Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-11-13 Thread Michael Stahl
On 13/11/13 12:32, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Eric Bautsch píše v Pá 01. 11. 2013 v 19:57 +:
> 
>> And the output suggests that the versions are OK:
>> bautsche@cressida $ pvs solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc 
>> libm.so.2 (SUNW_1.1);
>> libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_3.0);
>> libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1, SUNW_1.1, SUNW_0.9,
>> SUNW_0.7, SYSVABI_1.3);
>> libuno_sal.so.3 (LIBO_UDK_4.1, UDK_3.6, LIBO_UDK_4.0,
>> PRIVATE_1.1, UDK_3
>> _0_0);
>> bautsche@cressida $ pvs
>> solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 
>> libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_3.0);
>> libsocket.so.1 (SUNW_1.1, SUNW_0.7);
>> libnsl.so.1 (SUNW_0.7);
>> libm.so.2 (SUNW_1.1);
>> libpthread.so.1 (SUNW_1.1, SUNW_1.2, SUNW_0.9);
>> libuno_sal.so.3;
>> UDK_3_0_0;
> [...]
> 
> Knowing nothing about Solaris - I wonder why the other libs have eg.
> (SUNW_1.1) or (GCC_3.0), but libuno_sal.so.3 has nothing like that,
> instead the UDK_3_0_0 etc. are each on a separate line as if it was a
> library itself, or what?  Could that be the problem?

iirc the UDK_3_0_0 above is a version that libuno_sal.so.3 itself
exports whereas the things in brackets are versions that libuno_sal.so.3
requires from other (system, hence SUNW_*) libraries, hence the difference.

not obivous to me why it's failing to run anyway.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-11-13 Thread Eric Bautsch
No, I haven't played with this any further. I'm intending to, but I was going to 
move the compile over to Solaris 11.1, that being obviously a more stable platform.


I have no idea if the lack of brackets or UDK_3_0_0 on its own is significant, 
but doing a quick pvs on other files (/opt/openoffice.org3/program/*, /usr/bin/* 
and /usr/lib/*.so) it seems that this behaviour is OK for libraries but not 
binaries:


   rpcsec.so:
libgss.so.1 (SUNW_1.2, SUNWprivate_1.1);
libnsl.so.1 (SUNW_0.7, SUNWprivate_1.1);
libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.23);
rpcsec.so.1;
SUNW_1.2;
SUNW_1.1;
SUNWprivate_1.1;
   straddr.so:
libnsl.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1, SYSVABI_1.3);
libc.so.1 (SUNW_1.19);
straddr.so.2;
SUNWprivate_2.1;


I'll let you know how I get on though and thanks for your help. Any and all 
pointers always welcome...


Eric


On 13/11/2013 11:32, Jan Holesovsky wrote:

Hi Eric,

Eric Bautsch píše v Pá 01. 11. 2013 v 19:57 +:


Yes, the command is pvs:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5165/pvs-1/

Did you get anywhere, or still stuck, please? :-)


And the output suggests that the versions are OK:
 bautsche@cressida $ pvs solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc
 libm.so.2 (SUNW_1.1);
 libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_3.0);
 libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1, SUNW_1.1, SUNW_0.9,
 SUNW_0.7, SYSVABI_1.3);
 libuno_sal.so.3 (LIBO_UDK_4.1, UDK_3.6, LIBO_UDK_4.0,
 PRIVATE_1.1, UDK_3
 _0_0);
 bautsche@cressida $ pvs
 solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
 libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_3.0);
 libsocket.so.1 (SUNW_1.1, SUNW_0.7);
 libnsl.so.1 (SUNW_0.7);
 libm.so.2 (SUNW_1.1);
 libpthread.so.1 (SUNW_1.1, SUNW_1.2, SUNW_0.9);
 libuno_sal.so.3;
 UDK_3_0_0;

[...]

Knowing nothing about Solaris - I wonder why the other libs have eg.
(SUNW_1.1) or (GCC_3.0), but libuno_sal.so.3 has nothing like that,
instead the UDK_3_0_0 etc. are each on a separate line as if it was a
library itself, or what?  Could that be the problem?

Regards,
Kendy



--
 
  

 /  .   Eric A. Bautsch
/--   __   _____
   / //   /  /
  (_/(___(__/   email: eric.baut...@pobox.com



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-11-13 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Eric,

Eric Bautsch píše v Pá 01. 11. 2013 v 19:57 +:

> Yes, the command is pvs:
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5165/pvs-1/

Did you get anywhere, or still stuck, please? :-)

> And the output suggests that the versions are OK:
> bautsche@cressida $ pvs solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc 
> libm.so.2 (SUNW_1.1);
> libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_3.0);
> libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1, SUNW_1.1, SUNW_0.9,
> SUNW_0.7, SYSVABI_1.3);
> libuno_sal.so.3 (LIBO_UDK_4.1, UDK_3.6, LIBO_UDK_4.0,
> PRIVATE_1.1, UDK_3
> _0_0);
> bautsche@cressida $ pvs
> solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 
> libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_3.0);
> libsocket.so.1 (SUNW_1.1, SUNW_0.7);
> libnsl.so.1 (SUNW_0.7);
> libm.so.2 (SUNW_1.1);
> libpthread.so.1 (SUNW_1.1, SUNW_1.2, SUNW_0.9);
> libuno_sal.so.3;
> UDK_3_0_0;
[...]

Knowing nothing about Solaris - I wonder why the other libs have eg.
(SUNW_1.1) or (GCC_3.0), but libuno_sal.so.3 has nothing like that,
instead the UDK_3_0_0 etc. are each on a separate line as if it was a
library itself, or what?  Could that be the problem?

Regards,
Kendy

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-11-01 Thread Eric Bautsch

Yes, the command is pvs:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5165/pvs-1/

And the output suggests that the versions are OK:

   bautsche@cressida $ pvs solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc
   libm.so.2 (SUNW_1.1);
   libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_3.0);
   libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1, SUNW_1.1, SUNW_0.9, SUNW_0.7, SYSVABI_1.3);
   libuno_sal.so.3 (LIBO_UDK_4.1, UDK_3.6, LIBO_UDK_4.0, PRIVATE_1.1, UDK_3
   _0_0);
   bautsche@cressida $ pvs solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
   libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_3.0);
   libsocket.so.1 (SUNW_1.1, SUNW_0.7);
   libnsl.so.1 (SUNW_0.7);
   libm.so.2 (SUNW_1.1);
   libpthread.so.1 (SUNW_1.1, SUNW_1.2, SUNW_0.9);
   libuno_sal.so.3;
   UDK_3_0_0;
   UDK_3.1;
   UDK_3.2;
   UDK_3.3;
   UDK_3.4;
   UDK_3.5;
   UDK_3.6;
   UDK_3.7;
   UDK_3.8;
   UDK_3.9;
   UDK_3.10;
   UDK_3.11;
   LIBO_UDK_3.5;
   LIBO_UDK_3.6;
   LIBO_UDK_4.0;
   LIBO_UDK_4.1;
   PRIVATE_1.0;
   PRIVATE_1.1;
   PRIVATE_1.2;
   PRIVATE_textenc.1;
   PRIVATE_file.1;
   GLIBCXX_3.4;
   bautsche@cressida $



On 01/11/2013 15:22, Stephan Bergmann wrote:

On 11/01/2013 03:48 PM, Eric Bautsch wrote:

Output from LD_DEBUG=all ldd -r solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc >log 2>&1
attached.


Unfortunately doesn't give a clue why the loader refuses to pick the symobls 
from libuno_sal.so.3.


The last idea I have is that there's something wrong with the symbol versions.


02205: file=libuno_sal.so.3; needed by solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc
02205:
02205: find object=libuno_sal.so.3; searching
02205: search 
path=$ORIGIN/../../ure-link/lib:/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib 
(RUNPATH/RPATH from file solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc)
02205: trying 
path=/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/../../ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
02205: trying 
path=/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
libuno_sal.so.3 => 
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
02205: 
file=/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 
[ ELF ]; generating link map

02205: addr: 0xfe4e4000 size: 0x4e38c
02205: lmid: BASE lmco: 0x10
02205:
02205: version needed processing: file=solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc
02205: file version
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 LIBO_UDK_4.1
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 UDK_3.6
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 LIBO_UDK_4.0
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 PRIVATE_1.1
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 UDK_3_0_0


indicates that idlc does expect to see versioned symbols from libuno_sal.so.3, 
but I forgot what the Solaris command is to see what versions the symbols 
exported/required by an object should have (psv? pvs? something like that), 
and whether there's an LD_DEBUG argument in addition to "all" on Solaris to 
make it output information about symbol resolution version mismatch.


Stephan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice



--
 
  

 /  .   Eric A. Bautsch
/--   __   _____
   / //   /  /
  (_/(___(__/   email: eric.baut...@pobox.com



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-11-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann

On 11/01/2013 03:48 PM, Eric Bautsch wrote:

Output from LD_DEBUG=all ldd -r solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc >log 2>&1
attached.


Unfortunately doesn't give a clue why the loader refuses to pick the 
symobls from libuno_sal.so.3.


The last idea I have is that there's something wrong with the symbol 
versions.



02205: file=libuno_sal.so.3;  needed by solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc
02205:
02205: find object=libuno_sal.so.3; searching
02205:  search 
path=$ORIGIN/../../ure-link/lib:/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib
  (RUNPATH/RPATH from file solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc)
02205:  trying 
path=/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/../../ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
02205:  trying 
path=/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
libuno_sal.so.3 =>
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
02205: 
file=/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
  [ ELF ]; generating link map
02205: addr: 0xfe4e4000  size:  0x4e38c
02205: lmid:   BASE  lmco: 0x10
02205:
02205: version needed processing: file=solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc
02205: fileversion
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 LIBO_UDK_4.1
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 UDK_3.6
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 LIBO_UDK_4.0
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 PRIVATE_1.1
02205: libuno_sal.so.3 UDK_3_0_0


indicates that idlc does expect to see versioned symbols from 
libuno_sal.so.3, but I forgot what the Solaris command is to see what 
versions the symbols exported/required by an object should have (psv? 
pvs? something like that), and whether there's an LD_DEBUG argument in 
addition to "all" on Solaris to make it output information about symbol 
resolution version mismatch.


Stephan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-11-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann

On 11/01/2013 03:24 PM, Eric Bautsch wrote:

On 01/11/2013 13:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:

Try "ldd -r solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc" to force symbol resolution.



bautsche@cressida $ ldd -r solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc

[...]

 libuno_sal.so.3 =>

/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3

[...]

 symbol not found: osl_getProcessInfo
(solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc)



Try "nm -D solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3" to see whether it
exports rtl_string_new.



bautsche@cressida $ nm -D solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3

[...]

[336]   |252720|   449|FUNC |GLOB |0|11 |osl_getProcessInfo

[...]

So solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 exports osl_getProcessInfo 
etc. but solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc doesn't find it.  Try "LD_DEBUG=all 
-r solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc >log" to get (lots of) detailed output of 
what the loader actually does and grep the generated log e.g. for the 
lines where it says it does not find osl_getProcessInfo.


Stephan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-11-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann

On 11/01/2013 02:12 PM, Eric Bautsch wrote:

bautsche@cressida $ ldd solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc
 libnsl.so.1 =>   /lib/libnsl.so.1
 libsocket.so.1 =>/lib/libsocket.so.1
 libreglo.so =>

/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libreglo.so
 libuno_sal.so.3 =>

/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
 libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 =>

/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3
 libstdc++.so.6 =>/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
 libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
 libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
 libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
 libstorelo.so =>

/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libstorelo.so
 libpthread.so.1 =>   /lib/libpthread.so.1
bautsche@cressida $


Try "ldd -r solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc" to force symbol resolution.

Try "nm -D solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3" to see whether it 
exports rtl_string_new.


Stephan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-11-01 Thread Eric Bautsch

Hi Norbert and Stephan.

The LD_LIBRARY_PATH looks fine to me:

   [build IDL] udkapi/com/sun/star/idl
   mkdir -p
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/workdir/unxsogi.pro/UnoApiPartTarget/udkapi/com/sun/star/
   && RESPONSEFILE=/tmp/gbuild.LYKziC &&
   
SOLARBINDIR=/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/bin
   
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}"/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib:/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/instdir/unxsogi.pro/program"
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc
   -I/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/udkapi -M
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/workdir/unxsogi.pro/Dep/UnoApiPartTarget/udkapi/com/sun/star/
   -O
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/workdir/unxsogi.pro/UnoApiPartTarget/udkapi/com/sun/star/
   -verbose @${RESPONSEFILE} > /dev/null && rm -f ${RESPONSEFILE} && touch
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/workdir/unxsogi.pro/UnoApiPartTarget/udkapi/com/sun/star/idl.done
   ld.so.1: idlc: fatal: relocation error: file
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc:
   symbol rtl_string_new: referenced symbol not found
   /bin/sh: line 1: 2360: Killed
   make[1]: ***
   
[/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/workdir/unxsogi.pro/UnoApiPartTarget/udkapi/com/sun/star/idl.done]
   Killed
   make[1]: Leaving directory
   `/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3'
   gmake: *** [build] Error 2
   bautsche@cressida $ ls -la
   /export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib
   total 654
   drwxr-xr-x 2 bautsche user 11 Oct 31 12:12 ./
   drwxr-xr-x 4 bautsche user 4 Oct 31 12:12 ../
   -rw-r--r-- 1 bautsche user 66712 Oct 31 12:12 libcodemaker.a
   -rw-r--r-- 1 bautsche user 25514 Oct 31 12:12 libcodemaker_cpp.a
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 bautsche user 133221 Oct 31 12:12 libreglo.so*
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 bautsche user 161724 Oct 31 12:12 libstorelo.so*
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 bautsche user 15 Oct 31 12:12 libuno_sal.so -> libuno_sal.so.3*
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 bautsche user 377081 Oct 31 12:12 libuno_sal.so.3*
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 bautsche user 25 Oct 31 12:12 libuno_salhelpergcc3.so ->
   libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3*
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 bautsche user 36660 Oct 31 12:12 libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3*
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 bautsche user 229716 Oct 31 12:12 libunoidllo.so*
   bautsche@cressida $

Also:

   bautsche@cressida $ readelf -d solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc

   Dynamic section at offset 0x3a6a0 contains 29 entries:
   Tag Type Name/Value
   0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libnsl.so.1]
   0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libsocket.so.1]
   0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libreglo.so]
   0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libuno_sal.so.3]
   0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3]
   0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libstdc++.so.6]
   0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libm.so.2]
   0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libgcc_s.so.1]
   0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.1]
   0x000f (RPATH) Library rpath:
   
[$ORIGIN/../../ure-link/lib:/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib]
   0x000c (INIT) 0x804a140
   0x000d (FINI) 0x8072500
   0x6ef5 (GNU_HASH) 0x80480e8
   0x0005 (STRTAB) 0x8048be0
   0x0006 (SYMTAB) 0x80481b0
   0x000a (STRSZ) 3438 (bytes)
   0x000b (SYMENT) 16 (bytes)
   0x0015 (DEBUG) 0x0
   0x0003 (PLTGOT) 0x80837b0
   0x0002 (PLTRELSZ) 1096 (bytes)
   0x0014 (PLTREL) REL
   0x0017 (JMPREL) 0x8049cec
   0x0011 (REL) 0x8049b94
   0x0012 (RELSZ) 344 (bytes)
   0x0013 (RELENT) 8 (bytes)
   0x6ffe (VERNEED) 0x8049a94
   0x6fff (VERNEEDNUM) 4
   0x6ff0 (VERSYM) 0x804994e
   0x (NULL) 0x0
   bautsche@cressida $ ldd solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc
   libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1
   libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1
   libreglo.so =>
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libreglo.so
   libuno_sal.so.3 =>
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so.3
   libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 =>
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3
   libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
   libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
   libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
   libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
   libstorelo.so =>
   
/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/libstorelo.so
   libpthread.so.1 => /lib/libpthread.so.1
   bautsche@cressida $



I wonder whether some of the macro magic that Norbert Thiebaud mentioned (and 
that I have no idea how to make sense of) in sal/rtl/strtmpl.cxx isn't working 
for me on Sola

Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-11-01 Thread Stephan Bergmann

On 10/31/2013 01:25 PM, Eric Bautsch wrote:

I'm trying to compile LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris 12 (build 26,
currently).

Note: don't get excited, I'm doing this in my spare time and Oracle
are in no way endorsing, supporting, or anything else'ing my efforts.

I've been using this thread for assistance and it's been a great help:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/51422


Note that traditionally OOo had been building/working very well on 
Solaris, but these days there's only very little and seemingly 
occasional initiative to keep that up.  Therefore, Solaris-specific code 
in LO likely keeps rotting over time.


At runtime, the idlc executable needs the libuno_sal.so.3 dynamic 
library to resolve the rtl_string_new symbol (and others).  Therefore, 
idlc contains an RPATH (see "readelf -d solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc") so 
that it finds it *in an installation* ("$ORIGIN/../../ure-link/lib", 
where in an installation idlc is in sdk/bin/ and libuno_sal.so.3 is in 
ure-link/lib/).


However, idlc is also called during the build, where idlc is in 
solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/ and libuno_sal.so.3 is in 
solver/unxsogi.pro/lib/.  To make that work, idlc is called with an 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH that contains solver/unxsogi.pro/lib during the build. 
This is taken care of towards the end of 
solenv/gbuild/platform/com_GCC_defs.mk (gb_Helper_set_ld_path) and 
should work for Solaris.


To see what's going wrong, run "make VERBOSE=t" to see the command line 
of how exactly idlc is called to "[build IDL] udkapi/com/sun/star/idl".


Stephan


I'm currently struggling with getting a working idlc compiled. Here's
what happens:

[build IDL] udkapi/com/sun/star/idl
ld.so.1: idlc: fatal: relocation error: file

/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/solver/unxsogi.pro/bin/idlc:
symbol rtl_string_new: referenced symbol not found
/bin/sh: line 1: 8411: Killed
make[1]: ***

[/export/home/bautsche/libre-office/libreoffice-4.1.2.3/workdir/unxsogi.pro/UnoApiPartTarget/udkapi/com/sun/star/idl.done]
Killed
gmake: *** [build] Error 2
bautsche@cressida $

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: Compiling LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Solaris

2013-10-31 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Eric Bautsch  wrote:
>
> I think rtl_string_new is defined in include/rtl/string.h, but I can't see
> where the function is actually coming from (running a find -exec grep across
> the code).

see sal/rtl/strtmpl.cxx

This is a hacky way to implement both ustring and string using the
same source and some macro-magic

Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice