[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71470] Agenda

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71470

--- Comment #2 from davidheat...@blueyonder.co.uk ---
Hi,

In the Writer programme, File/Wizards/Agenda should create a dialogue box to
enable the fields in the Agenda template to be completed. No dialogue box
appears - just the template, which cannot be accessed at all. Other "Wizard"
functions seem to work OK except web page, which is of no interest to me.

D. Heath



  _  

From: bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
[mailto:bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org] 
Sent: 14 November 2013 23:13
To: davidheat...@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: [Bug 71470] Agenda



  Jorendc changed bug 71470
  


What

Removed

Added


Status

UNCONFIRMED 

NEEDINFO 


CC



jore...@libreoffice.org 


Ever confirmed



1 

Comment # 1   on bug
71470   from
 Jorendc 

I think we need a bit more information to try to reproduce this behavior.

So: can you explain step by step how we can reproduce your 'agenda function
does not work'. As far I know there is no 'general' agenda feature in
LibreOffice (maybe in a specific component (base? Calc?) which I'm not aware
of), so please be a bit more specific. If possible attach also a sample
agenda.

Kind regards,
Joren
  _  


You are receiving this mail because: 

*You reported the bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71628] ACCESSIBILITY: new GTK+ UI start center keyboard navigation not acceptable [a11y]

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71628

--- Comment #1 from Jan Holesovsky  ---
Stuart: Thank you a lot for the report!  Please - can you split it into
separate reports?  Unfortunately it makes things harder when many issues are
reported in one bug - it leads to bugs that are never fixed / closed :-(

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71536] EDITING: ctrl button cell selection bug

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71536

--- Comment #5 from Burak Ural  ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Actually.. it is exactly not like that in MS Excel or Kingsoft Office. This
> is one of the reasons for change - the other is that the old behavior was
> actually a side-effect of a bug. But because the old behavior is a lot
> cooler I implemented it as an option.

Hi,

I can not find the option to change this behaviour.
In the bug thread, "expert config" is being mentioned.
Where do we find the expert config page and the options?
How is it accessed in an installed Libreoffice?

Regards,
Burak Ural

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41169] All hotkeys are language dependent, don't work in non-Latin keyboard layout.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41169

--- Comment #28 from Mosaab Alzoubi  ---

== TESTS WE DO ==

This bug found in:
- Fedora 19 Gnome Shell
- Fedora 19 Mate
- Ubuntu 12.04 Unity
- Ubuntu 12.04 Cinnamon
- Ubuntu 13.10

This bug not found in:
- Fedora 19 KDE
- Mint 15 Cinnamon
- Mint 15 XFCE
- Debian 7.1
- Debian - nonstable XFCE
- Ubuntu 10.04 Gnome 2.30
- Arch KDE

Current behavior:
Accelators don't work
Expected behavior:
Accelators works


Operating System: Linux (Other)
Version: 4.1.2.3 release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 61727] Rotation of image by grouping images

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61727

--- Comment #7 from Owen Genat  ---
Created attachment 89252
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89252&action=edit
Control test file from Word Mac 2011, with PDFs showing rendering in Word and
LO.

I thought I would create a basic control test file illustrating: 

- rotating then grouping
- grouping then rotating

Attached DOCX is created under Word Mac 2011 with PDFs created via Word Mac
2011 (under MacOS 10.6.8) and LO v4.1.3.2 (under Crunchbang 11 x86_64). In no
case does the rotation appear to be preserved. Not the same version of Word (or
probably DOCX) as in the original report I know, but hopefully useful all the
same.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69358] [Mac] Use OS native toolbar backgrounds / Review toolbar structure

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69358

--- Comment #11 from Nicholas Shanks  ---
The ideal option for obtaining a Mac-native interface is to fork the UI code
and use NSToolbar. Whether that can feasibly be subclassed and made 'draggable'
to the sides or not, I don't know (whereupon it would revert to the current
appearance).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69358] [Mac] Use OS native toolbar backgrounds / Review toolbar structure

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69358

--- Comment #12 from Tor Lillqvist  ---
Of course we know that the ideal would be to use native NS* stuff. What we
don't know is who would provide the resources to do such work.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 51044] FILESAVE '.eps' graphic in '.doc' table is compressed to 0.41 mm tall when 'save' or 'save as'

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51044

--- Comment #8 from RSC  ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> tested with 4.1.3.2 under Win7 64bit
> 
> test .doc file when opened shows images collapsed and deformed to a thin
> stripe.
> 
> if I reset image to original size as explained I can show the image with
> using desired size. after saving and reopening the image size stay the same
> and does not revert to the deformed thin strip I saw before.
> 
> @RCS
> did you try recent 4.1.3 version? does it improve the situation with this
> bug?

REPLY. Did I try version 4.1.3? No, not yet. I am slow to change versions from
one that (generally) works. I'll post when I do change.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71598] Other: Cell Not Recalculating

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71598

--- Comment #2 from John McCulloch  ---
Created attachment 89253
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89253&action=edit
Test spreadsheet with macro

Use this with attached data file.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 51044] FILESAVE '.eps' graphic in '.doc' table is compressed to 0.41 mm tall when 'save' or 'save as'

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51044

--- Comment #9 from tommy27  ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> ...
> > @RCS
> > did you try recent 4.1.3 version? does it improve the situation with this
> > bug?
> 
> REPLY. Did I try version 4.1.3? No, not yet. I am slow to change versions
> from one that (generally) works. I'll post when I do change.

you could try downloading the portable version from here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/winpenpack/files/X-LibreOffice/releases/X-LibreOffice_4.1.3_rev16.zip/download

so you don't have to uninstall the current version

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71598] Other: Cell Not Recalculating

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71598

--- Comment #3 from John McCulloch  ---
Created attachment 89254
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89254&action=edit
Data file to use with macro.

Open attached test.ods.

Note value of Regular_Cash.I33 and Regular.I19.

Click button on sheet Main.  Select Regular and Transactions and click Browse
and find this file.  Click OK.

Note cell Regular_Cash.I33 moved down one, expanded range and recalculated.

