[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144079] Stylist: New Text Styles view misses interactions for CS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144079

--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)

Possibly better to close, and to have new when (if?) the work resumes on the
main problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149276] Assertion failed: (dynamic_cast(static_cast(pOldValue)->pChangedFormat)), function TriggerNodeUpdate, file ndtxt.cxx, line

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149276

--- Comment #2 from Telesto  ---
Created attachment 180358
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180358=edit
Example file

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149275] EDITING UI - Bug when selecting text in formula

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149275

Mike Kaganski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 145248 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149276] Assertion failed: (dynamic_cast(static_cast(pOldValue)->pChangedFormat)), function TriggerNodeUpdate, file ndtxt.cxx, line

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149276

--- Comment #1 from Telesto  ---
Created attachment 180357
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180357=edit
BT with symbols

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149276] New: Assertion failed: (dynamic_cast(static_cast(pOldValue)->pChangedFormat)), function TriggerNodeUpdate, file ndtxt.cxx,

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149276

Bug ID: 149276
   Summary: Assertion failed: (dynamic_cast(static_cast(pOldValue)->pChangedFormat)), function
TriggerNodeUpdate, file ndtxt.cxx, line 5275.
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: tele...@surfxs.nl

Description:
Assertion failed: (dynamic_cast(static_cast(pOldValue)->pChangedFormat)), function TriggerNodeUpdate, file
ndtxt.cxx, line 5275.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open the attached file (slightly modified version of the one at bug 149268)
2. Ignore the Macro, not important
3. CTRL+A
4. CTRL+C
5. CTRL+N
6. CTRL+V
7. CTRL+Z

Actual Results:
Assert

Expected Results:
No assert


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha1+ / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 62531ec1091c7b3f6a3577889a18234790ec716d
CPU threads: 8; OS: Mac OS X 12.3.1; UI render: default; VCL: osx
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138205] "Version incompatibility. Incorrect file version" when trying to open PDF

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138205

Jacobhue  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|INSUFFICIENTDATA|FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Jacobhue  ---
Your writing is really informative, especially because it's so meaningful and
updated. Thanks for sharing this wonderful post!
https://www.tcswebmail.info/
https://www.upsers.fyi/
https://www.prepaidgiftbalance.fyi/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136297] Spreadsheet Theme throws BASIC runtime error

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136297

Jacobhue  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Jacobhue  ---
Your writing is really great. I’m so glad I read it. It kept me hooked the
whole way through. 
https://www.imybkexperience.com/
https://www.mykfc-experience.com/
https://www.mybpcreditcard.one/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103947] LibreOffice Draw can not save as (replace) the opening pdf to itself, Must Rename.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103947

--- Comment #16 from Jacobhue  ---
Thanks for this information. I really appreciate the information that you have
provided. 
https://www.omegle.fyi/
https://www.chatrandom.one/
https://www.bazoocam.fyi/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149275] New: EDITING UI - Bug when selecting text in formula

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149275

Bug ID: 149275
   Summary: EDITING UI - Bug when selecting text in formula
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.3.3.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: santo@hotmail.com

When selecting text in a formula, if you make this procedure:

1) Select some text of a formula with the mouse.
2) DONT release left button yet, but move the mouse pointer below the formula
textbox, just a little outside until pointer changes to a "not allowed" symbol.
3) NOW you can release the button.
4) Without clicking, move the pointer side to side over the text.
5) You will see the bug, it must be killed!

Ok, now the pointer is selecting the text without the mouse button being
clicked.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149262] LibreOffice 7.3.3 not opening in Windows 10 Home

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149262

Tracy  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|1   |0
 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149262] LibreOffice 7.3.3 not opening in Windows 10 Home

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149262

--- Comment #3 from Tracy  ---
I have deleted my LO user profile. LO is still not launching.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149274] bestblogsan

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149274

bestblogsan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||https://www.bestblogsandart
   ||icles.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149274] New: bestblogsan

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149274

Bug ID: 149274
   Summary: bestblogsan
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 3.3.1 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Android Viewer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: bestblogsa...@outlook.com

Description:
That's great, I like it so much, come on!putting a balance in life may be as
easy as carving out 
time regularly to indulge in an activity of your choice. 
yahoo lifestyles sea chats with personalities who proportion their ardour
for a game or well-being pastime they revel in, which helps them tackle the
world with zeal. 
we hope this month-to-month series will encourage you to locate an hobby so
that it will 
upload that flicker in your lifestyles.
https://www.bestblogsandarticles.com

Actual Results:
The complete look of your internet site is remarkable, not to mention the
content material!

Expected Results:
The complete look of your internet site is remarkable, not to mention the
content material!


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes



Additional Info:
The complete look of your internet site is remarkable, not to mention the
content material!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149264] assert in checkGlyphsEqual() when loading sw/qa/extras/uiwriter/data/tdf104649.docx

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149264

--- Comment #5 from Luboš Luňák  ---
I expect https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/134891 handles this?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144997] Occasionally, text or numbers in the formula bar are not highlighted for editing correctly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144997

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149020] missing controls in flatpak version of LibreOffice

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149020

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149015] Impress: Improve search for animations

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149015

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149265] LibreCalc displays white lines over a background image

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149265

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149265] LibreCalc displays white lines over a background image

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149265

--- Comment #7 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145300] Viewing - bad horizontal scroll bar too skinny to be able to read multipage Writer document

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145300

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145300] Viewing - bad horizontal scroll bar too skinny to be able to read multipage Writer document

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145300

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear A_Artemis9,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145290] Slow scrolling with gtk3

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145290

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145290] Slow scrolling with gtk3

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145290

--- Comment #8 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear gianluca.dequecker,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 86066] [META] Bugs and improvements to the status bar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86066
Bug 86066 depends on bug 144929, which changed state.

Bug 144929 Summary: the new "document saved" icon and its ambiguous use
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144929

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144929] the new "document saved" icon and its ambiguous use

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144929

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144929] the new "document saved" icon and its ambiguous use

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144929

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear peter josvai,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139248] No control handles on text box

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139248

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Menoo,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138955] Deleting whitespace when pasting Calc cell to Writer

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138955

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear alan-sloma,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 99482] Changing mode from View menu doesn't change Display mode icon

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99482

--- Comment #13 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Yan Pas,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94631] Chinese font name does not display well in font lists when the Language of UI is not Chinese

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94631

--- Comment #11 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear cyanshrike,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79583] Other: Nonstandard Paper Size doesn't print

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79583

--- Comment #14 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear elicoten,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 55057] Unable to select Opera as mail client.

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55057

--- Comment #10 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Frank Bell,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149267] grid lines for .xlsx file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149267

--- Comment #2 from Randy Croan  ---
Created attachment 180355
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180355=edit
test calc file with grid lines and page breaks hidden

upgraded to v7.3.3.2 (x64)
created this test file with grid lines and page breaks hidden
save as .xlsx file
close LibreOffice Calc
open .xlsx file
for me the grid lines are back

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149273] New: Clicking on 'Entries' tab when inserting/editing an index crashes Writer (Mac OS)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149273

Bug ID: 149273
   Summary: Clicking on 'Entries' tab when inserting/editing an
index crashes Writer (Mac OS)
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.3.3.2 release
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: macOS (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: skh1...@hotmail.com

Description:
When either inserting a new or editing an existing index (table of contents or
alphabetical index, at least) in the 'Table of Contents, Index, or
Bibliography' dialogue. Clicking on the 'Entries' tab immediately crashes
Writer without any error dialogue. This happens even on a new empty file.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a new Writer document _OR_ open an existing one.
2. Choose in the menu 'Insert|Table of Contents and Index|Table of Contents,
Index, or Bibliography' _OR_ right-click on an existing index or TOC and select
'Edit Index'.
3. When the dialogue 'Table of Contents, Index, or Bibliography' opens, click
the 'Entries' tab.


Actual Results:
Writer immediately crashes without warning.

Expected Results:
The 'Entries' tab should open in the dialogue with 'Level', 'Structure and
Formatting', and a preview panes.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes


OpenGL enabled: Yes

Additional Info:
I have verified this behaviour on a few different documents. After this, I have
installed the 7.2.7.2 release and I was able to at least open the 'Entries' tab
(did not yet try actually editing). After this, when I try to select 'Edit
index' from the mouse menu over an existing index, the Writer crashes even
before showing the 'Table of Contents, Index, or Bibliography' dialogue. I am
still able to bring this dialogue up when inserting a new index, but clicking
on the 'Entries' tab crashes it immediately as before. 

So, the change in behaviour is that before installing the 7.2.7.2 release
beside the 7.3.3.2, I was able to invoke the 'Table of Contents, Index, or
Bibliography' dialogue from the mouse context menu 'Edit Index', but after that
the Writer crashes before displaying the dialogue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149265] LibreCalc displays white lines over a background image

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149265

--- Comment #6 from Michael  ---
One last observation. These images are very large, about 13777483. We have
about 27 different spreadsheets active. They are needed to accommodate the many
different logbook formats for the various ships and years.

When I saved this spreadsheet and re-opened it, I got just one white line. I
suspect I might see none or more if I did this repeatedly. However, just
scrolling so the buttons on the side are completely out of view and then doing
a Ctrl-Home, I see all the white lines.

I did the same thing with a different spreadsheet that has a much smaller
image: 4222314. No white lines appeared mo matter how I was moving around, or
if I was entering data.

So, it seems to have a problem with the very large images. Perhaps it is just
my generic video card, i don't know.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149265] LibreCalc displays white lines over a background image

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149265

--- Comment #5 from Michael  ---
I just went to the next day's image. After the date was set, I did a Ctrl-Home.
No white lines. I moved around with arrow keys, no macros, so Cell C4 was top
left in the Calc window. I entered a number in D5, did Ctrl-Home and the lines
were there.

While I was looking at the screen, Calc did an Auto-Save. Initially there were
no white lines associated with the bottom two buttons, but they appeared after
the Auto-Same.

I'm not sure if this helps.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149265] LibreCalc displays white lines over a background image

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149265

--- Comment #4 from Michael  ---
I have a couple of other observations.

1. I just noticed that when a new image is loaded, it is clean, that is no
white lines. When I do Alt-J, which aligns the view so that the AM weather
block is positioned nicely and sets the active cell to be the first data cell
for the AM weather, the lines appear on the image. Because the weather block is
aligned so that the top corner of the AM weather data is at the top left corner
of the spreadsheet, you can't see the white lines unless you do a Ctrl-Home.


2. You will notice, just from the screen capture I sent in the Zip file, that
the horizontal white lines correspond to the tops and bottoms of the buttons
along the left side of the spreadsheet.

