Re: GSoC idea to improve LightProof
If Lazlo is happy to mentor it sounds fine to me - can you create a well defined task statement / idea - which is bounded and clear ie. so we can assess whether you are 50% through 100% done etc. Then we can get that in the wiki for you. It depends on Lazlo. He as owner ought to know what's better for his project. Nevertheless I will manage some wiki/blog related to my progress anyway. Be sure. ;) It would also be fantastic to have a mentor from the LanguageTool side - there was talk of re-using / sharing rules from LanguageTool which sounds like some dual-mentor-ship might be a good idea. I really don't get the point of dual-mentoring clearly. Perhaps I will ask my ex-mentor (now I'm not sure how to call him exactly :-) ) from LT project (he's developer of my locale both spellchecker and LT). Perhaps you mean easy-to-port rules system. Then it's really hard. Because of Java and Python difference. Anyway I need Lazlo to talk LT guys. And of course, we'd want to have some easy-hack in this area committed before we go too much further:-) if there is no EasyHack in this area, can you suggest something ? the real intention there is to make sure you are fully equipped for the task, have everything you need (build-tree wise) to get going, and are able to create& send in patches. I guess I will make some rules for English locale (not mine) for better understanding whether this rules are acceptable. Is it fine, huh? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: GSoC idea to improve LightProof
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 12:30 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 01:15:01AM +0200, Коростіль Данило > wrote: > > I want to be honest. I was planed to be involved in LanguageTool > > project. Unfortunately, Google refused their application form for > > some reasons. I wasn't ready for that cruel turn. Shame. > > However I have big hope than I can switch to LightProof (because > > it's almost the same project). I have some experience of localization >> and languages rules. Actually I'm current Ukrainian coordinator >> of LO localization. > > > > So I'm just spreading new idea. Is it acceptable as a task ? So - yes; it sounds like an excellent idea, and working on the Lightproof which we bundle is well within the scope of the LibreOffice GSOC. > > I've already mailed to László Németh (creator of LightProof). >> Most likely he will be my mentor. If Lazlo is happy to mentor it sounds fine to me - can you create a well defined task statement / idea - which is bounded and clear ie. so we can assess whether you are 50% through 100% done etc. Then we can get that in the wiki for you. It would also be fantastic to have a mentor from the LanguageTool side - there was talk of re-using / sharing rules from LanguageTool which sounds like some dual-mentor-ship might be a good idea. And of course, we'd want to have some easy-hack in this area committed before we go too much further :-) if there is no EasyHack in this area, can you suggest something ? the real intention there is to make sure you are fully equipped for the task, have everything you need (build-tree wise) to get going, and are able to create & send in patches. All the best, Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: GSoC idea to improve LightProof
If the topic is LightProof, best to put Laszlo to CC. :) Yeah. Thank you! :) Nevertheless he hasn't appeared yet. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: GSoC idea to improve LightProof
Hi Daniel, On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 01:15:01AM +0200, Коростіль Данило wrote: > I want to be honest. I was planed to be involved in LanguageTool > project. Unfortunately, Google refused their application form for > some reasons. I wasn't ready for that cruel turn. However I have big > hope than I can switch to LightProof (because it's almost the same > project). I have some experience of localization and languages > rules. Actually I'm current Ukrainian coordinator of LO > localization. > > So I'm just spreading new idea. Is it acceptable as a task? I've > already mailed to László Németh (creator of LightProof). Most likely > he will be my mentor. > > Also as Ukrainian, I want to add support of my language in LP and > carry on working on LO localization process hardly. > > Discuss! I'm ready to be flexible and loyal for any responses. If the topic is LightProof, best to put Laszlo to CC. :) Miklos ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
GSoC idea to improve LightProof
Hi folks! I want to be honest. I was planed to be involved in LanguageTool project. Unfortunately, Google refused their application form for some reasons. I wasn't ready for that cruel turn. However I have big hope than I can switch to LightProof (because it's almost the same project). I have some experience of localization and languages rules. Actually I'm current Ukrainian coordinator of LO localization. So I'm just spreading new idea. Is it acceptable as a task? I've already mailed to László Németh (creator of LightProof). Most likely he will be my mentor. Also as Ukrainian, I want to add support of my language in LP and carry on working on LO localization process hardly. Discuss! I'm ready to be flexible and loyal for any responses. Best regards Daniel. ** ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
