[Libreoffice-qa] Newbie question: old version of Java for LO 3.3 regression testing?
Hi, This is very definitely a newbie question. I think I've found a bug, possibly two, in both 5.4.5 and 6.0.1.1. Up to this point I've been using NeoOffice and decided to switch over to LibreOffice, so I have no experience with previous versions. Anyway, I know I owe it to the community to see if the bug is present in the legacy code from OO. So I have downloaded LibreOffice 3.3 but it doesn't seem to like the JRE on my system (which seems to be OK for 5.4.5 and 6.0.1.1). Soo... how do I find a MacOS version of JRE that should work with LO 3.3? Yes, Java does seem to be needed for the feature that exhibits the bug(s). Yes, I've searched the LibreOffice QA pages and not found the answer. Running High Sierra, MacOS 10.13.3 -- Ted Lee ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Newbie question
Hello, I have recently committed my first patches for te bug 43157. These were my first experience in open source programming, so I chose easy task. Then I gor review saying that the workben submodule files where I made change are not built. I also noticed that. I waned to know how can I respond to the review. Thank you! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Newbie question
Hi Mukhiddin, On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Mukhiddin ymukhid...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have recently committed my first patches for te bug 43157. These were my first experience in open source programming, so I chose easy task. Then I gor review saying that the workben submodule files where I made change are not built. I also noticed that. I waned to know how can I respond to the review. When you are logged-in to gerrit, you will get a Reply button at the top, above the commit-message. ciao Christian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Newbie question
Thank you! -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Newbie-question-tp4109464p4109483.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Newbie question: git push
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi This is a newbie question: I have commit A and commit B, with A and B totally independent, and A was committed before B in my local copy. I want to push B to the repository. How can it be done? Thanks - -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Board of Directors Member - The Document Foundation LibreOffice translation leader for Brazilian Portuguese +55-21-8822-8812 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPCYeLAAoJEJp3R7nH3vLxVLwH/RywdBxEuaa7WqY2Fho4avqV IGVLohZKLuDKEyTiG/llnUC/jkhGs+JoD4miQmNsPH933ZWQN+tgtDxiU2HYPRUl NIKzrsqjW08yh5+tWdszdwdeSV6g1uSZQV4OiSlp4ID6YFV1lwjPJSJlb0eXnXBX 0YuDov7hrX7ZWKhV3e+anz4CWSnVEYE2py0BhWQqR39Hk0w6gGeIOXBjlqN68eoh 4zO1cpce+7tNNBRhwSFG+38j0y6e5YDgc7HPpYhqyY6XnQq3QJ65V4sxOStm+5Wr WbjyUNaXj7CU2OjFpf5AZxcaqhIjRun7Hp3Iq7GGcmWsdDRfEQQYfyQVN186ss4= =d2wH -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: git push
On 8 January 2012 13:09, Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org wrote: This is a newbie question: I have commit A and commit B, with A and B totally independent, and A was committed before B in my local copy. I want to push B to the repository. How can it be done? Assuming you don't have any uncommited changes, you can do: git format-patch HEAD~2 git reset --hard HEAD~2 git am 0002-commit-B-you-want-to-push git push then you can also git am 0001-commit-A HTH, Matus ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: git push
There are multiple ways, here are two Let's assume that your tree looks like * --- /origin/master | * --- commit A | * --- commit B : HEAD let's say that sha-A is the sha of commit A and sha-B is the sha1 of commit B 1/ You can swap the 2 commits with git-rebase -i git rebase -i origin/master then swap the 2 lines in the editor that pop-up and save. that should rewrite the commits in the order B,A at this point is it wise to rebase the whole things so that you can push git pull -r Now you want to save the corrent head: git branch save HEAD move master one up: git reset --hard master HEAD^ now your master is on B you can push it git push and finally restore you master to A (the saved point) git reset --hard save we don't need the save branch anymore git branch -d save 2/ you can play with branches and cherry pick to achieve the same save our branch and our 2 commits git branch save master 'rollback A and B on master' git reset --hard origin/master Now cherry pick B git cherry-pick save push it git push cherry pick A git cherry-pick save^ now master is back to having both commit in reverse order and B is pushed we don't need the 'save' branch anymore git branch -D save Norbert PS: you can do a gitk --all before all of the and keep it open, and File/Update after each step to visualize what is happening... Note that the second scenario can completely be done with gitk user interface ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Newbie question: i18n numeric formats
Hi I was looking into http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/plain/i18npool/source/localedata/data/pt_BR.xml and I found that the number of pre-defined numeric formats could be improved to handle telephone number, postal codes, social security numbers, and other locale numeric formats. My question is: is it OK that I patch the xml file with these new fomats? Thanks -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Board of Directors Member - The Document Foundation LibreOffice translation leader for Brazilian Portuguese +55-21-8822-8812 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: i18n numeric formats
Hi Olivier, On Tuesday, 2011-11-22 16:23:50 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: I found that the number of pre-defined numeric formats could be improved to handle telephone number, postal codes, social security numbers, and other locale numeric formats. My question is: is it OK that I patch the xml file with these new fomats? hmm.. well, yes, but.. ;-) it depends on what you want to achieve. For one, numeric input is limited to 15 digits, more digits are converted to scientific format and lose precision. Second, for example, a format code of 00-000-000 will display the number 12345678 as 12-345-678, so if the user sees such values in a column and wants to add a value or replace an existing one he might key in 12-345-678 that would result in a string instead of a number, effectively leading to a mix of numbers and strings. Number format codes are not input masks. Third, the actual cell content does not preserve leading zeros while the format may leave the impression it would. If that number was used as a key to lookup items that had this key stored as strings with leading zeros there would be no match. I might have forgotten something. Anyway, you'd probably want to decide on a case by case basis, YMMV. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD pgp2Ra9L3FVG1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: Windows SDK exact path
I build LO on Windows Server 2008R2 (i.e. the server version of Windows 7, 64-bit). I have the Windows SDK 7.0 installed in its default location(s), i.e. in C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0 *and* C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A , with some overlap, partly same files in both locations. (Yeah, seems a bit weird to me, too, but as far as I can recall it is not myself who have done any weird choice here.) Anyway, from the config.log I see that it is the first one that is found and that gets used. If I run ./oowintool --windows-sdk-home it outputs /cygdrive/C/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0 . --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: Windows SDK exact path
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 02:11 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: I build LO on Windows Server 2008R2 (i.e. the server version of Windows 7, 64-bit). I have the Windows SDK 7.0 installed in its default location(s), i.e. in C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0 *and* C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A , with some overlap, partly same files in both locations. (Yeah, seems a bit weird to me, too, but as far as I can recall it is not myself who have done any weird choice here.) I had difficulties on a fresh install of all the recommended things. Attached was my hack-around fix for the problem I had, which might be the same fundamental problem. C. diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 536ca8b..fd23669 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -6341,6 +6341,16 @@ if test $_os = WINNT; then if test -n $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME; then WINDOWS_SDK_HOME=`cygpath -d $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME` WINDOWS_SDK_HOME=`cygpath -u $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME` + +#If this sdk is incomplete, lets see if the one +#recommended to be installed is available +if test ! -x $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME/bin/msiinfo.exe; then +WINDOWS_SDK7_HOME=`cat /proc/registry/HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SOFTWARE/Microsoft/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.1/InstallationFolder 2 /dev/null | tr '\000' '\n' | head -n 1` +if test -n $WINDOWS_SDK7_HOME; then +WINDOWS_SDK_HOME=`cygpath -d $WINDOWS_SDK7_HOME` +WINDOWS_SDK_HOME=`cygpath -u $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME` +fi +fi fi else WINDOWS_SDK_HOME=`cygpath -u $with_windows_sdk_home` @@ -6385,14 +6395,15 @@ the Windows SDK are installed.]) fi fi + if test -z $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME; then AC_MSG_RESULT([no, hoping the necessary headers and libraries will be found anyway]) +elif echo $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME | grep v7 /dev/null 2/dev/null; then +AC_MSG_RESULT([found Windows SDK 7 ($WINDOWS_SDK_HOME)]) elif echo $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME | grep v6.1 /dev/null 2/dev/null; then AC_MSG_RESULT([found Windows SDK 6.1 ($WINDOWS_SDK_HOME)]) elif echo $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME | grep v6.0 /dev/null 2/dev/null; then AC_MSG_RESULT([found Windows SDK 6.0 ($WINDOWS_SDK_HOME)]) -elif echo $WINDOWS_SDK_HOME | grep v7 /dev/null 2/dev/null; then -AC_MSG_RESULT([found Windows SDK 7 ($WINDOWS_SDK_HOME)]) else AC_MSG_ERROR([Found legacy Windows Platform SDK ($WINDOWS_SDK_HOME)]) fi ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: Windows SDK exact path
Attached was my hack-around fix for the problem I had, which might be the same fundamental problem. Hmm, I know you say it's just a hack-around, but in general, I am not sure I like the idea of doing similar stuff as oowintool does (i.e. read the Registry through its Cygwin /proc/registry pathnames) in configure.in. (Yeah, I see that we already do that in one place...) I wonder if we should just move the oowintool code into configure.in? Sure, oowintool is Perl and configure.in is shell, but oowintool isn't that extremely perlish Perl, it would be relatively simple to implement its logic in shell code instead. That would keep all business logic related to compiler and SDK selection in one place. If we want to get fancy, one could even write a library of Autoconf macros for this;) An Easy Hack? --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: Windows SDK exact path
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 03:46 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: I wonder if we should just move the oowintool code into configure.in? Sure, oowintool is Perl and configure.in is shell, but oowintool isn't that extremely perlish Perl, it would be relatively simple to implement its logic in shell code instead. Cue language war ;-) personally I'd hate that, and having the tool standalone perhaps helps some quick debugging without re-autogenning etc. And of course truly-system-independent-non-bash shell is susbtantially uglier than perl but ... win32 is your world of course :-) ATB, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: Windows SDK exact path
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 22:58 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote: The SDK is usually automatically found through the oowintool utility. And of course improvements to oowintool much appreciated - for a start we should put our license header on it I guess - it was not a Sun / Oracle tool. ATB, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: Windows SDK exact path
Thanks guys I ran oowintool and it gave me (in cygwin), (Windows7 64 bits under a VirtualBox 4.1 VM). Olivier@Olivier-ntbk ~/libo $ ./oowintool --windows-sdk-home /cygdrive/C/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v6.0A Then I peeked at this directory: Olivier@Olivier-ntbk ~/libo $ ls -al /cygdrive/C/Program\ Files/Microsoft\ SDKs/Windows/v6.0A/ total 456 drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SISTEMA 0 Aug 17 14:48 . drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SISTEMA 0 Aug 17 15:15 .. drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SISTEMA 0 Aug 17 14:48 Include drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SISTEMA 0 Aug 17 14:48 Lib drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SISTEMA 0 Aug 17 14:48 bin but, but, but... I get this in autogen.sh: checking for Windows SDK... configure: error: Some (all) files of the Windows Installer SDK are missing, please install. There is another SDK in (note the x86): Olivier@Olivier-ntbk ~/libo $ ls -al /cygdrive/C/Program\ Files\ \(x86\)/Microsoft\ SDKs/Windows/ total 0 drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SISTEMA 0 Aug 17 15:09 . drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SISTEMA 0 Aug 4 22:49 .. drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SISTEMA 0 Aug 17 15:09 v6.0A drwx--+ 1 SYSTEM SISTEMA 0 Aug 4 22:50 v7.0A I am puzzled! Can Libo be built in a 64bit OS? Should I move to W7 or XP 32 bits? Thanks again Olivier 2011/8/19 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 22:58 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote: The SDK is usually automatically found through the oowintool utility. And of course improvements to oowintool much appreciated - for a start we should put our license header on it I guess - it was not a Sun / Oracle tool. ATB, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot -- Olivier Hallot Founder and Steering Commitee Member The Document Foundation ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Newbie question: Windows SDK exact path
Hi I am trying to build under windows 7 64Bits. I have installed Microsoft Windows SDK, but autogen is not able to find it no matter the trials I made. So can someone tell me what is the exact path to pass to --with-windows-sdk-home? The SDK is in 2 places: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs Which one is the good one? Thanks -- Olivier Hallot Founder and Steering Commitee Member The Document Foundation ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie question: Windows SDK exact path
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Hi I am trying to build under windows 7 64Bits. I have installed Microsoft Windows SDK, but autogen is not able to find it no matter the trials I made. So can someone tell me what is the exact path to pass to --with-windows-sdk-home? The SDK is in 2 places: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs Which one is the good one? The SDK is usually automatically found through the oowintool utility. In the cases where it is not found the problem is usually because the tool finds the SDK installed by your compiler, which is very incomplete and misses some of the required components. The safe bet is to install the same Microsoft SDK version as the one incompletely provided by your compiler (6.0A for Visual Studio 2008, if I remember well) The configure script looks for certain files inside those directories, so I guess the problem is that does files don't exist (probably because you did not install some required optional component): Lib/libcp.lib Include/adoint.h Include/SqlUcode.h Include/usp10.h lib/user32.lib bin/msiinfo.exe bin/msidb.exe bin/uuidgen.exe bin/msitran.exe Last but not least, it's also possible that the newest Microsoft SDK has some changes that requires that we update our detection. Hope that helps a bit :) -- Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org Document Foundation founding member Mobile: +34 661 11 38 26 Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