3. On occasion, the first time I do a CopyDown, Alt-], I see a quick flash of
the buttons displayed, even though they are out of sight of the current view.
This makes we wonder if the way the buttons are displayed has something to do
with the white lines and the occasional flash of buttons.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149250] Crash in: ScColumn::SetPattern(long, ScPatternAttr const &)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149250

k_coll...@yahoo.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

--- Comment #4 from k_coll...@yahoo.com ---
Thanks for the response.  I downloaded version 7.3.3.2 (x64) and tested again. 
I works without problem now.  Thank you for your help.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149265] LibreCalc displays white lines over a background image

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149265

--- Comment #3 from Michael  ---
Version: 7.2.6.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: b0ec3a565991f7569a5a7f5d24fed7f52653d754
CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: default; VCL: win
Locale: en-CA (en_CA); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135501] Change the default UI (see comment 67)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501

--- Comment #116 from John Mills  ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #115)
> (In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #112)
> > I agree with this point of view. Making the Tabbed UI should be a goal for
> > to be achieved within 1 or 2 years. If we start prioritizing it today, maybe
> > within 2 or 3 main releases we'll be able to make it the default.
> 
> If you want to make this argument, you need to address the objections of
> those of us who are against it. Which you, so far, have not.
> 
> > Maybe we could bring this issue to the ESC so that future grants can be
> > proposed to address Tabbed UI-related bugs and enhancements.

What precisely is wrong taking this proposal to the ESC? Currently is your
suggestion to delay because you have a better proposal for modernisation in the
UI? Or rather you believe that the current status quo is adequate?
> 
> Again, you're speaking as though this has somehow been agreed. On the
> contrary - you should refrain from lobbying the ESC for grant money; that
> would be a misrepresentation of the discussion here.
This is an open discussion that has been open for near 2 years now, with both
sides making their point. Unless there is any overstepping of statutes for TDF
that has been made it is entirely within a member's rights to make a proposal
or is this incorrect?

> 
> (In reply to John Mills from comment #107)
> John, I think in this latest reply you've provided the crux of your
> perspective:
> 
> > The standard lets say is MSO
> 
> Excuse the capital letters, but: THE STANDARD IS NOT MSO, nor should it be.
> "Do like MSO does" may be a reasonable fallback when we have no other
> alternative. But we also know MSO gets some things wrong, UI-wise; and one
> of these things is the switch to ribbons, which is more detrimental than
> beneficial to users.

For businesses and governments worldwide MSO is by far and way above any other
office suite by usage statistics. No other office suite is remotely close to
MSO. I would hazard a guess that pirated usage of MSO is significantly greater
than LibreOffice unfortunately. Your argument about switching to a ribbon being
detrimental is purely subjective. It certainly hasn't hampered their adoption
if you compare usage in 2007 compared to 2022. If MSO was not a de facto
standard then no suites would seek compatibility of UI paradigms or file
formats. Clearly this is not the case. 

> 
> > This is the critical part, the Tabbed UI provides an attractive (certainly
> > on Linux) and familiar interface to users coming from other office suites
> 
> The menus + toolbars provide an attractive and familiar interface to such
> users - as most desktop application software use menus and toolbars, and in
> fact so do half or more of other office suites. I would concede that tabs
> "look more attractive" - you get a larger canvas on which to represent your
> ideas - but they make users fail to notice and find a lot of functionality.
> And a shiny ribbon is  not a good enough reason to make this interface the
> default.

Again a subjective opinion, please provide some rational evidence that users
'fail to notice and find a lot of functionality.'
> 
> > such as MSO, OnlyOffice, Kingsoft, Softmaker to name a few.
> 
> You're naming the ones with tabs, and ignoring the others.

Which are the others you speak of that default to a 'classic' like interface?
Word Perfect, possibly Google docs if you are broadly reaching?
> 
> > if you were looking 50 to 10 years in to the future where do you
> > think the desktop and online office space is going to be? Will there be
> > consolidation? Will the desktop market shrink compared to online? Will MSO
> > still be number one, will new competitors enter the market? The fact is we
> > don't know for certain,
> 
> We know that, 30 years ago, desktop applications were using menu bars and
> toolbars, and 30 years later, they still use menu bars and toolbars, mostly.
> Ribbons are relatively unpopular. Another direction has been "smartphonish"
> interface - no menu bar and a hamburger menu. That's nice for a phone, but
> sucks for the desktop. Chrome, Firefox and Thunderbird have gone in this
> direction (along with using web-page-like dialog replacements - and it has
> been a degradation.

Well I hope we don't see significant hamburger menu like interfaces by default
but they certainly supplement applications now, however I am not talking
specifically about non-office applications. I do not see the relevance of the
menu structure for photoshop or Auto CAD to the applicability of a Ribbon
interface for LibreOffice.
> 
> > but if trends continue then i think there will be an
> > increased online presence and MSO will still be the most popular desktop
> > client.
> 
> if trends continue, then and most applications would still use menu bars and
> toolbars, while Microsoft will try out some more UI which may or may not be
> a good idea.

I am not 

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149227] duplicate style in styles tab of sidebar

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149227

m.a.riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #3 from m.a.riosv  ---
Doesn't show that for me.
Version: 7.3.3.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: d1d0ea68f081ee2800a922cac8f79445e4603348
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149272] New: LibreOffice will not open

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149272

Bug ID: 149272
   Summary: LibreOffice will not open
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.2.2.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Installation
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: timla...@bellsouth.net

Description:
I can't get LibreOffice to open after updating to 7.2 on 5/19/22

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Double click LibreOffice icon
2.
3.

Actual Results:
nothing, will not open

Expected Results:
open


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
no other info

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149265] LibreCalc displays white lines over a background image

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149265

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #2 from Regina Henschel  ---
I do not have any white lines, neither with Skia enabled nor with Skia
disabled. I have tested it with Version: 7.3.2.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 49f2b1bff42cfccbd8f788c8dc32c1c309559be0
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: de-DE (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: CL

Please post the version info from Help > About.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147991] FILESAVE PPTX: text shows with different paragraph indentation

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147991

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||5162
Version|unspecified |7.2.5.2 release
   Keywords||bibisected, bisected,
   ||regression
  Regression By||Attila Bakos (NISZ)
 CC||bakos.attilakar...@nisz.hu
 Status|RESOLVED|NEW
 Resolution|NOTABUG |---

--- Comment #19 from Aron Budea  ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #17)
> Right, not about font. But it's still NotABug. 
> Because LO doesn't write that in PPTX and MSO sets some arbitrary value.
I'd rather someone actually analyzed what is going on with the file instead of
pure guesswork. As principle, the reference of handling a PPTX is PowerPoint,
if there is a disparity in Impress, there has to be a good reason for it,
otherwise we can assume Impress is to blame.

I've bibisected the point where the extra indent is shown in PowerPoint using
repo bibisect-linux-64-7.2. It's the 7.2 backport of the following commit in
7.4. Adding CC: to Attila Bakos (NISZ).

Note the steps:
- open attachment 180283,
- save as PPTX,
- reload the PPTX, and save it,
- reload the PPTX again, and save it,
- open PPTX in PowerPoint.
(if there is no second reload, the indent isn't there)

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f57cfddb51b7d7409b7b425dc200aa73406a13bd
author  Attila Bakos (NISZ)
2021-12-08 10:22:37 +0100
committer   László Németh2021-12-09 12:14:51
+0100

tdf#145162 PPTX export: fix extra bullet regression

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107899] [META] PPTX paragraph-related issues

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107899
Bug 107899 depends on bug 147991, which changed state.

Bug 147991 Summary: FILESAVE PPTX: text shows with different paragraph 
indentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147991

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|NEW
 Resolution|NOTABUG |---

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149270] Writer: Font of watermark is displayed incorrectly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149270

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #6 from Regina Henschel  ---
You need no Watermark but the problem is already visible in Fontwork-shapes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149270] Writer: Font of watermark is displayed incorrectly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149270

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de

--- Comment #5 from Regina Henschel  ---
Created attachment 180354
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180354=edit
Bahnschrift semi bold in Fontwor shape

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149230] Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use of styles

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149230

--- Comment #12 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #11)
> * Impress and Draw are under-developed IMHO w.r.t. styles, so there's less
> to expose with the UI. Is there a meta-bug about this?

Answering myself: Well, there's Bug 90497 about implementing "themes", which is
at least part of what's missing. And of course, there's the
Impress-and-Draw-Styles meta-bug, Bug 100373.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107332] [META] Calc cell and page styles bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107332

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||62925


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62925
[Bug 62925] FORMATTING: enhancement: please add "chart styles" to the styles of
Calc
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 102946] [META] Styles bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102946

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|62925   |


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62925
[Bug 62925] FORMATTING: enhancement: please add "chart styles" to the styles of
Calc
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62925] FORMATTING: enhancement: please add "chart styles" to the styles of Calc

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62925

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|102946  |107332


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102946
[Bug 102946] [META] Styles bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107332
[Bug 107332] [META] Calc cell and page styles bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107326] [META] Writer style bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107326

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||38194


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194
[Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 102946] [META] Styles bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102946

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|38194   |


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194
[Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 38194] Style indicator in document margin

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38194

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|102946  |107326

--- Comment #46 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
This is just for Writer, right?


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102946
[Bug 102946] [META] Styles bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107326
[Bug 107326] [META] Writer style bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108014] [META] Writer character style bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108014

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|149271  |


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149271
[Bug 149271] Support composition of multiple styles of the same kind
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 102946] [META] Styles bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102946

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||149271


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149271
[Bug 149271] Support composition of multiple styles of the same kind
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149271] Support composition of multiple styles of the same kind

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149271

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|108014  |102946


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102946
[Bug 102946] [META] Styles bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108014
[Bug 108014] [META] Writer character style bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108014] [META] Writer character style bugs and enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108014

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||149271


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149271
[Bug 149271] Support composition of multiple styles of the same kind
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149271] Support composition of multiple styles of the same kind

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149271

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||108014


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108014
[Bug 108014] [META] Writer character style bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148755] A Quirk in the focusing property of the Navigator

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148755

--- Comment #7 from Jim Raykowski  ---
> Jim, I can see an inconsistency: Button is called "Content Navigation View",
> but in LO Help it is called "Content View" [1]. So if you try to search
> "Content Navigation View" (with quotation marks) in LO Help you won't get a
> result. So I would either change name of button or name in documentation. So
> my questions to you are:
> a) Do you agree, that we need more consistency here?
> b) Which name do you prefer?
Looks like the buttons tool tip was changed from "Content View" to "Content
Navigation View" in version 5.2 by a commit made for bug 43514:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43514#c20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94587] [META] ODF features missing or incorrectly imported

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94587

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||149271


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149271
[Bug 149271] Support composition of multiple styles of the same kind
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149271] Support composition of multiple styles of the same kind

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149271

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de
 Blocks||94587

--- Comment #1 from Regina Henschel  ---
What you are looking for is near to the ODF attribute text:class-names.
https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/os/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html#attribute-text_class-names

That is not implemented in LO.

Currently you can only make a hierarchical tree of styles using inheritance.

So I take this as enhancement request to implement the attribute
"text:class-names".


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94587
[Bug 94587] [META] ODF features missing or incorrectly imported
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149230] Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use of styles

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149230

--- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9)
> Since the discussion is going towards Writer only

Sadly, we do tend to do that... but TBH:

* Calc work involves a lot less styling, typically, regardless of whether it's
DF or cell/text styles.
* Impress and Draw are under-developed IMHO w.r.t. styles, so there's less to
expose with the UI. Is there a meta-bug about this?

> However, I would challenge the idea of educating users (just for sake of the
> argument). We can force users into learning a paradigm or - the actual
> challenge for UX/IT - make the software smart. Simple solution is to change
> DF = bold into CS = Emphasis (with the only attribute bold). Or change two
> empty paragraphs into a heading plus spacing.

Some changes are more difficult to accept in a deeper sense. For example, if
you change the empty paragraph into a heading + space - the heading style you
would choose would likely not be what the user expected, and they would be
tempted to either DF the heading, or just undo the change. I'm not sure the
user would realize "oh, I should specify the semantics of my document elements
rather than their visual layout/styling".

I wonder if users could be encouraged to watch a tutorial about preferring
styles over DF.


> But I believe this "convenience solution" would be the wrong way even when
> requested by the users. Competitors do so - on cost at flexibility and
> clearness. Everyone who tried to work with styles in MS Word knows that
> LibreOffice is way superior in this regards. 

in most aspects of style handling. It's still easier to convert a bunch of
identical DF into a style in MS Word.


> My solution would be to not force users into a certain workflow but rather
> give better feedback.

But the argument is that our current UI nudges users towards DF and does not
make the use of styles obvious/attractive enough.

> We could show a "traffic light indicator" in the
> statusbar with green in case of no DF and a low number of PS/CS, yellow for
> a few DF or large number of PS/CS, and red.

Before doing that, we should think about how to explain what such a traffic
light means; which brings me to wondering about whether there could be some
official tutorial, static or dynamic, for "DF is bad, Don't do DF, kay?"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149230] Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use of styles

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149230

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||9271

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108498] Character styles not working against the underlying paragraph style

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108498

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||9271

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127702] Support setting quantitative font features relatively to underlying paragraph style

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127702

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||9271

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149271] Support composition of multiple styles of the same kind

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149271

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
   ||5311,
   ||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||9230,
   ||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
   ||7702,
   ||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
   ||8498

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 115311] UI missing for nesting character styles

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115311

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||9271

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149271] New: Support composition of multiple styles of the same kind

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149271

Bug ID: 149271
   Summary: Support composition of multiple styles of the same
kind
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: medium
 Component: LibreOffice
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: eyalr...@gmx.com

If we think of styling/formatting in HTML documents, we'll notice that, like in
LO, you have direct formatting - setting the style="..." attribute of a single
element; and we also LO-like "styles" in the form of CSS classes.

One interesting difference between CSS classes and LO styles is, that a single
element can have _multiple_ styles applied to it at once.

LO should also support this.

In writer, an obvious example would be "Internet Link" and "Emphasis". Why
can't I have a segment of text (within some paragraph) which is emphasized, and
also contains an "Internet Link"?

But this is also relevant for paragraph styles. Say, "Footer" and "Blockquote".
I can put a blockquote in a footer if I want to, right?

Same goes for page styles: There's an "RTL page" style; and you could have a
page style with decorated margins. Surely it makes sense to combine them.

Proper support for combinations of styles is important for encouraging the use
of styles over direct formatting - as the unattainable combinations tend to
make people use DF rather than generate the 2^n combinations they may be
interested in.

Related bugs:

* Bug 115311 - UI missing for nesting character styles. Nesting is similar to
just combining styles, but perhaps not exactly the same thing; also, I'm
generalizing to other styles as well
* Bug 149230 - Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use
of styles
* Bug 127702 - Support setting quantitative font features relatively to
underlying paragraph style. There would need to be an ever more expansive
support for making style specs relative and partial.
* Bug 108498 - Character styles not working against the underlying paragraph
style. See discussion there regarding whether (character) styles need to be
relative/differential and to what.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135501] Change the default UI (see comment 67)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501

--- Comment #115 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #112)
> I agree with this point of view. Making the Tabbed UI should be a goal for
> to be achieved within 1 or 2 years. If we start prioritizing it today, maybe
> within 2 or 3 main releases we'll be able to make it the default.

If you want to make this argument, you need to address the objections of those
of us who are against it. Which you, so far, have not.

> Maybe we could bring this issue to the ESC so that future grants can be
> proposed to address Tabbed UI-related bugs and enhancements.

Again, you're speaking as though this has somehow been agreed. On the contrary
- you should refrain from lobbying the ESC for grant money; that would be a
misrepresentation of the discussion here.

(In reply to John Mills from comment #107)
John, I think in this latest reply you've provided the crux of your
perspective:

> The standard lets say is MSO

Excuse the capital letters, but: THE STANDARD IS NOT MSO, nor should it be. "Do
like MSO does" may be a reasonable fallback when we have no other alternative.
But we also know MSO gets some things wrong, UI-wise; and one of these things
is the switch to ribbons, which is more detrimental than beneficial to users.

> This is the critical part, the Tabbed UI provides an attractive (certainly
> on Linux) and familiar interface to users coming from other office suites

The menus + toolbars provide an attractive and familiar interface to such users
- as most desktop application software use menus and toolbars, and in fact so
do half or more of other office suites. I would concede that tabs "look more
attractive" - you get a larger canvas on which to represent your ideas - but
they make users fail to notice and find a lot of functionality. And a shiny
ribbon is  not a good enough reason to make this interface the default.

> such as MSO, OnlyOffice, Kingsoft, Softmaker to name a few.

You're naming the ones with tabs, and ignoring the others.

> if you were looking 50 to 10 years in to the future where do you
> think the desktop and online office space is going to be? Will there be
> consolidation? Will the desktop market shrink compared to online? Will MSO
> still be number one, will new competitors enter the market? The fact is we
> don't know for certain,

We know that, 30 years ago, desktop applications were using menu bars and
toolbars, and 30 years later, they still use menu bars and toolbars, mostly.
Ribbons are relatively unpopular. Another direction has been "smartphonish"
interface - no menu bar and a hamburger menu. That's nice for a phone, but
sucks for the desktop. Chrome, Firefox and Thunderbird have gone in this
direction (along with using web-page-like dialog replacements - and it has been
a degradation.

> but if trends continue then i think there will be an
> increased online presence and MSO will still be the most popular desktop
> client.

if trends continue, then and most applications would still use menu bars and
toolbars, while Microsoft will try out some more UI which may or may not be a
good idea.

> If they don't radically change their UI then the 'ribbon' will be 20
> + years old at that point and the type of UI used by LO 30 years old. 

Even older. But also note that if trends continue, there will still be few
ribbon apps and most free office suites will have menu bars and toolbars, not
ribbons.

> Just going by those numbers the current default UI paradigm used by LO will
> be hopelessly out of date

On the contrary. Going by those numbers LO will continue to be in vogue as it
is today. Of course, things may turn out differently: It may be the case that
in a decade or two, most apps are dumbed-down to smartphone-style interfaces.
If that happens, we should still not go down the same path.


> [u]nless there is
> emphasis and resources made available to correct these then nothing will
> happen and that stagnation is not healthy for the LO application and
> community in the longer term.

I hope you're not insinuating that not adopting your UI design preference
implies stagnation...

> There needs to be some strategic vision for where the UI needs to be

There is such a strategic vision: menu bar and toolbars. True, it's the
by-default vision, but to change it, proponents need to make a better argument
than "people who use MSO are used to it". Which is what I've also told Rafael,
above.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149267] grid lines for .xlsx file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149267

--- Comment #1 from Rafael Lima  ---
I cannot reproduce this issue using LO 7.3.3.

Created a new Calc file, added some borders and then hid the grid lines. Then I
saved as XLSX, closed and reopened it. The grid lines were still hidden.

Please try using the latest version of LibreOffice and check if the bug
persists.

System info:
Version: 7.3.3.2 / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 30(Build:2)
CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 5.13; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb)
Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.3~rc2-0ubuntu0.21.10.1~lo1
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149044] autonumbering and the action which caused it are combined into a single undo step

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149044

--- Comment #3 from Dieter  ---
(In reply to lvm from comment #2)
> I believe I already explained why it is a bug - it is inconsistent with undo
> behaviour for other types of autoformatting in LO e.g. URL recognition.

I don't understand. If I type www.example.com and press enter, a new paragraph
is inserted and text is recognized as link. Undo deletes paragraph and URL
recognition.

Perhaps another user understands your argument in a better way.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145239] Customize footnote symbols

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145239

--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
My opinion:

Yes, some footnote reference mechanisms have auto-progression/numbering. But -
some do not; and that may be sufficient for justifying this feature - even as a
more general implementation of what we have now, which simply gets exposed for
user addition. The implemented feature, at this point, could be customizing
only fixed finite lists with no auto-progression.

However - I would only be in favor of this if there are multiple obvious
examples. OP's example is one. Are there more? I'm not sure I buy ①②③. That is,
without auto-numbering, it's not as useful, and even with it - I kind of doubt
anybody would actually use this.

If there's only one or two obvious examples, we could for now just expand the 
non-customizable selection.


(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #5)
> Instead, we really should be looking to implement support for CSL (Citation
> Style List)

But isn't that only for references/citations? Footnotes are distinct from that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149270] Writer: Font of watermark is displayed incorrectly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149270

--- Comment #4 from BDF  ---
Created attachment 180353
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180353=edit
Observed example of bug 149270

In case the odt file as well as the pdf file look fine on your PC, this is how
it looks like on my machine.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149270] Writer: Font of watermark is displayed incorrectly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149270

--- Comment #3 from BDF  ---
Created attachment 180352
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180352=edit
Writer pdf file - bug 149270

The odt file exported as pdf in case the bug can not be observed on a different
machine.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149044] autonumbering and the action which caused it are combined into a single undo step

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149044

lvm  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 CC||lmiro...@yandex.ru
 Resolution|NOTABUG |---

--- Comment #2 from lvm  ---
I believe I already explained why it is a bug - it is inconsistent with undo
behaviour for other types of autoformatting in LO e.g. URL recognition. This
and only this is the correct undo behaviour because it allows one to undo
autoformatting if it was not needed without undoing the action which caused it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149270] Writer: Font of watermark is displayed incorrectly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149270

--- Comment #2 from BDF  ---
Created attachment 180351
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180351=edit
Writer text file - bug 149270

ODT file with multiple examples:
Page 1:
- Watermark only. Characters B, E, H and R as example in the Bahnschrift font.
Everything else was left to default

Page 2:
- Same as 1 plus "BEHR" in Bahnschrift font in colour black.


Page 3:
- Same as 1 plus "BEHR" in Bahnschrift font in colour black with 70%
transparency. The watermark font below shows the bug, the 'text' font does not.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149270] Writer: Font of watermark is displayed incorrectly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149270

--- Comment #1 from BDF  ---
Created attachment 180350
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180350=edit
bahnschrift.ttf

The regular Windows Bahnschrift font.
Since a quick google search shows that you can download this font for free from
multiple sites I think it's OK to share it for bug report purposes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149270] New: Writer: Font of watermark is displayed incorrectly

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149270

Bug ID: 149270
   Summary: Writer: Font of watermark is displayed incorrectly
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.3.3.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: bugs_documentfoundation_org.5.k...@xoxy.net

Description:
When a certain font is used for watermarks, the text is displayed incorrectly

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Add Watermark using the wrong font
(thats all)

Actual Results:
Watermark text is displayed incorrectly

Expected Results:
Watermark text is displayed correctly


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
You can NOT use any font to get this effect. The font has to be created with
'bad outlines'. An example for this is the "Bahnschrift" font.

- If you know a bit about SVGs: The outer line is not created by a single
multigon, but by overlaping parts. The parts where one part of the letter
intersects the other part seems to cause this bug.

- If you don't know SVGs: SVGs can be made up of one single shape or multiple
shapes combined. You can add two intersection squares and save them as such.
You ca also combine them into one shape and have the outline of both. The first
case seems to be the problem here (two shapes intersecting). The parts that
intersect each other are the parts that look incorrect.

I once knew how to extract the single glyph as SVG, but I aready forgot, Can't
be that difficult though.
If you upload the Bahnschrift font on https://opentype.js.org/ you can see the
problem as well. The outlines are created with the blue dots. The red dots seem
to be bezier curves (no idea though). The blue dots within the black shape are
the ones that cause the problem. They indicate that a shape overlaps the other
shape. The middle bar of the "E" for example is a single shape. The top bar,
the bottom bar as well as the left bar are also single shapes.

Why I think it's the problem of LibreOffice and not of the Bahnschrift font
simply is that the same font works in regular text in black font colour, grey
font colour and black font colour with a transparency of 70%.
So you would think that the same font looks the same way in the watermark.

--

Version: 7.3.3.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: d1d0ea68f081ee2800a922cac8f79445e4603348
CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: en-GB (de_AT); UI: de-DE
Calc: CL

(So far I only tested this on Windows because I yet have to find out how to
install fonts on my Linux machine.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103182] [META] GTK3-specific bugs

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
Bug 103182 depends on bug 148168, which changed state.

Bug 148168 Summary: LibreOffice Document Recovery dialog shows weird text input 
field
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148168

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149170] UI The "Document in use" dialog is not appearing anymore when opening from 'recent files menu'

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149170

--- Comment #5 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Michael Stahl committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/4ec4dd04b1a0f2313edfeff3cb7818ee560c99c3

tdf#149170 sfx2: store IsOriginallyLoadedReadOnly() for recent files

It will be available in 7.4.0.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149170] UI The "Document in use" dialog is not appearing anymore when opening from 'recent files menu'

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149170

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||target:7.4.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149251] Sometimes Writer doesn't refresh page display immediately after inserting or deleting characters when the line has formula

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149251

LeroyG  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|7.3.3.2 release |7.3.2.2 release

--- Comment #4 from LeroyG  ---
Reproducible with:

Version: 7.3.2.2 (x86) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 49f2b1bff42cfccbd8f788c8dc32c1c309559be0
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.1 Service Pack 1 Build 7601; UI render:
Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: es-MX (es_MX); UI: es-ES
Calc: threaded

Redrawing the screen (i.e., changing zoom level, underline changes in the
automatic spell checking) made it updated as expected.


NOT reproducible with:

Version: 7.2.7.2 (x86) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 8d71d29d553c0f7dcbfa38fbfda25ee34cce99a2
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.1 Service Pack 1 Build 7601; UI render:
Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: es-MX (es_MX); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149190] calc text spell check red line on word does not always present add to dictionary

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149190

--- Comment #2 from David Pickett  ---
The file was a xls file, and contains private info so I cannot excerpt or
screen shot it.  I seemed to be highly protected, too.  But if a cell was not
in focus but had a word redlined, I could click on it and see a spell check
supporting dialog.  Once selected, I could do the same click and only get a
copy cut paste sort of dialog.  At first I though the last word was being
discriminated against, but then I discovered it was about cell focus.  I was
editing in the cell, not in the formula field.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149269] New: LO uses wrong anchor character for position "Character" for object anchored "To character"

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149269

Bug ID: 149269
   Summary: LO uses wrong anchor character for position
"Character" for object anchored "To character"
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: All
   URL: https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/o
s/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html#
attribute-text_anchor-type
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: rb.hensc...@t-online.de

Created attachment 180349
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180349=edit
Shapes anchored "to character" vertical positioned "to character"

ODF 1.3 defines that the anchor is "The character after the drawing shape
element." in section 19.759 text:anchor-type. Thereby not the visual appearance
but the position in the file markup is meant.

The attached document "Anchor character is tall before shape.odt" has two
rectangles with position "top" and "bottom" respectively. You see, that the
vertical position corresponds to the character "|", which has a font size 96pt.

When you open the content.xml of the file in editor, then you see, that the
character "|" is before the rectangles.

I think, that the reference area for the vertical position should not be the
character before the object but the anchor character, and that has to be the
character after the object.

If you drag the anchor one character to the left or right, you see that the
reference area for the vertical position changes, which means, that in case of
"to character" really a character area is used, in contrast to "to Line of
Text" where the entire line area is used as reference area for vertical
position.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149268] FILEOPEN: particular document will CRASH immediately

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149268

Rainer Bielefeld Retired  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||LibreOffice@bielefeldundbus
   ||s.de

--- Comment #1 from Rainer Bielefeld Retired  
---
d) I can't tell whether there is a DUP in query


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149268] New: FILEOPEN: particular document will CRASH immediately

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149268

Bug ID: 149268
   Summary: FILEOPEN: particular document will CRASH immediately
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Keywords: regression
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de

Created attachment 180348
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180348=edit
Sample Document

Steps how to reproduce with attached sample document and  Server Installation
of Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)  Build ID
b871abad383583f02eb49c7e49aeae01f6941072
CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
LLocale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-US  |  Calc: CL  |  Auto Colibre Theme  | 
Special devUserProfile:

0. LaunchLibO
1. From StartCenter: Menu ˋFiel → open → browse for sample document → Openˊ
   » CRASH 

Additional Info
---
a) worked fine with Installation of Version: 7.3.3.2 (x64) 
Build ID: d1d0ea68f081ee2800a922cac8f79445e4603348
CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: de-DE |  Calc: threaded | ElementaryTheme | My
normal User Profile   
b) Trying Document recovery ends up in endless crash loop.
c) Crash reports: bc0e3e08-7783-40a3-bbca-b60c3dbeb24c ,
   8f93a713-2542-41b6-ad17-909451479c8e,  4a2e7506-12bd-4946-95d1-0b2082debd10
   0ecdd4e7-c38a-42c5-a6e1-f9130418f2e9,  278c0779-807f-4276-a5f1-90fd7a24e8aa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144060] Writer process hangs sometimes on macOS 11.4 on MacBook Air M1 (Intel version, Zotero uninstalled)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144060

--- Comment #21 from David Snow  ---
Your idea of copying the whole document and pasting it into a new one has some
bad consequences!  Page sizes and margins are not copied for all page types!
I do not know what else is randomly lost in the process. Since I only 6 page
styles this won't take too long to fix. But locating any other parameters that
get lost might take a while ;=}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149266] Anchor is character after the drawing shape element

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149266

Regina Henschel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Summary|Border on anchor character  |Anchor is character after
   |changes reference area for  |the drawing shape element
   |object anchored "To |
   |Character"  |
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Regina Henschel  ---
Sorry, the border is not the problem. I'll write a new report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149267] New: grid lines for .xlsx file

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149267

Bug ID: 149267
   Summary: grid lines for .xlsx file
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.2.7.2 release
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: n0...@hotmail.com

Description:
LibreOffice v7.2.7.2 (x64)
can't save a new .xlsx file with hide grid lines, when you close and re-open
the file, the grid lines show again.

also if you open a .xlsx with hide grid lines, you can't show them(used MS
Excel to hide them and saved)

Steps to Reproduce:
1.save .ods file with hide grid lines as .xlsx
2.close file and re-open .xlsx
3.grid lines will show

Actual Results:
see above

Expected Results:
already given


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes


OpenGL enabled: Yes

Additional Info:
It appears LibreOffice Calc is not saving the part of a .xlsx file that
contains whether to show or hide the grid lines.
When I use MS Excel to set the option to hide grid lines and save, the file
grows about 2k in size.
Then if opened with LibreOffice Calc I can't make it show grid lines

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146955] SAXParseException: '[word/footnotes.xml line 2] after RT save of DOCX - on open by LO and not by MSO

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146955

László Németh  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |nem...@numbertext.org
   |desktop.org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147991] FILESAVE PPTX: text shows with different paragraph indentation

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147991

--- Comment #18 from Timur  ---
Only way to "fix" it is to prevent the issue by setting value in LO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107899] [META] PPTX paragraph-related issues

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107899
Bug 107899 depends on bug 147991, which changed state.

Bug 147991 Summary: FILESAVE PPTX: text shows with different paragraph 
indentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147991

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147991] FILESAVE PPTX: text shows with different paragraph indentation

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147991

Timur  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG

--- Comment #17 from Timur  ---
Right, not about font. But it's still NotABug. 
Because LO doesn't write that in PPTX and MSO sets some arbitrary value.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149266] New: Border on anchor character changes reference area for object anchored "To Character"

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149266

Bug ID: 149266
   Summary: Border on anchor character changes reference area for
object anchored "To Character"
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: rb.hensc...@t-online.de

Created attachment 180347
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180347=edit
Document to reproduce the problem

Open attached document. It has two pink rectangles, both anchored "To
Character". The anchor is at the blue, tall rectangle. The characters around
the blue, tall rectangle are styled with the character style "Border".
The left pink rectangle has position "Top" to "Character", the right pink
rectangle has position "Bottom" to "Character.

Enable borders in character style "Border". Notice that the positions of the
pink rectangles change.

Expected: The position of the shapes is independent from the anchor character
style having border or not.

I consider this an implementation error of the feature "Border of characters".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149044] autonumbering and the action which caused it are combined into a single undo step

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149044

Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG

--- Comment #1 from Dieter  ---
I confirm the observed behaviour with

Version: 7.3.4.1 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 13668373362b52f6e3ebcaaecb031bd59a3ac66b
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB
Calc: CL

but for me it's the expected behaviour, because you've enabled autonumbering.
But it's still possible to ad a line brakt with Ctrl+Enter

=> NAB

Feel free to change i back to UNCONFIRMED with a short reasoning, if you
disagree.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149248] Feature request: Option to not hyphenate last word in a paragraph

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149248

--- Comment #10 from László Németh  ---
Created attachment 180346
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180346=edit
Select all last words by a regex to format their languages to [None] to disable
their hyphenation

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148813] Option For Where Text Insertion Point Goes After Correcting a Word

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148813

Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsUXEval
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149248] Feature request: Option to not hyphenate last word in a paragraph

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149248

--- Comment #9 from László Németh  ---
Created attachment 180345
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180345=edit
Workarounds to disable hyphenation of the last word of the paragraphs

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149248] Feature request: Option to not hyphenate last word in a paragraph

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149248

--- Comment #8 from László Németh  ---
It's easy to disable hyphenation of the last word, if you really need it, using
one of the following workarounds:

– Replace the space before the word with a line break (Shift-Enter);

– Insert Word Joiners (U+2060) by Insert→Formatting Mark→Word Joiner;

– Set language of the word to [None] in Format→Character…

See the attached test document.

To disable hyphenation of all last words, search them by using the

[^ ]*$

regex clicking on the "Find All" button, close Find and Replace, and set
language of the selected words to [None] (see the attached screenshot).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.