Note that cell Regular.I19 did NOT recalculate.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71553] FILESAVE: cannot save a copied version of writer document

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71553

--- Comment #12 from ign_christian  ---
I'm using this simple steps to reproduce:
1. Select cells A7:D28 from ODS attached & copy (ctrl-c)
2. Paste (ctrl-v) to new text document
3. Save as ODT & close
4. Reopen the ODT

Can't reproduce the issue with LO 4.0.6.2 (Win7 32bit)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71553] FILESAVE: cannot save a copied version of writer document

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71553

ign_christian  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71598] Other: Cell Not Recalculating

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71598

John McCulloch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

--- Comment #4 from John McCulloch  ---
Open spreadsheet, save data file and run macro with button.  See Details on
data file attachment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 51044] FILESAVE '.eps' graphic in '.doc' table is compressed to 0.41 mm tall when 'save' or 'save as'

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51044

--- Comment #10 from tommy27  ---
oppss... sorry I forgot you are on Linux.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 58628] Frame don't support Rotation

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58628

--- Comment #3 from Owen Genat  ---
Created attachment 89255
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89255&action=edit
Basic ODT example showing: text box, frame, text box in a frame.

This appears to be a shortcoming in the LO UI as the ODF specification
currently supports rotation of a frame. For clarity, all text boxes (inserted
by selecting T on the Drawing toolbar) are frames:


   
  Text in a text box.
   


... and they are rotated by inclusion of the draw:transform attribute of the
 element. A frame (Insert > Frame...) has a similar structure:


   
  Text in a frame.
   


... yet it cannot be rotated. Right-click on a text box > Position and Size...
> offers a dialog with a Rotation tab. Right-click on a frame > Frame... >
there are no similar options available.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71528] Wrong date saved file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71528

--- Comment #1 from ign_christian  ---
Please elaborate exactly what is the problem?

I saw the properties of that file:
created 11/10/2013
modified 12/11/2013

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71528] Wrong date saved file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71528

--- Comment #2 from ign_christian  ---
Sorry..forgot to say that using LO 4.0.6.2 (Win7 32bit)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71625] Calc inaccessible due cyclic/continuous saving with data loss as result

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71625

--- Comment #1 from ign_christian  ---
Could you please explain in detail how to reproduce the issue? Otherwise it's
hard to triage & analyze..

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71321] Can't scroll down in Calc and Writer on Mac osx

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71321

Foss  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #10 from Foss  ---
Thanks to the OS X nightly back in working state I'm able to verify this fix
(first nightly since the old nightly machine died :)

Tor, thanks so much this was a real road-blocker.

Setting to RESOLVED FIXED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 65675] LibreOffice 4.2 most annoying bugs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65675

Bug 65675 depends on bug 71321, which changed state.

Bug 71321 Summary: Can't scroll down in Calc and Writer on Mac osx
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71321

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70488] Other: Offer LO nightly builds for OS X to speed up triaging and QA

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70488

Foss  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Foss  ---
Christian: Kudos to you & hanks so much! I'm super happy to announce OS X
nightly builds are back in working state:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/MacOSX-x86@48-TDF/

RESOLVED FIXED.

First bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71321 has already been
verified and triaged :)

Feels good to be back up and running.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70488] Other: Offer LO nightly builds for OS X to speed up triaging and QA

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70488

Foss  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71321] Can't scroll down in Calc and Writer on Mac osx

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71321

Foss  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71626] FILESAVE: Text diregards its Text dimensions when saving to *.pptx

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71626

ign_christian  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 OS|Linux (All) |All
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|4.1.3.2 release |4.0.6.2 release
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from ign_christian  ---
Confirm reproducible with LO 4.0.6.2 & displayed the same on PPV 14 (Win7
32bit).

Looks like text box setting broken after filesave in PPTX.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 31405] Connecting a SQL query to a form letter without using the mailing wizard

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31405

--- Comment #22 from ribotb  ---
It's Ok for me (with LO 4.1).

Many thanks,
Bernard Ribot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71581] FILESAVE: DOCX: white artifact in the middle of exported pictures

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71581

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||target:4.2.0

--- Comment #3 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Muthu Subramanian committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=889b01696b7a3f55b5008a3cc58e3903d3d2779b

fdo#71581: Use pictureFrame for images.



The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71629] Extension:LanguageTools (v2.3) java errors on installation

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71629

Stephan Bergmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG
 CC||sberg...@redhat.com

--- Comment #1 from Stephan Bergmann  ---
Assuming you are referring to LanguageTool-2.3.oxt as available from
.  Note : "For Mac
users: LanguageTool now requires Java 7, which is available for the Mac only as
a 64 bit version. LibreOffice and OpenOffice are only available in 32 bit,
leading to an incompatibility so that LanguageTool cannot be used as an
LibreOffice/OpenOffice plugin on the Mac. The only known workaround is to use
LanguageTool 2.2, which is still available from the download archive, for which
a 32 bit version of Java 6 still exists. LanguageTool 2.2 doesn't require Java
7 but also works with Java 6."

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60270] LibreOffice 4.1 most annoying bugs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60270

Bug 60270 depends on bug 66864, which changed state.

Bug 66864 Summary: By using full screen applications and then restore them, the 
toolbar disappears in normal view.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66864

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71534] Other: Document Compatibility Submission Page/Service

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

--- Comment #3 from Owen Genat  ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Say I have a Microsoft Office document (doc/x, xls/x, ppt/x) that exhibits
> compatibility issues.
> 
> I want to submit this document, along with a description of the problem(s),
> somewhere that it can be triaged (confirmed or not) by someone, and
> submitted to the right person to look at it more closely.

This is entirely my opinion as a user and layperson helper both here on
bugzilla and more extensively in two user forums. As Qubit (QA) indicates
"we're all interested in how we can improve the experience for our users" and I
firmly support that sentiment. 

The main danger with the above is that it can result in an increase of reports
like bug #67450. As Joel Madero (QA) points out in the related comments to that
bug, it is fundamentally unhelpful to simply provide an example problematic
file with a comment like "does not work" or similar. A report needs to be more
specific if it is to have any chance of: (a) being understood / comprehended;
(b) being reproduced; (c) being fixed. Developers usually fix single issues. A
small report clearly outlining the steps required to reproduce a single problem
is essentially a better report. If a small example file clearly showing the
problem can be provided, so much so the better.

(In reply to comment #2)
>> This submission process should be very easy & accessible for users, and
>> should *not* require anyone to log in or do anything else other than these
>> two things.

> Interesting. We've had a bit of discussion about whether one should have to 
> login before submitting a bug report or feedback.

> How would you address the problem of SPAM

I think SPAM is one issue but IMO an even more important one is social
responsibility. This is essential to the wellbeing of any community. Demanding
that participants register for an account promotes this and is a fairly
consistent approach across most sites where users can provide feedback and
generally comment on issues.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71635] New: Menubar incorrect text colour.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71635

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71635
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: Menubar incorrect text colour.
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
  Reporter: pip@gmx.com
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
Status: NEW
   Version: 4.1.3.2 release
 Component: UI
   Product: LibreOffice

Created attachment 89257
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89257&action=edit
LibreOffice Menubar showing incorrect text colour.

After updating from LibreOffice 4.0-5 to 4.1.3.2 the Menubar text colour is
incorrect. Dropdown menus are correct.

As shown in the attached image.

Possibly distribution specific? 


openSUSE 12.3 x86_64 (Kernel Release 3.7.10-1.16-desktop)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71635] Menubar incorrect text colour.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71635

Paul  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #89257|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #1 from Paul  ---
Created attachment 89258
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89258&action=edit
LibreOffice Menubar showing incorrect text colour.

Sorry - bugzilla seems to think first attachment was text/plain.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71636] New: FORMATTING: Fonts not found after upgrade to LibreOffice 4.1.3

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71636

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71636
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: FORMATTING: Fonts not found after upgrade to
LibreOffice 4.1.3
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Mac OS X (All)
  Reporter: ma...@atix.de
  Hardware: Other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.3.2 release
 Component: Writer
   Product: LibreOffice

We are using Futura Std Light as internal font.

After upgrade my currently installed LibreOffice version from 4.0.6 to 4.1.3,
the font was not found anymore by LibreOffice (shown cursive in the writer UI
font picker element).

Additionally, the font is not properly rendered as Futura Std Light, but as
Futura.

The re-installation of 4.0.6 fixed the problem for the moment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 35669] Incorrect cross-references to illustrations and equations in master documents

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35669

Michael Stahl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #58114|application/octet-stream|application/gzip
  mime type||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41775] Don't remove all menus when no windows are open - keep Tools and Help

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41775

Emir Sarı  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ke...@collabora.com

--- Comment #8 from Emir Sarı  ---
@Kendy, 

Could it be possible to fix this small but annoying issue? Or maybe some code
pointers that would help people to have a look at it? It is a small but very
Mac-unlike detail of LibreOffice. 

I appreciate any help about this. :)
Regards,

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71637] New: Other: link to file in XLS document

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71637

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71637
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: Other: link to file in XLS document
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Windows (All)
  Reporter: cy...@web.de
  Hardware: Other
Whiteboard: BSA
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.2.3 release
 Component: Spreadsheet
   Product: LibreOffice

Problem description: 
links in the form of : 'file:///C:/example.xls'#$Projekte.B7
get *sometimes* shorten to: ='file:///C:/example.xls'#$''.B7

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open xls with link
2. Accept to Update linked files
3. *sometimes* (cant figuere out when) the problem gets applied to all links in
the document


Operating System: Windows 7
Version: 4.1.2.3 release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 46635] FILESAVE Endless loop during autosave

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46635

Urmas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||l...@outlook.com

--- Comment #9 from Urmas  ---
*** Bug 71625 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71625] Calc inaccessible due cyclic/continuous saving with data loss as result

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71625

Urmas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Urmas  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 46635 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41775] Don't remove all menus when no windows are open - keep Tools and Help

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41775

--- Comment #9 from Jan Holesovsky  ---
Emir: This is OSX specific, right? - would be great to attach a screenshot to
show what's going on :-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 67907] VIEWING: More then one text cursor at the same time on several positions

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67907

Foss  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #89045|text/plain  |image/ogv
  mime type||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71528] Wrong date saved file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71528

effetred...@hotmail.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 67907] VIEWING: More then one text cursor at the same time on several positions

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67907

Foss  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #7 from Foss  ---
Hi Mibu,

have you tried the latest stable release of LO already? 4.1.3.2 that is
currently: https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

Also from the video I don't see any wrong behavior. I only see one cursor at
any given time.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71581] FILESAVE: DOCX: white artifact in the middle of exported pictures

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71581

--- Comment #4 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Muthu Subramanian committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=98e7faeeb59e2fc13681bfc3896016b64a81d665

fdo#71581: Fix unit test cases.



The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 47214] LINE INPUT is not recognized after a colon

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47214

Urmas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |---
   Severity|critical|normal
Summary|instruction LINE INPUT  |LINE INPUT is not
   ||recognized after a colon

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56847] EDITING VIEWING: Can't insert/play various video formats with Impress (Mac OS X)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56847

Foss  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|NEW

--- Comment #33 from Foss  ---
For what it's worth, the test file does open but no video is seen or can be
played in

LO 4.1.3.2
or
LO Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha1+
Build ID: 868103846b9b32bfecd77c08055fdca69d0265c2
TinderBox: MacOSX-x86@48-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2013-11-14_23:51:46

on OS X 10.9.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69455] VIEWING: "About" window of latest master build allows typing in version info

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69455

--- Comment #4 from Foss  ---
Still valid with LO Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha1+
Build ID: 868103846b9b32bfecd77c08055fdca69d0265c2
TinderBox: MacOSX-x86@48-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2013-11-14_23:51:46

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68615] FILEOPEN: Crash on loading ODS file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68615

--- Comment #17 from fischer.alexan...@web.de ---
I have switched to Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1 and can load the document without
any problem.
After saving the document the file-size is shrinked.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71644] New: handle plurals in Android string resource

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71644

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71644
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: handle plurals in Android string resource
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
  Reporter: tima...@gmail.com
  Hardware: Other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ Master
 Component: Libreoffice
   Product: LibreOffice

Currently stringex tool (l10ntools/source/stringmerge.cxx) handles only
. In current android/sdremote/res/values/string.xml  is used,
too. We need to extend stringex to handle plurals, extract it to .po format and
merge it back from .po format. When merging back, we need to use the
information of "Plural-Forms:" header from .po file.
See also:
http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/resources/string-resource.html#Plurals

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71644] handle plurals in Android string resource

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71644

Andras Timar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Whiteboard||EasyHack SkillCpp
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70184] FORMATTING: Adobe Type 1 fonts do not appear in the font selection menu

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70184

--- Comment #2 from Owen Genat  ---
This problem seems variable according to the particular Type 1 font installed.
Here is an example of some Type 1 fonts I have installed here under Crunchbang
11 x86_64 running LO v4.1.3.2:

oweng:~$ fc-list | grep URW | sort
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/a010013l.pfb: URW Gothic L:style=Book
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/a010015l.pfb: URW Gothic L:style=Demi
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/a010033l.pfb: URW Gothic L:style=Book Oblique
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/a010035l.pfb: URW Gothic L:style=Demi Oblique
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/b018012l.pfb: URW Bookman L:style=Light
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/b018015l.pfb: URW Bookman L:style=Demi Bold
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/b018032l.pfb: URW Bookman L:style=Light Italic
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/b018035l.pfb: URW Bookman L:style=Demi Bold
Italic
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/p052003l.pfb: URW Palladio L:style=Roman
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/p052004l.pfb: URW Palladio L:style=Bold
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/p052023l.pfb: URW Palladio L:style=Italic
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/p052024l.pfb: URW Palladio L:style=Bold Italic
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/z003034l.pfb: URW Chancery L:style=Medium Italic
oweng:~$ fc-list | grep Symbol
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/s05l.pfb: Standard Symbols L:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/Symbol.pfb: Symbol:style=Regular
/usr/share/fonts/type1/mathml/Symbol.pfb: Symbol:style=Regular
oweng:~$ fc-list | grep Gyre
/home/oweng/.fonts/tex-gyre-t1/qcsr.pfb: TeXGyreSchola:style=Regular
/home/oweng/.fonts/tex-gyre-t1/qcsri.pfb: TeXGyreSchola:style=Italic
/home/oweng/.fonts/tex-gyre-t1/qcsbi.pfb: TeXGyreSchola:style=BoldItalic
/home/oweng/.fonts/tex-gyre-t1/qcsb.pfb: TeXGyreSchola:style=Bold

The URW fonts were installed with ghostscript and show up in the Writer
drop-down Font Name list. The Symbol fonts were installed with ghostscript and
the xfonts-mathml package. Again both Symbol and Standard Symbol show up in the
font list. The GNU TeX Gyre Schola font is available:

http://www.gust.org.pl/projects/e-foundry/tex-gyre/schola/qcs2.005bas.zip

The Type 1 files can be found under /fonts/type1/public/tex-gyre/ in the zip
but regardless of whether installed into ~/.fonts/ (as shown) or
/usr/share/fonts/ (using root privileges) they do not show up in the drop-down
font list. As a test, the OTF variant (in the same zip under
/fonts/opentype/public/tex-gyre/) if installed, does show up in the list of
fonts as "TexGyreSchola".

This would appear to be confirmation of the problem, but if someone else can
also confirm using this font (to ensure this is not a problem with my system)
that would be great. Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63800] EDITING: Input fields in write protected sections not update in window when edited

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63800

Rudolf Kollien  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Hardware|Other   |All
 OS|Windows (All)   |All
Version|4.0.0.3 release |4.1.3.2 release

--- Comment #2 from Rudolf Kollien  ---
This bug still exists in 4.1.3.2 (Linux).
Last version seen working correct was 3.6.x
It doesn't matter, if the section is protected with a password too or not.

This bug is very annoying in forms where it is essential, that the user can
only fill in fields but is not allowed to change the text.

Hitting key F9 or refresh via menu works. Then the new content of the input
field is shown.

Check fields in protected sections work like expected: checking/unchecking is
shown immediately. Seems the bug is only related to input fields.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71645] New: footnote numbers in cross references

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71645

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71645
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: footnote numbers in cross references
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
  Reporter: nem...@numbertext.org
  Hardware: Other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: Inherited From OOo
 Component: Writer
   Product: LibreOffice

Table of contents removes footnote numbers in its cross references, but not PDF
bookmarks and inserting cross reference UI.

Example (heading with footnote numbers):

1. Correct heading with superscript footnote number: 

Heading¹

2. Correct cross reference in TOC:

Heading

3. Bad cross reference in PDF bookmarks and Insert->Cross reference preview:

Heading1

See attached screenshots.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71645] footnote numbers in cross references

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71645

László Németh  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||nem...@numbertext.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71635] Menubar incorrect text colour.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71635

Ivan Timofeev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||saturda...@gmail.com,
   ||timofeev@gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Ivan Timofeev  ---
Thanks for the report!

Isamu, "git log" shows that the last commits in that area are yours, could you
please take a look at this bug?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71645] footnote numbers in cross references

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71645

--- Comment #1 from László Németh  ---
Created attachment 89264
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89264&action=edit
Insert -> Cross reference UI

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71645] footnote numbers in cross references

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71645

--- Comment #2 from László Németh  ---
Created attachment 89265
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89265&action=edit
LibreOffice bookmark export in a PDF Viewer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71645] footnote numbers in cross references

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71645

--- Comment #3 from László Németh  ---
Created attachment 89266
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89266&action=edit
test document

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71645] footnote numbers in cross references

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71645

--- Comment #4 from László Németh  ---
Created attachment 89267
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89267&action=edit
UI fix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71645] footnote numbers in cross references

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71645

--- Comment #5 from László Németh  ---
Created attachment 89268
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89268&action=edit
PDF export fix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71645] footnote numbers in cross references

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71645

László Németh  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #89266|application/octet-stream|application/vnd.oasis.opend
  mime type||ocument.text

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 69455] VIEWING: "About" window of latest master build allows typing in version info

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69455

Emir Sarı  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #5 from Emir Sarı  ---
Confirmed with Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha1+
Build ID: 868103846b9b32bfecd77c08055fdca69d0265c2
TinderBox: MacOSX-x86@48-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2013-11-14_23:51:46

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41775] Don't remove all menus when no windows are open - keep Tools and Help

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41775

--- Comment #10 from Emir Sarı  ---
Created attachment 89269
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89269&action=edit
Menus showing when Main Window is open

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41775] Don't remove all menus when no windows are open - keep Tools and Help

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41775

--- Comment #11 from Emir Sarı  ---
Created attachment 89270
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89270&action=edit
Only File menu is shown when no windows are open

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41775] Don't remove all menus when no windows are open - keep Tools and Help

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41775

Emir Sarı  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 QA Contact||emir_s...@msn.com

--- Comment #12 from Emir Sarı  ---
Sorry for the late screenshots - attached them :))

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 38332] app-office/openoffice-3.3.2 - ERROR: error 65280

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38332

Michael Stahl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
 CC||mst...@redhat.com

--- Comment #10 from Michael Stahl  ---
Error 65280 is from dmake and dmake is no longer used on master.

therefore i'm closing this bug now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41775] Don't remove all menus when no windows are open - keep Tools and Help

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41775

--- Comment #13 from Emir Sarı  ---
Created attachment 89271
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89271&action=edit
File menu when no windows are open

This menu should be removed I think, because it causes inconsistency among
menus

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 41775] Don't remove all menus when no windows are open - keep Tools and Help

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41775

--- Comment #14 from Emir Sarı  ---
Created attachment 89272
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89272&action=edit
File menu when a window is open

This menu should appear

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71534] Other: Document Compatibility Submission Page/Service

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

--- Comment #4 from Charles  ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #0)
>> Say I have a Microsoft Office document (doc/x, xls/x, ppt/x) that exhibits
>> compatibility issues.
>> 
>> I want to submit this document, along with a description of the problem(s),
>> somewhere that it can be triaged (confirmed or not) by someone, and
>> submitted to the right person to look at it more closely.

> The main danger with the above is that it can result in an increase of
> reports like bug #67450.

Please just use 'bug 67450' (without the # sign) when referncing bugs so that
the bug link is clicky... :)

As for your fear...

> As Joel Madero (QA) points out in the related comments to that bug,
> it is fundamentally unhelpful to simply provide an example problematic
> file with a comment like "does not work" or similar.

While I agree that the more precise a users initial description of the problem
the better, the fact is, it only takes a minute or so to download a problematic
document, open it in both Libreoffice and Microsoft Office (remember - this
bug/feature request is *only* about Microsoft file format issues), and look for
for obvious errors/problems.

> A report needs to be more specific if it is to have any chance of: (a) being
> understood / comprehended; (b) being reproduced; (c) being fixed.

Again, I agree that in most cases more detail is better, but I totally disagree
that a developer cannot simply open a document in both programs, and spend a
few minutes, and ascertain formatting problems/discrepancies... possibly even
doing a much better job of doing so than the original reporter would ever be
capable of.

A bare minimum from the user should just be something like 'open it in
Libreoffice Writer 4.1.3 and Microsoft Word 2010 and compare pages 1 & 2'...

And these two pieces of information (the versions of each software) should
obviously be part of the minimum mandatory info the user must provide.

> We've had a bit of discussion about whether one should have to 
> login before submitting a bug report or feedback.
> 
> How would you address the problem of SPAM

Explain in very clear language that in order for the user to submit a document
for analysis, they must either log in with their bugzilla account, or provide
an email address for confirmation purposes. Clearly explain that before their
submission will be accepted, they will have to click a confirmation link in a
confirmation email that will be automatically sent to them upon their initial
submission. At least this would be the most obvious way off the top of my head. 

> I think SPAM is one issue but IMO an even more important one is social
> responsibility. This is essential to the wellbeing of any community.
> Demanding that participants register for an account promotes this and is a
> fairly consistent approach across most sites where users can provide
> feedback and generally comment on issues.

Again, I am much more concerned with Libreoffice having improved file format
fidelity with Microsoft Office document formats than I am forcing someone to
'participate' in our community more than they wish to do. Encourage it,
certainly, but don't *require* it...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 65976] FORMATTING: Character formating/font lost for documents written with pre 4.x

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65976

--- Comment #2 from Owen Genat  ---
Created attachment 89273
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89273&action=edit
Example ODTs and PDFs under v3341, v3572, and v4132.

I am attaching some example documents showing the likely symbols used from the
OpenSymbol font for fax, telephone, and mail (there is no correct fax symbol).
All have been generated under Crunchbang 11 x86_64 running these versions of
LO:

- v3.3.4.1 OOO330m19 Build:401 (OpenSymbol v2.4.3)
- v3.5.7.2 Build ID: 3215f89-f603614-ab984f2-7348103-1225a5b (OpenSymbol
v102.2)
- v4.1.3.2 Build ID: 70feb7d99726f064edab4605a8ab840c50ec57a (OpenSymbol
v102.3)

All symbols display as expected, when the two older files are opened under
v4.1.3.2. From the description it sounds like the Helvetica font is somehow
being substituted for OpenSymbol (perhaps because the OpenSymbol font cannot be
found)?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71646] New: FILEOPEN: [docx] wrong directionality after save file created by MS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71646

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71646
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: FILEOPEN: [docx] wrong directionality after save file
created by MS
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
  Reporter: fmalota...@kacst.edu.sa
  Hardware: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+ Master
 Component: Writer
   Product: LibreOffice

This bug are based on this comment:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43093#c17


"a file originally created using Word 2013, and contains LTR left aligned text.
It opens fine using the above LO build, but if I save again and reopen, it
turns into RTL left aligned. If then I open the file with Word 2010 SP2, it
opens as RTL right aligned. It's a bug only with this file, I can't reproduce
it with other files."

Steps to reproduce:
1- open the attachment.
2- save it as docx.
3- open it again.

Current behavior:
the direction changed to RTL.

Expected behavior:
the direction still LTR.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71646] FILEOPEN: [docx] wrong directionality after save file created by MS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71646

--- Comment #1 from Faisal Menawer  ---
Created attachment 89274
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89274&action=edit
LTR left aligned save bug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71646] FILESAVE: [docx] wrong directionality after save file created by MS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71646

Faisal Menawer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|FILEOPEN: [docx] wrong  |FILESAVE: [docx] wrong
   |directionality after save   |directionality after save
   |file created by MS  |file created by MS

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71534] Other: Document Compatibility Submission Page/Service

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

--- Comment #5 from Joel Madero  ---
I pretty much completely agree with Owen here. The lower we set the bar the
more users will do what people tend to do which is "the least bit possible" -
this is why I routinely puts bugs in NEEDINFO even if perhaps if I took a bit
more time I could understand it - the reason being is that in the past this
philosophy was taken and basically bug reports continued to get worse and
worse. "Open this document and see the problem" when the problem is 10 pages
long with text and other things going on - you say "it only takes a minutes"
but let's say a bad report takes 3-5 minutes to triage (which isn't terrible)
but a good report of the same problem takes 30 seconds - when we're talking
about thousands of bugs, really it's the least a bug reporter can do is make it
"as easy and clear as possible" so as not to disrespect QA's time - time is
money, and mine is surely stretched thin right now. 

As for registering - we've already seen trolls even with registration and some
people have been banned because of it. A much better solution is to get openID
working so they don't have to have so many accounts - and this is currently
being looked into. Again, the lower we set the bar the more work is puts on the
shoulders of a very small team and that simply isn't fair. FLOSS is a
community, if individuals don't want to be part of that community, there are
plenty of other products out there that they can choose from or, they can sit
patiently and wait for fixes (instead of giving a terrible report, getting
irritated when the report goes into NEEDINFO and then every couple months
saying things like "any progress" "why isn't this fixed yet" "can we expect a
fix soon", either be a member of the community or don't, else, you're trying to
take from the community and give nothing in return. 

In general though I don't see this being a problem at all - I very rarely see
users angry about having to register and usually if I put a bug into NEEDINFO
the user apologizes for lack of clarity and gives precise steps.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71534] Other: Document Compatibility Submission Page/Service

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

--- Comment #6 from Rob Snelders  ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #0)
> >> Say I have a Microsoft Office document (doc/x, xls/x, ppt/x) that exhibits
> >> compatibility issues.
> >> 
> >> I want to submit this document, along with a description of the problem(s),
> >> somewhere that it can be triaged (confirmed or not) by someone, and
> >> submitted to the right person to look at it more closely.
> 
> > The main danger with the above is that it can result in an increase of
> > reports like bug #67450.
> 
> Please just use 'bug 67450' (without the # sign) when referncing bugs so
> that the bug link is clicky... :)
> 
> As for your fear...
> 
> > As Joel Madero (QA) points out in the related comments to that bug,
> > it is fundamentally unhelpful to simply provide an example problematic
> > file with a comment like "does not work" or similar.
> 
> While I agree that the more precise a users initial description of the
> problem the better, the fact is, it only takes a minute or so to download a
> problematic document, open it in both Libreoffice and Microsoft Office
> (remember - this bug/feature request is *only* about Microsoft file format
> issues), and look for for obvious errors/problems.
> 
> > A report needs to be more specific if it is to have any chance of: (a) being
> > understood / comprehended; (b) being reproduced; (c) being fixed.
> 
> Again, I agree that in most cases more detail is better, but I totally
> disagree that a developer cannot simply open a document in both programs,
> and spend a few minutes, and ascertain formatting problems/discrepancies...
> possibly even doing a much better job of doing so than the original reporter
> would ever be capable of.

If a bug requires me to open it in Microsoft Office then I can't solve the bug,
quite literally. I don't have Microsoft Office anywhere running at my home. And
there are quite some with me who only have/use LibreOffice.

> 
> A bare minimum from the user should just be something like 'open it in
> Libreoffice Writer 4.1.3 and Microsoft Word 2010 and compare pages 1 & 2'...
> 
> And these two pieces of information (the versions of each software) should
> obviously be part of the minimum mandatory info the user must provide.
> 
> > We've had a bit of discussion about whether one should have to 
> > login before submitting a bug report or feedback.
> > 
> > How would you address the problem of SPAM
> 
> Explain in very clear language that in order for the user to submit a
> document for analysis, they must either log in with their bugzilla account,
> or provide an email address for confirmation purposes. Clearly explain that
> before their submission will be accepted, they will have to click a
> confirmation link in a confirmation email that will be automatically sent to
> them upon their initial submission. At least this would be the most obvious
> way off the top of my head. 

That's why we are working towards openID. To lower this a bit. But I agree with
JMadero in comment 5 about this. The easier it gets to enter a text the more
bullies you attract.

> 
> > I think SPAM is one issue but IMO an even more important one is social
> > responsibility. This is essential to the wellbeing of any community.
> > Demanding that participants register for an account promotes this and is a
> > fairly consistent approach across most sites where users can provide
> > feedback and generally comment on issues.
> 
> Again, I am much more concerned with Libreoffice having improved file format
> fidelity with Microsoft Office document formats than I am forcing someone to
> 'participate' in our community more than they wish to do. Encourage it,
> certainly, but don't *require* it...

And when they file a bug that way, who is going to pick it up? We don't really
have the manpower to keep up now, let alone when it increases with people who
aren't interested in anything but filing their bug with the minimal
requirements (and even try hard to go below that).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71648] New: Other: Unable to register Databases

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71648

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71648
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: Other: Unable to register Databases
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
  Reporter: olivier.mus...@libertysurf.fr
  Hardware: Other
Whiteboard: BSA
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.3.2 release
 Component: Database
   Product: LibreOffice

Problem description: 

Steps to reproduce:
1. Start LibreOffice
2. Choose Menu -> Options
3. LibreOffice Base -> Connections or -> Databases

Current behavior:
LibreOffice crash with no message no error. I can reproduce problem on 2 PC's
and 1 laptop all running OpenSuse 12.3

Expected behavior:
Open Databases option to register existing databases.

Operating System: openSUSE
Version: 4.1.3.2 release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 40966] wizard shouldn't use bitmap files

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40966

Michael Stahl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #56470|image/bmp   |image/x-MS-bmp
  mime type||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70210] FILEOPEN, REGRESSION: draw and impress do not load connector skew properly and consequently break documents on saving again

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70210

David Clayton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|blocker

--- Comment #23 from David Clayton  ---
I have changed the status to blocker as I feel that 4.1.4 should not be
released without addressing this issue, owing to the fact it 'damages' existing
documents for other users. I am slightly disappointed that this bug has not
received an official LO developer  reply, to say it was posted in October and
has such an impact.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71646] FILESAVE: [docx] wrong directionality after save file created by MS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71646

Ahmad Harthi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |fmalota...@kacst.edu.sa
   |desktop.org |
 Depends on||43093
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71534] Other: Document Compatibility Submission Page/Service

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

--- Comment #7 from Joel Madero  ---
Let's just think about numbers also:

Let's say the average developer is probably making somewhere in the range of
$25-$40/hr ( perhaps more, just throwing out a number). You say you disagree
that a developer can't just open a bug and spend a few minutes trying to guess
at what the user is trying to point us to. Let's say the few minutes is 5-10
minutes, we get 25 bug reports a day or so. So now we're at somewhere between
$50-$100 a day wasted because users don't provide clear steps - this is really
just unacceptable. Again, just to reiterate my previous point, you can either
be a part of the community and share in the fruits of our mutual labor or you
can sit on the side lines and "get what you get when you get it" - I honestly
wouldn't be opposed to "kudos" points on our bug tracker so users who are clear
and concise see benefits to being awesome. This is probably really unlikely to
happen but if every user gave 1 hour a year or $1 dollar a year - well let's
just say we'd be an awesome shape. Instead what we have is tens of millions of
users and less than a couple thousand infrequent contributors and probably less
than 500 frequent contributors (meaning in every team, devs, QA, localization,
etc . . .) and some people suggesting that we ask less of our users and let
them keep demanding so much of our time - seems like a counter productive
strategy

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71534] Other: Document Compatibility Submission Page/Service

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

--- Comment #8 from Joel Madero  ---
IMHO this report doesn't provide anything clear that we can use going forward.
My suggestion is mark as INVALID. 

If there are specific individual things that we want (such as openID) I suggest
a bug report (enhancement) for the one single thing and that "bugzilla" or
whatever is in the title of the bug. If this report is just saying 

1. No registration
my vote is no (but open to openID which should be its own report)

2. Allow users to submit documents without mandatory steps required
again my vote is no (I think requirements should be stricter actually)

3. Allow users to submit without info about their system
again, my vote is no (absolutely not, complete waste of QA's time, again I
think the requirement should be stricter)

4. The "questions" by the system
As Qubit has mentioned - we're talking about a BSA version 2.0 - this is really
Qubit and Rob's project - I am hardly in a position to demand anything of their
time as I can't contribute much on the technical side. I do plan on diagramming
out questions so that they can use what they want when we get to that project
(which won't be until 2014 or later, this is valid but should be in its own bug
with clear and precise language)

I guess because it's pretty unclear what exactly is being asked here other than
the three things above (which actually is 4 reports in one I suspect), again my
suggestion is marking as INVALID.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71650] New: BUGZILLAASSISTANT: More Automated Bug Submission Process Based on Yes/No Questions

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71650

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71650
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: BUGZILLAASSISTANT: More Automated Bug Submission
Process Based on Yes/No Questions
  Severity: enhancement
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
  Reporter: jmadero@gmail.com
  Hardware: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: unspecified
 Component: Libreoffice
   Product: LibreOffice

As we have discussed in the past, it would be great to have a BSA2.0 or some
such thing where the majority of the process is done automatically via simple
yes/no questions and the system "adapts" to the users answers. I am willing to
do a tree diagram of the options. 

Benefits of this would be that at the end we would be:

1. Much more information from the user

2. Automagically prioritize a bug based on responses

3. Require more non optional information when it's appropriate, example: can a
simple test document show this problem (yes/no) if they say yes, automatically
require them to attach a document.

4. Perhaps it can be used to get clearer steps (but this is a bit trickier to
do)

5. Offer a ton of benefits for those who English isn't their primary language,
require the user to type less

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71650] BUGZILLAASSISTANT: More Automated Bug Submission Process Based on Yes/No Questions

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71650

Joel Madero  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
   ||g/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71651] New: BUGZILLA: Add OpenID support

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71651

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71651
CC: webs...@global.libreoffice.org
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: BUGZILLA: Add OpenID support
  Severity: enhancement
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
  Reporter: qu...@runcibility.com
  Hardware: Other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: unspecified
 Component: WWW
   Product: LibreOffice

For various reasons, QA is supportive of implementing OpenID support in
Bugzilla. This would (hopefully) lower the barrier to users filing new bug
reports, and would allow us to do interesting things in the future, such as
creating tools to move a Bugzilla bug -> Ask LibreOffice question (or vice
versa).

We should wait on this improvement until we migrate Bugzilla to a separate
instance.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71651] BUGZILLA: Add OpenID support

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71651

Qubit  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||qu...@runcibility.com
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71534] Other: Document Compatibility Submission Page/Service

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

--- Comment #10 from Qubit  ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> 
> 1. No registration
> my vote is no (but open to openID which should be its own report)

Bug 71651 - BUGZILLA: Add OpenID support

> 2. Allow users to submit documents without mandatory steps required
> again my vote is no (I think requirements should be stricter actually)
> 
> 3. Allow users to submit without info about their system
> again, my vote is no (absolutely not, complete waste of QA's time, again I
> think the requirement should be stricter)

So I think we have two choices here
1) We relax restrictions and instruct QA to triage reports more quickly, or
2) We keep/tighten restrictions, and give QA more time per report

Either one will discourage some subset of our userbase; I'm not sure which one
is optimal.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 70421] the master freezes when adding a new path for templates

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70421

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de

--- Comment #3 from Regina Henschel  ---
I see the same problem on Windows 7 with Build ID:
0aa9ced531b8d85ad067c1d156a9708eea628d78

It is not needed to set the new path as default path for writing, it hangs
already for read-only paths.

It does not only hang in case of template path, but for AutoText and AutoCorr
too. It does not hang when changing the path of Images.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71534] Other: Document Compatibility Submission Page/Service

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

Joel Madero  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
   ||g/show_bug.cgi?id=71650

--- Comment #9 from Joel Madero  ---
Created a new bug for item #4 - "see also" field

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71652] New: UI: Parameter use description

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71652

  Priority: medium
Bug ID: 71652
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
   Summary: UI: Parameter use description
  Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Windows (All)
  Reporter: clicks...@yahoo.co.uk
  Hardware: Other
Whiteboard: BSA
Status: UNCONFIRMED
   Version: 4.1.3.2 release
 Component: Spreadsheet
   Product: LibreOffice

Created attachment 89276
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89276&action=edit
A screenshot showing the text.

Problem description: 
The parameter description for 'No thousands separator' in the FIXED function is
overly complicated and confusing.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Open an instance of Calc, launch the Function Wizard and double-click on the
FIXED function.
2. Click in the 'No thousands separator' input box to bring upt the explanation
in the wizard.


Current behavior:The current text is displayed, quite correctly.

Expected behavior:
To simplify this text and explicitly explain the point of the parameter, alter
the text to something like;
'Thousands separator. If 0 or omitted the locale group separator is used else
the separator is suppressed.'


I appreciate this is not a defect as such but the current text is very poor. I
don't know of any other way to bring this up than as a bug.

Operating System: Windows XP
Version: 4.1.3.2 release

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63546] EDITING:In Calc when writing direction of cell is changed to RTL, text remains left-aligned.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63546

--- Comment #25 from Eike Rathke  ---
A question for understanding: is it expected that when changing writing
direction to RTL text should also be right aligned if it consists of non-RTL
letters, e.g. is written in Latin script? Or should it be left aligned in that
case?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71534] Other: Document Compatibility Submission Page/Service

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534

--- Comment #11 from Rob Snelders  ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > 
> > 1. No registration
> > my vote is no (but open to openID which should be its own report)
> 
> Bug 71651 - BUGZILLA: Add OpenID support

I am afraid that is a long-term plan

> 
> > 2. Allow users to submit documents without mandatory steps required
> > again my vote is no (I think requirements should be stricter actually)
> > 
> > 3. Allow users to submit without info about their system
> > again, my vote is no (absolutely not, complete waste of QA's time, again I
> > think the requirement should be stricter)
> 
> So I think we have two choices here
> 1) We relax restrictions and instruct QA to triage reports more quickly, or
> 2) We keep/tighten restrictions, and give QA more time per report
> 
> Either one will discourage some subset of our userbase; I'm not sure which
> one is optimal.

When we make the entering of bugreports easier we don't satisfy our user-base.
Because the bugs they enter won't be replyed to, so they are still angry
afterwards. So choice 1 will get you a angry userbase and angry community. The
2nd option gives you a angy userbase.
For me there is no choice as there is only 1 valid option as long as the
QA-community isn't MUCH bigger.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63546] EDITING:In Calc when writing direction of cell is changed to RTL, text remains left-aligned.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63546

--- Comment #26 from Ahmad Harthi  ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> A question for understanding: is it expected that when changing writing
> direction to RTL text should also be right aligned if it consists of non-RTL
> letters, e.g. is written in Latin script? Or should it be left aligned in
> that case?

* RTL and LTR functions used to decide where to put weak characters and how to
mix different directionality words.

* Alignment should follow the "document/parent object" directionality, if RTL
all text should be aligned right by default... and so on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62461] LO-4.x.x creates new ODT, ODP and ODG file with fallback PNG graphic first, if an SVG picture inserted into the file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62461

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|target:4.1.0|target:4.1.0 target:4.2.0

--- Comment #23 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Caolan McNamara committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=306a39ec0d2cde09d7e75e726ce47622939733d7

Resolves: fdo#62461 put preferred image first



The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63546] EDITING:In Calc when writing direction of cell is changed to RTL, text remains left-aligned.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63546

--- Comment #27 from Ahmad Harthi  ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > A question for understanding: is it expected that when changing writing
> > direction to RTL text should also be right aligned if it consists of non-RTL
> > letters, e.g. is written in Latin script? Or should it be left aligned in
> > that case?
> 
> * RTL and LTR functions used to decide where to put weak characters and how
> to mix different directionality words.
> 
> * Alignment should follow the "document/parent object" directionality, if
> RTL all text should be aligned right by default... and so on.

To make it more clear there is a difference between applying RTL to text or to
(document/parent object), if you apply RTL to text it hasn't to be aligned
right, it should keep the previous alignment as is...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62461] LO-4.x.x creates new ODT, ODP and ODG file with fallback PNG graphic first, if an SVG picture inserted into the file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62461

Caolán McNamara  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |caol...@redhat.com
   |desktop.org |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 65675] LibreOffice 4.2 most annoying bugs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65675

Bug 65675 depends on bug 62461, which changed state.

Bug 62461 Summary: LO-4.x.x creates new ODT, ODP and ODG file with fallback PNG 
graphic first, if an SVG picture inserted into the file
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62461

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 60270] LibreOffice 4.1 most annoying bugs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60270

Bug 60270 depends on bug 62461, which changed state.

Bug 62461 Summary: LO-4.x.x creates new ODT, ODP and ODG file with fallback PNG 
graphic first, if an SVG picture inserted into the file
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62461

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 64499] Goalseek does not get answer although Excel has no problem on same sheet saved in xls format

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64499

--- Comment #7 from Bruce Sobey  ---
Hi Foss
I think I initially submitted an xls file (RetirementCalc.xls), but I may
have saved it as an ods file as well.  It makes no difference they both
give the same problem when goal seek is run in LibreOffice.  It is a file
to calculate how much one can draw (cell B6) to reach the target at the
number of years.  To do this one runs goal seek (or makes many successive
changes to cell B6).  Running goal see (Tools, Goal Seek)one would tell it
to set Formula cell D7, Target value = 0, Variable cell B6.  However
LibreOffice (like OpenOffice before it) does not find a solution. However
Excel does not have a problem withe this - In fact the excel file has a
macro to do this automatically, which I was intending to move to
LibreOffice.

I made a small test file doing something similar and it ran Goal Seek fine,
so there is some problem with the convergence algorithm in this case.

Hope this helps
Bruce


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:09 PM,  wrote:

>  Foss  changed bug 
> 64499
>  What Removed Added  Status UNCONFIRMED NEEDINFO  Ever confirmed   1
>
>  *Comment # 6  on
> bug 64499  from Foss
>  *
>
> Bruce, sorry for being an ubernoob. Could you post exact reproduce steps? 
> Which
> file is opened in which format with which application.
>
> This seems to be about excel but the test file is a ods file?
>
>  --
> You are receiving this mail because:
>
>- You reported the bug.
>
>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63546] EDITING:In Calc when writing direction of cell is changed to RTL, text remains left-aligned.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63546

--- Comment #28 from Eike Rathke  ---
This entire bug is only about the text alignment within one cell, not text
portions or weak characters. Which is similar to paragraph level. Also, this is
about the alignment that should result if the WRITING DIRECTION was set to RTL
for a cell, which overrides the sheet's writing direction. Of course when no
direction is set at cell level then the sheet's direction shall be considered.

Still I'd like to know what alignment should result if the writing direction is
RTL (sheet or cell level) and the text for example starts with a Latin letter.
Should the cell's alignment be right or left in that case (if no explicit
alignment is set).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 64499] Goalseek does not get answer although Excel has no problem on same sheet saved in xls format

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64499

Qubit  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

--- Comment #8 from Qubit  ---
Bruce - Thanks for the update.

[Changing status -> UNCONFIRMED]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63546] EDITING:In Calc when writing direction of cell is changed to RTL, text remains left-aligned.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63546

--- Comment #29 from Faisal Menawer  ---
when writing direction changed to RTL the alignment should changed
to the right whatever the text was (Latin letter, arabic ...) except if the
alignment set for center of justified.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs