[Bug 158825] bug in libre

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158825

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INVALID
  Component|BASIC   |deletionRequest
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158588] Redesign font embedding options in sfx2/uiconfig/ui/documentfontspage.ui

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158588

--- Comment #16 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #15)
> I wouldn't check it by default. This should be checked when it is known the
> document will not have any major edits in the future, which would use styles
> that are not yet used in the document.   
So you save 50MB Noto fonts just in case it might be used later? Quite unlikely
that you share a document with people around the world who want to edit your
document but don't have the proper font installed. The default should be off.

> How do you know what kind of text is written in the document - currently we
> don't know this. I rather the user makes a explicit decision about this.
Why do we need the CTL/CJK/Latin options at all? Embedded should be enough.

(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #12)
> the Save/Save As... dialog didn't ask me whether I wanted to embed fonts.
I suggest to discuss the consequences of shared documents in an extra ticket.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158550] [META] Regressions from "reduce Calc's INITIALCOLCOUNT to 1"

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158550
Bug 158550 depends on bug 154044, which changed state.

Bug 154044 Summary: Undoing the first applied cell formatting only works for 
column A
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154044

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 108252] [META] Cell-related bugs and enhancements (including formatting)

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108252
Bug 108252 depends on bug 154044, which changed state.

Bug 154044 Summary: Undoing the first applied cell formatting only works for 
column A
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154044

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 105948] [META] Undo/Redo bugs and enhancements

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105948
Bug 105948 depends on bug 154044, which changed state.

Bug 154044 Summary: Undoing the first applied cell formatting only works for 
column A
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154044

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158825] New: bug in libre

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158825

Bug ID: 158825
   Summary: bug in libre
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: BASIC
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: varshaupp...@gmail.com

Description:
dhfgduyhgdusyf

Steps to Reproduce:
1.ftgrd
fcgfdy
2.tuyhtgu
3.tuyhtuty

Actual Results:
ftugyhjtu

Expected Results:
tfutfgu


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes

Additional Info:
tujtyuj

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 107450] [META] Cell and sheet protection bugs and enhancements

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107450
Bug 107450 depends on bug 136003, which changed state.

Bug 136003 Summary: PROTECT SHEET: Can't delete rows, despite of allow to 
deletes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136003

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 136003] PROTECT SHEET: Can't delete rows, despite of allow to deletes

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136003

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |me.sahilgau...@gmail.com
   |desktop.org |
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |.freedesktop.org|tion.org

--- Comment #20 from Heiko Tietze  ---
(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #19)
> Sahil committed a patch related to this issue.

...in which he amended the UNO command labels with "(for unprotected cells)".
While this is not the ultimate solution it might at least give a clue and make
user read the help.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 136003] PROTECT SHEET: Can't delete rows, despite of allow to deletes

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136003

--- Comment #19 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Sahil committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/68d074fb910de7298cbefb6a3c3e192dae201837

tdf#136003 Make Delete Rows/Columns labels more descriptive

It will be available in 24.8.0.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 136003] PROTECT SHEET: Can't delete rows, despite of allow to deletes

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136003

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||target:24.8.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158824] sahana is

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158824

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Impress |deletionRequest
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158067] Replace O(U)StringLiterals with custom O(U)String literals in code

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158067

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|varshney.devansh614@gmail.c |libreoffice-b...@lists.free
   |om  |desktop.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158612] Not able to select different border thickness

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158612

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO

--- Comment #4 from Buovjaga  ---
(In reply to marcu...@gmail.com from comment #3)
> The change in border styles was another issue I got mixed up now :-D.
> 
> Sorry
> 
> Can't these options be grouped where it is more logical to look for them
> rather than as currently the case?

Ok, if you have a proposal, we can ask the design team. Let me know what you
envision.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158824] New: sahana is

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158824

Bug ID: 158824
   Summary: sahana is
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Impress
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: asundiarch...@gmail.com

Description:
good girl

Steps to Reproduce:
1.esrft
tfghf

2.
3.

Actual Results:
tyyfgg


Expected Results:
rttuyhrj657


Reproducible: Sometimes


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
y5uy568u67kot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158822] bugs in libre

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158822

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID
  Component|Draw|deletionRequest

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158823] bugs in libra

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158823

Buovjaga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INVALID
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
  Component|Draw|deletionRequest

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158823] New: bugs in libra

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158823

Bug ID: 158823
   Summary: bugs in libra
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Draw
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: shreyachakrasal...@gmail.com

Description:
doijrtp;j

Steps to Reproduce:
1.,kaseth;
2.ldhggnzx
3.ixhgn

Actual Results:
slijgt

Expected Results:
kdh;hfg


Reproducible: Sometimes


User Profile Reset: Yes

Additional Info:
liuhargkh

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158822] New: bugs in libre

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158822

Bug ID: 158822
   Summary: bugs in libre
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Draw
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: shreyachakrasal...@gmail.com

Description:
ablisdrgthapoj

Steps to Reproduce:
1.ksaef
2.zsfg
3.soagt

Actual Results:
olshigt'pyjgfh

Expected Results:
ipht[pkgy


Reproducible: Sometimes


User Profile Reset: Yes

Additional Info:
lkdhusgjh

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156443] Windows: alt+numpad doesn't work for Unicode decimal codes, like in WordPad/Word

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156443

--- Comment #8 from Mike Kaganski  ---
(In reply to libretist from comment #7)

The proposal here is based on the status *prior* to bug 158112. You may recall,
that you wrote bug 158786 as a "regression": before the assignment of
Alt+Number to sidebar panels, you could normally use the ALT+168 combination,
and get what you expected.

As explained in comment 0, the *combinations starting with 0 or greater than
255* weren't processed correctly. Values below 256 were processed using Windows
WM_CHAR message, which contains a resulting character value, but only
truncated. So the whole text there discussed how to enable *also* greater
values.

Then comment 3 (not mine) could confuse people, because it suggested this
proposal as a "solution" to bug 158112 (which is it not, and can't be). As you
noted in bug 158112 comment 22, even Alt+single_digit is a useful special
character combination.

But in any case, before writing things like "Many characters ... are not
handled by your method", one needs to make sure they understand what they
object to.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158821] bugs in libra

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158821

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|BASIC   |deletionRequest

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158821] bugs in libra

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158821

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158820] bugs in Libreoffice

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158820

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Writer  |deletionRequest

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158820] bugs in Libreoffice

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158820

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INVALID
 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158821] New: bugs in libra

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158821

Bug ID: 158821
   Summary: bugs in libra
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: BASIC
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: varshauppa...@gmail.com

Description:
shdfgjkasjdhf

Steps to Reproduce:
1.ydgqwerh
2.adgjh
3.jahsdk

Actual Results:
aswfgjkfg

Expected Results:
sjdhfbajh


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes

Additional Info:
vfasmjhvf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158820] New: bugs in Libreoffice

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158820

Bug ID: 158820
   Summary: bugs in Libreoffice
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: halya...@gmail.com

Description:
Libreoffice has got bug

Steps to Reproduce:
1.libroffice
2.writer
3.

Actual Results:
libreoffice

Expected Results:
ufye8yr4e


Reproducible: Sometimes


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
54ry6i8o

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158067] Replace O(U)StringLiterals with custom O(U)String literals in code

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158067

Devansh Varshney  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |varshney.devansh614@gmail.c
   |desktop.org |om

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 105526] Allow interactions for different events such as mouse over

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105526

--- Comment #9 from Kandra Johns  ---
Enabling interactions like mouse over adds dynamic engagement to websites,
enhancing user experience. Such features contribute to a more immersive
environment, especially in online gaming. For instance, in the context of
online casinos, it could elevate the gaming experience. If you're interested in
exploring 5 euro deposit online casinos in Finland, check out
https://casino358.com/minimitalletus/5-euron/ for valuable information. It's a
great way to discover affordable and accessible gaming opportunities.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158819] Sorting by 2 columns doesn't sort properly

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158819

Daniel DeLorme  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Daniel DeLorme  ---
Please ignore, I finally noticed that each line of column N had a reference to
one line below (N5 has ref to H6), rendering the sort unstable. orz

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158819] New: Sorting by 2 columns doesn't sort properly

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158819

Bug ID: 158819
   Summary: Sorting by 2 columns doesn't sort properly
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.3.7.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: dan...@dan42.com

Created attachment 191556
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191556=edit
ods spreadsheet with sorting bug

See attached spreadsheet.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Select the data (A2:P33)
2. Data > Sort...
3. sort key 1: column A
4. sort key 2: column B
5. click "ok"

Result:
The data is not sorted in the expected order.
Every time I repeat the steps above, I get a different (apparently random)
order in column B.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158588] Redesign font embedding options in sfx2/uiconfig/ui/documentfontspage.ui

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158588

--- Comment #15 from Tomaz Vajngerl  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #13)
> To tackle the problem we suggest to check the "only used fonts" option by
> default and disable it until the first "do embed fonts" option is active.

I wouldn't check it by default. This should be checked when it is known the
document will not have any major edits in the future, which would use styles
that are not yet used in the document.   

> Furthermore it could make sense to check the script types depending on what
> is set under tools > options > language. So far unchecking CTL/CJK has no
> effect on the font embedding options (remains available and checked).

That probably makes sense, but I can still write Japanese in the document even
when I don't have "Asian" enabled in the settings. 

> However, if the document contains no CJK text it makes not much sense to
> embed such fonts - and we wonder if those options make sense.

How do you know what kind of text is written in the document - currently we
don't know this. I rather the user makes a explicit decision about this.

BTW. CJK and Complex will not have much effect unless you actually use a font
that extensively supports CJK and Complex. For example use Noto Sans - the
numbers I get in this case are (and I have no CJK or Complex language support
enabled):

Default: 9.4kB
Embedded: 52.4MB
Embedded, "only used": 31.7MB
Embedded, "only used", only Latin: 1.5MB

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158482] Must not produce 3D surfaces which are opaque on one side and transparent on other side

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158482

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158423] CppunitTest_unoxml_domtest failing with libxml-2.12

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158423

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158816] Dependence on ~/Documents

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158816

--- Comment #8 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 155458] LibreOffice Writer goes into a loop saving document while doing autosave

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155458

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear plaldridgester,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 155445] Wrong XHTML Footnotes/Endnotes IDs

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155445

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear JI,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103182] [META] GTK3-specific bugs

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
Bug 103182 depends on bug 153828, which changed state.

Bug 153828 Summary: Lagging with GTK
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153828

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 153828] Lagging with GTK

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153828

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Gerald,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156043] Crash in: _chkstk

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156043

--- Comment #2 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Greg Skyles,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 98064] Copying rich text HTTP Link does not Ampersand character in URL properly

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98064

--- Comment #13 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear ka,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156044] Spacing dialog does not appear on click when in compressed/dropdown toolbar

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156044

--- Comment #2 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Amy,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 63347] FILEOPEN: missing graphic in RTF file

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63347

--- Comment #20 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Mike,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 146035] Output to HTML: error: reference source not found

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146035

--- Comment #2 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear achim,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 146034] Output to HTML: confusing filenames after confirmation to overwrite existing one

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146034

--- Comment #2 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear achim,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 145798] Separator between Math preview space and control space too small

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145798

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Thorsten Wagner,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 129498] EDITING: Last row of table in Impress slide is not drawn correctly after multiple-undo and multiple-redo

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129498

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Stepas Toliautas,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 126128] Impress Page Setup dialog with a resolution of 1366 x 768 requires a lot of scrolling

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126128

--- Comment #24 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Gülşah Köse,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 107840] Above paragraph spacing not affecting first text line in textbox

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107840

--- Comment #17 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired),

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 121366] Export to PDF creates non-functional hyperlinks when used in frame attached to header/footer

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121366

--- Comment #14 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Alexander Graf,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158818] New: same style eats list ordinals' border box

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158818

Bug ID: 158818
   Summary: same style eats list ordinals' border box
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.6.4.1 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: s...@wolke7.net

Description:
When the first character after a list ordinal has the same style as the list
ordinal, the list ordinal's border box disappears.

It's hard to understand without seeing images. So please have a look at the
screenshots here:
https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/strange-bug-in-libreoffice-writer-same-color-eats-borders/99735

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a list
2. style the list so that the list ordinals have a border box
3. also assign a custom style to the list ordinal, e.g. bold + blue color
   (I don't know if step 3 is a requirement, but that's my test case, so I
mention it to be safe)
4. now assign the same style to the adjacent text (including the first
character after the ordinal - this is key, because if the first character does
not have the same style, the bug does not occur)

Actual Results:
the list ordinal's border box disappears

Expected Results:
the list ordinal's border box should not disappear


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Version: 7.6.4.1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: e19e193f88cd6c0525a17fb7a176ed8e6a3e2aa1
CPU threads: 1; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 16299; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158588] Redesign font embedding options in sfx2/uiconfig/ui/documentfontspage.ui

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158588

--- Comment #14 from Tomaz Vajngerl  ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #12)
> First, I don't see why it's legitimate, that an editor whose native format
> is ODT would make changes to an opened ODT which is saved with no user
> actions. The input ODT is just fine as an output ODT.

No idea what you're trying to say here.

> Second - the Save/Save As... dialog didn't ask me whether I wanted to embed
> fonts. Who told LO I was willing to embed _any_ fonts? I sure didn't! At the
> very least it should let me get to another dialog where that setting is
> present - if not outright have it in the Save dialog. I get asked about PGP
> encryption but not about font embedding; why?

True, I agree you should be able to review and change the settings from the
"save as" dialog, not just font embedding, but various other properties as well
like document descriptions, author, purge statistics, document signing,... 

> Third, how come the choice of whether or not to embed fonts is a property of
> the document? I mean, it can tell me whether it _has_ embedded fonts, but
> how can another person's document hold a preference of mine? This is weird.
> Does the ODF mandate this?

Because to embed fonts is a decision that needs to be done for each document
depending on the use case and font copyright situation, and removing the
embedded fonts choice is also something that needs to be explicit because it
can have document structure implications.

For example: 
- The document you use will always only be read and edited by you - no need to
embed fonts. 

- Next document you will want that share so you want it to preserves the
structure for others because there is a good chance that the fonts you're using
they don't have - you select to embed fonts. 

- You get a document with embedded fonts, but you don't have the fonts
installed on your computer and open the document, the structure of the document
will be correct. Then you change the document and save it - the document will
still have the embedded fonts - next time you open the document it will still
display correctly. If this wouldn't be per-document choice, this use-case would
fail silently.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158816] Dependence on ~/Documents

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158816

--- Comment #7 from gra...@harris.net.nz ---
Created attachment 191555
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191555=edit
Menu; Edit; Links to external files

This is what I see when I go to Edit; Links to external files.

In each case only the file name is shown in the list but when expanded below
the /home/graham/Documents/ is prepended.

If I 'Break Link' on one of the external files, then save and exit, when I
re-open the file then I am not prompted regarding that file any more (as
expected).

And the data in the column which is supplied by the file of the same name in
the current directory (same as the 'master' spreadsheet) is still there in the
master, so clearly it is coming from the correct sub-sheet, not the phantom in
/home/graham/Documents/ 

So for me, I can resolve this issue just by breaking all the links, and I knew
that. I am just bringing this up as a bug so that no-one in future needs to go
through the troubleshooting exercise.

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158612] Not able to select different border thickness

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158612

--- Comment #3 from marcu...@gmail.com  ---
The change in border styles was another issue I got mixed up now :-D.

Sorry

Can't these options be grouped where it is more logical to look for them rather
than as currently the case?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158612] Not able to select different border thickness

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158612

marcu...@gmail.com  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|INVALID |---
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from marcu...@gmail.com  ---
This is not what I wanted to see. I was not after changing a particular cell's
properties. 

The difficulty I have is seeing where I am on a sheet. I have to click a cell
as a starting point and that cell is barely discernibly different from
neighbouring cells. If one moves to a different cell, eg using arrow keys,
there is nothing that is very visible to show the movements across the sheet.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158816] Dependence on ~/Documents

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158816

--- Comment #6 from m.a.riosv  ---
Maybe, but you can go Menu/Edit/Link to external data - Select Modify and
selecting again the file.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158816] Dependence on ~/Documents

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158816

--- Comment #5 from gra...@harris.net.nz ---
Thanks for giving this some attention.

I have checkmarks next to both "Save URLs relative to filesystem" and "Save
URLs relative to internet", and I have certainly saved the file since that was
set. 

It is possible that I first saved the file with that not set, but I have no way
to go back and check.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158817] 保存格式问题

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158817

m.a.riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv  ---
Please use English in this site, is the language here.

What if you save in Word-2007(*.docx) file type, that you can select in save as
window.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158816] Dependence on ~/Documents

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158816

m.a.riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #4 from m.a.riosv  ---
Test if it is related to:
Menu/Tools/Options/Load/General - Save URLs relative to file system.
Maybe you have save the file with the option disable.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158815] After downloading the latest LibreOffice update, the .msi file wouldn't open to install

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158815

m.a.riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv  ---
No issue for me to download and open the msi file on Win11.

What browser do you use to download.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158812] Writer freezes for 40 seconds when pasting contents from a web page

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158812

m.a.riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #2 from m.a.riosv  ---
But the website seems heavy to load, at least 10 seconds on my computer.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158811] The title is cut - popup to create a new database

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158811

m.a.riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #2 from m.a.riosv  ---
Reproducible
Version: 24.2.0.0.beta1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 5f390384195b7264c6e52add9e90a39790285249
CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22631; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: fr-FR Calc: CL threaded

But at least you can make wider the window.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 42030] UI: Page Preview Bar scaling slider function unclear

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42030

Sahil Gautam  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158817] New: 保存格式问题

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158817

Bug ID: 158817
   Summary: 保存格式问题
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.6.4.1 release
  Hardware: All
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: rongshuy...@qq.com

Description:
保存为word 2010-365 格式后,不能用word 2007打开此文件。另外,如果保存为ODF文件,用word
2007打开此文件也会报错。我使用的操作系统是win 7.

Actual Results:
无法打开此文件,因为内容有错误。

Expected Results:
无法打开此文件,因为内容有错误。


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
[Information automatically included from LibreOffice]
Locale: zh-CN
Module: TextDocument
[Information guessed from browser]
OS: Windows (All)
OS is 64bit: no

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158814] FILEOPEN DOCX RTF Empty header with formatted paragraph and shape appears

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158814

Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||9292

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 149292] FILEOPEN DOCX First page style not applied to table-in-table

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149292

Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
   ||8814

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157961] Sheet tab selection area UI direction flipped based on sheet direction

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157961

--- Comment #10 from ady  ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #9)

> although I think
> that people will get used to sheet tabs just following the UI direction,
> soon enough, 

That is not a realistic assumption for some users, IMO.

If an old user has dozens of workbooks built a decade (or 2 or 3) ago, they
were built with the consideration of the old behavior. And old users adapted
their own workflow to the behavior that was available back then, for decades.

It is possible that, for new workbooks, the new behavior will be adopted by old
users. Or maybe not, because muscle memory and old habits are hard to forget.

Is the old worksheet tab “jumping” behavior preferable? Probably not, but after
decades, forcing a new behavior on everyone is not going to be welcome, as
proven already in recent reports. Both alternatives should be offered; old
“jumping worksheet tab” behavior, and UI-locale-dependent behavior.

Unfortunately, RTL issues keep piling up faster than they are solved, for
decades now.

There are several items that cannot be really considered one by one, but as a
whole (also proven by recent attempts to solve the problem, only to anger users
that do not agree on what the adequate desired behavior should be).

* Location of the worksheet tab according to RTL worksheet setting, or IOW the
old "jumping" tab when the worksheet is changed from RTL to LTR or vice versa.

* Location of the worksheet tab according to UI RTL or UI LTR; no "jumping"
worksheet tab.

* Behavior of the action of introducing a new worksheet tab; where the new tab
will be located?, will it be RTL or LTR?, dependent on what?, what other
default settings should users expect regarding the new worksheet and within it,
and depending on which settings?

* Location (right or left) of Column A, or IOW "direction" of the columns in
the Column header from Column A, B, C, and up.

* Location of the Row header (which should always cross the Column header
wherever the "origin/zero" point would be, near Column A, whichever the
location of Column A would be).

* Text direction (RTL or LTR) within the cells is another thing; let's not mix.

* Text direction within the worksheet tab itself (worksheet name, e.g "Sheet2"
in English) is another thing; let's not mix.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158816] Dependence on ~/Documents

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158816

--- Comment #3 from gra...@harris.net.nz ---
Tools; Options; LibreOffice; Paths, My Documents is set to
/home/graham/Documents

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158816] Dependence on ~/Documents

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158816

--- Comment #2 from gra...@harris.net.nz ---
Created attachment 191554
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191554=edit
one of the subsidiary spreadsheets on the same directory as the master

This data shows up in the master spreadsheet Sheet1 column F.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158816] Dependence on ~/Documents

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158816

gra...@harris.net.nz changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||gra...@harris.net.nz

--- Comment #1 from gra...@harris.net.nz ---
Created attachment 191553
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191553=edit
master spreadsheet demonstrating the problem

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158816] New: Dependence on ~/Documents

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158816

Bug ID: 158816
   Summary: Dependence on ~/Documents
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.6.4.1 release
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: gra...@harris.net.nz

Description:
I have a 'master' spreadsheet which aggregates data from a lot of other
spreadsheets in the same directory. When I open this 'master' spreadsheet it
errors once per external file referenced: 
"The following external file could not be loaded. Data linked from this file
did not get updated. 
file://home/graham/Documents/solarview+2023+killigray-elevation-60-azimuth-60W-table_mhr-monthly.ods"

Once the 'master' is open there is no apparent missing data. There are no files
in /home/graham/Documents/, I almost never use it. All the files referenced are
actually in the same directory as the 'master' ie
/home/graham/projects/killigray/energy/insolation/ and seem to actually get
loaded OK. I search in the 'master' for Documents in All sheets, Documents is
not found in either Value or Formulas. 
So I conclude there is some hard coded dependence on /home/$USER/Documents/ 

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open attached spreadsheet. 
2.Witness error dialogs
3.

Actual Results:
Error dialogs as described. 
This is not resolved by re-saving the file. 

Expected Results:
None of these error dialogs should have been displayed- there are no actual
errors affecting the data load.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes

Additional Info:
The subsidiary files to load are identified by formulae which create their
filenames (with no path) from hard-coded values in Sheet1 like:
="solarview+2023+killigray-elevation-60-azimuth-"&"-table_mhr-monthly"
If I change the formula to
="./solarview+2023+killigray-elevation-60-azimuth-"&"-table_mhr-monthly"
then the same errors still occur on loading the master spreadsheet but it
actually cannot load the subsidiary spreadheets from the current directory. 

In Safe mode the 'master' sheet does not load all subsidiary sheets
automatically, instead "Security Warning Automatic update of external links has
been disabled.". When I click Allow updating the problem as described above is
replicated.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158815] New: After downloading the latest LibreOffice update, the .msi file wouldn't open to install

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158815

Bug ID: 158815
   Summary: After downloading the latest LibreOffice update, the
.msi file wouldn't open to install
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.6.4.1 release
  Hardware: All
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Installation
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: snoopy198...@gmail.com

Description:
After downloading the latest LibreOffice update for Windows 10 x64, the .msi
file wouldn't open to install. An error would pop up stating: "The installation
package could not be opened. Contact the application vendor to verify that this
is a valid Windows Installer package."

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Have windows 10 with libreoffice 7.5.3.2 installed
2.download the .msi from
"https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download-libreoffice/;
3.and simply double click the .msi file to install it.

Actual Results:
I get an error message telling me: "The installation package could not be
opened. Contact the application vendor to verify that this is a valid Windows
Installer package."

Expected Results:
The installer should have popped up and allowed me to install/update my current
installation.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Resetting the UserProfile shouldn't have any relation to the .msi file
installing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 114441] Convert use of sal_uLong to better integer types

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114441

--- Comment #77 from Commit Notification 
 ---
t-aswath committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/a2cd681369061574974517b1aabf78613f5601b7

tdf#114441 - Convert use of sal_uLong to better integer types

It will be available in 24.8.0.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 114441] Convert use of sal_uLong to better integer types

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114441

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|target:6.1.0 target:6.2.0   |target:6.1.0 target:6.2.0
   |target:6.3.0 target:6.4.0   |target:6.3.0 target:6.4.0
   |target:6.5.0 target:7.0.0   |target:6.5.0 target:7.0.0
   |target:7.2.0 target:7.3.0   |target:7.2.0 target:7.3.0
   |target:7.4.0 target:7.5.0   |target:7.4.0 target:7.5.0
   |target:7.6.0 reviewed:2023  |target:7.6.0 reviewed:2023
   |target:24.2.0   |target:24.2.0 target:24.8.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 100584] With an RTL sheet, make added sheets RTL as well

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100584

--- Comment #34 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Andreas Heinisch committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-24-2":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/a735f64391b5c194b38cacb577f14ef60556bcbc

Revert "tdf#100584, tdf#157784 - Arrange sheets depending on the RTL settings"

It will be available in 24.2.0.2.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 100584] With an RTL sheet, make added sheets RTL as well

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100584

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|target:7.6.0 target:24.2.0  |target:7.6.0 target:24.2.0
   |target:7.6.3 target:24.8.0  |target:7.6.3 target:24.8.0
   ||target:24.2.0.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 100584] With an RTL sheet, make added sheets RTL as well

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100584

--- Comment #33 from ady  ---
(In reply to Andreas Heinisch from comment #30)
> Should we revert this fix? This causes to many regressions. Let the sheets
> jump around.
> 

bug 157961
bug 158552
bug 158768

This may sound rude to some readers; please don't take it like that, as it is
not my intention.

If anyone cares to actually carefully read those reports, all those
consequences were already foreseen and mentioned before, more than once.

The solution is to actually pay attention to what users are reporting.

The Row header and the worksheet tab have been "jumping" for too long. Some old
users might already be used to it and even might take advantage of it. But that
is because there was no better behavior for such a long time. So users shrug
and adapt (but are not happy with the situation).

So, in that regard, the solution *for the worksheet tab* is to provide 2
alternatives for users to choose from: A)leave the old "jumping" behavior, or
B)set the side according to UI locale (RTL or LTR).

And what about the Row header? Whichever the location of the first column
(Column A), the vertical Row header should always cross the horizontal Column
header on the "origin, zero". Whichever the side that "zero" would be.

The patch in comment 25 attempted to put the worksheet tab according to UI RTL
or UI LTR, but screwed up the Row header crossing point!

Hopefully this comment will be (carefully) read, with the same sincere and
thankful spirit I have when attempting to convey the problemS with these RTL
issues. Let's see if we can start over in Bug 157961.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158814] FILEOPEN DOCX RTF Empty header with formatted paragraph and shape appears

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158814

--- Comment #2 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)  ---
Created attachment 191552
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191552=edit
Same example in doc format, this is / was always good

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158814] FILEOPEN DOCX RTF Empty header with formatted paragraph and shape appears

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158814

--- Comment #1 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)  ---
Created attachment 191551
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191551=edit
The docx example file in Word 2016 and Writer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 113423] [META] RTF (text) header and footer-related issues

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113423

Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||158814


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158814
[Bug 158814] FILEOPEN DOCX RTF Empty header with formatted paragraph and shape
appears
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 81942] FILEOPEN: RTF numbering point style not retained

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81942

Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
   ||8814

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 104522] [META] DOCX (OOXML) header & footer-related issues

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104522

Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||158814


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158814
[Bug 158814] FILEOPEN DOCX RTF Empty header with formatted paragraph and shape
appears
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158814] New: FILEOPEN DOCX RTF Empty header with formatted paragraph and shape appears

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158814

Bug ID: 158814
   Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX RTF Empty header with formatted
paragraph and shape appears
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 5.0.0.5 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Keywords: bibisected, bisected, regression
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: kelem...@ubuntu.com
Blocks: 104522, 113423

Created attachment 191550
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191550=edit
The example file saved as docx

attachment 191548 is an RTF file with only a formatted paragraph and drawing
shape (line) in the header.
Word hides this, but in Writer it's enabled, changing document layout.
Also happens if the document is converted to docx format.

1. Open attachment 191548 or the attached docx version
-> page header is enabled, showing a line and a lot of spacing between the top
of the page and the document body.

Screenshot is attachment 191549

Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 2eb428a8890dda29fbdc8b639fc1377080fab59f
CPU threads: 15; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: hu-HU (hu_HU); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

This seems to have started in 5.0 (for both docx/rtf), before it was good for
both RTF/DOCX. Still good in doc: there the header is not enabled.

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=17e51f427b3f0cec74ac8e0a1b3f51189006ae6f

author  Miklos Vajna   2014-11-21 17:41:24 +0100
committer   Miklos Vajna   2014-11-21 18:10:59
+0100
commit  17e51f427b3f0cec74ac8e0a1b3f51189006ae6f (patch)

DOCX import: first page header should always set default headers as well


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104522
[Bug 104522] [META] DOCX (OOXML) header & footer-related issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113423
[Bug 113423] [META] RTF (text) header and footer-related issues
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156443] Windows: alt+numpad doesn't work for Unicode decimal codes, like in WordPad/Word

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156443

--- Comment #7 from libretist  ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #6)
> (In reply to libretist from comment #5)
> 
> Do you really understand what this issue is about? The non-Unicode (lower
> numbers) codes were already working using the normal WM_CHAR method ("as
> before"). Please avoid commenting without understanding the technical
> background.

That's funny. One doesn't know what one doesn't know.
Of course I thought I understood your suggestion.
Otherwise I wouldn't have commented, obviously.

But if I got something wrong, please explain why/what. Thank you.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157961] Sheet tab selection area UI direction flipped based on sheet direction

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157961

--- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to William Friedman from comment #8)

I obviously agree with William regarding the default.

I don't mind whether this is made configurable or not - although I think that
people will get used to sheet tabs just following the UI direction, soon
enough, and may not really want to switch to the current behavior. But this is
speculation on my part.

If the option of a dialog popping up is chosen, I would like to be able to
configure it so that it will never come up (i.e. always stick with what I've
chosen as default). I don't have a strong opinion about whether having such a
dialog is a good idea or not. Maybe it depends on how intrusive it would
actually be. Perhaps it could be something like a small bubble popping up next
to the sheet tabs rather than a full-blown dialog? I wonder.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 34850] incorrect positioning when dragging newly-created frame (editing formatting ui)

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34850

--- Comment #17 from Lawrence D'Oliveiro  
---
Bug reconfirmed, LibreOffice version Version: 7.5.9.1 on Debian Unstable AMD64.

Same time next year, then?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157961] Sheet tab selection area UI direction flipped based on sheet direction

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157961

--- Comment #8 from William Friedman  ---
I wrote a long comment for bug 157784, but in the interim the bug/regression
was solved by (thankfully!) reverting the problematic patch. 

The issue of the ordering of the sheet tabs remains, however. Since, like
Mahmoud there, I use an LTR interface but work very frequently with RTL-only
and mixed LTR/RTL spreadsheets, I figured an additional opinion might be of
use.

The simplest and most elegant solution, IMO, would be to make this aspect of
the UI easily configurable, e.g., an option could be added, e.g., under "View"
there could be an option "Display Sheet Order" with two radio buttons "LTR" and
"RTL."

The default behavior could follow the user interface unless this option is
changed, although I can imagine two other solutions: 

1) Follow the directionality of the majority of the sheets (this fails if there
are an equal number of LTR and RTL sheets); 

2) The first time a sheet of different directionality than the UI is created, a
pop up could appear: "Switch direction of sheet order?" (A similar pop up could
also deal with the failure case of option 1.)

(Regarding Mahmoud's larger complaints about UI tinkering, I am reminded of the
lengthy discussion in bug 155494 regarding a change in cursor behavior that
many of those commenting thought was poorly-considered. Perhaps there needs to
be a "public comment" system for proposed UI changes in which users could give
their input and vote.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 129661] [META] Right-To-Left (RTL) user interface issues

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129661
Bug 129661 depends on bug 158552, which changed state.

Bug 158552 Summary: In Calc, (ver 7.6.3 and newer) the position of row header 
is on the left instead of the right for RTL sheets, which makes it harder to 
keep focus on the row number
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158552

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158552] In Calc, (ver 7.6.3 and newer) the position of row header is on the left instead of the right for RTL sheets, which makes it harder to keep focus on the row number

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158552

Andreas Heinisch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Heinisch  ---
Fix for tdf#100584 has been reverted. Should be the same now as before the
patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 129661] [META] Right-To-Left (RTL) user interface issues

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129661
Bug 129661 depends on bug 158768, which changed state.

Bug 158768 Summary: Frozen columns in an RTL worksheet transported to its left 
side
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158768

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158768] Frozen columns in an RTL worksheet transported to its left side

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158768

Andreas Heinisch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Andreas Heinisch  ---
Fix for tdf#100584 has been reverted. Should be the same now as before the
patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 129661] [META] Right-To-Left (RTL) user interface issues

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129661
Bug 129661 depends on bug 157784, which changed state.

Bug 157784 Summary: In libreoffice calc, the names of the sheets are displayed 
in opposite direction now, which is annoying.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157784

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 100584] With an RTL sheet, make added sheets RTL as well

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100584

Andreas Heinisch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|andreas.heini...@yahoo.de   |libreoffice-b...@lists.free
   ||desktop.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 81942] FILEOPEN: RTF numbering point style not retained

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81942

--- Comment #11 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)  ---
Created attachment 191549
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191549=edit
Screenshot of the colored bullet issue

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 81942] FILEOPEN: RTF numbering point style not retained

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81942

--- Comment #10 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)  ---
Created attachment 191548
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191548=edit
Minimal example file for the colored bullet symbol issue

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 111942] [META] User locale bugs and enhancements

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111942
Bug 111942 depends on bug 100584, which changed state.

Bug 100584 Summary: With an RTL sheet, make added sheets RTL as well
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100584

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|NEW
 Resolution|FIXED   |---

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 129661] [META] Right-To-Left (RTL) user interface issues

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129661
Bug 129661 depends on bug 100584, which changed state.

Bug 100584 Summary: With an RTL sheet, make added sheets RTL as well
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100584

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|NEW
 Resolution|FIXED   |---

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 108912] [META] Sheet-level bugs and enhancements

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108912
Bug 108912 depends on bug 100584, which changed state.

Bug 100584 Summary: With an RTL sheet, make added sheets RTL as well
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100584

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|NEW
 Resolution|FIXED   |---

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158554] Semaphore files are not deleted when in use path longer than 200 characters or shorter path with long file name

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158554

--- Comment #10 from edg  ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #9)
> You don't happen to have any anti-virus software running that could meddle
> with the lock files?

No AV at all.

The lock files

Ex. .~lock.2023-12-21 - File not removed demonstration.odt#

are normally created with the exact filename of the document but then they must
be manually removed from the directory because closing LO application (in this
case Writer) the temporary files remains in the folder.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158768] Frozen columns in an RTL worksheet transported to its left side

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158768

raal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||r...@post.cz
  Regression By||Andreas Heinisch
   Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected

--- Comment #5 from raal  ---
This seems to have begun at the below commit in bibisect repository/OS .
Adding Cc: to Andreas Heinisch ; Could you possibly take a look at this one?
Thanks

d57251113ba61e450f1a72f7165fba98edf70e0f is the first bad commit
commit d57251113ba61e450f1a72f7165fba98edf70e0f
Author: Jenkins Build User 
Date:   Wed Nov 1 06:07:17 2023 +0100

source sha:7a062cdd9b91c577b2296bfe1f81ea78e0b75168

158696: tdf#100584, tdf#157784 - Arrange sheets depending on the RTL settings |
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/158696

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158499] Crash in: SwHTMLParser::SetAnchorAndAdjustment(short,short,SfxItemSet &,bool)

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158499

--- Comment #9 from Don Busch  ---
Good to know it wasn't me doing something stoopid. I might have, but others
have had somewhat similar problems; so it is not ONLY this keyboard driver.

I do Thank y'all for bettering LO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158680] Leading space if using variables

2023-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158680

BogdanB  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
   ||g
 Blocks||129294


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129294
[Bug 129294] [META] Variable field bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  1   2   3   >