[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70488] Other: Offer LO nightly builds for OS X to speed up triaging and QA

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70488

--- Comment #4 from Foss  ---
Hi Christian, is there any news already? I'm missing my every day bug triage
run. ;)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69745] FORMATTING: optimal-row-height is ignored if there are some leading covered cells

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69745

--- Comment #9 from brigitte.roschew...@hksinformatik.de ---
Please look at the lines with "use-optimal-row-height":

e.g.




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70938] outline, inconsistent display

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70938

--- Comment #1 from Dominique Boutry  ---
This is the right behaviour (and the same in AOO, Powerpoint). Let me explain :
- The outline tab requires a continuous linear flow of text, through the whole
presentation ; specific additionnal pieces of text drawn with the "Text"
drawing feature, can't find their place in this flow (try to imagine a promote,
demote or split if these texts were present in the outline),
- the ability to change lay-out requires that a text part (the "official" part,
as I named it ; at least the title) of the diapo in its initial state be moved
to a predefined place on the final state of the diapo ; not all text can be
moved such a way, only the official one ; the remaining text remains in place
- for all these reasons, there are 2 kinds of text in a diapo : 1/ the
"official" in the provided area, and 2/ the additionnal "graphic" text. Should
you switch of lay-out, text can fall from 1/ to 2/ qualification, but never the
opposite,
- and only the "official" text is present on the "outline" tab.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 34171] Bad user reported when file is locked

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34171

Foss  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
 CC|spa...@gmx.net  |f...@openmailbox.org

--- Comment #8 from Foss  ---
No feedback for 2 months. Setting to NEEDINFO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69818] FORMATTING: artistic edges

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69818

Jean-Baptiste Faure  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Hardware|Other   |All
 OS|Windows (All)   |All
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID
   Severity|normal  |enhancement
 CC||jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org

--- Comment #1 from Jean-Baptiste Faure  ---
You do not provide any information on what you mean by "artistic edge".
Closed as INVALID. Please feel free to reopen if you can provide useful
information.

Best regards. JBF

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70814] FILEOPEN: xlsx file opens as an empty file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70814

GerardF  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 CC||gerard.farg...@orange.fr
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #10 from GerardF  ---
May be you don't have "Calibri" font on your OS...(Calibri is a windows
proprietary font).

Try with changing the font, directly from toolbar or in the replacement table
(Tools > Options > Fonts.
https://help.libreoffice.org/Scalc/CUI_HID_OFA_FONT_SUBST_CLB#bm_id3150360

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70947] New: Incompatible changes in LO behaviour between versions

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70947

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70947
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: Incompatible changes in LO behaviour between versions
  Severity: enhancement
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
  Reporter: t...@tim-passingham.co.uk
  Hardware: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: unspecified
 Component: Libreoffice
   Product: LibreOffice

A recent change in LO, version 4.1.1, is incompatible with previous versions,
and with OO.  Anyone using macros in Basic (or presumably other languages) will
have to make changes to take account of this.  

There will be applications that need to run on both older and newer versions of
LO.  Rather than have two different versions one would want to have one
application that changes its behaviour depending on the LO version.

Some changes, such as the one in 4.1.1, can be detected by checking on the type
of a data item (in this case the Date changed from a Long to a Struct in
controls on forms in BASE).  Other changes may be less obvious.

There should therefore be functions to obtain information about the version,
such as GetOfficeVersion and GetOfficeName and GetOfficeVendor.  People can
then write code that works on the different versions.

For changes to behaviour based on types of data items there should also be
simple functions to find out what the data type of an item in a control is. 
This isn't as easy as it seems, since many items are Variant/Empty when
uninitialised and there is no difference in data type until one tries to set
the contents.  A GetDataType function which works in such cases is required
(the Basic vartype function does not suffice).

I have been given a lot of help from Lionel Mamane in overcoming the
compatibility problems between LO 4.1.1 and previous versions, but a more
generic set of facilities should be put in place so that application developers
do not need to bother your own developers about such issues.  He has worked out
ways of detecting the data type change, and the LO version, but there are quite
difficult, and very obscure.

All such incompatible changes need to be flagged in advance and facilities
provided for application developers to make appropriate adjustments.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 65717] FILEOPEN: DOCX import - picture with 'Square' wrapping style is rendered incorrectly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65717

Foss  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG

--- Comment #15 from Foss  ---
NOTABUG as of comment 12 and 14.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70925] Advanced filter: case sensitive criterium produces no result

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70925

--- Comment #2 from Dominique Boutry  ---
Reproduced with LibO 4.1.2.3 on Win7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70645] : Sudden erasure of partially completed letter

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70645

--- Comment #1 from Dominique Boutry  ---
Are the files sufficiently anonymous to be posted as attachments, so that we
can have a glance ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70914] Terribly low performance of selecting/moving/resizing tables and text frames

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70914

--- Comment #1 from Piotr Kołaczkowski  ---
Today I noticed another interesting thing.

The performance depends on the size of the Impress main window. If I keep it
maximized (2560x1600), the performance is terrible like described. If I keep it
much smaller, e.g. 1/2 of the full size - it gets acceptable. Still far from
responsive, but at least usable. 

This let me come to an idea of checking what top shows during the process of
moving the table. It turned out, Xorg is taking 99% of CPU (when moving table
in LO) while LO itself is fine with only about 5-15%. 

So I guess LO must be doing some heavy refreshing or repainting or some other
heavy calls to the graphics pipeline, even though the operation of
moving/selecting 2D objects is extremely simple. My slides are nothing fancy,
no heavy images, no videos, no embedded objects, mostly academic-style black
text on white and a few small tables. Even if you needed to repaint the whole
slide in the loop, performance for that kind of complexity should be in
thousands FPS, not 0.2 FPS. 

BTW: I'm neither noticing any performance problems like that with other
applications that involve dragging 2D objects or even drawing lots of moving
elements games. Ubuntu Unity flies on this hardware and both 2D and 3D
acceleration is awesome.

glmark2 benchmark results:
===
glmark2 2012.08
===
OpenGL Information
GL_VENDOR: NVIDIA Corporation
GL_RENDERER:   Quadro 1000M/PCIe/SSE2
GL_VERSION:4.3.0 NVIDIA 319.32
===
[build] use-vbo=false: FPS: 2259 FrameTime: 0.443 ms
[build] use-vbo=true: FPS: 2572 FrameTime: 0.389 ms
[texture] texture-filter=nearest: FPS: 2294 FrameTime: 0.436 ms
[texture] texture-filter=linear: FPS: 2269 FrameTime: 0.441 ms
[texture] texture-filter=mipmap: FPS: 2393 FrameTime: 0.418 ms
[shading] shading=gouraud: FPS: 1998 FrameTime: 0.501 ms
[shading] shading=blinn-phong-inf: FPS: 2123 FrameTime: 0.471 ms
[shading] shading=phong: FPS: 1864 FrameTime: 0.536 ms
[bump] bump-render=high-poly: FPS: 1191 FrameTime: 0.840 ms
[bump] bump-render=normals: FPS: 2664 FrameTime: 0.375 ms
[bump] bump-render=height: FPS: 2584 FrameTime: 0.387 ms
[effect2d] kernel=0,1,0;1,-4,1;0,1,0;: FPS: 1102 FrameTime: 0.907 ms
[effect2d] kernel=1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;: FPS: 462 FrameTime: 2.165 ms
[pulsar] light=false:quads=5:texture=false: FPS: 1823 FrameTime: 0.549 ms
[desktop] blur-radius=5:effect=blur:passes=1:separable=true:windows=4: FPS: 536
FrameTime: 1.866 ms
[desktop] effect=shadow:windows=4: FPS: 1063 FrameTime: 0.941 ms
[buffer]
columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map:
FPS: 901 FrameTime: 1.110 ms
[buffer]
columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=subdata:
FPS: 1099 FrameTime: 0.910 ms
[buffer]
columns=200:interleave=true:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map:
FPS: 871 FrameTime: 1.148 ms
[ideas] speed=duration: FPS: 1591 FrameTime: 0.629 ms
[jellyfish] : FPS: 1058 FrameTime: 0.945 ms
[terrain] : FPS: 117 FrameTime: 8.547 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 2094 FrameTime: 0.478 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 1564 FrameTime: 0.639 ms
[conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 2117 FrameTime: 0.472 ms
[function] fragment-complexity=low:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 2078 FrameTime: 0.481
ms
[function] fragment-complexity=medium:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 1902 FrameTime:
0.526 ms
[loop] fragment-loop=false:fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 2096
FrameTime: 0.477 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=false:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 2109
FrameTime: 0.474 ms
[loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=true:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1886
FrameTime: 0.530 ms
===
  glmark2 Score: 1689 
===

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 43370] Footnotes always uses numbering by chapter

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43370

sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #8 from sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for attachment.

Steps to reproduce:
0. Start Writer or open first attachment
1. Tools->Footnotes/Endnotes
2. tab "Footnotes" field "Position" radiobutton "End of document"
select it
3. field "Counting": change it to "Per document"
4. Press OK.
5. repeat step 1
Expected: "Per document" remains there
Actually: reverts to "Per page" and works actually as "Per chapter" though
there is no such option.

reproduced in 4.1.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70940] bullet list, cannot promote

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70940

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl

--- Comment #4 from Cor Nouws  ---
thanks for testing and explaining. The title slide has a different purpose.
See my comment in bug 70938

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70938] outline, inconsistent display

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70938

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl

--- Comment #2 from Cor Nouws  ---
thanks for explaning, Dominique.
Wai, pls feel free to look at the page with help offers
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/ if you have further questions on the
subject.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70925] Advanced filter: case sensitive criterium produces no result

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70925

Jean-Baptiste Faure  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Jean-Baptiste Faure  ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Reproduced with LibO 4.1.2.3 on Win7

Ok, so set status to NEW.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70947] Incompatible changes in LO behaviour between versions

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70947

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Cor Nouws  ---
Hi tim,

What information channels/means would you suggest?
Are you aware of what is currently done to inform users/developers?

thanks,
Cor

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70947] Incompatible changes in LO behaviour between versions

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70947

t...@tim-passingham.co.uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||t...@tim-passingham.co.uk

--- Comment #2 from t...@tim-passingham.co.uk ---
I'm aware of the release notes.  People need to read these before installing
new versions.  I might suggest that where there's a backwards incompatibility
this could be flagged more strongly.

However, these notes don't help in writing code compatible with multiple
versions of LO (or OO).  For that, one needs to be able to detect the change at
run-time.  That's what I am asking for.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70947] Incompatible changes in LO behaviour between versions: provide better support, information at runtime, .. for extension developers

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70947

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
Summary|Incompatible changes in LO  |Incompatible changes in LO
   |behaviour between versions  |behaviour between versions:
   ||provide better support,
   ||information at runtime, ..
   ||for extension developers

--- Comment #3 from Cor Nouws  ---
thanks Tim. Is the summary as I made it now fine for you?
Cor

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70947] Incompatible API changes between versions: provide better support, information at runtime, .. for extension developers

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70947

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Incompatible changes in LO  |Incompatible API changes
   |behaviour between versions: |between versions: provide
   |provide better support, |better support, information
   |information at runtime, ..  |at runtime, .. for
   |for extension developers|extension developers

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70949] New: Please provide utility functions to get the current product (Office Suite) name, version, etc.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70949

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70949
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
Blocks: 70947
   Summary: Please provide utility functions to get the current
product (Office Suite) name, version, etc.
  Severity: enhancement
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
  Reporter: lio...@mamane.lu
  Hardware: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+ Master
 Component: BASIC
   Product: LibreOffice

Although it is possible from Basic script to get the version of LibrOffice it
is running under, the way to do so is rather baroque and (worse!) undocumented.
It should just be a call to a utility function, like e.g.

 getOfficeVersion
 getOfficeProductName
 ...

For reference, that's how one can do it now:

Sub Main
Dim cfgProv As Object
Set cfgProv =
CreateUnoService("com.sun.star.configuration.ConfigurationProvider")
Dim arg1 as new "com.sun.star.beans.PropertyValue"
Dim args(1) as new "com.sun.star.beans.PropertyValue"
arg1.Name = "nodepath"
arg1.Value="/org.openoffice.Setup/Product"
args(0) = arg1
Dim cfgAccess As Object
Set cfgAccess =
cfgProv.createInstanceWithArguments("com.sun.star.configuration.ConfigurationAccess",
args)
MsgBox cfgAccess.ooName & " version " & cfgAccess.ooSetupVersion & ",
provided by """ & cfgAccess.ooVendor & 
End Sub

This provides a string; it would be better if the version were provided as a
(set of) _number_s.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70947] Incompatible API changes between versions: provide better support, information at runtime, .. for extension developers

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70947

Lionel Elie Mamane  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||70949

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70859] Other: Error saving file to a Vnxe 3100 SAN in NAS CIFS mode

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70859

--- Comment #2 from Olivier MORIN  ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Olivier: just for the test, could you give a try to pre release 4.1.3? (see
> http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/)

Bonjour,

4.1.3.1 installed this morning, same problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70500] EDITING: Selecting with Shift+PageUp/PageDown is not working

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70500

--- Comment #1 from Dominique Boutry  ---
Created attachment 88218
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88218&action=edit
Test of PageDown key

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69893] EDITING: Ctrl+A select only the table if there is an empty table with a first cell empty at the document beginning

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69893

Miklos Vajna  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |vmik...@collabora.co.uk
   |desktop.org |

--- Comment #9 from Miklos Vajna  ---
Created attachment 88219
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88219&action=edit
Reproducer document

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70947] Incompatible API changes between versions: provide better support, information at runtime, .. for extension developers

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70947

--- Comment #5 from Lionel Elie Mamane  ---
As a matter of example, here is how to detect the alluded to change. 't would
be nice if someone posted it on some documentation / FAQ / code snippets
website.

Dim OOoReflection As Object
Set OOoReflection =
CreateUnoService("com.sun.star.reflection.CoreReflection")
Dim gD as Object
Set gD =
OOoReflection.forName("com.sun.star.awt.XDateField").getMethod("getDate").ReturnType
if gD.TypeClass = com.sun.star.uno.TypeClass.LONG then
gbDateIsStruct = false
 elseif gD.TypeClass = com.sun.star.uno.TypeClass.STRUCT And gD.Name =
"com.sun.star.util.Date" then
gbDateIsStruct = true
else
   MsgBox "Unknown situation"
end if


(In reply to comment #0)
> There should therefore be functions to obtain information about the version,
> such as GetOfficeVersion and GetOfficeName and GetOfficeVendor.  People can
> then write code that works on the different versions.

I agree that having utility functions to easily get version information is
good;
I disagree that using them to "adapt" code is a good idea. If possible, feature
tests (rather than version tests) are more robust.

> For changes to behaviour based on types of data items there should also be
> simple functions to find out what the data type of an item in a control is.

That's exactly what the above code does. The control implements an interface,
and that code looks what data type that interface gives.

As an example of "other change", if the control used to implement interface
XFoo1
but now does not, then that's the "right thing" to test: does it implement
interface "XFoo1"?

> All such incompatible changes need to be flagged in advance

Yeah, that one was rather "last minute". But OTOH, even if we had done it
months
before release, I'm still not clear on how to announce it in a way that users
will notice.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70947] Incompatible API changes between versions: provide better support, information at runtime, .. for extension developers

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70947

--- Comment #4 from t...@tim-passingham.co.uk ---
Almost OK, but it isn't just for extension developers, it is for anyone writing
macros of any sort in their own organisation's applications.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70500] EDITING: Selecting with Shift+PageUp/PageDown is not working

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70500

--- Comment #2 from Dominique Boutry  ---
I noticed a behaviour with PageDown key (without any selection) which may be
underlying to the present bug case. When I press successive PageDown key on the
attachment 88218, I see 2 cases :
- either the press causes both a scroll and a movement of the caret relative to
the text,
- or the press causes only a scroll (the caret remains tighten to the same text
character, it may be hiden or not, after that).

Now in conjunction with the area selection : Shift + PageDown key causes :
- a visible growing of the selected area,
- a simple scroll without growing of the selected area, its bottom remaining
visible,
- a simple scroll and the bottom of the selected area becoming hiden,
eventually making the user think that the whole selection has gone.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70381] Objects scaled to 100% of a page are rendered outside of page

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70381

--- Comment #1 from Dominique Boutry  ---
Reproduced withy LibO 4.1.2.3 on Win7.

I noticed that :
- the image is indeed still present, as shown in the Navigator,
- double-clic on it in the navigator, the 8 green handles appear in the
landscape sheet, at an unchanged location,
- the anchor is visible at the top-left of page 2 (portrait).
- it's possible to grab the image (although blank) and drag&drop it in page 2
(the one with its anchor), and its content re-appeared. All seems repaired.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70859] Other: Error saving file to a Vnxe 3100 SAN in NAS CIFS mode

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70859

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||michael.me...@collabora.com

--- Comment #3 from Julien Nabet  ---
Michael: do you know who may help here?
BTW, quick translation of error messages:
Error during saving of the document ..., access denied
then
IO Error for second screenshot.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70488] Other: Offer LO nightly builds for OS X to speed up triaging and QA

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70488

--- Comment #5 from Christian Lohmaier  ---
expect the daily builds to be available later this week.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70915]=?UTF-8?Q?=20Missing=20letters=20in=20Basic=20OLH=20on=20=C2=BB?="/" operator (mathematical) « with Master build

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70915

Stephan Bergmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |sberg...@redhat.com
   |desktop.org |

--- Comment #1 from Stephan Bergmann  ---
That was a regression introduced by a broken fix.  Meanwhile fixed again with

"Correctly fix 'Terminating NUL' fix."

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70345] [FILESAVE] I/O ERROR when saving document on a network file.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70345

--- Comment #4 from Matthieu  ---
Here is the gerrit associated:

https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/6460/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68082] FILESAVE: File cannot be saved on network drive

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68082

Maxim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|FILESAVE: File cannot be|FILESAVE: File cannot be
   |saved if Load LibreOffice   |saved on network drive
   |at startup is checked   |
   |(LibreOffice quickstart is  |
   |on) for network files   |

--- Comment #6 from Maxim  ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The same behaviour is with quick start on and off.
OK, so I'll correct the summary.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70498] VIEWING: graphic file wmf image is not displayed correctly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70498

--- Comment #4 from John Bakker  ---
Created attachment 88223
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88223&action=edit
Screenshot original wmf File

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70498] VIEWING: graphic file wmf image is not displayed correctly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70498

--- Comment #5 from John Bakker  ---
Created attachment 88224
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88224&action=edit
screenshot wmf file in odt document made in LO 4.1.2.3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70859] Other: Error saving file to a Vnxe 3100 SAN in NAS CIFS mode

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70859

Maxim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||momonas...@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from Maxim  ---
Looks like a duplicate of Bug 68082 (see especially Bug 68082 comment 4), which
might be in turn caused by the same cause as (the recently fixed) Bug 67534.

@Olivier MORIN: Could you please run LibreOffice installation, choose 'Modify'
and uncheck the installation of Windows Explorer extensions? Does it solve your
problem?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70953] New: Always list last three used languages

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70953

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70953
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: Always list last three used languages
  Severity: enhancement
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
  Reporter: emir_s...@msn.com
  Hardware: Other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: Inherited From OOo
 Component: Linguistic
   Product: LibreOffice

Currently in the language selection menu language entries disappear after a
certain amount of time (Tools - Language - For all text, paragraph, selection
etc. - or right click on the status bar).

For example, after using three languages, after quitting LibreOffice only
default language remains. 

It would be better to show the last three used languages always (maybe more),
and have them replace only if more languages are used.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70953] Always list last three used languages

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70953

Emir Sarı  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 QA Contact||emir_s...@msn.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70814] FILEOPEN: xlsx file opens as an empty file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70814

--- Comment #11 from Maxim  ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> May be you don't have "Calibri" font on your OS...(Calibri is a windows
> proprietary font).
It doesn't matter, because in such case LO should display the text with a
fallback font.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70954] New: VIEWING: curve connector middle position not saved

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70954

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70954
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: VIEWING: curve connector middle position not saved
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Windows (All)
  Reporter: whats...@gmx.net
  Hardware: Other
Whiteboard: BSA
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.2.3 release
 Component: Presentation
   Product: LibreOffice

Problem description: 

Steps to reproduce:
1. draw two rectangles
2. link the rectangles with a curve connector
3. move the middle anchor
4. save document
5. open document

Current behavior:
after reopening the document the middle anchor of the connector is reseted to
the middle of the two link points.

Expected behavior:
the middle anchor should be in the place where I moved it.
Operating System: Windows 7
Version: 4.1.2.3 release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70119] FORMATTING: I don’t know how to find duplicated data between two columns with Conditional Formatting

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70119

Jean-Baptiste Faure  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID
 CC||jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org

--- Comment #5 from Jean-Baptiste Faure  ---
This bugtacker is not an helpdesk. For assistance please ask the users
mailing-list or ask your question on http://ask.libreoffice.org.

Best regards. JBF

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70252] EDITING: Auto-Correct - Word Completion is collecting passwords from internet browsing

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70252

Jean-Baptiste Faure  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG
 CC||jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org

--- Comment #5 from Jean-Baptiste Faure  ---
Due to comment #2, closing as NotOurBug. :-)

Best regards. JBF

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70937] Libreoffice crashes with segfault in soffice.bin "error 4 in libmergedlo.so"

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70937

Jean-Baptiste Faure  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jbf.fa...@sud-ouest.org

--- Comment #2 from Jean-Baptiste Faure  ---
You should try with the build provided by LibreOffice website which, AFAIK,
does not use the build option that produces the libmerged.so library.

Best regards. JBF

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70955] New: Problem with printing (exporting to pdf) objects pasted from MS Excel

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70955

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70955
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: Problem with printing (exporting to pdf) objects
pasted from MS Excel
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Windows (All)
  Reporter: pitri...@mail.ru
  Hardware: Other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: unspecified
 Component: Writer
   Product: LibreOffice

Created attachment 88225
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88225&action=edit
original file

Problem with printing (exporting to pdf) objects pasted from MS Excel

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70955] Problem with printing (exporting to pdf) objects pasted from MS Excel

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70955

--- Comment #1 from PITRider  ---
Created attachment 88226
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88226&action=edit
pdf created in linux

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56209] FILEOPEN: opening a .ods file saved in Excel (pre-ODF1.2) damages all formula

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56209

--- Comment #16 from Eike Rathke  ---
AFAIR there wasn't an explicit support of these 'msoxl:' namespace
formulas (except the reference address part), but things may have worked
by chance, we may have assumed OOXML syntax in that case and used
a different formula parser which for some reason we don't do now. I'd
have to dig through 3.5 code and compare.

The joy of Excel 2010 "supporting" ODF is that they deliberately broke
the formula part, to their "excuse" as it wasn't specified with ODF 1.0
(ISO/IEC 26300:2006) and they purposely implemented only what was
specified in the ISO standard. On import of ODF it even strips all
formulas. However, with Excel 2013 they implemented OpenFormula of ODF
1.2, so if you want real ODF spreadsheet interoperability in MS-Excel
you need Excel 2013.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70955] Problem with printing (exporting to pdf) objects pasted from MS Excel

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70955

--- Comment #2 from PITRider  ---
Created attachment 88227
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88227&action=edit
pdf created in windows

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 55930] Labels of modifier keys in menus all shown as "???"

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55930

--- Comment #7 from Rudolf Kollien  ---
See bug 60131 - this must be related to vnc and the keyboard layout it is
reporting. Tried different vnc clients (Mac, Windows, Linux): they all show
"???" instead of the correct modifiers.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68903] FILEOPEN: CSV files with .xls suffix are opened as Writer documents

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68903

Maxim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |momonas...@gmail.com
   |desktop.org |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70957] New: (Windows only?) pdf show after export fails if the pdf file doesn't already exist (first export and so on)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70957

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70957
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: (Windows only?) pdf show after export fails if the pdf
file doesn't already exist (first export and so on)
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
  Reporter: carlo.str...@tiscali.it
  Hardware: Other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.3.2 rc
 Component: Printing and PDF export
   Product: LibreOffice

Hi Everyone,

from italian user mailing list [users-it]
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/it/users/msg01378.html

I want to file a perhaps new bug (I havent found nothing similar to the known
open bugs).

My system:
--
- Microsoft Windows 8.1, 64 bit, updated, ita guied;
- LibreOffice 4.1.3.2 (but the bug seem to be documentable since 4.1.1.2
release), from here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/
but not from here yet, at the moment:
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/4.1.3/win/x86/
- Adobe Acrobat Reader XI, MUI, 11.0.5, win32, ita guied;
- pdfforge GmbH PDF Architect, 1.1.83.9982, win32, ita gui selected.

The Bug:

The bug presents itself both on using Acrobat Reader or PDF Architect as
Windows (System) pdf default viewer.

On Windows only systems (it seems) and on all LibreOffice's applications, if
you enable "pdf show after export" in the File -> "Export in PDF format"
windows, you get an error Window.

That Window, probably still from LibreOffice because it doesn't change from
Acrobat or PDF Architect, says that was unable to open the pdf file and suggest
to check the pdf file name and retry. In any case, the pdf export itself goes
fine, but the default viewer doesn't open.

If the pdf file already exist on the export folder (next exports of the same
file and so on), all goes fine (and the showed pdf is in the right version
too)! The "already existing file" may also be an empty ".pdf renamed" txt file
and all still goes fine!

It seems that the system call to the system default pdf viewer is somewhat
performed before the real pdf creations and lock o something similar.

Finally , it seems that the bug affects Microsoft Windows only systems because
in these first cases all seems to go well:
1.
- Kubuntu 13.04 / KDE 4.11.2
- LibreOffice 4.1.2.3
2.
- Debian Jesse
- libreoffice 4.1.1-1+b1


How to reproduce the bug

- On Microsoft Windows systems;
- open LibreOffice Writer (for example);
- write on it some words or letters;
- go to the File -> "Export in PDF format" window;
- check the (default unchecked!!!) following option "Show the PDF after export"
and click on "Export";
- choose an unexisting (!) pdf file name and click on "Save";
- enjoy the error alert window. ;-)


Hope giving you the right informations.

Have a sunny day,

Carlo

p.s. May somewhat related to the Bug 51347
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51347

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68082] FILESAVE: File cannot be saved on network drive

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68082

--- Comment #7 from Urmas  ---
If you uninstall 'Libreoffice Windows Explorer extension', does the problem
persist?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70850] EDITING - Limited character set using MySql(JDBC)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70850

t...@tim-passingham.co.uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 OS|Linux (All) |All
Version|4.1.1.2 release |4.1.2.3 release

--- Comment #10 from t...@tim-passingham.co.uk ---
Is anyone else able to test this?  Ubuntu and Windows 7 show the same incorrect
behaviour.

I am currently trapped between Mysql(Native) which seems slightly unstable with
MariaDB (LO says the server has 'gone away' quite frequently) and MySql(JDBC)
which cannot store the characters I need.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70498] VIEWING: graphic file wmf image is not displayed correctly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70498

--- Comment #6 from John Bakker  ---
Created attachment 88230
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88230&action=edit
screenshot wmf file in odt document made in LO 4.0.6.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70959] New: HYPERLINK-function with Scriptprotocol don' work

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70959

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70959
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: HYPERLINK-function with Scriptprotocol don' work
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
  Reporter: karloofo...@arcor.de
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.2.3 release
 Component: Spreadsheet
   Product: LibreOffice

Created attachment 88229
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88229&action=edit
ExampleCalc-dokument with Makro

Up to LO3.6 we could specify HYPERLINK() -functions to execute Basic-Scripts or
Python, etc.
This don't work with LO4.1.2.3 - Why ?

Open attached Document with both LO_3.6 and LO_4.1.2.3

It also still work in AOO_4.01


Karolus

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70859] Other: Error saving file to a Vnxe 3100 SAN in NAS CIFS mode

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70859

--- Comment #5 from Olivier MORIN  ---
Yes after unsinstalling this extenion it is OK.

I have installed the
libreoffice-4-1~2013-10-25_22.57.18_LibreOfficeDev_4.1.4.0.0_Win_x86 and it is
also OK.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70959] HYPERLINK-function with Scriptprotocol don' work

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70959

karolus  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #88229|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #1 from karolus  ---
Created attachment 88231
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88231&action=edit
ExampleCalc-dokument with Makro

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70859] Other: Error saving file to a Vnxe 3100 SAN in NAS CIFS mode

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70859

Maxim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Severity|blocker |major
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #6 from Maxim  ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I have installed the
> libreoffice-4-1~2013-10-25_22.57.18_LibreOfficeDev_4.1.4.0.0_Win_x86 and it
> is also OK.
Did you install it from the command line with 'WRITE_REGISTRY=1'? If not it's
irrelevant, because dev buils don't write the appropriate registry values by
default.

Anyway I'm able to reproduce this bug using 4.1.3.1 with a simple Windows 7
share. Uninstalling shell extensions solves the problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69601] Windows MSI Error 1937 for Current builds of Master, signature error for cli_cpuhelper_assembly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69601

--- Comment #11 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Michael Stahl committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=decf809674a837bfddb5b9a376502927364377e8

fdo#69601: refactor CliNativeLibrary



The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70960] New: Repeat Action command results in LibreOffice crash

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70960

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70960
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: Repeat Action command results in LibreOffice crash
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Mac OS X (All)
  Reporter: icerabbi...@gmail.com
  Hardware: Other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.0.4 release
 Component: Libreoffice
   Product: LibreOffice

Created attachment 88232
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88232&action=edit
text document with complete copy of crash report

Working in LibreOffice Writer on a 5 column table with probably 36 rows.
Intended to be a simple checklist. Just many cells & rows filled out with one
or more  words. Some rows were left blank as spacer rows. Font for entire
document set to size 9. Doesn't all fit on a single page any more. Can't make
multiple non-contiguous row selection (missing feature) ... so I figured to use
the Repeat action button. 

Select a row which was left blank as a spacer. Change font size to 6. 
Select another blank row. Click repeat action icon. 
Doing that for the fifth time, I get the beach ball spinning for a brief while.
Saved my document (just in case)
Did Repeat action for a sixth time. 
LibreOffice Hangs indefinitely. 

Copy / Pasted the crash report from Apple into a text document to submit to
your team. Adding that as an attachment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70961] New: Other: Send document as e-mail doesn't work with major webmail providers

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70961

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70961
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: Other: Send document as e-mail doesn't work with major
webmail providers
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Windows (All)
  Reporter: computergeoff...@zoho.com
  Hardware: Other
Whiteboard: BSA
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.2.3 release
 Component: Writer
   Product: LibreOffice

Problem description: 

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open a document (odt or docx doesn't matter)
2. Go to File -> Send -> Send document as e-mail

Current behavior:
It spawns errors at the user to configure the local e-mail client. (set as
default application) (and in my case, an additional JRE error)

This problem also applies to Impress, and could apply to Calc (not tested)

Expected behavior:
It would be useful to support Gmail, Outlook (aka Hotmail) and Yahoo! Mail.
Maybe this should be implemented in the settings as mail provider (local
applications and supported web services listed)

Operating System: Windows 8
Version: 4.1.2.3 release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70859] Other: Error saving file to a Vnxe 3100 SAN in NAS CIFS mode

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70859

--- Comment #7 from Olivier MORIN  ---
Yes i did !

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70859] Other: Error saving file to a Vnxe 3100 SAN in NAS CIFS mode

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70859

--- Comment #8 from Julien Nabet  ---
Maxim: first thank you for the help here.
About fdo#67534, the fix is present from 4.1.4 not 4.1.3 so it's normal you can
reproduce the problem with 4.1.3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70498] VIEWING: graphic file wmf image is not displayed correctly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70498

--- Comment #7 from John Bakker  ---
Comment on attachment 88224
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88224
screenshot wmf file in odt document made in LO 4.1.2.3

The problem is that  the values between 0 and 2 are disappeared in LO 4.1.2 in
writer, calc and impress

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70960] Repeat Action command results in LibreOffice crash

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70960

--- Comment #1 from icerabbit  ---
Repeatable crash. 

I've continued to work with the document a little. The crash is certainly
repeatable. I needed to squeeze more stuff on the page. So I'm using Repeat to
size down the font in the rows that were size 9 to size 8. Upon the 7th Repeat
action there is a brief slow down. Then with the 8th it hangs a bit. 9th it
seems really stuck. As I'm typing this note, I can't switch back to LibreOffice
any more, it is that hung up. And then a minute later comes the crash report. 

Note that this is simple writer table, 5 columns, however many fit on a page.
Repeat action asks to apply a font size to 5 cells in a row. 

Core i7, 16GB of RAM, ... something is definitely not right. 



Process: soffice [758]
Path:/Applications/LibreOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice
Identifier:  org.libreoffice.script
Version: 4.1.0.4 (???)
Code Type:   X86 (Native)
Parent Process:  launchd [134]
User ID: 501

Date/Time:   2013-10-28 10:26:20.546 -0400
OS Version:  Mac OS X 10.8.5 (12F45)
Report Version:  10

Interval Since Last Report:  106616 sec
Crashes Since Last Report:   1
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report:   1
Anonymous UUID:  A8027D46-3810-98A7-EE81-D0944559F5B3

Crashed Thread:  0  Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread

Exception Type:  EXC_CRASH (SIGABRT)
Exception Codes: 0x, 0x

Application Specific Information:
abort() called
terminate called throwing an exception

Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
0   libsystem_kernel.dylib0x96c7ca6a __pthread_kill + 10
1   libsystem_c.dylib 0x9737fb2f pthread_kill + 101
2   libsystem_c.dylib 0x973b6631 abort + 168
3   libc++abi.dylib   0x93fe97e0 abort_message + 151
4   libc++abi.dylib   0x93fe7249 default_terminate() + 34
5   libc++abi.dylib   0x93fe7289 safe_handler_caller(void
(*)()) + 13
6   libc++abi.dylib   0x93fe72f1 std::terminate() + 23
7   libc++abi.dylib   0x93fe83e6 __cxa_throw + 110
8   libstdc++.6.dylib 0x940502f6 operator new(unsigned long) +
127
9   libsvllo.dylib0x00b90483 std::vector
>::_M_insert_aux(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator > >,
MarkedUndoAction const&) + 499
10  libsvllo.dylib0x00b9085f std::vector
>::insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator > >,
MarkedUndoAction const&) + 63
11  libsvllo.dylib0x00b8d9de
SfxUndoManager::ImplAddUndoAction_NoNotify(SfxUndoAction*, bool, bool,
svl::undo::impl::UndoManagerGuard&) + 254
12  libsvllo.dylib0x00b8e66a
SfxUndoManager::AddUndoAction(SfxUndoAction*, unsigned char) + 106
13  libswlo.dylib 0x12bde09c
sw::UndoManager::AddUndoAction(SfxUndoAction*, unsigned char) + 108
14  libswlo.dylib 0x12bddea0
sw::UndoManager::AppendUndo(SwUndo*) + 32
15  libswlo.dylib 0x128fcae7 SwDoc::InsertItemSet(SwPaM
const&, SfxItemSet const&, unsigned short) + 247
16  libswlo.dylib 0x12be5112
SwUndoAttr::RepeatImpl(sw::RepeatContext&) + 98
17  libsvllo.dylib0x00b8c077
SfxListUndoAction::Repeat(SfxRepeatTarget&) + 55
18  libswlo.dylib 0x12bde3ec
sw::UndoManager::Repeat(sw::RepeatContext&, unsigned short) + 236
19  libswlo.dylib 0x129f6d0c SwEditShell::Repeat(unsigned
short) + 140
20  libswlo.dylib 0x130efb10
SwWrtShell::Do(SwWrtShell::DoType, unsigned short) + 448
21  libswlo.dylib 0x12f9ad58
SwBaseShell::ExecUndo(SfxRequest&) + 280
22  libsfxlo.dylib0x0082b2d8
SfxDispatcher::Call_Impl(SfxShell&, SfxSlot const&, SfxRequest&, unsigned char)
+ 360
23  libsfxlo.dylib0x00594d33
SfxBindings::Execute_Impl(SfxRequest&, SfxSlot const*, SfxShell*) + 99
24  libsfxlo.dylib0x005cc175
SfxDispatchController_Impl::dispatch(com::sun::star::util::URL const&,
com::sun::star::uno::Sequence const&,
com::sun::star::uno::Reference
const&) + 4021
25  libsfxlo.dylib0x005cd1f5
SfxOfficeDispatch::dispatch(com::sun::star::util::URL const&,
com::sun::star::uno::Sequence const&) +
341
26  libsvtlo.dylib0x00df1f7f
svt::ToolboxController::execute(short) + 847
27  libsfxlo.dylib0x007d4ea0
SfxToolBoxControl::execute(short) + 48
28  libfwklo.dylib0x0eba0c1a
framework::ToolBarManager::Select(void*) + 250
29  libvcllo.dylib0x01a160cf ToolBox::Select() + 111
30  libvcllo.dylib0x01a275b6
ToolBox::ImplHandleMouseButtonUp(MouseEvent const&, unsigned char) + 550
31  libvcllo.dylib0x01a27994
ToolBox::Tracking(TrackingEvent const&) + 100
32  libvcllo.dylib

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70961] Other: Send document as e-mail doesn't work with webmail

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70961

Cor Nouws  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 OS|Windows (All)   |All
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Severity|normal  |enhancement
 CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
Summary|Other: Send document as |Other: Send document as
   |e-mail doesn't work with|e-mail doesn't work with
   |major webmail providers |webmail
Version|4.1.2.3 release |Inherited From OOo
  Component|Writer  |Libreoffice
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Cor Nouws  ---
Hi Geoffrey,

As far as I know, Send as e-mail only works with default local mail clients..
Maybe that can be changed?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70961] Other: Send document as e-mail doesn't work with webmail

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70961

--- Comment #2 from Urmas  ---
I am sure that major webmail providers will LOVE an interface for unattended
mail sending, with attachments included!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 47726] Impress very slow due to antialiasing

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47726

--- Comment #9 from Glutanimate  ---
I am experiencing similar issues when working with graphics in LibreOffice
Writer. If anti-aliasing is turned on, moving graphics becomes very sluggish
and unresponsive.

(observed on LO 3.6.6)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70500] EDITING: Selecting with Shift+PageUp/PageDown is not working

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70500

Zoltán Hegedüs  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70919] wiki-publisher extension make Writer crashing in master

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70919

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||target:4.2.0

--- Comment #2 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Stephan Bergmann committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f924cf3c2203be22631e6a3c631f712558fd8161

Related fdo#70919 Missing instdir redirect ini-file



The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70859] Other: Error saving file to a Vnxe 3100 SAN in NAS CIFS mode

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70859

Maxim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Whiteboard|BSA |BSA target:4.2.0
   ||target:4.1.4
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Maxim  ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> About fdo#67534, the fix is present from 4.1.4 not 4.1.3 so it's normal you
> can reproduce the problem with 4.1.3
Yes I know, just wanted to prove that it's related to shell extension.

What we have now: Olivier MORIN confirmed that it's fixed in 4.1 dev build. I
can also confirm the same for several master builds, the oldest one is from
2013-10-15_15:51:52. master build from 2013-10-10_06.40.14 still had that bug.
The fixes for Bug 67534 were pushed at 10-11 & 10-14. So it's resonable to
assume that it's indeed a duplicate. Closing as RESOLVED FIXED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70918] Base freeze while opening in kubuntu

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70918

--- Comment #1 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
Did you report this to Kubuntu also? When it will work on the same machine with
another windowmanager it seems to be a problem of the windowmanager.
Which KDE-Version do you use in Ubuntu?
Could you start LO from Konsole? Could be there appear errors for this
freezing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68082] FILESAVE: File cannot be saved on network drive

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68082

Maxim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #8 from Maxim  ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> If you uninstall 'Libreoffice Windows Explorer extension', does the problem
> persist?
@Robert Popa: Following Urmas suggestion: Please run LibreOffice installation,
choose 'Modify' and uncheck the installation of Windows Explorer extensions.
Does it solve your problem?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63372] Numbering restarts when it shouldn't

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63372

--- Comment #2 from Dominique Boutry  ---
Created attachment 88233
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88233&action=edit
Bad mix of the two usages of numbering

Please see bug 69652 for the analysis and present attachment (pb corrected)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70919] javaldx re-scanning on every start in master instdir installation

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70919

Stephan Bergmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 CC||sberg...@redhat.com
Summary|wiki-publisher extension|javaldx re-scanning on
   |make Writer crashing in |every start in master
   |master  |instdir installation

--- Comment #3 from Stephan Bergmann  ---
That some process instantiated a JVM on every start of soffice from a master
instdir installation was unrelated to wiki-publisher and Writer.  It has been
fixed as described in comment 2 now.  Adapting this issue's summary accordingly
and closing as FIXED.

That a JVM fails if you artificially limit virtual memory size via ulimit -v is
NOTABUG or at least NOTOURBUG.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63372] Numbering restarts when it shouldn't

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63372

--- Comment #3 from Dominique Boutry  ---
Created attachment 88234
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=88234&action=edit
Bad consequences of mixing numberring features

Please see bug 69562 and comment 1 in bug 69498, for the analysis and present
attachment with corrected problem

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 47726] Impress very slow due to antialiasing

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47726

--- Comment #10 from Maxim  ---
Hi,
I can't reproduce with 4.1.2.3 under Ubuntu 13.10 (64-bit).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68082] FILESAVE: File cannot be saved on network drive

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68082

--- Comment #9 from Robert Popa  ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > If you uninstall 'Libreoffice Windows Explorer extension', does the problem
> > persist?
> @Robert Popa: Following Urmas suggestion: Please run LibreOffice
> installation, choose 'Modify' and uncheck the installation of Windows
> Explorer extensions. Does it solve your problem?

YES!!! It finally works! I could not get the files blocked anymore. I opened
multiple Explorer Windows and every time the files opened correct. 

Regarding save: I did multiple saves, very quick, and still the file did not
block me to save it.

I guess this was the problem. However, why did we need the Windows Eplorer
Extension in the first place? I don't know what it is used for... :(

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68082] FILESAVE: File cannot be saved on network drive

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68082

Maxim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #10 from Maxim  ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> YES!!! It finally works!
Great, thanks for confirming!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 67534 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70963] New: Save dialog can appear outside the viewport with multi-page desktops

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70963

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 70963
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: Save dialog can appear outside the viewport with
multi-page desktops
  Severity: major
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
  Reporter: vincent-...@vinc17.net
  Hardware: Other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.2.3 release
 Component: UI
   Product: LibreOffice

Under some conditions described below, the Save dialog can appear outside the
viewport. In some cases, the unchanged data cannot be saved and are lost (even
after LibreOffice's recovery feature). I first reported this bug on the Debian
BTS:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728106

To reproduce the bug, you need the Fvwm window manager (or any window manager
that works in a similar way to implement multi-page desktops). Use the
following desktop config:

  DeskTopSize 3x2

(2x1 is sufficient, but the 3 pages positioned horizontally help to see what
happens) and the FvwmPager module. Then do the following steps:

1. On Page 2, open a first file with "libreoffice file1.odt", and modify it
(but do not save it).

2. On Page 3, open a second file with: "libreoffice file2.odt". So, one has:

  |  Page 1   |  Page 2   |  Page 3   |
  |   | file1.odt | file2.odt |
  |   |   |  VISIBLE  |

3. In the file2.odt window, type Ctrl-Q to quit.

LibreOffice switches to Page 2 (perhaps by raising or giving the focus to the
file1.odt window), and the "Save" dialog appears on Page 1 instead of Page 2:

  |  Page 1   |  Page 2   |  Page 3   |
  |  "Save"   | file1.odt | file2.odt |
  |   |  VISIBLE  |   |

More precisely, FvwmDebug information shows that the X coordinate of the "Save"
dialog is a large negative number, which corresponds to the left of the
currently visible page. If file1.odt is on the leftmost page, the "Save" dialog
doesn't appear at all, and the user can't do anything to save the file (which
is what I initially reported on the Debian BTS, after finding information with
FvwmDebug).

I think that the following happens when LibreOffice wants to display the "Save"
dialog over the file1.odt window (after receiving the Ctrl-Q). I haven't looked
at the sources, but this can explain what I could see above:

First, I don't know exactly how fvwm implements multi-page desktops, but I
think it does that by translating the coordinates of the windows. That's why,
for instance, a window can appear partly on two adjacent pages. So, when I move
to the right page, the X coordinates of the windows on the left page become
negative.

1. LibreOffice gets the coordinates of the file1.odt window (currently
negative, as on Page 2, while Page 3 of the desktop is being displayed), with
the goal to display the "Save" window above the file1.odt window.

2. LibreOffice makes fvwm switch to Page 2 (perhaps by raising or giving the
focus to the file1.odt window). This makes fvwm translate the coordinates of
all the windows at the same time.

3. LibreOffice opens the "Save" window, using the coordinates obtained in (1).
But the problem is that these coordinates are not up-to-date!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70345] [FILESAVE] I/O ERROR when saving document on a network file.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70345

--- Comment #5 from Maxim  ---
@Matthieu: 4.0.6 release was the last release of 4.0.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70957] (Windows only?) pdf show after export fails if the pdf file doesn't already exist (first export and so on)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70957

Maxim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Maxim  ---
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this bug. It's already reported as Bug 68099.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68099 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68099] Other: error while starting pdf-viewer after pdf-export

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68099

Maxim  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||carlo.str...@tiscali.it

--- Comment #6 from Maxim  ---
*** Bug 70957 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69641] Other: Draw crashes when trying to check spelling

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69641

--- Comment #7 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Caolan McNamara committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9d5b07b9085f97edfff5d4ac474e9711036bb0c4

Related: fdo#69641 add a regression test



The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69641] Other: Draw crashes when trying to check spelling

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69641

--- Comment #5 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Caolan McNamara committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=08b7af126e546bdbd175023429f544baa9861dba

Related: fdo#69641 check index against length before iterateCodePoints



The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69641] Other: Draw crashes when trying to check spelling

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69641

--- Comment #6 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Caolan McNamara committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=507e627d83dbfb6a35677450a3fc42d10c79a82e

Related: fdo#69641 double iterateCodePoints doesn't make sense to me



The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69641] Other: Draw crashes when trying to check spelling

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69641

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|BSA |BSA target:4.2.0

--- Comment #4 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Caolan McNamara committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=47c6eef77378d96d0921c76ec14c338169f14dbe

Related: fdo#69641 convert OSL_ASSERT into assert



The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70963] Save dialog can appear outside the viewport with multi-page desktops

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70963

Rene Engelhard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||r...@debian.org
   See Also||http://bugs.debian.org/7281
   ||06

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69641] Other: Draw crashes when trying to check spelling

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69641

Caolán McNamara  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from Caolán McNamara  ---
It didn't crash for me, but there was a pile of brokenness for me. I fixed
those and hopefully that was the reason for the final crash. Here's hoping.
Feel free to reopen if this persists in a daily that includes these fixes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70947] Incompatible API changes between versions: provide better support, information at runtime, .. for extension developers

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70947

Stephan Bergmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sberg...@redhat.com

--- Comment #6 from Stephan Bergmann  ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > All such incompatible changes need to be flagged in advance
> 
> Yeah, that one was rather "last minute". But OTOH, even if we had done it
> months
> before release, I'm still not clear on how to announce it in a way that users
> will notice.

Bug 70667 tries to address that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69799] In conditional formatting where 2 cells have same sum, they get different color FORMATTING

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69799

--- Comment #7 from Ady  ---
To confirm that the floating point calculation is part of the problem, I:

A_ “played” with the specific numbers that are part of the data that sum up 
always exactly “=1”, and;
B_ multiplied the numbers and the user-defined format by 100.

For case “A”, depending on the specific numbers, the color of the result would 
change, while I know it was always summed up exactly “=1”.

For case “B”, whichever values I used (summing up “=100”), the color of the 
result was consistent.


After some experiments confirming the original report, I believe there are 3 
different matters here.

1_ Floating point calculations. As a user, I would expect that using 2 (or 3, 
or “a few”) decimals should not trigger any inconsistency in the real 
calculation. I am not talking about how many decimals are displayed (thus, 
rounding the actual result accordingly). I think that using 2 decimal places is 
very common and the results (whether from a formula or from the user-defined 
format code) should be consistent, and not depending on the specific data 
values. Using 2 decimals in source data values and displaying 2 decimals, is 
not the same as using 14 decimals or using some relevant scientific notation.

In other words, a user inserting values with 2 decimal places and using format 
codes with 2 decimal places is not likely to think “I should explicitly add a 
round function up to 2 decimal places, just in case”. It would be an 
unrealistic expectation from common users, IMHO.


2_ The user-defined format seems to have some limitation after its second 
condition. I can use “[=1]” (or “[=100]”, or any other condition) if it is part 
of the first or the second section of the user-defined format code, but in the 
third section Calc rejects the usage of conditions. It can still accept a color 
though.

At first glance, this seems to be in contrast to the help in Calc, where 3 
conditions in three sections are used as example (quote: “All temperatures 
below zero are blue, temperatures between 0 and 30 °C are black, and 
temperatures higher than 30 °C are red.”). But it should be noted that the 
user-defined code in the example (in the help) only uses 2 sections with 
conditions, leaving the third section without a conditional range of results 
(“[BLACK]#,0 "°C"”).

In other words, the third section is applied to whichever range (condition) is 
not covered by the first 2 sections.

Perhaps this limitation (only the first 2 sections can include “conditional 
brackets”) should be explicitly added to the help example in Calc?


3_ According to my experiments, the floating point calculations seem to affect 
the user-defined format code, but not “Format -> Conditional Formatting”).

I used different cells with the same “=sum” formula, without user-defined 
format. In these cells, I used “Format ->  Conditional Formatting” instead, 
with the same conditions that were used in the original “=sum” cells. While the 
original summing cells indeed show different colors for the same exact “=1” 
result, the new cells are consistently showing “1” in green.


I would expect for the user-defined “conditional brackets” to behave in the 
same way.

Thank you and Best Regards,
Ady.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70667] Notify libreoffice user list of API changes and motivate user to test extensions on dailies/beta

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70667

t...@tim-passingham.co.uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||t...@tim-passingham.co.uk

--- Comment #7 from t...@tim-passingham.co.uk ---
Please bear in mind it isn't just fairly technical developers of 'extensions'
that can be affected.  End-users with application developments of their own can
also be affected. 

The details of many of the commit messages are incomprehensible to such as
myself.  However, I well understand that changing a data type in a form control
could affect my code.

I do understand it's difficult to please everyone, but I'm just trying to
clarify some of the characteristics of your potential audience.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70963] Save dialog can appear outside the viewport with multi-page desktops

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70963

Mirosław Zalewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Version|4.1.2.3 release |3.6.0.0.alpha1
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Mirosław Zalewski  ---
Since you were really in hurry to report this here, let me ask you a question:
are you using GTK LibreOffice interface?
If so, can you switch to generic X11 interface (`export SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gen
&& libreoffice`) and try to reproduce that bug? What are the results?

I could reproduce this issue on fvwm only (I tried KDE, JWM, Openbox and
Fluxbox), which lean me towards closing this as NOTOURBUG.

But even on fvwm, I could reproduce it only on GTK interface (did not check
KDE, though). GTK interface takes advantage of window manager tips described in
EWMH. EWMH was introduced over decade ago, but fvwm is NOT EWMH-compliant (it
supports only older ICCCM). So I am afraid that fvwm developers will find this
not their bug, either (it's outcome of their design decisions).

Also, I could reproduce this issue on master snapshot ID
099198a4224778fe6e43f5dc13b5b9b1b4dc828c (roughly week before 3.6 branching),
so I set version field accordingly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70963] Save dialog can appear outside the viewport with multi-page desktops

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70963

--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefevre  ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Since you were really in hurry to report this here, let me ask you a
> question:
> are you using GTK LibreOffice interface?

Yes (the main purpose is to get readable fonts).

> If so, can you switch to generic X11 interface (`export
> SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gen && libreoffice`) and try to reproduce that bug? What
> are the results?

With SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gen, after moving the file2.odt window the right desktop
page to be under the same conditions, I cannot reproduce the bug: LibreOffice
doesn't try to switch the desktop[*] after Ctrl-Q, and as a consequence, the
"Save" dialog appears on the current desktop.

[*] Desktop switching might be a consequence of raise / set focus.

> I could reproduce this issue on fvwm only (I tried KDE, JWM, Openbox and
> Fluxbox), which lean me towards closing this as NOTOURBUG.

I don't think fvwm is doing anything wrong here, and you haven't proved that
reproducing the bug on KDE, etc. is impossible. IMHO, LibreOffice does a wrong
assumption about the window coordinates.

> But even on fvwm, I could reproduce it only on GTK interface (did not check
> KDE, though). GTK interface takes advantage of window manager tips described
> in EWMH. EWMH was introduced over decade ago, but fvwm is NOT EWMH-compliant
> (it supports only older ICCCM). So I am afraid that fvwm developers will
> find this not their bug, either (it's outcome of their design decisions).

Could you explain what EWMH feature would make the bug impossible to reproduce?

If this really comes from a lack of EWMH support (something that would make the
client aware that the coordinates have changed?), how about an option to let
the window manager determine where the "Save" dialog would appear, instead of
forcing some fixed coordinates?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70955] Problem with printing (exporting to pdf) objects pasted from MS Excel

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70955

bfoman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #88225|text/plain  |application/vnd.oasis.opend
  mime type||ocument.text

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70963] Save dialog can appear outside the viewport with multi-page desktops

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70963

--- Comment #3 from Mirosław Zalewski  ---
Please don't get me wrong. I am not claiming that this is not bug in
LibreOffice. I just have large share of doubt about it and I think we should
not waste developer's precious time until these doubt are dispelled. It's your
job as bug reporter to convince developers to fix that particular issue
(instead of one of 6000 reports we have open), so all burden of proof lies on
you.

So far, this bug has been observed only on fvwm and only when LO GTK interface
was used. Which is enough to ring a bell that it might not be LibreOffice bug
at all.

LO GTK interface usage of EWMH and fvwm lack of support for that gives us good
starting point for explaining possible failure here.

If you think that it indeed is bug in LibreOffice, please prove that. By, for
example, providing steps on how to reproduce it on EWMH-compliant window
manager, such as KDE's KWin. Or pointing out in LibreOffice source code where
exactly it is wrong. Or, better yet, proposing patch that fixes this issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69282] MAILMERGE: Format (page style) of the first page changed from other pages in mail merge

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69282

Sean Madsen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||s...@seanmadsen.com

--- Comment #1 from Sean Madsen  ---
I am experiencing this same behavior with LibreOffice 4.1.2.3 on Ubuntu.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56209] FILEOPEN: opening a .ods file saved in Excel (pre-ODF1.2) damages all formula

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56209

Eike Rathke  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |er...@redhat.com
   |desktop.org |

--- Comment #17 from Eike Rathke  ---
Presumably found the cause, trying to fix.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70667] Notify libreoffice user list of API changes and motivate user to test extensions on dailies/beta

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70667

--- Comment #8 from Björn Michaelsen  ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Please bear in mind it isn't just fairly technical developers of
> 'extensions' that can be affected.  End-users with application developments
> of their own can also be affected. 
> 
> The details of many of the commit messages are incomprehensible to such as
> myself.  However, I well understand that changing a data type in a form
> control could affect my code.

The Good Thing is: You dont need to completely understand the commit message to
test a daily build. Actually its a Good Thing if the tester isnt _too_
confident in "completely understanding" the commit message, as it can lead to
the reader thinking: "ah, this cant possibly break my stuff, so Im not testing
..." (see also:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8&feature=player_detailpage#t=1399s ).
This is not what we want for three reasons:
- if the reader tests the change, he/she is not only testing the specific
scenario, but also other stuff
- if the reader is confident in understanding the message, but misunderstands,
there is less testing, which is not what we want
- the the reader is confident and understands the message right, the message
might still be wrong or incomplete. Again, testing would help the case here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70963] Save dialog can appear outside the viewport with multi-page desktops

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70963

--- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefevre  ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> LO GTK interface usage of EWMH and fvwm lack of support for that gives us
> good starting point for explaining possible failure here.

I'd like to look at this more closely, but could you tell me what EWMH feature
allows the bug not to appear?

> If you think that it indeed is bug in LibreOffice, please prove that.

The end of my bug report gives some hints.

> By, for example, providing steps on how to reproduce it on EWMH-compliant
> window manager, such as KDE's KWin.

I'll try to do some tests, but if the implementation is different, this becomes
pointless.

> Or pointing out in LibreOffice source code where exactly it is wrong.
> Or, better yet, proposing patch that fixes this issue.

I'll try to look at that when I have the time. Unfortunately the LibreOffice
source is huge. If you can tell me which source file(s) can be concerned by the
bug, this would help me (I suppose some file in a gtk directory, since gtk2 is
used under Debian). Or if there is a way to get detailed debugging information.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70919] javaldx re-scanning on every start in master instdir installation

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70919

--- Comment #4 from Jean-Baptiste Faure  ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> That some process instantiated a JVM on every start of soffice from a master
> instdir installation was unrelated to wiki-publisher and Writer.  It has
> been fixed as described in comment 2 now.  Adapting this issue's summary
> accordingly and closing as FIXED.
> 
> That a JVM fails if you artificially limit virtual memory size via ulimit -v
> is NOTABUG or at least NOTOURBUG.

Sure, but it seems that 3 Go should be enough to open an empty text document.
If 3 Go of virtual memory is too small, I think it is the sign that something
went wrong. Perhaps some option used to start the JVM.

What made me incriminating Wiki Publisher extension is that if I remove it the
JVM crash disappears.

Best regards. JBF

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs