[Bug 161055] New: Editing Docx Image shifts to and sticks to righthand margin when moved
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161055 Bug ID: 161055 Summary: Editing Docx Image shifts to and sticks to righthand margin when moved Product: LibreOffice Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: saywel...@gmail.com Created attachment 194098 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194098=edit The right hand image jumps to margin when moved In the attached .docx, if I touch the right hand image with the mouse, the image jumps to the right hand margin and can only be put back by setting the position in the Properties dialogue. Expected behaviour: the image can be dragged and placed in a new location and stay where it is placed. Issue arose in https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/positioning-images-of-different-sizes-and-shapes-side-by-side-and-setting-default-text-padding-to-0-2cm/105752/4 UnstableImages.docx created in Word 2010 for this report following this question: "Every time I add the second image to the right of another image it snaps to the right edge of the page." Same behaviour seen in 6.4.7.2 Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22631; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-NZ (en_NZ); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160846] Flathub Libreoffice (24.2.2.2) Failed to open display terminal message. Crashes seconds later
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160846 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org --- Comment #2 from Buovjaga --- Is there a reason why this is not reported to https://github.com/flathub/org.libreoffice.LibreOffice/issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160824] Print dialogue's "Number of copies" field is scrollable and focused by default, leading to excess copies being printed on accident
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160824 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Print dialogue's "Number of |Print dialogue's "Number of |copies" field is scrollable |copies" field is scrollable |and focus by default, |and focused by default, |leading to excess copies|leading to excess copies |being printed on accident |being printed on accident -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 103309] [META] Print dialog bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103309 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160824 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160824 [Bug 160824] Print dialogue's "Number of copies" field is scrollable and focus by default, leading to excess copies being printed on accident -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160824] Print dialogue's "Number of copies" field is scrollable and focus by default, leading to excess copies being printed on accident
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160824 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Draw|UI CC||caolan.mcnamara@collabora.c ||om, ||heiko.tietze@documentfounda ||tion.org, ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Blocks||103309 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| OS|Windows (All) |All Ever confirmed|0 |1 Version|24.2.2.2 release|7.2.0.4 release Summary|Print dialogue box is |Print dialogue's "Number of |scrollable for number of|copies" field is scrollable |copies leading to excess|and focus by default, |copies being printed on |leading to excess copies |accident|being printed on accident --- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I agree that it can lead to very problematic results, and I doubt anyone relies on the scrollability of this field to assign a value (too fiddly when we know exactly what value we want to assign). This kind of interaction might make sense for e.g. a value that auto-updates a preview (e.g. in the Character dialog), but not here. gtk3 VCL plugin does not allow changing the value by mouse scroll. gen and kf5 do, even with the pointer outside of the field, which is focused by default, as MT said. Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: ad1f0bdeac30fca1dc56a08803ef23f2aca4db05 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: x11 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded Also in 7.2.0.4. In 7.1.0.3, the field was not focused when opening the dialog, so it was less of a problem. Heiko, Caolán, thoughts? Are there other examples of making such a spinbox "unscrollable"? Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103309 [Bug 103309] [META] Print dialog bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161043] CALC Error in SUBTOTAL(9;range) when the source values are minutes and seconds exceeding 60 minutes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161043 Colin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161048] Background processes are left opened by LO Dev Start Center on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161048 --- Comment #9 from Mike Kaganski --- See also: https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/exit-lo-windows/93863 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160849] [UI]Shortcut Key Ctrl+F6 is not listed in Tools>Customize, tab Keyboard
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160849 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161053] the distance between first and second lines in paragraphs is smaller than others
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161053 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bibisectRequest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160834] Unclear meaning of "Ignore pieces of length"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160834 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 158210] Slide background transparency lost
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158210 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear mkhemlock, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160850] Gender mismatch in Draw status bar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160850 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 158214] picture resizing problem in LibreOffice write mode
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158214 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear Piet Wierenga, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 155269] Chapter numbering mech silently changes para style numeric outline-level
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155269 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 158208] crashed when I tried to save to email
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158208 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear sk8elote, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 142261] [EMF/EMF+] SetMiterLimit support
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142261 --- Comment #10 from QA Administrators --- Dear Valek Filippov, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 140411] Calc constantly re-calculating (bug in the sheet?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140411 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear Dan, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 158207] Crash in: SwRangeRedline::MoveFromSection(unsigned __int64)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158207 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear whawn, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 141317] Screenreaders not announcing focus switch between frames (see comment 3)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141317 --- Comment #9 from QA Administrators --- Dear juergenkohler23, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 146494] Inserting LibreOffice OLE objects in other applications fail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146494 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear Hossein, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 132578] Page wrap confused if page wrapping is on and another image is anchored as character
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132578 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 138634] Impress slide show pauses when using another LibreOffice application (except Base)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138634 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Jayman, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 119887] DOC: Vertical spacing not properly applied in the paragraph, moves one more line to second page in LO compared to MSO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119887 --- Comment #12 from QA Administrators --- Dear Patrick Jaap, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161054] New: ODT: incorrect size of empty lines in a text box
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161054 Bug ID: 161054 Summary: ODT: incorrect size of empty lines in a text box Product: LibreOffice Version: 24.8.0.0 alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: mikekagan...@hotmail.com Created attachment 194097 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194097=edit A text box with directly set font size, with an empty line The same problem as in bug 161023, but in ODT files: empty lines in a text box, where font size was set directly, lose that size, and revert to the default size, changing vertical size of the shape. In the attachment, put cursor into the text box, and check font size of each of the three lines. In 24.2.0, it shows font size 10 in all three. In current master, it shows 18 in the second (empty) line, making the overall height larger. Regression after commit 69ed893087f89d176a5ec4b263ce8d75774be72b (tdf#160253: fix list identifier export decision code, 2024-04-24). The fix for bug 161023 only fixed this problem in non-text documents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161048] Background processes are left opened by LO Dev Start Center on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161048 --- Comment #8 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #6) > Despite being an alpha+, not yet beta, I do see significant writes into > Windows registry. Note that writing to registry in this case is likely related to the Windows Installer service operation itself (e.g., its uninstall logging), not to the registry settings that LibreOffice MSI has in it (registration of explorer extensions, file type associations, and so on). ady, can you please: 1. Check which command line is reported in Windows Task Manager for the leftover process? You might need to enable "Command line" column in Details tab for that. The command line may be long. 2. Use https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/How_to_get_a_backtrace_with_WinDbg#Producing_a_mini_dump to produce a minidump of the leftover BIN process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 105582] [META] Function wizard dialog bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105582 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160835 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160835 [Bug 160835] Unclear meaning of "a basic total population" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160835] Unclear meaning of "a basic total population"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160835 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||105582 Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo Priority|medium |low Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com ||, ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Severity|normal |minor --- Comment #7 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Rafael, what do you think? I feel like this could be simplified to just "population". The string exists in OOo 3.3, but doesn't mean anything to me either, and an online search seems to confirms that it does not have any special meaning in stats. Elsewhere: - MS Excel uses "a sample of a population"[1][2]. - Google Docs only says it's a sample without having to mention "from a population". (Only uses "population" to refer to other functions that consider the whole population instead of a sample.)[2] [1]: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/stdeva-function-5ff3-7ea5-48de-9a6d-11ed73b29e9d [2]: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/vara-function-3de77469-fa3a-47b4-85fd-81758a1e1d07 [3]: https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3094055 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105582 [Bug 105582] [META] Function wizard dialog bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 153293] [META] Dark Mode bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153293 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160829 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160829 [Bug 160829] checkbox state ticked / unticked poorly visible in dark mode (Breeze icon theme) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 118017] [META] macOS Dark Mode bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118017 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|160829 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160829 [Bug 160829] checkbox state ticked / unticked poorly visible in dark mode (Breeze icon theme) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 107139] [META] Breeze icons
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107139 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160829 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160829 [Bug 160829] checkbox state ticked / unticked poorly visible in dark mode (Breeze icon theme) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160829] checkbox state ticked / unticked poorly visible in dark mode (Breeze icon theme)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160829 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|checkbox state ticked / |checkbox state ticked / |unticked poorly visible in |unticked poorly visible in |dark mode |dark mode (Breeze icon ||theme) Blocks|118017 |153293, 107139 Keywords||accessibility CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 OS|macOS (All) |All Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #5 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Looks like it is specific to the Breeze (dark) icon theme. Not reproduced with other icon theme variants. Steve, can you please double-check that's correct? (You might need to restart LO to make extra sure the change of icon theme is registered, I have seen inconsistency in that.) I can reproduce on Linux, so not macOS-specific. Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: ad1f0bdeac30fca1dc56a08803ef23f2aca4db05 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107139 [Bug 107139] [META] Breeze icons https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118017 [Bug 118017] [META] macOS Dark Mode bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153293 [Bug 153293] [META] Dark Mode bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 118000] [META] Remote desktop related bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118000 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160839 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160839 [Bug 160839] "Recent Documents" file open menu items filenames from remote sources have %20 instead of spaces (URI entities not unquoted) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 61174] [META] Recent Documents List
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61174 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160839 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160839 [Bug 160839] "Recent Documents" file open menu items filenames from remote sources have %20 instead of spaces (URI entities not unquoted) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160839] "Recent Documents" file open menu items filenames from remote sources have %20 instead of spaces (URI entities not unquoted)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160839 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low Blocks||61174, 118000 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |minor Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org --- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Reproduced with: Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded (Flatpak or not, using WebDav) Also in 7.3.7.2 and a recent daily build. Window title not affected. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61174 [Bug 61174] [META] Recent Documents List https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118000 [Bug 118000] [META] Remote desktop related bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160846] Flathub Libreoffice (24.2.2.2) Failed to open display terminal message. Crashes seconds later
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160846 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| --- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Not reproduced with Flatpak version: Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Flatpak Calc: threaded Have you tried updating to 24.2.3? That's now the latest version of Flathub. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161035] Spinning wheel hang on MacOS when using the Zotero plugin.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161035 Patrick Luby (volunteer) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guibomac...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Patrick Luby (volunteer) --- I don't know anything about Zotero, but my first guess is that LibreOffice is caught in a deadlock between two competing threads. Are you familiar with the Activity Monitor application on macOS? If yes, can you upload a sample of LibreOffice when it is hanging? If no, I can write some steps for you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161048] Background processes are left opened by LO Dev Start Center on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161048 --- Comment #7 from ady --- I uninstalled LO Dev, manually searched for LibreOfficeDev in the registry and deleted every item I found (except those also related to the antivirus, because the antivirus itself does not allow me to perform such action). Between each step I also reboot the system. I did not use Revo. While re-installing LO Dev 2024-05-11, the original custom location (D:\LO\ALPHA\) was not recognized by default as it used to happen before. Instead, the default location (under program files) was offered as installation location. This was expected. I modified the installation location to be the same customized location as before. When I selected to personalized installation (not the "typical" radius option), the same custom options that I used before (with additional languages and dictionaries) were already selected. This was not expected, and it hints that some remnants were left-over from the normal uninstall procedure. For the purpose of this ticket, I am OK with this, but others might disagree. Launching the new soffice.exe adds 1 process to the Windows' Task Manager. Closing the Start Center leaves that first process and adds 1 more, leaving 2 left-over processes in the background. New processes are left over for every such launch-and-close steps. Once again I installed LO Dev built on an older date as before. Once again I do not have any left-overs. So, for now I will have to remain at this LO Dev date. Hopefully someone will be able to replicate the behavior and gather more info, or alternatively I might find where the problem is in this system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161052] Color mistake (rows on color palette shifted?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161052 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de --- Comment #2 from Regina Henschel --- I see no color difference when opening a file created by LO7.2 in a current daily build. Tested with Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 2b85bceca88ab119fff5cbdc41fe913435a479ca CPU threads: 32; OS: Windows 11 (10.0 build 22631); UI render: default; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 158262] SVG generated by a handwriting tool shows "hollow"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158262 --- Comment #8 from Animus --- I just encountered this issue also in LibreOffice 24.2 This is a >> crucial << rendering issue, that currently defeats the benefits of SVGs e.g. with text in widely used Google Fonts (which contain path overlaps) converted to curves for compatibility. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160960] Conversion from PPT(X) to PDF via LibreOffice Headless distorts background color (gradient)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160960 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de --- Comment #4 from Regina Henschel --- Created attachment 194096 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194096=edit Compare 2-stop with 3-stop gradient in pptx The interpolation of a two-stop-color gradient is different to a three-stop-color gradient in MS Office even if the third stop is at the same place and has the same color as the start or end stop of the two-stop-color gradient. MS Office seems to use a somehow quadratic interpolation in the two-stops-color gradient case. Open attached document in PowerPoint. It has in the middle a rectangle with two-stop-color gradient and below it a rectangle with three-stop-color gradient. Above is a screenshot of the two rectangles as rendered in PowerPoint. Then open the file in LibreOffice. LibreOffice has only linear color interpolation, same as MS Office uses, if three or more stops are present. So when you want the color interpolation to be the same in LibreOffice as in MS Office, you have to use at least three color stops in MS Office. I have added a screenshot to the file, because MS Office does not export the two-stop-color interpolation the same way to png as it renders it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161043] CALC Error in SUBTOTAL(9;range) when the source values are minutes and seconds exceeding 60 minutes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161043
--- Comment #9 from ady ---
(In reply to m_a_riosv from comment #8)
> For me Excel shows the same result as LibreOffice, for the attached sample
> file.
IIUC, I think that @Colin meant that (for him or in his system) Excel shows
cell D1 as 547:12:52 whereas Calc shows the same cell D1 as 12:52:00, without
having to modify the cell format of that specific cell ("MM:SS"). I don't see
the same as @Colin's claims.
In any case, I don't see a bug in the SUBTOTAL function in Calc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161053] the distance between first and second lines in paragraphs is smaller than others
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161053 m_a_riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||regression Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from m_a_riosv --- Seems it happens whet for the paragraph style, in this case 'Default..', has the line spacing as 'Proportional' in the 'Indents & Spacing' tab. Looks fine for other types. Maybe is there some other option creating the issue. Reproducible Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 2b85bceca88ab119fff5cbdc41fe913435a479ca CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 11 (10.0 build 22631); UI render: default; VCL: win Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded Of the versions I have installed. Last working for me Version 3.6.7.2 (Build ID: e183d5b) First showing the issue Version: 4.4.7.2 Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600 Locale: es_ES -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161046] No substitute fonts when opening a file without the file's font installed locally
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161046 --- Comment #2 from Jon --- Thank you for the link. However, the solutions there (of 8 or 9 years ago) don't seem to apply here. Yes, I could use the substitution table, but I'm looking at documents that do not consistently use a certain font. Also, the problem only occurred when moving from 7.6 to 24.2, not when there was a change in OS or as a result of a kernel or other update in Fedora 39. I observed the same behavior on two separate computers, both running Fedora 39, though I updated LibreOffice on them weeks apart from each other. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161053] the distance between first and second lines in paragraphs is smaller than others
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161053 --- Comment #1 from ardv --- Created attachment 194095 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194095=edit example file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161053] New: the distance between first and second lines in paragraphs is smaller than others
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161053 Bug ID: 161053 Summary: the distance between first and second lines in paragraphs is smaller than others Product: LibreOffice Version: 24.2.2.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: dz.wb...@gmail.com Description: when i write a paragraph in Arabic language and change the line spacing below 100% the the distance between the first and second lines in paragraphs is smaller than others. an example file is attached Steps to Reproduce: 1. a paragraph in Arabic language 2. change the paragraph line spacing below 100 percent Actual Results: space between 2 first line is smaller than others Expected Results: the space should be similar to other lines Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: make the lines spacing similar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161048] Background processes are left opened by LO Dev Start Center on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161048 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com --- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote --- So went ahead and did an actual /i install of the TB77 nightly from 20240510. Custom to a named folder (C:\Program Files\LibreOfficeDev_24"), just the en-US dict and locale, no default document association, no quickstarter. Sorry, but still can't repro the zombie soffice.bin instance, opening and closing to Start Center. I get just one soffice.exe/soffice.bin pair, and both close cleanly on exit. I was curious about the MSI packaging. And should have logged the install (done via command line rather than GUI and adding a /L*v instLog.txt). Despite being an alpha+, not yet beta, I do see significant writes into Windows registry. But if I open the MSI in Orca, and the 'Property' table's -> WRITE_REGISTRY value is set to 0, and checked the Win registry for items that tested for that control. Did not see any, and no recent change to the Windows build solver: solenv/bin/modules/installer/windows/registry.pm To clean up between installs, you should be able to use the Win appwiz.cpl to remove the LODev cleanly, then use the Find command in regedit.exe to check for any left overs (look for "LibreOfficeDev"). Or for a more robust uninstall with a bit more aggressive registry cleanup, VSRevo Revo Uninstaller is my preferred tool. =-testing-= Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 0ffdfb58a07e2a1b89a36bc241c6a2767e82cd2c CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10 (10.0 build 19045); UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161021] LO hangs (endless loop) when footnote is on the wrong page
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161021 Markus Grob changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All OS|Windows (All) |All --- Comment #6 from Markus Grob --- I have checked now with debug mode on OpenSuse. Same as on Windows. Because it runs into this function: SwTwips SwLayoutFrame::ShrinkFrame( SwTwips nDist, bool bTst, bool bInfo ) x times/second (defined in: wsfrm.cxx line 3084) it runs at 100% CPU time and doesn't react. It warns (in the background), that there are unknown properties and the bookmark is on the wrong page. The unknown properties are in lngprophelp.cxx line 636: unknown property 'HyphNoLastWord', unknown property 'HyphKeepType', unknown property 'HyphKeep' My problem is, that it doesn't tells me, where exactly in the document and why it happens. Maybe I could unzip and wipe it out manually or use the ooxml-viewer-vscode on github: https://github.com/yuenm18/ooxml-viewer-vscode Somebody any hints? At the moment I will find out, if LO runs through this function even if an empty document is open, but for this, I have to insert timestamps and recompile. Let's see, I never programmed c++ until now ;-) Sincerely, Markus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 158288] When you select part of a column with merged cells, all columns that are part of the merged cell are selected
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158288 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #5 from Aron Budea --- Thinking about this, I'm not sure this should be considered a bug. There's a merged cell in the range, which means your selection isn't strictly within column A, but spans to column C. Excel also behaves the same way. Let's ask the UX team, can you please share your thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 155796] Deselecting merged cells using Shift+⬆ doesn't work in some cases
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155796 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||8288 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 158288] When you select part of a column with merged cells, all columns that are part of the merged cell are selected
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158288 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aron.bu...@gmail.com See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||5796 --- Comment #4 from Aron Budea --- (In reply to kdub from comment #3) > I was able to replicate this bug in Linux using this repository: > https://bibisect.libreoffice.org/linux-64-7.6 > > More information on the commit that caused this bug here: > https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/ > 39aa1f6424390821579bfb6b6ba14e9ce11040ce Let's the commit from the master branch (24.2) as well: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=341029de72cf957b7bc7775e51544070d4a49874 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161052] Color mistake (rows on color palette shifted?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161052 --- Comment #1 from HunHKPK --- Created attachment 194094 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194094=edit Screenshot for explanation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161052] New: Color mistake (rows on color palette shifted?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161052 Bug ID: 161052 Summary: Color mistake (rows on color palette shifted?) Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.3.7.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: lass...@freemail.hu Description: I have an older calc file, continuously edited. Some cells had light green background. Since version 7.3.7.2 these colors became "mustard". On color palette the rows seems to be shifted. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Update to 7.3.7.2 from older version. 2.Open in an older file which has light green colored cells. 3.You may see the color of mustard instead light green Actual Results: displayed color changed Expected Results: Restore the original color Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.3.7.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: hu-HU (hu_HU.UTF-8); UI: hu-HU Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.4 Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161051] New: Scrolling too fast and snappy while selecting text
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161051 Bug ID: 161051 Summary: Scrolling too fast and snappy while selecting text Product: LibreOffice Version: 24.2.2.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: alessiomanfr...@gmail.com Description: While I select a portion of text, and maybe want to go down or up to select the text that I don’t see on the screen, the program makes me scroll through pages in a snappy way, not smooth and too fast, so as to prevent a detailed and precise selection of text. The problem arises only with libreoffice, so I rule out that it is a problem of settings of my pc or mouse. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Hold down the left mouse button to select text 2.While holding down and selecting text, move the mouse to the bottom or top of the screen Actual Results: pages scroll too fast and snappy Expected Results: pages should scroll more slowly and smoothly Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: Version: 24.2.2.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d56cc158d8a96260b836f100ef4b4ef25d6f1a01 CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22635; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: it-IT (it_IT); UI: it-IT Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161007] Report Builder Wizard fails
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161007 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Säger --- (In reply to mc from comment #3) > Hi, after pressing 5 times the Next button, next step appear > > > Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community > Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba > CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22631; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: > win > Locale: it-IT (it_IT); UI: it-IT > Calc: CL threaded For me, it jumps to the last step without filling any controls into the document. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161007] Report Builder Wizard fails
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161007 --- Comment #3 from mc --- Hi, after pressing 5 times the Next button, next step appear Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22631; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: it-IT (it_IT); UI: it-IT Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 159348] Highlight cell does not repaint on when window is maximized
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159348 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g --- Comment #4 from BogdanB --- Also in Version: 24.2.3.1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: fc604d5980a783e74808a001f1918a603d920494 CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 99746] [META] PDF import filter in Draw
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99746 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160885 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160885 [Bug 160885] Libreoffice draw improper handling of texts in pdf with highlights -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160885] Libreoffice draw improper handling of texts in pdf with highlights
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160885 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||99746 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99746 [Bug 99746] [META] PDF import filter in Draw -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 112128] [META] Cell edit mode bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112128 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160908 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160908 [Bug 160908] "Edit cell background highlight" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 153293] [META] Dark Mode bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153293 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||159121 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159121 [Bug 159121] MS word highlighting is not displayed correctly in dark mode -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 159121] MS word highlighting is not displayed correctly in dark mode
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159121 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Blocks||153293 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153293 [Bug 153293] [META] Dark Mode bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 113363] [META] DOCX (OOXML) content control-related issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||158661 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158661 [Bug 158661] FILEOPEN: DOCX: extra character in block SDT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 158661] FILEOPEN: DOCX: extra character in block SDT
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158661 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||113363 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113363 [Bug 113363] [META] DOCX (OOXML) content control-related issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 104522] [META] DOCX (OOXML) header & footer-related issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104522 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||159013 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159013 [Bug 159013] FILEOPEN: DOCX: first page is duplicated on page 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 159013] FILEOPEN: DOCX: first page is duplicated on page 2
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159013 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||104522 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104522 [Bug 104522] [META] DOCX (OOXML) header & footer-related issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 107331] [META] Document themes bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107331 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||159479 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159479 [Bug 159479] FILESAVE: DOCX: Connectors in SmartArt are lost in MSO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 159479] FILESAVE: DOCX: Connectors in SmartArt are lost in MSO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159479 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||107331 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107331 [Bug 107331] [META] Document themes bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160545] LO Writer not saving hyperlink in docx file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160545 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Blocks||125611 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125611 [Bug 125611] [META] DOCX (OOXML) Hyperlink-related issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 125611] [META] DOCX (OOXML) Hyperlink-related issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125611 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160545 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160545 [Bug 160545] LO Writer not saving hyperlink in docx file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 103152] [META] Writer image bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103152 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160571 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160571 [Bug 160571] FILEOPEN: Cropped SVG in .docx file (from winword) is rendered uncropped in Writer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160571] FILEOPEN: Cropped SVG in .docx file (from winword) is rendered uncropped in Writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160571 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||103152 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103152 [Bug 103152] [META] Writer image bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 103100] [META] Writer table bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103100 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160713 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160713 [Bug 160713] DOCX: Merged cells or spans are lost when the document has complex tables -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160713] DOCX: Merged cells or spans are lost when the document has complex tables
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160713 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Blocks||103100 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103100 [Bug 103100] [META] Writer table bugs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160840] Crash on libuno_sal.so.3 when saving document on DOCX (Word 2007-365)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160840 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||104520 CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104520 [Bug 104520] [META] DOCX (OOXML) bug tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 104520] [META] DOCX (OOXML) bug tracker
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104520 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160840 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160840 [Bug 160840] Crash on libuno_sal.so.3 when saving document on DOCX (Word 2007-365) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161023] FILESAVE: ODP: Incorrect spacing in list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161023 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |mikekagan...@hotmail.com |desktop.org | --- Comment #3 from Mike Kaganski --- https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/167557 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161043] CALC Error in SUBTOTAL(9;range) when the source values are minutes and seconds exceeding 60 minutes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161043 --- Comment #8 from m_a_riosv --- Created attachment 194093 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194093=edit Screenshot LibreOffice vs Excel For me Excel shows the same result as LibreOffice, for the attached sample file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161048] Background processes are left opened by LO Dev Start Center on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161048 m_a_riosv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #5 from m_a_riosv --- I can not reproduce with Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 2b85bceca88ab119fff5cbdc41fe913435a479ca CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 11 (10.0 build 22631); UI render: default; VCL: win Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161046] No substitute fonts when opening a file without the file's font installed locally
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161046 m_a_riosv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #1 from m_a_riosv --- Please take a look at https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/an-option-like-missing-font-substitution/11053 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161048] Background processes are left opened by LO Dev Start Center on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161048 ady changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Background processes are|Background processes are |left opened by LO Dev |left opened by LO Dev Start |install on Windows |Center on Windows -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 148174] FILEOPEN DOCX Ref field incorrect with "Paragraph # in full context" and "Relative position of paragraph" enabled
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148174 --- Comment #3 from Dieter --- Still present in Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 148173] FILEOPEN DOCX Ref field incorrect with "Paragraph # from marked paragraph" and "Relative position of paragraph" enabled
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148173 --- Comment #3 from Dieter --- Still present in Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 148171] FILEOPEN DOCX PageRef field with "Position of paragraph" option incorrectly imported
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148171 --- Comment #3 from Dieter --- Still present in Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160690] Animated GIF completely invisible in Edit mode (GIF has alpha-transparency)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160690 Patrick Luby (volunteer) changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |guibomac...@gmail.com |desktop.org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Patrick Luby (volunteer) --- I think I found the cause: GIF images with color palettes of 16 colors or less need additional handling. I have a fix (see following debug patch) but I need to do more testing before I submit it to make sure it doesn't cause tdf#157635 or tdf#157793 to reoccur: diff --git a/vcl/source/filter/igif/gifread.cxx b/vcl/source/filter/igif/gifread.cxx index c3151f3274d0..6c3deb4da3d0 100644 --- a/vcl/source/filter/igif/gifread.cxx +++ b/vcl/source/filter/igif/gifread.cxx @@ -683,10 +683,10 @@ void GIFReader::CreateNewBitmaps() // Due to the switch from transparency to alpha in commit // 81994cb2b8b32453a92bcb011830fcb884f22ff3, mask out black // pixels in bitmap. -if (bEnhance) -aAnimationFrame.maBitmapEx = BitmapEx( aBmp8, aBmp8 ); -else -aAnimationFrame.maBitmapEx = BitmapEx( aBmp8 ); +Bitmap aAlphaMask( aBmp8 ); +if (!bEnhance) +aAlphaMask.Invert(); +aAnimationFrame.maBitmapEx = BitmapEx( aBmp8, aAlphaMask ); } aAnimationFrame.maPositionPixel = Point( nImagePosX, nImagePosY ); -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161048] Background processes are left opened by LO Dev install on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161048 --- Comment #4 from ady --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #3) > If you want to install/test like that, what I'd suggest is to clear the per > user profile that links to you D:\LO\Alpha\program used in your custom > installs. Even though install is to your D: drive, your user profile is > going to be C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\LibreOfficeDev. Delete > it to clear the profile (on next launch that will recreate with defaults. I have "reset" my LO Dev profile, but I have not manually deleted anything in C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\LibreOfficeDev. I'd like to ask you, what should I manually delete, specifically, and what not? Additionally, should I delete anything using regedit.exe? FWIW, I have been installing and using LO Dev as I described, for more than a year, with several updates per month. The left-overs processes in Windows' Task Manager are new, and I cannot replicate the problem when going back to the build from 2024-04-30. So maybe the "/a" installation method overcomes or avoids the problem, whereas the "common" installation method allows the problem to be triggered. If this happens to be true, then at some point the "common" install method will arrive to the Stable branch (e.g. when 24.8 becomes Stable Fresh), and then users will report the same problem. My point is that perhaps the "common" installation should be tested now with LO Dev 24.8 in order to test whether the left-overs of soffice.exe can be replicated, after launching and closing the LO Dev Start Center several times. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160690] Animated GIF completely invisible in Edit mode (GIF has alpha-transparency)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160690
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Luby (volunteer) ---
If I apply the following debug patch, on macOS this bug no longer occurs in the
document window, printing, or export to PDF. Unfortunately, this swapping of
code that create alpha masks cause tdf#156630 to reoccur so there must to
something different between the animated images. I will continue debugging and
post again when I have some news:
diff --git a/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/graphicprimitivehelper2d.cxx
b/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/graphicprimitivehelper2d.cxx
index d756e6e3b74f..03cecb5c6a7e 100644
--- a/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/graphicprimitivehelper2d.cxx
+++ b/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/graphicprimitivehelper2d.cxx
@@ -180,12 +180,12 @@ namespace drawinglayer::primitive2d
BitmapEx bitmap;
if( useAlphaMask )
{
-const AlphaMask
aMaskBitmap(maVirtualDeviceMask->GetBitmap(Point(),
maVirtualDeviceMask->GetOutputSizePixel()));
+const Bitmap
aMaskBitmap(maVirtualDeviceMask->GetBitmap(Point(),
maVirtualDeviceMask->GetOutputSizePixel()));
bitmap = BitmapEx(aMainBitmap, aMaskBitmap);
}
else
{
-Bitmap aMaskBitmap(maVirtualDeviceMask->GetBitmap(Point(),
maVirtualDeviceMask->GetOutputSizePixel()));
+AlphaMask
aMaskBitmap(maVirtualDeviceMask->GetBitmap(Point(),
maVirtualDeviceMask->GetOutputSizePixel()));
// tdf#156630 invert the alpha mask
aMaskBitmap.Invert(); // convert from transparency to
alpha
bitmap = BitmapEx(aMainBitmap, aMaskBitmap);
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 136040] Undo doesn't restore text in columns (Hebrew?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136040 --- Comment #10 from Dieter --- Tested with Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded Actual result: Writer freezes after step 6 Same with Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 2b85bceca88ab119fff5cbdc41fe913435a479ca CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10 (10.0 build 19045); UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161048] Background processes are left opened by LO Dev install on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161048 --- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote --- Alright, your install method is quite different than what is suggested. Performing an MS Installer "Administrative" aka. "server" install, done with the /a flag simply extracts content of the installer msi. And technically it does not install the package. Each package so extracted stands alone, and can/should be configured to not use your user profile. With this /a install and config, there should not be a "LibreOfficeDev" folder entry in your %APPDATA% (C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming) folder. Only if you run the installer as for a default /i flag will you get an install, which by default will write to C:/Program Files/LibreOfficeDev. And to fully integrate with Win os/DE you'd have to add a "WRITER_REGISTRY=1" flag to the install (as msi package for the dev builds have that disabled and set 0). Doing the /a installs are simpler to cleanup, use TARGETDIR=, and adjust the bootstrap.ini Userinstallation= stanza to use $ORIGIN rather than $SYSUSERCONFIG. Then simply deleting the folder will remove all trace. Otherwise, you need to clean the registry--and config of each of the dev builds will interfere with all others. Though fortunately with defaults--the dev builds should not touch the release build configs. If you want to install/test like that, what I'd suggest is to clear the per user profile that links to you D:\LO\Alpha\program used in your custom installs. Even though install is to your D: drive, your user profile is going to be C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming\LibreOfficeDev. Delete it to clear the profile (on next launch that will recreate with defaults. See if that clears the zombie soffice.bin at close of the recent build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 102985] [META] Font bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102985 Bug 102985 depends on bug 147693, which changed state. Bug 147693 Summary: Font should use capital letter ẞ or if not available then it should be used SS https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147693 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 147693] Font should use capital letter ẞ or if not available then it should be used SS
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147693 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Dieter --- No repro with Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded => RESOLVED WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 142319] FILEOPEN DOCX: Too large spacing between image and paragraph with intersecting spacings
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142319 --- Comment #12 from Dieter --- Tested with Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded and attachment 172064 Actual result: Header spacing changes from 0,5cm (in odt-file) to 0,8cm and "use dynamic spacing" enabled. But room Acustic is still on page 2. So I can't see change in layout Expected result: Perhaps acutal result? What do you think, Telesto? Additional information Page stle changes from "First Page" to "Default Page" and from "Default Page" to "Converted 1" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 147192] Track changes registers 'portions' of changes while editing, after save and reload 2 remain
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147192 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #9 from Dieter --- Not possible for me o delete image pressing backspace in Version: 24.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded Telesto, could you please retest? => NEEDINFO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 125674] [META] Document Comparison bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125674 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||160834 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160834 [Bug 160834] Unclear meaning of "Ignore pieces of length" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 160834] Unclear meaning of "Ignore pieces of length"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160834 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de, ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval Blocks||125674 --- Comment #1 from Dieter --- (In reply to Tuomas Hietala from comment #0) > Description: > The UI string "Ignore _pieces of length:" is somewhat confusing and > contradictory. The following explanation is given in Help: "Set the minimum > number of characters to trigger a valid comparison." > > The UI and Help are at odds here, because it's not clear whether the > selected number of characters is to be ignored (as indicated by the UI > string) or if it's the minimum amount to be taken into account (as indicated > by Help) I agree and couldn't really figure out, what is the current behaviour => NEW > "Pieces of length" should IMO also be reworded for clarity. I'd suggest > replacing the string with something like "Minimum number of characters to > compare" (if Help is correct) or "Maximum number of characters to ignore" > (if Help is not). I support a terminology, that is much clearer, but I don't know, what's the best solution here cc: Design-Team (who should also decide, if we should separate the two issues into two different reports. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125674 [Bug 125674] [META] Document Comparison bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 155269] Chapter numbering mech silently changes para style numeric outline-level
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155269 --- Comment #7 from R. Bingham --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #6) > R. Bingham, unfortunately nobody could could confirm your for almost one > year. So I'd like to ask, if it is still valid, because a new major release > of LibreOffice is available since this bug was reported. Could you please > try to reproduce it with the latest version of LibreOffice from > https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ ? > > If it is still present, please try to provide a short set of steps, because > this makes it easier for us to reproduce the bug. Perhaps it is possible for > you to attach a sample document. thanks > > => NEEDINFO Acknowledged. Will review. Regards. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161048] Background processes are left opened by LO Dev install on Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161048 --- Comment #2 from ady --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1) > @Ady, anything different with your install STR? I don't run by command line. I install each new Dev update version in the same specific directory (so one new Dev installation replaces the older one). I selected this directory the first time, and every Dev msi always selects this same directory by default. Since I have several languages and dictionaries installed with the Dev version, I always select the personalized option when installing (instead of the "typical" radius option). I never select to use QuickLaunch. I also select to add a direct access link to the desktop (so I have one for the Dev version and another for the Stable version). I have a Stable version (soffice.exe located in C:\Program Files\LibreOffice\program, 7.6.5 ATM), a Dev version (in D:\LO\ALPHA\program, note the separate "D:"), and several "Windows portable" versions (installed from paf.exe installers), each installed in separated directories. In order to run each soffice.exe, I have created "direct access" links to each "parallel" installation. The whole set of direct links are all located in one "central" directory, and I double-click on the icon that I want to run according to LO version. Similarly, I have AOO (and some other spreadsheet tool). I am usually "clean" (ordered) regarding which version I am running, and I always wait until one version is completely closed before executing a different version. When I have not waited enough time, I get a message that another version is still closing, so I cannot have more than one soffice.exe version running simultaneously. A few days ago, I received such message a couple of times when trying to launch some portable version(s), and so I found the left-overs in Windows Task Manager. I can replicate the issue, also after rebooting. After killing every LibreOfficeDev (and related Calc process, if there is such) line in Windows' Task Manager, I can replicate the same behavior again. Open LO Dev Start Center and then close it; there is one additional left-over. Each run leaves a new left-over. I can run the Stable version, but any of the "portable" versions (starting with 4.0) is blocked with the aforementioned message, unless I kill the left-overs. By chance I have saved the LO Dev msi installer built on 2024-04-30, so after some few days of this new issue, I reinstalled it over the same "D:\LO\ALPHA\" location. No problem, no repro. I then reinstalled the LO Dev msi installer built on 2024-05-11 (the latest ATM), and I can repro the problem again, just as it has been for a couple/few days now. If it happens to be of any relevance, my Windows OS is not in English, and the msi installer runs in the same language as my OS, but the default language for LO in all my installations is English (USA) (by choice), with several additional UI languages and dictionaries installed too. IDK which other details might be needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 56408] Writer always breaks lines at text direction change, leaving orphan bracket
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56408 --- Comment #31 from kava...@yahoo.com --- dear خالد It is 12 years. is any solution? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161049] Vertical Tab dialogs--Format Cells dialog in recent 24.8 alpha is too small
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161049 --- Comment #2 from ady --- I would guess that this is at least partially related to tdf#99528 comment 32, patch committed on 2024-05-06? IDK if needs to be bisected in order to confirm? Not only the size of the dialog is too small, the width of the "vertical tabs" box seems to be too small too (so the text to select each "vertical tab" is not completely readable), and cannot be modified. No scroll bars in this "vertical tabs" box either (which is not necessarily the best way to solve it). As a side note, is the UX team really sure that using "vertical tabs" in this Format Cells dialog is really saving screen usage? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 161043] CALC Error in SUBTOTAL(9;range) when the source values are minutes and seconds exceeding 60 minutes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161043 --- Comment #7 from ady --- (In reply to Colin from comment #6) > Excel gets it right so besides data loss, there's the compatibility issue. Let's be accurate then. Is 547:12:52 an incorrect calculation? IIUC, it is correct; please clarify if it isn't. There is no data loss. I have not modified the formulas nor the functions, so SUBTOTAL(9;range) is not failing in any way. There is indeed a cell format issue. A clock and/or calendar time/date values are not the same as timer/period value. You want the latter. A cell format such as: MM:SS is not a timer/period cell format, but a calendar/clock cell format. So, changing it to: [HH]:MM:SS makes sense in terms of what you want to achieve. OTOH, changing it to: HH:MM:SS would be incorrect for your case, because that is a calendar/clock cell format, and that is not what you need. With each of these formats: _ MM:SS _ HH:MM:SS _ [HH]:MM:SS _ (clear direct cell formatting) you see a different result in the cell, but it does not mean that the SUBTOTAL function has a bug because of such different results. Regarding what Excel does... Calc probably lacks some needed enhancements regarding supporting cell formats. In particular, the whole set of issues about date/time cell formats and calculations is almost never-ending, in whichever spreadsheet tool you would mention, including Excel. As for compatibility, ODS is the natural file format in Calc, based on the ODF standard. Excel is (or should be) following the same standard. Excel might be better in cell formatting in general (in its own XLSX file format) and in some algorithm that assumes what the user wants to achieve, but it could also be incorrect in that assumption. In this particular case, the assumption apparently was adequate. You could open a new ticket with an enhancement request – Calc needs to be more "intelligent" regarding "timer" cell formats, but please be specifically focused on it, with a clear simple basic use-case and what the exact expected behavior should be. Please be prepared to opposite cases, in which Calc might need to assume a different behavior than what you suggest should be, in order to distinguish between those; developers should be able to discern those cases in order for Calc to make accurate and useful assumptions, without major negative consequences for other use-cases. If I may a humble suggestion, I would suggest first for you to acquire more insight regarding cell formatting, so the enhancement request would have a clear presentation and arguments. As far as I can understand up to this point, this particular ticket seems to be NAB, unless 547:12:52 is wrong (too). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 155279] Increasing image size, makes a part of the text vanish from canvas
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155279 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dgp-m...@gmx.de Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #5 from Dieter --- Telesto, is the bug still reproducible for you with actual master? => NEEDINFO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
