Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Simple fix for frmsh.cxx to review (from cppcheck report)

2012-01-15 Thread David Tardon 
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 04:08:46AM -0800, julien2412 wrote:
 Hello,
 
 cppcheck reported this :
 core/sw/source/ui/shells/frmsh.cxx
 516   duplicateExpression style   Same expression on both sides of ''
 
 After a quick reading, i thought about this page but perhaps it's less
 straightforward than I think
 
 diff --git a/sw/source/ui/shells/frmsh.cxx b/sw/source/ui/shells/frmsh.cxx
 index 718839c..7a6db74 100644
 --- a/sw/source/ui/shells/frmsh.cxx
 +++ b/sw/source/ui/shells/frmsh.cxx
 @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ void SwFrameShell::Execute(SfxRequest rReq)
  if(pArgs  SFX_ITEM_SET ==
 pArgs-GetItemState(GetPool().GetWhich(nSlot), sal_False, pItem))
  {
  aMgr.SetAttrSet( *pArgs );
 -if(SID_ATTR_ULSPACE == nSlot  SID_ATTR_ULSPACE == nSlot)
 +if(SID_ATTR_ULSPACE == nSlot  SID_ATTR_LRSPACE == nSlot)
  bCopyToFmt = sal_True;
  }
  }
 
 Any idea ?

Yes, you changed the condition from always true to always false .-)
I think it is not necessary at all. It is hard to tell what was the
intent, because the code has not changed since the original CVS import.

D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Simple fix for frmsh.cxx to review (from cppcheck report)

2012-01-15 Thread julien2412 
You're absolutely right ! It can't be both at the same time :-(

Julien

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-Simple-fix-for-frmsh-cxx-to-review-from-cppcheck-report-tp3658800p3662400.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice