ran lots: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-March/009422.html I tried hacking on the makefile but got lost. Can this shortcut be re-enabled or is there a new way now? Sometimes, you just want to add a printf. The build process works great otherwise. * When you just add a debugging printf to some .cxx file in module foo, you can do make foo instead of just make to only rebuild module foo, which usually suffices today to get the effect into the instdir installation. * For debugging purposes, note that there is SAL_DEBUG with added usefulness compared to printf. * If all else fails, there appears to be make build-nocheck. Stephan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Disabling unit tests, redux
It appears when making changes to individual C++ files that my computer spends about 90% of the build time running unit tests. I tried make -sr all to disable them, but it still ran lots: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-March/009422.html I tried hacking on the makefile but got lost. Can this shortcut be re-enabled or is there a new way now? Sometimes, you just want to add a printf. The build process works great otherwise. -Keith ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Disabling unit tests, redux
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:56:59AM -0500, Keith Curtis wrote: It appears when making changes to individual C++ files that my computer spends about 90% of the build time running unit tests. It seems that ‘make foo.build’ will not run the tests, at least this is what I “discovered” few days ago. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
